Skip to main content

Full text of "Little journeys to the homes of great teachers"

See other formats


HAROLD  B.  LEE  LIBRARY 

BRIGHAM  YOUNG  UNIVERSITY 
PHOVO    UTAH 


i\  w 


t 


mkS^M 

^M 

H 

%\m  ^ 

Jfonrnrss 

^^^1 

So  tif  V^tmn  of  W^  (gmit 

pM^^l^gC 

%\^nx  Jb^lWh 

^^1^^ 

intmoriiil  dritton 

Sig^^M 

Prints  (mft  no&t  intt  ft  Booli  1^ 
Wit  Boerroftfrf,  todirii  if  in  lEcft 

J^'^^L^^""^^^^^^AW"»| 

W^^M^4^\fd 

iBtn.  I^.  Miiiie  &  Co. 

^;?^Koiy2/i'.v^.v*S£i 

W2«i^Vi 

^m 

/B94G 


Copyright,  1916, 
By  The  Roycroftcrs 


CONTENTS 


MOSES 9 

CONFUCIUS 41 

PYTHAGORAS 69 

PLATO 97 

KING  ALFRED 123 

ERASMUS 149 

BOOKER  T.  WASHINGTON      .      .      .      .  183 

THOMAS  ARNOLD 217 

FRIEDRICH  FROEBEL        .      .      .      .      .  245 

HYPATIA 269 

SAINT  BENEDICT  .      , 293 

MARY  BAKER  EDDY 327 


%Mt  Jf onrnf (s 

So  td^  Hmti 

of 
(6mit  Sfurlimi 


MOSES 


And  God  said  unto  Moses,  I  AM  THAT  I  AM:  and  he 

said.  Thus  shalt  thou  say  unto  the  children  of  Israel, 

I  AM  hath  sent  me  unto  you.  And  God  said,  moreover, 

unto  Moses:  Thus  shalt  thou  say  unto  the  children  of 

Israel,  The  Lord  God  of  your  Fathers,   the  God  of 

Abraham,  the  God  of  Isaac,  and  the  God  of  Jacob,  hath 

sent  me  unto  you:  this  is  my  name  forever,  and  this  is 

my  memorial  unto  all  generations. 

— Exodus  in:  14,  15 


MOSES 


OSES  was  the  world's  first  great 
teacher.  He  is  still  one  of  the  world's 
great  teachers.  Seven  million  people 
yet  look  to  his  laws  for  special  daily 
guidance,  and  more  than  two  hun- 
dred millions  read  his  books  and 
regard  them  as  Holy  Writ.  And 
■'  these  people  as  a  class  are  of  the 
best  and  most  enlightened  who  live  now  or  who  have 
ever  lived  33  5S 

Moses  did  not  teach  of  a  life  after  this — ^he  gives  no 
hint  of  immortality — all  of  his  rewards  and  punish- 
ments refer  to  the  present.  If  there  is  a  heaven  for  the 
good  and  a  hell  for  the  bad,  he  did  not  know  of  them. 
^The  laws  of  Moses  were  designed  for  the  Now  and 
the  Here.  Many  of  them  ring  true  and  correct  even 
today,  after  all  this  interval  of  more  than  three  thou- 
sand years.  Moses  had  a  good  knowledge  of  physiology, 
hygiene,  sanitation.  He  knew  the  advantages  of  cleanli- 
ness, order,  harmony,  industry  and  good  habits.  He 
also  knew  psychology,  or  the  science  of  the  mind:  he 
knew  the  things  that  influence  humanity,  the  limits  of 
the  average  intellect,  the  plans  and  methods  of  govern- 
ment that  will  work  and  those  which  will  not. 
He  was  practical.  He  did  what  was  expedient.  He 
considered  the  material  with  which  he  had  to  deal,  and 

11 


MOSES 

he  did  what  he  could  and  taught  that  which  his  people 
would  and  could  believe.  The  Book  of  Genesis  was 
plainly  written  for  the  child-mind. 
The  problem  that  confronted  Moses  was  one  of  prac- 
tical politics,  not  a  question  of  philosophy  or  of  absolute 
or  final  truth.  The  laws  he  put  forth  were  for  the 
guidance  of  the  people  to  whom  he  gave  them,  and  his 
precepts  were  such  as  they  could  assimilate. 
It  were  easy  to  take  the  writings  of  Moses  as  they  have 
come  down  to  us,  translated,  re-translated,  colored  and 
tinted  with  the  innocence,  ignorance  and  superstition 
of  the  nations  who  have  kept  them  alive  for  thirty-three 
centuries,  and  then  compile  a  list  of  the  mistakes  of  the 
original  writer.  The  writer  of  these  records  of  dreams 
and  hopes  and  guesses,  all  cemented  with  stern  com- 
monsense,  has  our  profound  reverence  and  regard.  The 
**  mistakes  **  lie  in  the  minds  of  the  people  who,  in  the 
face  of  the  accumulated  knowledge  of  the  centuries, 
have  persisted  that  things  once  written  were  eternally 
sufficient  5S  5S 

In  point  of  time  there  is  no  teacher  within  many  hun- 
dred years  following  him  who  can  be  compared  with  him 
in  originality  and  insight. 

Moses  lived  fourteen  hundred  years  before  Christ. 
The  next  man  after  him  to  devise  a  complete  code  of 
conduct  was  Solon,  who  lived  seven  hundred  years 
after.  A  little  later  came  Zoroaster,  then  Confucius, 
Buddha,  Lao-tsze,  Pericles,  Socrates,  Plato,  Aristotle 
12 


MOSES 

— contemporaries,  or  closely  following  each  other, 
their  philosophy  woven  and  interwoven  by  all  and  each 
and  each  by  all. 

Moses,  however,  stands  out  alone.  That  he  did  not 
know  natural  history  as  did  Aristotle,  who  lived  a 
thousand  years  later,  is  not  to  his  discredit,  and  to 
emphasize  the  fact  were  irrelevant. 
Back  of  it  all  lies  the  undisputed  fact  that  Moses  led  a 
barbaric  people  out  of  captivity  and  so  impressed  his 
ideals  and  personality  upon  them  that  they  endure  as 
a  distinct  and  peculiar  people,  even  unto  this  day.  He 
founded  a  nation.  And  chronologically  he  is  the  civi- 
lized world's  first  author. 

Moses  was  a  soldier,  a  diplomat,  an  executive,  a  writer, 
a  teacher,  a  leader,  a  prophet,  a  stonecutter.  Beside  all 
these  he  was  a  farmer — a  workingman,  one  who  when 
forty  years  of  age  tended  flocks  and  herds  for  a  liveli- 
hood. Every  phase  of  the  outdoor  life  of  the  range  was 
familiar  to  him.  ^nd  the  greatness  of  the  man  is 
revealed  in  the  fact  that  his  plans  and  aspirations  were 
so  far  beyond  his  achievements  that  at  last  he  thought 
he  had  failed.  Exultant  success  seems  to  go  with  that 
which  is  cheap  and  transient.  All  great  teachers  have, 
in  their  own  minds,  been  failures — they  saw  so  much 
further  than  they  were  able  to  travey 


13 


MOSES 

LL  ancient  chronology  falls  easily  into  three 
general  divisions:  the  fabulous,  the  legendary, 
and  the  probable  or  natural. 
J  In  the  understanding  of  history,  psychology 
is  quite  as  necessary  as  philology. 

To  reject  anything  that  has  a  flaw  in  it  is  quite  as  bad 
as  to  have  that  excess  of  credulity  which  swallows  every- 
thing presented. 

It  is  not  necessary  to  throw  away  the  fabulous  nor  deny 
the  legendary.  But  it  is  certainly  not  wise  to  construe 
the  fabulous  as  the  actual  and  maintain  the  legendary 
as  literally  true.  Things  may  be  true  allegorically  and 
false  literally,  and  to  be  able  to  distinguish  the  one  from 
the  other,  and  prize  each  in  its  proper  place,  is  the  mark 
of  wisdom. 

If,  however,  we  were  asked  to  describe  the  man  Moses 
to  a  jury  of  sane,  sensible,  intelligent  and  unprejudiced 
men  and  women,  and  show  why  he  is  worthy  of  the 
remembrance  of  mankind,  we  would  have  to  eliminate 
the  fabulous,  carefully  weigh  the  traditional,  and  rest 
our  argument  upon  records  that  are  fair,  sensible  and 
reasonably  free  from  dispute. 

The  conclusions  of  professional  retainers,  committed 
before  they  begin  their  so-called  investigations  to  a 
literal  belief  in  the  fabulous,  should  be  accepted  with 
great  caution.  For  them  to  come  to  conclusions  out- 
side of  that  which  they  have  been  taught,  is  not  only 
to  forfeit  their  social  position,  but  to  lose  their  actual 
14 


MOSES 

means  of  livelihocKl.  Perhaps  the  truth  in  the  final 
summing  up  can  best  be  gotten  from  those  who  have 
made  no  vows  that  they  will  not  change  their  opinions, 
and  have  nothing  to  lose  if  they  fail  occasionally  to 
gibe  with  the  popular. 

On  a  certain  occasion  after  Colonel  IngersoU  had 
delivered  his  famous  lecture  entitled,  "Some  Mistakes 
of  Moses,"  he  was  entertained  by  a  local  club.  At  the 
meeting,  which  was  of  the  usual  informal  kind  known 
as  "A  Dutch  Feed,"  a  young  lawyer  made  bold  to 
address  the  great  orator  thus:  **  Colonel  IngersoU,  you 
are  a  lover  of  freedom — ^with  you  the  word  liberty 
looms  large.  All  great  men  love  liberty,  and  no  man 
lives  in  history,  respected  and  revered,  save  as  he  has 
sought  to  make  men  free.  Moses  was  a  lover  of  liberty. 
Now,  would  n't  it  be  gracious  and  generous  in  you  to 
give  Moses,  who  in  some  ways  was  in  the  same  busi- 
ness as  yourself,  due  credit  as  a  liberator  and  law- 
giver and  not  emphasize  his  mistakes  to  the  total 
exclusion  of  his  virtues?  " 

Colonel  IngersoU  listened — ^he  was  impressed  by  the 
fairness  of  the  question.  He  listened,  paused  and 
replied:  **  Young  man,  you  have  asked  a  reasonable 
question,  and  all  you  suggest  about  the  greatness  of 
Moses,  in  spite  of  his  mistakes,  is  well  taken.  The 
trouble  in  your  logic  lies  in  the  fact  that  you  do  not 
imderstand  my  status  in  this  case.  You  seem  to  forget 
that  I  am  not  the  attorney  for  Moses.  He  has  more 

15 


MOSES 

than  two  million  men  looking  after  his  interests.  I  am 
retained  on  the  other  side!  ** 

Like  unto  Colonel  IngersoU,  I  am  not  an  attorney  for 
Moses.  I  desire,  however,  to  give  a  fair,  clear  and 
judicial  account  of  the  man.  I  will  attempt  to  present 
a  brief  for  the  people,  and  neither  prosecute  nor  defend. 
I  will  simply  try  to  picture  the  man  as  he  once  existed, 
nothing  extenuating,  nor  setting  down  aught  in  malice. 
As  the  original  oflfice  of  the  State's  Attorney  was 
rather  to  protect  the  person  at  the  bar  than  to  indict 
him,  so  will  I  try  to  bring  out  the  best  in  Moses, 
rather  than  hold  up  his  mistakes  and  raise  a  laugh  by 
revealing  his  ignorance.  Modesty,  which  is  often  ego- 
tism turned  wrong  side  out,  might  here  say,  **  Oh, 
Moses  requires  no  defense  at  this  late  day! "  But 
Moses,  like  all  great  men,  has  suffered  at  the  hands  of 
his  friends.  To  this  man  has  been  attributed  powers 
which  no  human  being  ever  possessed. 
Moses  lived  thirty-three  hundred  years  ago.  In  one 
sense  thirty-three  centuries  is  a  very  long  time.  All  is 
comparative — children  regard  a  man  of  fifty  as  **  awful 
old."  I  have  seen  several  persons  who  have  lived  a 
hundred  years,  and  they  did  n't  consider  a  century 
long,  **  and  thirty-five  is  n't  anything,"  said  one  of 
them  to  me. 

Geologically,  thirty-three  centuries  is  only  an  hour  ago. 
It  does  not  nearly  take  us  back  to  the  time  when  men 
of  the  Stone  Age  hunted  the  hairy  mammoth  in  what  is 
16 


MOSES 

now  Nebraska,  nor  does  thirty-three  centuries  give  us 
any  gHmpse  of  the  time  when  tropical  animals,  plants 
and  probably  men  lived  and  flourished  at  the  North 
Pole  53  33 

Egyptian  civilization,  at  the  time  of  Moses,  was  more 
than  three  thousand  years  old.  Egypt  was  then  in  the 
first  stage  of  senility,  entering  upon  her  decline,  for  her 
best  people  had  settled  in  the  cities,  and  this  completes 
the  cycle  and  spells  deterioration.  She  had  passed 
through  the  savage,  barbaric,  nomadic  and  agricultural 
stages  and  was  living  on  her  unearned  increment,  a 
part  of  which  was  Israelitish  labor.  Moses  looked  at 
the  Pyramids,  which  were  built  more  than  a  thousand 
years  before  his  birth,  and  asked  in  wonder  about  who 
built  them,  very  much  as  we  do  today.  He  listened  for 
the  Sphinx  to  answer,  but  she  was  silent,  then  as  now. 
The  date  of  the  exodus  has  been  fixed  as  having  prob- 
ably occurred  during  the  reign  of  the  Great  Pharaoh, 
Mineptah,  or  the  nineteenth  Egyptian  Dynasty.  The 
date  is,  say,  fourteen  hundred  years  before  Christ.  An 
inscription  has  recently  been  found  which  seems  to 
show  that  Joseph  settled  in  Egypt  during  the  reign  of 
Mineptah,  but  the  best  scholars  now  have  gone  back 
to  the  conclusions  I  have  stated. 

At  the  time  of  the  Pharaohs,  Egypt  was  the  highest 
civilized  country  on  earth.  It  had  a  vast  system  of 
canals,  an  organized  army,  a  goodly  degree  of  art,  and 
there  were  engineers   and   builders   of  much   ability. 

17 


MOSES 

Philosophy,  poetry  and  ethics  were  recognized,  prized 
and  discussed. 

The  storage  of  grain  by  the  government  to  bank  against 
famine  had  been  practised  for  several  hundred  years. 
There  were  also  treasure-cities  built  to  guard  against 
fire,  thieves  or  destruction  by  the  elements.  It  will 
thus  be  seen  that  foresight,  thrift,  caution,  wisdom, 
played  their  parts.  The  Egyptians  were  not  savages. 


18 


MOSES 


BOUT  five  hundred  years  before  the  birth  of 
Moses  there  lived  in  Arabia  a  powerful  Sheik 
or  Chief,  known  as  Abraham.  This  man  had  a 
familiar  spirit,  or  guide,  or  guardian-angel 
known  as  Yaveh  or  Jehovah.  All  of  the  desert  tribes 
had  such  tutelary  gods ;  and  all  of  these  gods  were  once 
men  of  power  who  lived  on  earth.  The  belief  in  special 
gods  has  often  been  held  by  very  great  men:  Socrates 
looked  to  his  **  demon  *'  for  guidance;  Themistocles 
consulted  his  oracle;  a  President  of  the  United  States 
visited  a  clairvoyant,  who  consented  to  act  as  a  medium 
and  interpret  the  supernatural.  This  idea,  which  is  a 
variant  of  ancestor  worship,  still  survives,  and  very 
many  good  people  do  not  take  journeys  or  make  invest- 
ments until  they  believe  they  are  being  dictated  to  by 
Shakespeare,  Emerson,  Beecher  or  Phillips  Brooks. 
These  people  also  believe  that  there  are  bad  spirits  to 
which  we  must  not  harken. 

Abraham  was  led  by  Jehovah;  what  Jehovah  told  him 
to  do  he  did ;  when  Jehovah  told  him  to  desist  or  change 
his  plans,  he  obeyed.  Jehovah  promised  him  many 
things,  and  some  of  these  promises  were  fulfilled. 
Whether  these  tutelary  gods  or  controlling  spirits  had 
any  actual  existence  outside  of  the  imagination  of  the 
people  who  believed  in  them — whether  they  were 
merely  pictures  thrown  upon  the  screen  by  a  sub- 
conscious spiritual  stereopticon — is  not  the  question 
now  under  discussion.  Something  must  be  left  for  a 

19 


MOSES 

later  time:  the  fact  remains  that  special  providences 
are  yet  relied  upon  by  sincere  and  intelligent  people. 
^  Abraham  had  a  son  named  Isaac.  And  Isaac  was  the 
father  of  Jacob,  or  Israel,  **  the  Soldier  of  God,"  so 
called  on  account  of  his  successful  wrestling  with  the 
angel.  And  Jacob  was  the  father  of  twelve  sons.  All  of 
these  people  believed  in  Jehovah,  the  god  of  their  tribe; 
and  while  they  did  not  disbelieve  in  the  gods  of  the 
neighboring  tribes,  they  yet  doubted  their  power  and 
had  grave  misgivings  as  to  their  honesty.  Therefore, 
they  had  nothing  to  do  with  them,  praying  to  their  own 
god  only  and  looking  to  him  for  support.  They  were 
the  chosen  people  of  Jehovah,  just  as  the  Babylonians 
were  the  chosen  people  of  Baal;  the  Canaanites  the 
chosen  people  of  Ishitar;  the  Moabites  the  chosen 
people  of  Chemos;  the  Ammonites  the  chosen  people 
of  Rimmon. 

Now  Joseph  was  the  favorite  son  of  Jacob,  and  his 
brethren  were  naturally  jealous  of  him.  So  one  day 
out  on  the  range  they  sold  him  into  slavery  to  a  passing 
caravan,  and  went  home  and  told  their  father  the  boy 
was  dead,  having  been  killed  by  a  wild  beast.  To  make 
the  matter  plausible  they  took  the  coat  of  Joseph  and 
smeared  it  with  the  blood  of  a  goat  which  they  had 
killed.  Nowadays,  the  coat  would  have  been  sent  to 
a  chemist's  laboratory  and  the  blood-spots  tested  to 
see  whether  it  was  the  blood  of  beast  or  human.  But 
Jacob  believed  the  story  and  mourned  his  son  as  dead. 
20 


MOSES 

Now  Joseph  was  taken  to  Egypt  and  there  arose  to  a 
position  of  influence  and  power  through  his  intelligence 
and  diligence.  How  eventually  his  brethren,  starving, 
came  to  him  for  food,  there  being  a  famine  in  their 
own  land,  is  one  of  the  most  natural  and  beautiful 
stories  in  all  literature.  It  is  a  folklore  legend,  free 
from  the  fabulous,  and  has  all  the  corroborating  marks 
of  the  actual. 

For  us  it  is  history  undisputed,  unrefuted,  because  it 
is  so  natural.  It  could  all  easily  happen  in  various 
parts  of  the  world  even  now.  It  shows  the  identical 
traits  of  human  nature  that  are  alive  and  pulsing  today. 
^  Joseph  having  made  himself  known  to  his  brethren 
induced  some  of  them  and  their  neighbors  to  come 
down  into  Egypt,  where  the  pasturage  was  better  and 
the  water  more  sure,  and  settle  there.  The  Bible  tells 
us  that  there  were  seventy  of  these  settlers  and  gives 
us  their  names. 

These  emigrants,  called  Israelites,  or  Children  of  Israel, 
account  for  the  presence  of  the  enslaved  people  whom 
Moses  led  out  of  captivity  three  hundred  years  later. 
^  One  thing  seems  quite  sure,  and  that  is  that  they  were 
a  peculiar  people  then,  with  the  pride  of  the  desert  in 
their  veins,  for  they  stood  socially  aloof  and  did  not 
mix  with  the  Egyptians.  They  still  had  their  own  god 
and  clung  to  their  own  ways  and  customs. 
That  very  naive  account  in  the  first  chapter  of  Exodus 
of  how  they  had  two  midwives,  **  and  the  name  of  one 

21 


MOSES 

was  Shiphrah  and  the  other  Puah,"  is  as  fine  In  its 
elusive  exactitude  as  an  Uncle  Remus  story.  Children 
always  want  to  know  the  names  of  people.  These  two 
Hebrew  midwives  were  bribed  by  the  King  of  Egypt 
— ruler  over  twenty  million  people — in  person,  to  kill 
all  the  Hebrew  boy  babies.  Then  the  account  states 
that  Jehovah  was  pleased  with  these  Hebrew  women 
who  proved  false  to  their  master,  and  Jehovah  rewarded 
them  by  giving  them  houses. 

This  order  to  kill  the  Hebrew  children  must  have 
gone  into  execution,  if  at  all,  about  the  time  of  the 
birth  of  Moses,  because  Aaron,  the  brother  of  Moses, 
and  three  years  older,  certainly  was  not  killed. 
Whether  Moses  was  the  son  of  Pharaoh's  daughter, 
his  father  an  Israelite,  or  both  of  his  parents  were 
Israelites,  is  problematic.  Royal  families  are  not  apt 
to  adopt  an  unknown  waif  into  the  royal  household 
and  bring  him  up  as  their  royal  own,  especially  if  this 
waif  belongs  to  what  is  regarded  as  an  inferior  race. 
The  tie  of  motherhood  is  the  only  one  that  could  over- 
rule caste  and  override  prejudice.  If  the  daughter  of 
Pharaoh,  or  more  properly  **  the  Pharaoh,**  were  the 
mother  of  Moses,  she  had  a  better  reason  for  hiding 
him  in  the  bulrushes  than  did  the  daughter  of  a  Levite, 
for  the  order  to  kill  these  profitable  workers  is  extremely 
doubtful.  The  strength,  skill  and  ability  of  the  Israelites 
formed  a  valuable  acquisition  to  the  Egyptians,  and 
what  they  wanted  was  more  Israelites,  not  fewer. 
22 


MOSES 

Judging  from  the  statement  that  there  were  only  two 
midwives,' there  were  only  a  few  hundred  Israelites — 
perhaps  between  one  and  two  thousand,  at  most  53 
So  leaving  the  legend  of  the  childhood  of  Moses  with 
just  enough  mystery  mixed  in  it  to  give  it  a  perpetual 
piquancy,  we  learn  that  he  was  brought  up  an  Egyptian, 
as  the  son  of  Pharaoh's  daughter,  and  that  it  was  she 
who  gave  him  his  name. 

Philo  and  Josephus  give  various  sidelights  on  the  life 
and  character  of  Moses.  The  Midrash  or  Commentaries 
on  the  History  of  the  Jews,  composed,  added  to  or 
modified  by  many  men,  extending  over  a  period  of 
twenty  centuries,  also  add  their  weight,  even  though 
the  value  of  these  Commentaries  is  conjectural. 
Egyptian  accounts  of  Moses  and  the  Israelites  come 
to  us  through  Hellenic  sources,  and  very  naturally  are 
not  complimentary.  These  picture  Moses,  or  Osarsiph, 
as  they  call  him,  as  an  agitator,  an  undesirable  citizen, 
who  sought  to  overturn  the  government,  and  failing  in 
this,  fled  to  the  desert  with  a  few  hundred  outlaws. 
They  managed  to  hold  out  against  the  forces  sent  to 
capture  them,  were  gradually  added  to  by  other  refu- 
gees, and  through  the  organizing  genius  of  Moses  were 
rounded  into  a  strong  tribe. 

That  Moses  was  their  supreme  ruler,  and  that  to  better 
hold  his  people  in  check  he  devised  a  religious  ritual  for 
them,  and  impressed  his  god,  Jehovah,  upon  them,  al- 
most to  the  exclusion  of  all  other  gods,  and  thus  formed 

23 


MOSES 

them  into  a  religious  whole,  is  beyond  question.  No 
matter  what  the  cause  of  the  uprising,  or  who  was  to 
blame  for  it,  the  fact  is  undisputed  that  Moses  led  a 
revolt  in  Egypt,  and  the  people  he  carried  with  him  in 
this  exodus  formed  the  nucleus  of  the  Hebrew  Nation. 
And  further,  the  fact  is  beyond  dispute  that  the  per- 
sonality of  Moses  was  the  prime  cementing  factor  in 
the  making  of  the  nation.  The  power,  poise,  patience 
and  unwavering  self-reliance  of  the  man,  through  his 
faith  in  the  god  Jehovah,  are  all  beyond  dispute. 
Things  happen  because  the  man  makes  them  happen. 


f 


24 


MOSES 


HE  position  of  the  Israelites  in  Egypt  was  one 
of  voluntary  vassalage.  The  government  was 
a  feudal  monarchy.  The  Israelites  had  come 
into  Egypt  of  their  own  accord,  but  had 
never  been  admitted  into  the  full  rights  of  citizenship.^ 
This  exclusion  by  the  Egyptians  had  no  doubt  tendea 
to  fix  the  Children  of  Israel  in  their  religious  beliefs,  and 
on  the  other  hand,  their  proud  and  exclusive  nature 
had  tended  to  keep  them  from  a  full  fellowship  with 
the  actual  owners  of  the  land. 

The  Egyptians  never  attempted  to  traffic  in  them  as 
they  did  in  slaves  of  war,  being  quite  content  to  use 
them  as  clerks,  laborers  and  servants,  paying  them  a 
certain  wage,  and  also  demanding  an  excess  of  labor 
in  lieu  of  taxation.  In  other  words,  they  worked  out 
their  **  road-tax,**  which  no  doubt  was  excessive.  Many 
years  later,  Athens  and  also  Rome  had  similar  **slaves,'* 
some  of  whom  were  men  of  great  intellect  and  worth. 
If  one  reads  the  works  of  modern  economic  prophets, 
it  will  be  seen  that  wage-workers  in  America  are  often 
referred  to  as  **  slaves  *'  or  **  bondmen,'*  terms  which 
will  probably  give  rise  to  confusion  among  historians 
to  come  53  53 

Moses  was  brought  up  in  the  court  of  the  king,  and 
became  versed  in  all  the  lore  of  the  Egyptians.  We  are 
led  to  suppose  that  he  also  looked  like  an  Egyptian,  as 
we  are  told  that  people  seeing  him  for  the  first  time, 
he  being  a  stranger  to  them,  went  away  and  referred 

25 


MOSES 

to  him  as  **  that  Egyptian."  He  was  handsome,  com- 
manding, silent  by  habit  and  slow  of  speech,  strong 
as  a  counselor,  a  safe  man.  That  he  was  a  most  valu- 
able man  in  the  conduct  of  Egyptian  official  affairs, 
there  is  no  doubt.  And  although  he  was  nominally  an 
Egyptian,  living  with  the  Egyptians,  adopting  their 
manners  and  customs,  yet  his  heart  was  with  **  his 
brethren,"  the  Israelites,  who  he  saw  were  sore 
oppressed  through  governmental  exploitation. 
Moses  knew  that  a  government  which  does  not  exist 
for  the  purpose  of  adding  to  human  happiness  has  no 
excuse  for  being.  And  once  when  he  was  down  among 
his  own  people  he  saw  an  Egyptian  taskmaster  or 
foreman  striking  an  Israelitish  workman,  and  in  wrath 
he  arose  and  killed  the  oppressor.  The  only  persons 
who  were  witnesses  to  this  affair  were  two  Hebrews. 
The  second  day  after  the  fight,  when  Moses  was 
attempting  to  separate  two  Hebrews  who  had 
gotten  into  an  altercation  with  each  other,  they  taunted 
him  by  saying,  **  Who  gavest  thee  to  be  a  ruler  over 
us? — ^wilt  thou  also  kill  us  as  thou  didst  the  Egyptian?  " 
^This  gives  us  a  little  light  upon  the  quality  and 
character  of  the  people  with  whom  Moses  had  to 
deal.  It  also  shows  that  the  ways  of  the  reformer  and 
peatcemaker  are  not  flower-strewn.  The  worst  enemies 
of  a  reformer  are  not  the  Egyptians — he  has  also  to 
deal  with  the  Israelites. 

I  once  heard  Terence  V.  Powderly,  who  organized  the 
26 


MOSES 

Knights  of  Labor — the  most  successful  labor  organiza- 
tion ever  formed — say,  **Any  man  who  devotes  his 
life  to  helping  laboring  men  will  be  destroyed  by  them.*' 
And  then  he  added,  **  But  this  should  not  deter  us  from 
the  effort  to  benefit." 

As  the  Hebrew  account  plainly  states  that  the  killing 
of  all  the  male  Hebrew  children  was  carried  out  with 
the  connivance  of  Hebrew  women  who  pretended  to 
be  ministering  to  the  Hebrew  mothers,  so  was  the 
flight  of  Moses  from  Egypt  caused  by  the  Hebrews, 
who  turned  informants  and  brought  him  into  disgrace 
with  Pharaoh,  who  sought  his  life. 

Very  naturally,  the  Egyptians  deny  and  have  always 
denied  that  the  order  to  kill  children  was  ever  issued 
by  a  Pharaoh.  They  also  point  to  the  fact  that  the 
Israelites  were  a  source  of  profit — a  valuable  asset  to 
the  Egyptians.  And  moreover,  the  proposition  that 
the  Egyptians  killed  the  children  to  avoid  trouble  is 
preposterous,  since  no  possible  act  that  man  can  com- 
mit would  so  arouse  sudden  rebellion  and  fan  into 
flame  the  embers  of  hate  as  the  murder  of  the  young. 
If  the  Egyptians  had  attempted  to  carry  out  any  such 
savage  cruelty,  they  would  not  only  have  had  to  fight 
the  Israelitish  men,  but  the  outraged  mothers  as  well. 
The  Egyptians  were  far  too  wise  to  invite  the  fury  of 
frenzied  motherhood.  To  have  done  this  would  have 
destroyed  the  efficiency  of  the  entire  Hebrew  popula- 
tion. An  outraged  and  heartbroken  people  do  not  work. 

27 


MOSES 

^When  one  person  becomes  angry  with  another,  his 
mental  processes  work  overtime  making  up  a  list  of 
the  other's  faults  and  failings. 

When  a  people  arise  in  revolt  they  straightway  prepare 
an  indictment  against  the  government  against  which 
they  revolted,  giving  a  schedule  of  outrages,  insults, 
plunderings  and  oppressions.  This  is  what  is  politely  called 
partisan  history.  **  Uncle  Tom's  Cabin  "  was  a  literary 
indictment  of  the  South  by  featuring  its  supposed  bru- 
talities. And  the  attitude  of  the  South  is  mirrored  in  a 
pretty  parable  concerning  a  Southern  girl  who  came 
North  on  a  visit,  and  seeing  in  print  the  words  **  damned 
Yankee,"  innocently  remarked  that  she  always  thought 
they  were  one  word.  A  description  of  the  enemy,  made 
by  a  person  or  a  people,  must  be  taken  cum  grano 
Syracuse  53  53 


28 


MOSES 


HEN  Moses  fled,  after  killing  the  Egyptian, 
he  went  northward  and  east  Into  the  land  of 
the  MIdlanltes,  who  were  also  descendants  of 
Abraham.  At  this  time  he  was  forty  years  of 
age,  and  still  unmarried,  his  work  In  the  Egyptian  Court 
having  evidently  fully  absorbed  his  time. 
It  Is  a  pretty  little  romance,  all  too  brief  In  Its  details,  of 
how  the  tired  man  stopped  at  a  well,  and  the  seven 
<laughters  of  Jethro  came  to  draw  water  for  their  flocks. 
Certain  shepherds  came  also  and  drove  the  girls  away, 
^when  Moses,  true  to  his  nature,  took  the  part  of  the 
young  ladles,  to  the  chagrin  and  embarrassment  of 
the  male  rustics  who  had  left  their  manners  at  home. 
The  story  forms  a  melodramatic  stage-setting  which  the 
mummers  have  not  been  slow  to  use,  representing 
the  seven  daughters  as  a  ballet,  the  shepherds  as  a 
male  chorus,  and  Moses  as  basso-profundo  and  hero. 
We  are  told  that  the  girls  went  home  and  told  their 
father  of  the  chivalrous  stranger  they  had  met,  and  he, 
with  all  the  deference  of  the  desert,  sent  for  him  "  that 
he  might  eat  bread." 

Very  naturally  Moses  married  one  of  the  girls. 
And  Moses  tended  the  flocks  of  Jethro,  his  father-in- 
law,  taking  the  herds  a  long  distance,  living  with  them 
and  sleeping  out  under  the  stars. 

Now  Jethro  was  the  chief  of  his  tribe.  Moses  calls  him 
a  **  priest,"  but  he  was  a  priest  only  Incidentally,  as 
all  the  Arab  chiefs  were. 

29 


MOSES 

The  clergy  originated  in  Egypt.  Before  the  Israelites 
were  in  Goshen,  the  ** sacra,"  or  sacred  utensils,  belonged 
to  the  family;  and  the  head  of  the  tribe  performed  the 
religious  rites,  propitiating  the  family  deity,  or  else 
delegated  some  one  else  to  do  so.  This  head  of  the 
tribe,  or  chief,  was  called  a  **  Cohen  '*;  and  the  man 
who  assisted  him,  or  whom  he  delegated,  was  called 
a  **  Levi.*'  The  plan  of  making  a  business  of  being  a 
**  Levi  "  was  borrowed  from  the  Egyptians,  who  had 
men  set  apart,  exclusively,  to  deal  in  the  mysterious. 
Moses  calls  himself  a  Levi,  or  Levite. 
After  the  busy  life  he  had  led,  Moses  could  not  settle 
down  to  the  monotonous  existence  of  a  shepherd.  It  is 
probable  that  then  he  wrote  the  Book  of  Job,  the 
world's  first  drama  and  the  oldest  book  of  the  Bible. 
Moses  was  full  of  plans.  Very  naturally  he  prayed  to 
the  Israelitish  god,  and  the  god  barkened  unto  his 
prayer  and  talked  to  him. 

The  silence,  the  loneliness,  the  majesty  of  the  moun- 
tains,  the  great  stretches  of  shining  sand,   the  long 
peaceful  nights,  all  tend  to  hallucinations.  Sheepmen 
are  in  constant  danger  of  mental  aberration.  Society 
is  needed  quite  as  much  as  solitude. 
From  talking  with  God,  Moses  desired  to  see  Him. 
One  day,  from  the  burning  red  of  an  acacia-tree,  the 
Lord  called  to  him,  **  Moses,  Moses!  " 
And  Moses  answered,  **  Here  am  I !  " 
Moses  was  a  man  born  to  rule — he  was  a  leader  of  men. 
30 


MOSES 

— and  here  at  middle  life  the  habits  of  twenty-five  years 
were  suddenly  snapped  and  his  occupation  gone.  He 
yearned  for  his  people,  and  knowing  their  unhappy  lot, 
his  desire  was  to  lead  them  out  of  captivity.  He  knew 
the  wrongs  the  Egyptian  government  was  visiting  upon 
the  Israelites.  Rameses  the  Second  was  a  ruler  with 
the  builder's  eczema:  always  and  forever  he  made 
gardens,  dug  canals,  paved  roadways,  constructed  model 
tenements,  planned  palaces,  erected  colossi.  He  was 
a  worker,  and  he  made  everybody  else  work.  It  was  in 
this  management  of  infinite  detail  that  Moses  had  been 
engaged;  and  while  he  entered  into  it  with  zest,  he 
knew  that  the  hustling  habit  can  be  overdone  and  its 
voteiries  may  become  its  victims — not  only  that,  but 
this  strenuous  life  may  turn  freemen  into  serfs,  and 
serfs  into  slaves. 

And  now  Rameses  was  dead,  and  the  proud,  vain, 
fretful  and  selfish  Mineptah  ruled  in  his  place.  It  was 
worse  with  the  Israelites  than  ever! 
The  more  Moses  thought  of  it  the  more  he  was  con- 
vinced that  it  was  his  duty  to  go  back  to  Egypt  and 
lead  his  people  out  of  bondage.  He  himself,  having 
been  driven  out,  made  the  matter  a  burning  one  with 
him:  he  had  lost  his  place  in  the  Egyptian  Court,  but 
he  would  get  it  back  and  hold  it  under  better  conditions 
than  ever  before! 

He  heard  the  **  Voice"!  All  strong  people  hear  the 
Voice  calling  them.  And  barkening  to  the  Inner  Voice 

31 


r 


MOSES 

IS  simply  doing  what  you  want  to  do,    ^  **  Moses, 
Moses!" 

And  Moses  answered,  **  Lord,  here  am  I." 
The  laws  of  Moses  still  influence  the  world,  but  not 
even  the  orthodox  Jews  follow  them  literally.  We  bring 
our  reason  to  bear  upon  the  precepts  of  Moses,  and 
those  which  are  not  for  us  we  gently  pass  over.  In  fact, 
the  civil  laws  of  most  countries  prohibit  many  of  the 
things  which  Moses  commanded.  For  instance,  the 
eighteenth  verse  of  the  twenty-second  chapter  of 
Exodus  says,  **  Thou  shalt  not  suffer  a  witch  to  live.** 
Certainly  no  Jewish  lawyer  nor  Rabbi,  in  any  part  of 
the  world,  advocates  the  killing  of  persons  supposed  to 
be  witches.  We  explain  that  in  this  instance  the  inspired 
writer  lapsed  and  merely  mirrored  the  ignorance  of  his 
time.  Or  else  we  fall  back  upon  the  undoubted  fact  that 
various  writers  and  translators  have  tampered  with  the 
original  text — this  must  be  so,  since  the  book  written 
by  Moses  makes  record  of  his  death. 
But  when  we  find  passages  in  Moses  requiring  us  to 
benefit  our  enemies,  we  say  with  truth  that  this  was 
the  first  literature  to  express  for  us  the  brotherhood  of 
man  33  53 

**  Thou  shalt  take  no  gift:  for  the  gift  blindeth  the  wise 
and  perverteth  the  words  of  the  righteous.'*  Here  we 
get  Twentieth-Century  Wisdom.  And  very  many  pas- 
sages as  fine  and  true  can  be  found,  which  prove 
for  us  beyond  cavil  that  Moses  was  right  a  part  of  the 
32 


MOSES 

time,  and  to  say  this  of  any  man,  living  or  dead,  is  a 
very  great  compliment. 

In  times  of  doubt  the  Jewish  people  turn  to  the  Torah, 
or  Book  of  4:he  Law.  This  book  has  been  interpreted  by 
the  Rabbis,  or  the  learned  men,  and  to  meet  the  exi- 
gencies of  living  under  many  conditions,  it  has  been 
changed,  enlarged  and  augmented.  In  these  changes 
the  people  were  not  consulted.  Very  naturally  it  was 
done  secretly,  for  inspired  men  must  be  well  dead 
before  the  many  accept  their  edict.  To  be  alive  is 
always  more  or  less  of  an  offense,  especially  if  you  be 
a  person  and  not  a  personage. 

y  he  murmurings  against  Moses  during  his  lifetime 
often  broke  into  a  rumble  and  a  roar.  The  mob  accused 
him  of  taking  them  out  into  the  wilderness  to  perish. 
To  get  away  from  the  constant  bickering  and  criticisms 
of  the  little  minds,  Moses  used  to  go  up  into  the  moun- 
tains alone  to  find  rest,  and  there  he  communicated  with 
his  godjil  t  was  surely  a  great  step  in  advance  when  all  the 
Elohims  were  combined  into  one  Supreme  Elohim  that 
was  everywhere  present  and  ruled  the  world.  Instead 
of  dozens  of  little  gods,  jealous,  jangling,  fearful,  fretful, 
fussy,  boastful,  changing  walking-sticks  to  serpents,  or 
doing  other  things  quite  as  useless,  it  was  a  great 
advance  to  have  one  Supreme  Being,  dispassionate,  a 
God  of  Love  and  Justice,  **  with  whom  can  be  no  varia- 
tion, neither  shadow  that  is  cast  by  turning.*/  This 
gradual  ennobling  of  the  conception  of  Divinity  reveals 

33 


MOSES 

the  extent  to  which  man  is  ennobling  his  own  nature. 
^  Up  to  within  a  very  few  years  God  had  a  rival  in  the 
Devil,  but  now  the  Devil  lives  only  as  a  pleasantry. 
Until  the  time  of  Moses,  the  God  of  Sinai  was  only 
the  God  of  the  Hebrew  people,  and  this  accounts  for 
His  violence,  wrath,  jealousy,  and  all  of  those  qualities 
which  went  to  make  up  a  barbaric  chief,  including  the 
tendency  of  His  sons  and  servants  to  make  love  to  the 
daughters  of  earth. 

It  is  probable  that  the  idea  of  God — in  opposition  to  a 
god,  one  of  many  gods — ^was  a  thought  that  grew  up 
very  gradually  in  the  mind  of  Moses.  The  ideal  grew, 
and  Moses  grew  with  the  ideal. 

Then  from  God  being  a  Spirit,  to  being  Spirit,  is  a 
natural,  easy  and  beautiful  evolution. 
The  thought  of  angels,  devils,  heavenly  messengers, 
like  Gabriel  and  the  Holy  Ghost,  constantly  surround- 
ing the  Throne,  is  a  suggestion  that  comes  from  the 
court  of  the  absolute  monarch.  The  Trinity  is  the 
oligarchy  refined,  and  the  one  son  who  gives  himself  as  a 
sacrifice  for  all  the  people  who  have  oflFended  the 
monarch  is  the  retreating  vision  of  that  night  of  igno- 
rance when  all  nations  sought  to  appease  the  wrath  of 
their  god  by  the  death  of  human  beings. 
God  to  us  is  Spirit,  realized  everywhere  in  unfolding 
Nature.  We  are  a.  part  of  Nature — ^we,  too,  are  Spirit. 
When  Moses  commands  his  people  that  they  must 
return  the  stray  animal  of  their  enemy  to  its  rightful 
34 


MOSES 

owner,  we  behold  a  great  man  struggling  to  benefit 
humanity  by  making  them  recognize  the  laws  of  Spirit. 
We  are  all  one  family — we  can  not  afford  to  wrong  or 
harm  even  an  enemy. 

Instead  of  thousands  of  warring,  jarring  families  or 
tribes,  we  have  now  a  few  strong  federations  of  States, 
or  countries,  which,  if  they  would  make  war  on  one 
another,  would  today  quickly  face  a  larger  foe.  Already 
the  idea  of  one  government  for  all  the  world  is  taking 
form — there  must  be  one  Supreme  Arbiter,  and  all  this 
monstrous  expense  of  money  and  flesh  and  blood  and 
throbbing  hearts  for  purposes  of  war,  must  go,  just  as 
we  have  sent  to  limbo  the  jangling,  jarring,  jealous 
gods.  Also,  the  better  sentiment  of  the  world  will  send 
the  czars,  emperors,  kings,  grand  dukes,  and  the  greedy 
grafters  of  so-called  democracy,  into  the  dust-heap  of 
oblivion,  with  all  the  priestly  phantoms  that  have 
obscured  the  sun  and  blackened  the  sky.  The  gods  have 
gone,  but  MAN  IS  HERE. 


35 


MOSES 


HE  plagues  that  befell  the  Egyptians  were  the 
natural  ones  to  which  Egypt  was  liable: 
drought,  flood,  flies,  lice,  frogs,  disease.  The 
Israelites  very  naturally  declared  that  these 
things  were  sent  as  a  punishment  by  the  Israelitish  god. 
I  remember  a  farmer,  in  my  childhood  days,  who  was 
accounted  by  his  neighbors  as  an  infidel.  He  was  struck 
by  lightning  and  instantly  killed,  while  standing  in  his 
doorway.  The  Sunday  before,  this  man  had  worked  in 
the  fields,  and  just  before  he  was  killed  he  had  said, 
**  dammit,"  or  something  quite  as  bad.  Our  preacher 
explained  at  length  that  this  man's  death  was  a  **  judg- 
ment." Afterward,  when  our  church  was  struck  by 
lightning,  it  was  regarded  as  an  accident. 
Ignorant  and  superstitious  people  always  attribute 
special  things  to  special  causes.  When  the  grasshoppers 
overran  Kansas  in  Eighteen  Hundred  EWfive.  I 
heard  a  good  man  from  the  South  say  it  was  a  punish- 
ment on  the  Kansans  for  encouraging  Old  John  Brown. 
The  next  year  the  boll-weevil  ruined  the  cotton  crop, 
and  certain  preachers  in  the  North,  who  thought  they 
knew,  declared  it  was  the  lingering  wrath  of  God  on 
account  of  slavery.  ^  Three  nations  unite  to  form  our 
present  civilization.  These  are  the  Greek,  the  Roman 
and  the  Judaic.  The  lives  of  Perseus,  Romulus  and 
Moses  all  teem  with  the  miraculous,  but  if  we  accept 
the  supernatural  in  one  we  must  in  all.  Which  of  these 
three  great  nations  has  contributed  most  to  our 
36 


MOSES 

well-being  is  a  question  largely  decided  by  tempera- 
ment; but  just  now  the  star  of  Greece  seems  to  be  in 
the  ascendant.  We  look  to  art  for  solace.  Greece  stands 
for  art ;  Rome  for  conquest ;  Judea  for  religion. 
And  yet  Moses  was  a  lover  of  beauty,  and  the  hold  he 
had  upon  his  people  was  quite  as  much  through  train- 
ing them  to  work  as  through  his  moral  teaching.  Indeed, 
his  morality  was  expediency — which  is  reason  enough 
according  to  modern  science.  When  he  wants  them  to 
work,  he  says,  **  Thus  saith  the  Lord,"  just  the  same 
as  when  he  wishes  to  impress  upon  them  a  thought. 
^  No  one  can  read  the  twenty-sixth,  twenty-seventh 
and  twenty-eighth  chapters  of  Exodus  without  being 
impressed  with  the  fact  that  the  man  who  wrote  them 
had  in  him  the  spirit  of  the  Master  Workman — a  King's 
Craftsman.  His  carving  the  ten  commandments  on 
tablets  of  stone  also  shows  his  skill  with  mallet  and 
chisel,  a  talent  he  had  acquired  in  Egypt,  where  Rameses 
the  Second  had  thousands  of  men  engaged  in  sculpture 
and  in  making  inscriptions  in  stone. 
Several  chapters  in  Exodus  might  have  been  penned 
by  Albrecht  Durer  or  William  Morris.  The  command- 
ment, **  Thou  shalt  not  make  unto  thyself  any  graven 
image,*'  was  unmistakably  made  merely  to  correct  a 
local  evil:  the  tendency  to  worship  the  image  instead 
of  the  thing  it  symbolized.  People  who  do  not  contrib- 
ute to  the  creation  of  an  object  fall  easy  victims  to 
this  error.  With  all  the  stern  good  sense  that  Moses 

37 


MOSES 

revealed.  It  is  but  fair  to  assume  that  he  did  not  mean 
the  command  to  be  perpetual.  It  was  only  through 
so  much  moving  about  that  the  Jews  seemed  to  lose 
their  art  spirit. 

And  certainly  the  flame  of  art  in  the  Jewish  heart  hets 
never  died  out,  even  though  at  times  it  has  smoldered, 
for  wherever  there  has  been  peace  and  security  for  the 
Jews,  they  have  not  been  slow  to  evolve  the  talent 
which  creates.  History  teems  with  the  names  of  Jews 
who,  in  music,  painting,  poetry  and  sculpture,  have 
devoted  their  days  to  beauty.  And  the  germ  of  genius 
is  seen  in  many  of  the  Jewish  children  who  attend  the 
manual-training  and  art  schools  of  America. 
Art  has  its  rise  in  the  sense  of  sublimity.  It  seems 
at  times  to  be  a  fulfilment  of  the  religious  impulse. 
The  religion  which  balks  at  work,  stopping  at  prayer 
and  contemplation,  is  a  form  of  arrested  development. 
^  The  number  of  people  in  the  exodus  was  probably  two 
or  three  thousand.  Renan  says  that  one  century  only 
elapsed  between  the  advent  of  Joseph  into  Egypt  and 
the  revolt.  Very  certain  it  was  not  a  great  number  that 
went  forth  into  the  desert.  A  half-million  women  could 
not  have  borrowed  jewelry  of  their  neighbors — the  secret 
could  not  have  been  kept.  And  in  the  negotiations  be- 
tween Moses  and  the  King,  it  will  be  remembered  that 
Moses  asked  only  for  the  privilege  of  going  three  days* 
journey  into  the  wilderness  to  make  sacrifices.  It  was  a 
kind  of  picnic  or  religious  campmeeting.  A  vast  multitude 
38 


MOSES 

could  not  have  taken  part  in  any  such  exercise.  We 
also  hear  of  their  singing  their  gratitude  on  account 
of  reaching  Elim,  where  there  were  "  twelve  springs  and 
seventy  palm-trees.'*  Had  there  been  several  million 
people,  as  we  have  been  told,  the  insignificant  shade 
of  seventy  trees  would  have  meant  nothing  to  them. 
^  The  distance  from  Goshen  in  Egypt  to  Canaan  in 
Palestine  was  about  one  hundred  seventy-five  miles. 
But  by  the  circuitous  route  they  traveled  it  was  nearly 
a  thousand  miles.  It  took  forty  years  to  make  the 
passage,  for  the  way  had  to  be  fought  through  the  coun- 
try of  foes  who  very  naturally  sought  to  block  the 
way.  Quick  transportation  was  out  of  the  question. 
The  rate  of  speed  was  about  twenty-five  miles  a  year. 
^  Here  was  a  people  without  homes,  or  fixed  habitation, 
beset  on  every  side  with  the  natural  dangers  of  the 
desert,  and  compelled  to  face  the  fury  of  the  inhabitants 
whose  lands  they  overran,  fearful,  superstitious,  haunted 
by  hunger,  danger  and  doubt.  By  night  a  man  sent 
ahead  with  a  lantern  on  a  pole  led  the  way;  by  day  a 
cavalcade  that  raised  a  cloud  of  dust.  One  was  later 
sung  by  the  poets  as  a  pillar  of  fire,  and  the  other  a 
cloud.  Chance  flocks  of  quail  blown  by  a  storm  into 
their  midst  were  regarded  as  a  miracle;  the  white 
exuding  wax  of  the  manna-plant  was  told  of  as  **  bread  ** 
— or  more  literally  food. 

Those  who  had  taken  part  in  the  original  exodus  were 
nearly    all    dead — their    children    and    grandchildren 

39 


^'. 


MOSES 

survived,  desert  born  and  savage  bred.  Canaan  was  not 
the  land  flowing  with  milk  and  honey  that  had  been 
described.  Milk  and  honey  are  the  results  of  labor 
applied  to  land.  Moses  knew  this  and  tried  to  teach 
this  great  truth.  He  was  true  to  his  divine  trust. 
Through  doubt,  hardship,  poverty,  misunderstanding, 
he  held  high  the  ideal — they  were  going  to  a  better  place. 
^At  last,  worn  by  his  constant  struggle,  aged  one 
hundred  twenty,  "  his  eye  not  dim  nor  his  natural 
force  abated  ** — for  only  those  live  long  who  live  well 
— Moses  went  up  into  the  mountain  to  find  solace  in 
solitude  as  was  his  custom.  His  people  waited  for  him 
in  vain — he  did  not  return.  Alone  there  with  his  God 
he  slept  and  forgot  to  awaken.  His  pilgrimage  was  done. 
**And  no  man  knoweth  his  grave  even  unto  this  day.** 
^History  is  very  seldom  recorded  on  the  spot — cer- 
tainly it  was  not  then.  Centuries  followed  before  fact, 
tradition,  song,  legend  and  folklore  were  fused  into 
the  form  we  call  Scripture.  But  out  of  the  fog  and 
mist  of  that  far-off  past  there  looms  in  heroic  outline 
the  form  and  features  of  a  man — a  man  of  will,  untiring 
activity,  great  hope,  deep  love,  a  faith  which  at  times 
faltered,  but  which  never  died.  Moses  was  the  first 
man  in  history  who  fought  for  human  rights  and 
sought  to  make  men  free,  even  from  their  own  limita- 
tions. **And  there  arose  not  a  prophet  since  Israel  like 
unto  Moses,  whom  the  Lord  knew  face  to  face." 

40 


hf 


CONFUCIUS 


The  highest  study  of  all  is  that  which  teaches  us  to 
develop  those  principles  of  purity  and  perfect  virtue 
which  Heaven  bestowed  upon  us  at  our  birth,  in  order 
that  we  may  acquire  the  power  of  influencing  for  good 
those  amongst  whom  we  are  placed,  by  our  precepts 
and  example;  a  study  without  an  end — for  our  labors 
cease  only  when  we  have  become  perfect — an  unattain- 
able goal,  but  one  that  we  must  not  the  less  set  before 
us  from  the  very  first.  It  is  true  that  we  shall  not  be 
able  to  reach  it,  but  in  our  struggle  toward  it  we  shall 
strengthen  our  characters  and  give  stability  to  our  ideas, 
so  that,  whilst  ever  advancing  calmly  in  the  same  direc- 
tion, we  shall  be  rendered  capable  of  applying  the  facul- 
ties with  which  we  have  been  gifted  to  the  best  possible 

account. 

— "  The  Annals  "  of  Confucius 


CONFUCIUS 


HE  Chinese  comprise  one-fourth  of 
the  inhabitants  of  the  earth.  There 
are  four  hundred  milUons  of  them  53 
They  can  do  many  things  which  we 
can  not  do,  and  we  can  do  a  few 
things  which  they  have  not  yet 
been  able  to  do ;  but  they  are  learn- 
ing from  us,  and  possibly  we  would 
do  well  to  learn  from  them.  In  China  there  are  now 
trolley-cars,  telephone-lines,  typewriters,  cash-registers 
and  American  plumbing.  China  is  a  giant  awaking  from 
sleep.  He  who  thinks  that  China  is  a  country  crumbling 
into  ruins  has  failed  to  leave  a  call  at  the  office  and  has 
overslept. 

The  West  can  not  longer  afford  to  ignore  China.  And 
not  being  able  to  waive  her,  perhaps  the  next  best 
thing  is  to  try  to  understand  her. 

The  one  name  that  looms  large  above  any  other  name 
in  China  is  Confucius.  He  of  all  men  has  influenced 
China  most.  One- third  of  the  human  race  love  and 
cherish  his  memory,  and  repeat  his  words  as  sacred  writ. 
^  Confucius  was  born  at  a  time  when  one  of  those  tidal 
waves  of  reason  swept  the  world — ^when  the  nations 
were  full  of  unrest,  and  the  mountains  of  thought  were 
shaken  with  discontent. 

It  was   just  previous   to   the   blossoming  of  Greece. 

43 


CONFUCIUS 


Pericles  was  seventeen  years  old  when  Confucius  died. 
Themistocles  was  preparing  the  way  for  Pericles;  for 
then  was  being  collected  the  treasure  of  Delos,  which 
made  Phidias  and  the  Parthenon  possible.  During  the 
life  of  Confucius  lived  Leonidas,  Miltiades,  Cyrus  the 
Great,  Cambyses,  Darius,  Xerxes.  And  then  quite 
naturally  occurred  the  battles  of  Marathon,  Salamis 
and  Thermopylae.  Then  lived  Buddha-Gautama,  Lao- 
tsze,  Ezekiel,  Daniel,  Haggai,  Zechariah,  Pythagoras, 
Pindar,  i^schylus  and  Anacreon. 

The  Chinese  are  linked  to  the  past  by  ties  of  language 
and  custom  beyond  all  other  nations.  They  are  a 
peculiar  people,  a  chosen  people,  a  people  set  apart. 
Just  when  they  withdrew  from  the  rest  of  mankind 
and  abandoned  their  nomadic  habits,  making  them- 
selves secure  against  invasion  by  building  a  wall  one 
hundred  feet  high,  and  settled  down  to  lay  the  founda- 
tions of  a  vast  empire,  we  do  not  know.  Some  historians 
have  fixed  the  date  about  ten  thousand  years  before 
Christ — let  it  go  at  that.  There  is  a  reasonably  well- 
authenticated  history  of  China  that  runs  back  twenty- 
five  hundred  years  before  Christ,  while  our  history 
merges  into  mist  seven  hundred  fifty  years  before  the 
Christian  era. 

The  Israelites  wandered;  the  Chinese  remained  at  home. 
Walls  have  this  disadvantage:  they  keep  people  in  as 
well  as  shut  the  barbarians  out.  But  now  there  are  vast 
breaches  in  the  wall,  through  which  the  inhabitants 
44 


CONFUCIUS 


ooze,  causing  men  from  thousands  of  miles  away  to  cry 
in  alarm,  **  the  Yellow  Peril!  '*  And  also  through  these 
breaches,  Israelites,  Englishmen  and  Yankees  enter 
fearlessly,  settle  down  in  heathen  China,  and  do  business. 
^  It  surely  is  an  epoch,  and  what  the  end  will  be  few 
there  are  who  dare  forecast. 


45 


CONFUCIUS 


HIS  then  IS  from  the  pen  of  Edward  Carpenter, 
the  Church  of  England  curate  who  was  so 
great  a  friend  and  admirer  of  our  own  Walt 
Whitman  that  he  made  a  trip  across  the  sea 

to  join  hands  with  him  in  preaching  the  doctrine  of 

democracy  and  the  religion  of  humanity. 

In  the  interior  of  China,  along  low-lying  plains  and 
great  river-valleys,  and  by  lake-sides,  and  far  away  up 
into  hilly  and  even  mountainous  regions. 
Behold!  an  immense  population,  rooted  in  the  land, 
rooted  in  the  clan  and  the  family. 

The  most  productive  and  stable  on  the  whole  Earth. 
A  garden  one  might  say — a  land  of  rich  and  recherche 
crops,  of  rice  and  tea  and  silk  and  sugar  and  cotton 
and  oranges; 

Do  you  see  it? — stretching  away  endlessly  over  river- 
lines  and  lakes,  and  the  gentle  undulations  of  the  low- 
lands, and  up  the  escarpments  of  the  higher  hills; 
The  innumerable  patchwork  of  civilization — the  poign- 
ant verdure  of  the  young  rice;  the  somber  green  of 
orange-groves;  the  lines  of  tea-shrubs,  well  hoed,  and 
showing  the  bare  earth  beneath ;  the  pollard  mulberries ; 
the  plots  of  cotton  and  maize  and  wheat  and  yam  and 
clover;  the  little  brown  and  green  tiled  cottages  with 
spreading  recurbed  eaves,  the  clumps  of  feathery  bam- 
boo, or  of  sugar-canes; 

The  endless   silver   threads   of   irrigation   canals   and 
ditches,  skirting  the  hills  for  scores  and  hundreds  of 
miles,  tier  above  tier,  and  serpentining  down  to  the 
lower  slopes  and  plains — 
46 


CONFUCIUS 


The  accumulated  result,  these,  of  centuries  upon  cen- 
turies of  ingenious  industry,  and  innumerable  public 
and  private  benefactions,  continued  from  age  to  age; 
^  The  grand  canal  of  the  Delta  plain  extending,  a 
thronged  waterway,  for  seven  hundred  miles,  with 
sails  of  junks  and  bankside  villages  innumerable; 
The  chain-pumps,  worked  by  buffaloes  or  men,  for 
throwing  the  water  up  slopes  and  hillsides,  from  tier 
to  tier,  from  channel  to  channel ; 

The  endless  rills  and  cascades  flowiAg  down  again 
into  pockets  and  hollows  of  verdure,  and  on  fields  of 
steep  and  plain; 

The  bits  of  rock  and  wildwood  left  here  and  there, 
with  the  angles  of  Buddhist  or  Jain  temples  projecting 
from  among  the  trees; 

The  azalea  and  rhododendron  bushes,  and  the  wild 
deer  and  pheasants  unharmed; 

The  sounds  of  music  and  the  gong — the  Sin-fa  sung  at 
eventide — and  the  air  of  contentment  and  peace  per- 
vading ; 

A  garden  you  might  call  the  land,  for  its  wealth  of 
crops  and  flowers, 
A  town  almost  for  its  population, 

A  population  denser,  on  a  large  scale,  than  anywhere 
else  on  earth — 

Five  or  six  acre  holdings,  elbowing  each  other,  with 
lesser  and  larger,  continuously  over  immense  tracts, 
and  running  to  plentiful  market  centers; 
A  country  of  few  roads,  but  of  innumerable  footpaths 
and  waterways. 

Here,  rooted  in  the  land,  and  rooted  in  the  family,  each 
family  clinging  to  its  portion  of  ancestral  earth,  each 

47 


CONFUCIUS 


offshoot  of  the  family  desiring  nothing  so  much  as  to 
secure  its  own  patrimonial  field, 

Each  member  of  the  family  answerable  primarily  to 
the  family  assembly  for  his  misdeeds  or  defalcations, 
^  All  bound  together  in  the  common  worship  of  ances- 
tors, and  in  reverence  for  the  past  and  its  sanctioned 
beliefs  and  accumulated  prejudices  and  superstitions; 
^  With  many  ancient,  wise,  simple  customs  and  ordi- 
nances, coming  down  from  remote  centuries,  and  the 
time  of  Confucius, 

This  vast  population  abides — the  most  stable  and  the 
most  productive  in  the  world. 

And  Government  touches  it  but  lightly — can  touch  it 
but  lightly. 

With  its  few  officials  (only  some  twenty-five  thousand 
for  the  whole  of  its  four  hundred  millions),  and  its 
scanty  taxation  (about  one  dollar  per  head),  and  with 
the  extensive  administration  of  justice  and  affairs  by 
the  clan  and  the  family — little  scope  is  left  for  govern- 
ment 33  5S 

The  great  equalized  mass  population  pursues  its  even 
and  accustomed  way,  nor  pays  attention  to  edicts  and 
foreign  treaties,  unless  these  commend  themselves 
independently ; 

Pays  readier  respect,  in  such  matters,  to  the  edicts  and 
utterances  of  its  literary  men,  and  the  deliberations  of 
the  Academy. 

And  religious  theorizing  touches  it  but  lightly — can 
touch  it  but  lightly. 

Established  on  the  bedrock  of  actual  life,  and  on  the 
living  unity  and  community  of  present,  past  and  future 
48 


CONFUCIUS 


generations.   ^  Each  man  stands  bound  already,  and 

by  the  most  powerful  ties,  to  the  social  body — ^nor  needs 

the  dreams  and  promises  of  Heaven  to  reassure  him  Si 

And  all  are  bound  to  the  Earth. 

Rendering  back  to  it  as  a  sacred  duty  every  atom  that 

the  Earth  supplies  to  them  (not  insensately  sending  it 

in  sewers  to  the  sea). 

By  the  way  of  abject  commonsense  they  have  sought 

the  gates  of  Paradise — and  to  found  on  human  soil 

their  City  Celestial ! 


49 


CONFUCIUS 


iv; 


HE  first  general  knowledge  of  Confucius  came 
to  the  Western  jv^rfdjnjthaJatter^pai±ij£jl^ 
Sixteenth^entury  f romjesuk^nussionaries. 
Indeed,  it  was  theyjvvho  gave  hiiiijthe.Latm-' 
ized  name  oF  **^X!onfucius,"  the  Chinese  name  beipg 
KungTu-tsze. 

So^impressedr'were  these  missionaries  by  the  greatness 
of  Confucius  that  they  urged  upon  the  Vatican  the 
expediency  of  placing  his  name  upon  the  calendar  of 
Saints.  They  began  by  combating  his  teachings,  but 
this  they  soon  ceased  to  do,  and  the  modicum  of  success 
which  they  obtained  was  through  beginning  each 
Christian  service  by  the  hymn  which  may  properly  be 
called  the  National  Anthem  of  China.  Its  opening 
stanza  is  as  follows: 

Confucius!  Confucius! 

Great  was  our  Confucius! 

Before  him  there  was  no  Confucius, 

Since  him  there  was  no  other, 

Confucius!  Confucius! 

Great  was  our  Confucius! 

The  praise  given  by  these  early  Jesuits  to  Confucius 
was  at  first  regarded  at  Rome  as  apology  for  the 
meager  success  of  their  ministrations.  But  later  scien- 
tific study  of  Chinese  literature  corroborated  all  that 
the  Jesuit  Fathers  proclaimed  for  Confucius,  and  he 
stands  today  in  a  class  with  Socrates  and  the  scant 
half-dozen  whom  we  call  the  saviors  of  the  world. 
50 


' CONFUCIUS 


fl  Yet  Confucius  claimed  no  **  divine  revelation,"  nor 
did  he  seek  to  found  a  religion.  I";fc_.was_  simply  a 
teacher,  and  what  he  taught  was  the  science  of  living — 
living  in  the  present,  with  the  plain  and  simple  men 
and  women  who  make  up  the  world,  and  bettering  our 
condition  by  bettering  theirs.  Of  a  future  life  he  said 
he  knew  nothing,  and  concerning  the  supernatural  he 
was  silent,  even  rebuking  his  disciples  for  trying  to 
pry  into  the  secrets  of  Heaven.  The  word  **  God " 
he  does  not  use,  but  his  recognition  of  a  Supreme 
Intelligence  is  limited  to  the  use  of  a  word  which  can 
best  be  translated  **  Heaven,"  since  it  tokens  a  place 
more  than  it  does  a  person.  Constantly  he  speaks 
of  "  doing  the  will  of  Heaven."  And  then  he  goes  on 
to  say  that  **  Heaven  is  speaking  through  you,"  **  Duty 
lies  in  mirroring  Heaven  in  our  acts,"  and  many  other 
such  New-Thought  aphorisms  or  epigrams. 
That  the  man  was  a  consummate  literary  stylist  is 
beyond  doubt.  He  spoke  in  parables  and  maxims, 
short,  brief  and  musical.  He  wrote  for  his  ear,  and 
always  his  desire,  it  seems,  was  to  convey  the  greatest 
truth  in  the  fewest  words.  The  Chinese,  even  the 
lowly  and  uneducated,  know  hundreds  of  Confucian 
epigrams,  and  still  repeat  them  in  their  daily  conver- 
sation or  in  writing,  just  as  educated  Englishmen  use 
the  Bible  and  Shakespeare  for  symbol. 
Minister  Wu,  in  a  lecture  delivered  in  various  American 
cities,  compared  Confucius  with  Emerson,  showing  how 

51 


CONFUCIUS 


in  many  ways  these  two  great  prophets  paralleled  each 
other.  Emerson,  of  all  Americans,  seems  the  only  man 
worthy  of  being  so  compared. 

The  writer  who  lives  is  the  man  who  supplies  the 
world  with  portable  wisdom — short,  sharp,  pithy 
maxims  which  it  can  remember,  or,  better  still,  which 
it  can  not  forget. 

Confucius  said,  **  Every  truth  has  four  corners:  as  a 
teacher  I  give  you  one  corner,  and  it  is  for  you  to  find 
the  other  three.** 

The  true  artist  in  words  or  things  is  always  more  or  less 
impressionistic — he  talks  in  parables,  and  it  is  for  the 
hearer  to  discover  the  meaning  for  himself. 
An  epigram  is  truth  in  a  capsule.  The  disadvantage 
of  the  epigram  is  the  temptation  it  affords  to  good 
people  to  explain  it  to  the  others  who  are  assumed  to 
be  too  obtuse  to  comprehend  it  alone.  And  since 
explanations  seldom  explain,  the  result  is  a  mixture 
or  compound  that  has  to  be  spewed  utterly  or  taken 
on  faith.  Confucius  is  simple  enough  until  he  is  explained. 
Then  we  evolve  sects,  denominations  and  men  who  make 
it  their  profession  to  render  moral  calculi  opaque.  China, 
being  peopled  by  human  beings,  has  suffered  from  this 
tendency  to  make  truth  concrete,  just  as  all  the  rest  of 
the  world  has  suffered.  Truth  is  fluid  and  should  be 
allowed  to  flow.  Ankylosis  of  a  fact  is  superstition. 
Confucius  was  a  free-trader. 


52 


CONFUCIUS  ^ 


^HINA  has  always  been  essentially  feudal  in 
her  form  of  government.  China  is  made  up 
of  a  large  number  of  States,  each  presided 
over   by   a   prince   or   governor,    and   these 


States  are  held  together  by  a  rather  loose  federal 
government,  the  Emperor  being  the  supreme  ruler. 
State  rights  prevail.  State  may  fight  with  State,  or 
States  may  secede — it  is  n't  of  much  moment.  They  are 
glad  enough,  after  a  few  years,  to  get  back,  like  boys 
who  run  away  from  home,  or  farmhands  who  quit  work 
in  a  tantrum.  The  Chinese  are  very  patient — they 
know  that  time  cures  all  things,  a  truth  the  West  has 
not  yet  learned.  States  that  rebel,  like  individuals  who 
place  themselves  beyond  the  protection  of  all,  assume 
grave  responsibilities. 

The  local  prince  usually  realizes  the  bearing  of  the 
Social  Contract — that  he  holds  his  office  only  during 
good  behavior,  and  that  his  welfare  and  the  welfare  of 
his  people  are  one. 

Heih,  the  father  of  Confucius,  was  governor  of  one  of 
these  little  States,  and  had  impoverished  himself  in  an 
effort  to  help  his  people.  Heih  was  a  man  of  seventy, 
wedded  to  a  girl  of  seventeen,  when  their  gifted  son 
was  born.  When  the  boy  was  three  years  old  the 
father  died,  and  the  lad's  care  and  education  depended 
entirely  on  the  mother.  This  mother  seems  to  have 
been  a  woman  of  rare  mental  and  spiritual  worth. 
She  deliberately  chose  a  life  of  poverty  and  honest  toil 

53 


CONFUCIUS 


for  herself  and  child,  rather  than  allow  herself  to  be 
cared  for  by  rich  kinsmen.  The  boy  was  brought  up 
in  a  village,  and  he  was  not  allowed  to  think  himself 
any  better  than  the  other  village  children,  save  as  he 
proved  himself  so.  He  worked  in  the  garden,  tended 
the  cattle  and  goats,  mended  the  pathways,  brought 
wood  and  water,  and  waited  on  his  elders.  Every 
evening  his  mother  used  to  tell  him  of  the  feats  of 
strength  of  his  father,  of  his  heroic  qualities  in  friend- 
ship, of  deeds  of  valor,  of  fidelity  to  trusts,  of  his 
absolute  truthfulness,  and  his  desire  for  knowledge  in 
order  that  he  might  better  serve  his  people. 
The  coarse,  plain  fare,  the  long  walks  across  the  fields* 
the  climbing  of  trees,  the  stooping  to  pull  the  weeds  in 
the  garden,  the  daily  bath  in  the  brook,  all  combined  to 
develop  the  boy*s  body  to  a  splendid  degree.  He  went 
to  bed  at  sundown,  and  at  the  first  flush  of  dawn  was  up 
that  he  might  see  the  sunrise.  There  were  devotional 
rites  performed  by  the  mother  and  son,  morning  and 
evening,  which  consisted  in  the  playing  upon  a  lute  and 
singing  or  chanting  the  beauty  and  beneficence  of 
creation  5S  53 

Confucius,  at  fifteen,  was  regarded  as  a  phenomenal 
musician,  and  the  neighbors  used  to  gather  to  hear  him 
perform.  At  nineteen  he  was  larger,  stronger,  comelier, 
more  skilled,  than  any  other  youth  of  his  age  in  all  the 
country  round. 

The  simple  quality  of  his  duties  as  a  prince  can  be 
54 


CONFUCIUS 


guessed  when  we  are  told  that  his  work  as  keeper  of 
the  herds  required  him  to  ride  long  distances  on  horse- 
back to  settle  difficulties  between  rival  herders.  The 
range  belonged  to  the  State,  and  the  owners  of  goats, 
sheep  and  cattle  were  in  continual  controversies. 
Montana  and  Colorado  will  understand  this  matter. 
Confucius  summoned  the  disputants  and  talked  to 
them  long  about  the  absurdity  of  quarreling  and  the 
necessity  of  getting  together  in  complete  understanding. 
Then  it  was  that  he  first  put  forth  his  best-known 
maxim:  **  You  should  not  do  to  others  that  which  you 
would  not  have  others  do  to  you." 
This  negative  statement  of  the  Golden  Rule  is  found 
expressed  in  various  ways  in  the  writings  of  Confucius. 
/A  literal  interpretation  of  the  Chinese  language  is  quite 
impossible,  as  the  Chinese  have  single  signs  or  symbols 
that  express  a  complete  idea.  To  state  the  same  matter, 
we  often  use  a  whole  pagef 

Confucius  had  a  single  word  which  expressed  the 
Golden  Rule  in  such  a  poetic  way  that  it  is  almost 
useless  to  try  to  convey  it  to  people  of  the  West. 
This  word,  which  has  been  written  into  English  as 
"  Shu,"  means:  My  heart  responds  to  yours,  or  my 
heart's  desire  is  to  meet  your  heart's  desire,  or  I  wish 
to  do  to  you  even  as  I  would  be  done  by.  This  sign, 
symbol  or  word  Confucius  used  to  carve  in  the  bark  of 
trees  by  the  roadside.  The  French  were  filled  with  a  like 
impulse  when  they  cut  the  words  Liberty,  Fraternity, 

55 


CONFUCIUS 


Equality,  over  the  entrances  to  all  public  buildings. 
^  Confucius  had  his  symbol  of  love  and  friendship 
painted  on  a  board,  which  he  stuck  into  the  ground 
before  the  tent  where  he  lodged;  and  finally  it  was 
worked  upon  a  flag  by  some  friends  and  presented  to 
him,  and  became  his  flag  of  peace. 
His  success  in  keeping  down  strife  among  the  herders, 
and  making  peace  among  his  people,  soon  gave  him  a 
fame  beyond  the  borders  of  his  own  State.  As  a  judge 
he  had  the  power  to  show  both  parties  where  they  were 
wrong,  and  arranged  for  them  a  common  meeting- 
ground  53  53 

His  qualifications  as  an  arbiter  were  not,  however, 
limited  to  his  powers  of  persuasion — ^he  could  shoot  an 
arrow  farther  and  hurl  a  spear  with  more  accuracy  than 
any  man  he  ever  met.  Very  naturally  there  are  a  great 
number  of  folklore  stories  concerning  his  prowess,  some 
of  which  make  him  out  a  sort  of  combination  Saint 
George  and  William  Tell,  with  the  added  kingly  graces 
of  Alfred  the  Great.  Omitting  the  incredible,  we  are 
willing  to  believe  that  this  man  had  a  giant's  strength, 
but  was  great  enough  not  to  use  it  like  a  giant. 
We  are  willing  to  believe  that  when  attacked  by 
robbers,  he  engaged  them  in  conversation  and  that, 
seated  on  the  grass,  he  convinced  them  they  were  in 
a  bad  business.  Also,  he  did  not  later  hang  them,  as  did 
our  old  friend  Julius  Caesar  under  like  conditions. 
When  twenty-seven  he  ceased  going  abroad  to  hold 
56 


CONFUCIUS 


court  and  settle  quarrels,  but  sending  for  the  dispu- 
tants, they  came,  and  he  gave  them  a  course  of  lectures 
in  ethics.  In  a  week,  by  a  daily  lesson  of  an  hour's 
length,  they  were  usually  convinced  that  to  quarrel  is 
very  foolish,  since  it  reduces  bodily  vigor,  scatters  the 
mind,  and  disturbs  the  secretions,  so  the  man  is  the 
loser  in  many  ways. 

This  seems  to  us  like  a  very  queer  way  to  hold  court, 
but  Confucius  maintained  that  men  should  learn  to 
govern  their  tempers,  do  equity,  and  thus  be  able  to 
settle  their  own  disputes,  and  this  without  violence. 
**  To  fight  decides  who  is  the  stronger,  the  younger/ 
and  the  more  skilful  in  the  use  of  arms,  but  it  does  not 
decide  who  is  right.  That  is  to  be  settled  by  the  Heaven 
in  your  own  heart.*' 

To  let  the  Heaven  into  your  heart,  to  cultivate  a  con-  ^ 
science  so  sensitive  that  it  can  conceive  the  rights  of  | 
the  other  man,  is  to  know  wisdom. 
To  decide  specific  cases  for  others  he  thought  was  to 
cause  them  to  lose  the  power  of  deciding  for  them- 
selves. When  asked  what  a  just  man  should  do  when  he 
was  dealing  with  one  absolutely  unjust,  he  said,  **  He  [ 
who  wrongs  himself  sows  in  his  own  heart  nettles."  58  j 
And  when  some  of  his  disciples,   after  the  Socratic 
method,  asked  him  how  this  helped  the  injured  man, 
he  replied,  **  Tg^ej^obbedjoi^wroriged^ 
you   continue   to   remember   it."    When   pushed   still 
nirther^he  said,  '^  metn  should  fight,  only  when  he  does 
~~  57 


CONFUCIUS 


so  Jta^rotectJiiniself  or  his  family  from  bodily  harm." 
^  Here  a  questioner  asked,  If  we  are  to  protect  our 
persons,  must  we  not  learn  to  fight?  " 
And  the  einswer  comes,  **  The  just  man,  he  who  par- 
takes moderately  of  all  good  things,  is  the  only  man  to 
fear  in  a  quarrel,  for  he  is  without  fear." 
Over  and  over  is  the  injunction  in  varying  phrase. 
Abolish  fear — abolish  fear!  "  When  pressed  to  give  in 
one  word  the  secret  of  a  happy  life,  he  gives  a  word 
which  we  translate,  **  Equanimity." 


» 


CONFUCIUS 


HE  mother  of  Confucius  died  during  his  early 
manhood.  For  her  he  ever  retained  the  most 
devout  memories. 
L  Before  going  on  a  journey  he  always  visited 
her  grave,  and  on  returning,  before  he  spoke  to  any  one, 
he  did  the  same.  On  each  anniversary  of  her  death  he 
ate  no  food  and  was  not  to  be  seen  by  his  pupils.  This 
filial  piety,  which  is  sometimes  crudely  and  coarsely 
called  **  ancestor  worship,**  is  something  which  for  the 
Western  world  is  rather  difficult  to  appreciate.  But  in 
it  there  is  a  subtle,  spiritual  significance,  suggesting 
that  it  is  only  through  our  parents  that  we  are  able  to 
realize  consciousness  or  personal  contact  with  Heaven. 
These  parents  loved  us  into  being,  cared  for  us  with 
infinite  patience  in  infancy,  taught  us  in  youth,  watched 
with  high  hope  our  budding  manhood;  and  as  reward 
and  recognition  for  the  service  rendered  us,  the  least  we 
can  do  is  to  remember  them  in  all  our  prayers  and 
devotions.  The  will  of  Heaven  used  these  parents  for 
us,  therefore  parenthood  is  divine. 
That  this  ancestor  worship  is  beautiful  and  beneficial 
is  quite  apparent,  and  rightly  understood  no  one  could 
think  of  it  as  **  heathendom.**  Confucius  used  to  chant 
the  praises  of  his  mother,  who  brought  him  up  in 
poverty,  thus  giving  a  close  and  intimate  knowledge 
of  a  thousand  things  from  which  princes,  used  to  ease 
and  luxury,  are  barred. 

So  close  was  he  to  nature  and  the  plain  people  that 

59 


CONFUCIUS 


he  ordered  that  all  skilful  charioteers  in  his  employ 
should  belong  to  the  nobility.  This  giving  a  title  or 
degree  to  men  of  skill — men  who  can  do  things — ^we 
regard  as  essentially  a  modern  idea. 
China,  I  believe,  is  the  first  country  in  the  world  to 
use  the  threads  of  a  moth  or  worm  for  fabrics.  The 
patience  and  care  and  inventive  skill  required  in  first 
making  silk  were  very  great.  But  it  gives  us  an  index 
to  invention  when  we  hear  that  Confucius  regarded 
the  making  of  linen,  using  the  fiber  of  a  plant,  as  a 
greater  feat  than  utilizing  the  strands  made  by  the  silk- 
worm. Confucius  had  a  sort  of  tender  sentiment  toward 
the  moth,  similar  to  the  sentiments  which  our  vege- 
tarian friends  have  toward  killing  animals  for  food. 
Confucius  wore  linen  in  preference  to  silk,  for  senti- 
mental reasons.  The  silkworm  dies  at  his  task  of 
making  himself  a  cocoon,  so  to  evolve  in  a  winged 
joy,  but  falls  a  victim  of  man's  cupidity.  Likewise, 
Confucius  would  not  drink  milk  from  a  cow  until  her 
calf  was  weaned,  because  to  do  so  were  taking  an 
unfair  advantage  of  the  maternal  instincts  of  the  cow. 
It  will  thus  be  seen  that  Confucius  had  a  very  fair  hold 
on  the  modern  idea  which  we  call  **  Monism,'*  or  *'  The 
One.'*  He,  too,  said,  **A11  is  one."  In  his  attitude 
toward  all  living  things  he  was  ever  gentle  and  con- 
siderate 53  5S 

No  other  prophet  so   much   resembles   Confucius   in 
doctrine  as  Socrates.   But  Confucius  does  not  suffer 
60 


CONFUCIUS 


from  the  comparison.  He  had  a  beauty,  dignity  and 
grace  of  person  which  the  great  Athenian  did  not  pos- 
sess. Socrates  was  more  or  less  of  a  buffoon,  and  to  many 
in  Athens  he  was  a  huge  joke — a  town  fool.  Confucius 
combined  the  learning  and  graces  of  Plato  with  the 
sturdy,  practical  commonsense  of  Socrates.  No  one 
ever  affronted  or  insulted  him;  many  didjigt  under- 
stand him,  but  he  met  prince  or  pauper  jm  terms  of 
equality  5S  S& 
^Tn  his  travels  Confucius  used  often  to  meet  recluses 
or  monks — men  who  had  fled  the  world  in  order  to 
become  saints.  For  these  men  Confucius  had  more  pity 
thein  respect.  **  The  world's  work  is  difficult,  and  to 
live  in  a  world  of  living,  striving  and  dying  men  and 
women  requires  great  courage  and  great  love.  Now  we 
cein  not  all  run  away,  and  for  some  to  flee  from  humanity 
and  to  find  solace  in  solitude  is  only  another  name  for 
weakness.**  53  S& 

This  sounds  singularly  like  our  Ralph  Waldo  who  says, 
"It  is  easy  in  the  world  to  live  after  the  world*s 
opinions;  it  is  easy  in  solitude  to  live  after  our  own; 
but  the  Great  Man  is  he  who  in  the  midst  of  the  crowd 
keeps  with  perfect  sweetness  the  independence  of  soli- 
tude.** 33  33 
Confucius  is  the^rstjnanmjQint_o£-time4:e^ proclaim    ] 

the   divinity-frf-«HivyirH^  -t4^^>^4^n<'1nm1innrl--f^£-J3aaji^_^1i        i 

the  truth  that  in-^JtsefuLwQrk  th€fe-4s"na4tighrnDriow  j 
degree.  In  talking  to  a  group  of  young  men  he  says: 
^        ^  61 


CONFUCIUS 


"  When  I  was  keeper  of  the  herds  I  always  saw  to  it 
that  all  of  my  cattle  were  strong,  healthy  and  growing, 
that  there  was  water  in  abundance  and  plenty  of  feed. 
When  I  had  charge  of  the  public  granaries  I  never 
slept  until  I  knew  that  all  was  secure  and  cared  for 
against  the  weather,  and  my  accounts  as  true  and  cor- 
rect as  if  I  were  going  on  my  long  journey  to  return 
no  more.  My  advice  is  to  slight  nothing,  forget  nothing, 
never  leave  things  to  chance,  nor  say,  *  Nobody  will 
know — this  is  good  enough.*  ** 

In  all  of  his  injunctions  Confucius  never  has  anything 
in  mind  beyond  the  present  life.  Of  a  future  existence 
he  knows  nothing,  and  he  seems  to  regard  it  as  a  waste 
of  energy  and  a  sign  of  weakness  to  live  in  two  worlds 
at  a  time.  **  Heaven  provides  us  means  of  knowing  all 
about  what  is  best  here,  and  supplies  us  in  abundance 
every  material  thing  for  present  happiness,  and  it  is 
our  business  to  realize,  to  know,  to  enjoy." 
He  taught  rhetoric,  mathematics,  economics,  the 
science  of  government  and  natural  history.  And  always 
and  forever  running  through  the  fabric  of  his  teaching 
/Was  the  silken  thread  of  ethics — man's  duty  to  man, 
man's  duty  to  Heaven.  Music  was  to  him  a  necessity, 
since  **  it  brings  the  mind  in  right  accord  with  the  will 
of  Heaven."  Before  he  began  to  speak  he  played  softly 
on  a  stringed  instrument  which  perhaps  would  compare 
best  with  our  guitar,  but  it  was  much  smaller,  and  this 
instrument  he  always  carried  with  him,  suspended  from 
62 


CONFUCIUS 


his  shoulder  by  a  silken  sash.  Yet  with  all  of  his  passion 
for  music,  he  cautioned  his  disciples  against  using  it  as 
an  end.  It  was  merely  valuable  as  an  introduction  to 
be  used  in  attuning  the  mind  and  heart  to  an  under- 
standing of  great  truth. 

Confucius  was  seventy-two  years  old  at  his  death. 
During  his  life  his  popularity  was  not  great.  When 
he  passed  away  his  followers  numbered  only  about 
three  thousand  persons,  and  his  **  disciples,"  or  the 
teachers  who  taught  his  philosophy,  were  seventy  in 
number  S&  5S 

There  is  no  reason  to  suppose  that  Confucius  assumed 
that  a  vast  number  of  people  would  ever  ponder  his 
words  or  regard  him  as  a  prophet. 
At  the  time  that  Confucius  lived,  also  lived  Lao-tsze. 
As  a  youth  Confucius  visited  Lao-tsze,  who  was  then 
an  old  man.  Confucius  often  quotes  his  great  contem- 
porary and  calls  himself  a  follower  of  Lao-tsze.  The 
difference,  however,  between  the  men  is  marked.  Lao- 
tsze's  teachings  are  full  of  metaphysics  and  strange 
and  mystical  curiosities,  while  Confucius  is  always 
simple,  lucid  and  practical. 


63 


CONFUCIUS 


ONFUCIUS  has  been  revered  for  twenty 
centuries,  revered  simply  as  a  man,  not  as  a. 
god  or  as  a  divinely  appointed  savior.  He 
offered  no  reward  of  heaven,  nor  did  he 
threaten  non-believers  with  hell.  He  claimed  no  special 
influence  nor  relationship  to  the  Unseen.  In  all  his 
teachings  he  was  singularly  open,  frank  and  free  from 
all  mystery  or  concealment.  In  reference  to  the  super- 
natural he  was  an  agnostic.  He  often  said,  **  I  do  not 
know.**  He  was  always  an  inquirer,  always  a  student, 
always  open  to  conviction.  History  affords  no  instance 
of  another  individual  who  has  been  so  well  and  so  long 
loved,  who  still  holds  his  place,  and  who,  so  far  as  his 
reasoning  went,  is  unassailed  and  unassailable.  Even  the 
two  other  great  religions  in  China  that  rival  Confucian- 
ism— Buddhism  and  Taoism  (the  religion  of  Lao-tsze) 
— do  not  renounce  Confucius:  they  merely  seek  to 
amend  and  augment  him. 

During  his  lifetime  Confucius  made  many  enemies  by 
his  habit  of  frankly  pointing  out  the  foibles  of  society 
and  the  wrongs  visited  upon  the  people  by  officials  who 
pretended  to  serve  them.  Of  hypocrisy,  selfishness, 
vanity,  pretense,  he  was  severe  in  his  denunciation. 
^  Politicians  at  that  time  had  the  very  modern  habit 
of  securing  the  office  and  then  leaving  all  the  details 
of  the  work  to  menials,  they  themselves  pocketing 
the  perquisites.  As  Minister  of  State,  Confucius 
made  himself  both  feared  and  detested  on  account  of 
64 


CONFUCIUS 


his  habit  of  summoning  the  head  of  the  office  before 
him  and  questioning  him  concerning  his  duties.  In  fact, 
this  insistence  that  those  paid  by  the  State  should  work 
for  the  State  caused  a  combination  to  be  formed  against 
him,  which  finally  brought  about  his  deposition  and 
exile,  two  things  which  troubled  him  but  little,  since  one 
gave  him  leisure  and  the  other  opportunity  for  travel. 
^  The  personal  followers  of  Confucius  did  not  belong 
to  the  best  society;  but  immediately  after  his  death, 
many  who  during  his  life  had  scorned  the  man  made 
haste  to  profess  his  philosophy  and  decorate  their 
houses  with  his  maxims.  Humanity  is  about  the  same, 
whether  white  or  yellow,  the  round  world  over,  and 
time  modifies  it  but  little.  It  will  be  recalled  how  John 
P.  Altgeld  was  feared  and  hated  by  both  press  and  pul- 
pit, especially  in  the  State  and  city  he  served.  But  rigor 
mortis  had  scarcely  seized  upon  that  slight  and  tired 
body  before  the  newspapers  that  had  disparaged  the 
man  worst  were  vying  with  one  another  in  glowing 
eulogies  and  warm  testimonials  to  his  honesty,  sin- 
cerity, purity  of  motive  and  deep  insight.  A  personality 
which  can  neither  be  bribed,  bought,  coerced,  flattered 
nor  cajoled  is  always  regarded  by  the  many — especially 
by  the  party  in  power — as  **  dangerous."  Vice,  masked 
as  virtue,  breathes  easier  when  the  honest  man  is 
safely  under  the  sod. 

The  plain  and  simple  style  of  Confucius*  teaching  can  be 
gathered  by  the  following  sayings,  selected  at  random 

65 


CONFUCIUS 


from  the  canonical  books  of  Confucianism,  consisting  of 
the  teachings  of  the  great  master  which  were  gathered 
together  and  grouped  by  his  disciples  and  followers 
after  his  death: 

The  men  of  old  spoke  little.  It  would  be  well  to  imitate 
them,  for  those  who  talk  much  are  sure  to  say  something 
it  would  be  better  to  have  left  unsaid. 

Let  a  man's  labor  be  proportioned  to  his  ^  needs.  For 
he  who  works  beyond  his  strength  does  but  sidcl  to  his 

j  cares  and  disappointments.  A  man  should  be  moderate 

jeven  in  his  efforts. 

Be  not  over-anxious  to  obtain  relaxation  or  repose. 
For  he  who  is  so,  will  get  neither. 

Beware  of  ever  doing  that  which  you  are  likely,  sooner 
or  later,  to  repent  of  having  done. 

Do  not  neglect  to  rectify  an  evil  because  it  may  seem 
small,  for,  though  small  at  first,  it  may  continue  to 
grow  until  it  overwhelms  you. 

As  riches  adorn  a  house,  so  does  an  expanded  mind 
adorn  and  tranquillize  the  body.  Hence  it  is  that  the 
superior  man  will  seek  to  establish  his  motives  on 
correct  principles. 

The  cultivator  of  the  soil  may  have  his  fill  of  good 
things,  but  the  cultivator  of  the  mind  will  enjoy  a 
continual  feast. 

66 


CONFUCIUS 


It  is  because  men  are  prone  to  be  partial  toward  those 
they  love,  unjust  toward  those  they  hate,  servile 
toward  those  above  them,  arrogant  to  those  below 
them,  and  either  harsh  or  over-indulgent  to  those  in 
poverty  and  distress,  that  it  is  so  difficult  to  find  any 
one  capable  of  exercising  a  sound  judgment  with 
respect  to  the  qualities  of  others. 

He  who  is  incapable  of  regulating  his  own  family 
can  not  be  capable  of  ruling  a  nation.  The  superior  man 
will  find  within  the  limits  of  his  own  home,  a  suffi- 
cient sphere  for  the  exercise  of  all  those  principles  upon 
which  good  government  depends.  How,  indeed,  can  it 
be  otherwise,  when  filial  piety  is  that  which  should 
regulate  the  conduct  of  a  people  toward  their  prince; 
fraternal  affection,  that  which  should  regulate  the 
relations  which  should  exist  between  equals,  and  the 
conduct  of  inferiors  toward  those  above  them;  and 
paternal  kindness,  that  which  should  regulate  the  bear- 
ing of  those  in  authority  toward  those  over  whom 
they  are  placed? 

IBe  slow  in  speech,  but  prompt  in  action. 

He  whose  principles  are  thoroughly  established  will 
not  be  easily  led  from  the  right  path. 

The  cautious  are  generally  to  be  found  on  the  right  side. 

By  speaking  when  we  ought  to  keep  silence,  we  waste 
our  words. 

If  you  would  escape  vexation,  reprove  yourself  liberally 
and  others  sparingly. 

67 


CONFUCIUS 


There  is  no  use  attempting  to  help  those  who  can  not 
help  themselves. 

I  Make  friends  with  the  upright,  intelligent  and  wise; 
lavoid  the  licentious,  talkative  and  vain. 

Disputation  often  breeds  hatred. 

Nourish  good  principles  with  the  same  care  that  a 
mother  would  bestow  on  her  newborn  babe.  You  may 
not  be  able  to  bring  them  to  maturity,  but  you  will 
nevertheless  be  not  far  from  doing  so. 

I  The  decrees  of  Heaven  are  not  immutable,  for  though 
]  a  throne  may  be  gained  by  virtue,  it  may  be  lost  by  vice. 

There  are  five  good  principles  of  action  to  be  adopted: 
To  benefit  others  without  being  lavish;  to  encourage 
labor  without  being  harsh;  to  add  to  your  resources 
without  being  covetous;  to  be  dignified  without  being 
supercilious;  and  to  inspire  awe  without  being  austere. 
Also,  we  should  not  search  for  love  or  demand  it,  but 
so  live  that  it  will  flow  to  us. 

Personal  character  can  only  be  established  on  fixed 
principles,  for  if  the  mind  be  allowed  to  be  agitated  by 
violent  emotions,  to  be  excited  by  fear,  or  unduly 
moved  by  the  love  of  pleasure,  it  will  be  impossible 
for  it  to  be  made  perfect.  A  man  must  reason  calmly, 
for  without  reason  he  would  look  and  not  see,  listen 
and  not  hear. 

When  a  man  has  been  helped  around  one  corner  of  a 
square,  and  can  not  manage  by  himself  to  get  around 
the  other  three,  he  is  unworthy  of  further  assistance/ 
68 


PYTHAGORAS 


Consult  and  deliberate  before  you  act,  that  thou  mayest 

not  commit  foolish  actions.   For   *t  is   the  part  of  a 

miserable  man  to  speak  and  to  act  without  reflection. 

But  do  that  which  will  not  afHict  thee  afterwards,  nor 

oblige  thee  to  repentance. 

— Pythagoras 


X 


PYTHAGORAS 


PYTHAGORAS 


ITH  no  desire  to  deprive  Mr.  Bok 
of  his  bread,  I  wish  to  call  attention 
to  Pythagoras,  who  lived  a  little 
more  than  five  hundred  years  before 
Christ  53  Si 

Even  at  that  time  the  world  was 
old.  Memphis,  which  was  built  four 
thousand  years  ago,  had  begun  to 
crumble  into  ruins.  Troy  was  buried  deep  in  the  dust 
which  an  American  citizen  of  German  birth  was  to 
remove.  Nineveh  and  Babylon  were  dying  the  death 
that  success  always  brings,  and  the  star  of  empire  was 
preparing  to  westward  wend  its  way. 
Pythagoras  ushered  in  the  Golden  Age  of  Greece. 
All  the  great  writers  whom  he  immediately  preceded, 
quote  him  and  refer  to  him.  Some  admire  him;  others 
are  loftily  critical;  most  of  them  are  a  Httle  jealous; 
and  a  few  use  him  as  a  horrible  example,  calling  him 
a  poseur,  a  pedant,  a  learned  sleight-of-hand  man,  a 
bag  of  books. 

Trial  by  newspaper  was  not  invented  in  the  time  of 
Pythagoras;  but  personal  vilification  has  been  popular 
since  Balaam  talked  gossip  with  his  vis-a-vis. 
Anaxagoras,  who  gave  up  his  wealth  to  the  State  that 
he  might  be  free,  and  who  was  the  teacher  of  Pericles, 
was  a  pupil  of  Pythagoras,  and  used  often  to  mention 

71 


PYTHAGORAS 


him  58  In  this  way  Pericles  was  impressed  by  the 
Pythagorean  philosophy,  and  very  often  quotes  it  in  his 
speeches.  Socrates  gave  Pythagoras  as  an  authority 
on  the  simple  life,  and  stated  that  he  was  willing  to 
follow  him  in  anything  save  his  injunction  to  keep 
silence.  Socrates  wanted  silence  optional;  whereas 
Pythagoras  required  each  of  his  pupils  to  live  for  a  year 
without  once  asking  a  question  or  making  an  explana- 
tion. In  aggravated  cases  he  made  the  limit  five  years. 
fl  In  many  ways  Pythagoras  reminds  us  of  our  friend 
Muldoon,  both  being  beneficent  autocrats,  and  both 
/proving  their  sincerity  by  taking  their  own  medicine. 
(Pythagoras  said,  **  I  will  never  ask  another  to  do  what 
I  have  not  done,  and  am  not  willing  to  do  myself.*^ 
To  this  end  he  was  once  challenged  by  his  three  nun- 
dred  pupils  to  remain  silent  for  a  year.  He  accepted 
the  defi,  not  once  defending  himself  from  the  criticisms 
and  accusations  that  were  rained  upon  him,  not  once 
complaining,  nor  issuing  an  order.  Tradition  has  it, 
however,  that  he  made  averages  good  later  on,  when 
V  the  year  of  expiation  was  ended. 

There  are  two  reasonably  complete  lives  of  Pythagoras, 
one  by  Diogenes  Laertius,  and  another  by  lamblichus. 
Personally,  I  prefer  the  latter)  M  lamblichus,  as  might 
be  inferred  from  his  name,  makes  Pythagoras  a  descend- 
ant of  i^neas,  who  was  a  son  of  Neptune.  This  is 
surely  better  than  the  abrupt  and  somewhat  sensational 
statement  to  the  effect  that  his  father  was  Apollo. 
72 


PYTHAGORAS 


HE  birthplace  of  Pythagoras  was  Samos,  an  j^ 
isle  of  Greece.  He  was  born  of  wealthy  but 
honest  parents,  who  were  much  in  love  with 
each  other — a  requisite,  says  Pythagoras,  for 
parentage  on  its  highest  plane.  It  is  probable  that 
Pythagoras  was  absolutely  correct  in  his  hypothesis  53 
That  he  was  a  very  noble  specimen  of  manhood — 
physically  and  mentally — there  is  no  doubt.  He  was 
tall,  lithe,  dignified,  commanding  and  silent  by  nature, 
realizing  fully  that  a  handsome  man  can  never  talk  as 
well  as  he  looks.  V  H 

He  was  quite  aware  of  his  physical  graces,  and  in 
following  up  the  facts  of  his  early  life,  he  makes  the 
statement  that  his  father  was  a  sea-captain  and  trader. 

^^JHe  then  incidentally  adds  that  the  best  results  are 
obtained  for  posterity  where  a  man  is  absent  from  his 
family  eleven  months  in  the  year.  This  is  an  axiom 
agreed  upon  by  many  modern  philosophers,   few  of 

^V  whom,  however,  live  up  to  their  ideals.  Aristophanes, 
who  was  on  friendly  terms  with  some  of  the  disciples 
of  Pythagoras,  suggested  in  one  of  his  plays  that  the 
Pythagorean  domestic  time-limit  should  be  increased 
at  least  a  month  for  the  good  of  all  concerned. 

j)  ^jrPlato,  Xenophon  and  Aristotle  make  frequent  refer- 
ences to  Pythagoras.  In  order  to  impress  men  like  these, 
the  man  must  have  taught  a  very  exalted  philosophy.  In 
truth,  Pythagoras  was  a  teacher  of  teachers.  And  like 
all  men  who  make  a  business  of  wisdom  he  sometimes 

73 


PYTHAGORAS 


came  tardy  off,  and  indulged  in  a  welter  of  words  that 
wrecked  the  original  idea — if  there  were  one. 
There  are  these  three:  Knowledge,  Learning,  Wisdom. 
And  the  world  has  until  very  recent  times  assumed 
that  they  were  practically  one  and  the  same  thing, 
psj^  Knowledge  consists  of  the  things  we  know,  not  the 
things  we  believe  or  the  things  we  assume.  Knowledge 
is  a  personal  matter  of  intuition,  confirmed  by  experi- 
ence. Learning  consists  largely  of  the  things  we  mem- 
orize and  are  told  by  persons  or  books.  Tomlinson  of 
Berkeley  Square  was  a  learned  man.  When  we  think 
of  a  learned  man,  we  picture  him  as  one  seated  in  a 
library  surrounded  by  tomes  that  top  the  shelves. 
Wisdom  is  the  distilled  essence  of  what  we  have 
learned  from  experience.  It  is  that  which  helps  us  to 
live,  work,  love  and  make  life  worth  living  for  all 
we  meet.  Men  may  be  very  learned,  and  still  be  far 
from  wise. 

Pythagoras  was  one  of  those  strange  beings  who  are 
bom  with  a  desire  to  know,  and  who  finally  compre- 
hending the  secret  of  the  Sphinx,  that  there  is  really 
nothing  to  say,  insist  on  saying  it.  That  is,  vast  learning 
is  augmented  by  a  structure  of  words,  and  on  this  is 
built  a  theogony.  Practically  he  was  a  priest. 
Worked  into  all  priestly  philosophies  are  nuggets  of 
wisdom  that  shine  like  stars  in  the  darkness  and  lead 
men  on  and  on. 
\  All  great  religions  have  these  periods  of  sanity,  otherwise 
"^       74 


PYTHAGORAS 


they  would  have  no  followers  at  all.  The  followers, 
understanding  little  bits  of  this  and  that,  hope  finally 
to  understand  it  all.  Inwardly  the  initiates  at  the 
shrine  of  their  own  conscience  know  that  they  know 
nothing.  When  they  teach  others  they  are  obliged  to 
pretend  that  they,  themselves,  fully  comprehend  the 
import  of  what  they  are  saying.  The  novitiate  attrib- 
utes his  lack  of  perception  to  his  own  stupidity,  and 
many  great  teachers  encourage  this  view. 
**  Be  patient,  and  you  shall  some  day  know,"  they  say, 
and  smile  frigidly. 

And  when  credulity  threatens  to  balk  and  go  no  further, 
magic  comes  to  the  rescue  and  the  domain  of  Hermann 
and  Kellar  is  poached  upon. 

Mystery  and  miracle  were  born  in  Egypt.  It  was  there 
that  a  system  was  evolved,  backed  up  by  the  ruler,  of 
religious  fraud  so  colossal  that  modern  deception  looks 
like  the  bungling  efforts  of  an  amateur.  The  govern- 
ment, the  army,  the  taxing  power  of  the  State,  were 
sworn  to  protect  gigantic  safes  in  which  was  hoarded 
— ^nothing.  That  is  to  say,  nothing  but  the  pretense 
upon  which  cupidity  and  self-hypnotized  credulity 
battened  and  fattened: 

All  institutions  which  through  mummery,  strange  acts, 
dress  and  ritual,  affect  to  know  and  impart  the  inmost 
secrets  of  creation  and  ultimate  destiny,  had  their  rise 
in  Egypt.  In  Egypt  now  are  only  graves,  tombs, 
necropolises  and  silence.   The  priests   there   need   no 

75 


PYTHAGORAS 


soldiery  to  keep  their  secrets  safe.  Ammon-Ra,  who 
once  ruled  the  universe,  being  finally  exorcised  by 
Yaveh,  is  now  as  dead  as  the  mummies  who  once 
were  men  and  upheld  his  undisputed  sway. 


76 


PYTHAGORAS 


HE  Egyptians  guarded  their  mysteries  with 

jealous  dread. 

We  know  their  secret  now.  It  is  this — there 
_J  are  no  mysteries. 
That  Is  the  only  secret  upon  which  any  secret  society 
holds  a  caveat.  Wisdom  can  not  be  corraled  with  gib- 
berish and  fettered  in  jargon.  Knowledge  is  one  thing — 
palaver  another.  The  Greek-letter  societies  of  our  callow 
days  still  survive  in  bird's-eye,  and  next  to  these  come 
the  Elks,  who  take  theirs  with  seltzer  and  a  smile,  as  a 
rare  good  joke,  save  that  brotherhood  and  good-fellow- 
ship are  actually  a  saving  salt  which  excuses  much  that 
would  otherwise  be  simply  silly. 

All  this  mystery  and  mysticism  was  once  official,  and 
later,  on  being  discarded  by  the  authorities,  was  con- 
tinued by  the  students  as  a  kind  of  prank. 
Greek-letter  societies  are  the  rudimentary  survivals  of 
what  was  once  an  integral  part  of  every  college.  Making 
dead  languages  optional  was  the  last  convulsive  kick 
of  the  cadaver. 

And  now  a  good  many  colleges  are  placing  the  seal 
of  their  disapproval  on  secret  societies  among  the 
students;  and  the  day  is  near  when  the  secret  society 
will  not  be  tolerated,  either  directly  or  indirectly,  as  a 
part  of  the  education  of  youth.  All  this  because  the 
sophomoric  mind  is  prone  to  take  its  Greek-letter 
mysteries  seriously,  and  regard  the  college  curriculum 
as  a  joke  of  the  faculty, 

77 


PYTHAGORAS 


If  knowledge  were  to  be  gained  by  riding  a  goat,  any 
petty  crossroads,  with  its  lodge-room  over  the  grocery, 
would  contain  a  Herbert  Spencer;  and  the  agrarian 
mossbacks  would  have  wisdom  by  the  scruff  and  detain 
knowledge  with  a  tail-hold. 

There  can  be  no  secrets  in  life  and  morals,  because 
Nature  has  so  provided  that  every  beautiful  thought 
you  know  and  every  precious  sentiment  you  feel,  shall 
shine  out  of  your  face  so  that  all  who  are  great  enough 
may  see,  know,  understand,  appreciate  and  appropri- 
ate. You  can  keep  things  only  by  giving  them  away. 


78 


PYTHAGORAS 


HEN  Pythagoras  was  only  four  or  five  years 
old,  his  mother  taught  him  to  take  his  morn- 
ing bath  in  the  cold  stream,  and  dry  his  baby 
skin  by  running  in  the  wind.  As  he  ran,  she 
ran  with  him,  and  together  they  sang  a  hymn  to  the 
rising  sun,  that  for  them  represented  the  god  Apollo. 
^This  mother  taught  him  to  be  indifferent  to  cold, 
heat,  hunger,  to  exult  in  endurance,  and  to  take  a  joy  in 
the  glow  of  the  body. 

So  the  boy  grew  strong  and  handsome,  and  proud; 
and  perhaps  it  was  in  those  early  years,  from  the 
mother  herself,  that  he  gathered  the  idea,  afterward 
developed,  that  Apollo  had  appeared  to  his  mother, 
and  so  great  was  the  beauty  of  the  god  that  the  woman 
was  actually  overcome,  it  being  the  first  god  at  which 
she  had  ever  had  a  good  look. 

The  ambition  of  a  great  mother  centers  on  her  son, 
Pythagoras  was  filled  with  the  thought  that  he  W2is 
different,  peculiar,  set  apart  to  teach  the  human  race. 
^  Having  compassed  all  there  was  to  learn  in  his  native 
place,  and,  as  he  thought,  being  ill  appreciated,  he 
started  for  Egypt,  the  land  of  learning.  The  fallacy  that 
knowledge  was  a  secret  to  be  gained  by  word  of  mouth 
and  to  be  gotten  from  books  existed  then  as  now.  The 
mother  of  Pythagoras  wanted  her  son  to  comprehend 
the  innermost  secrets  of  the  Egyptian  mysteries.  He 
would  then  know  all.  To  this  end  she  sold  her  jewels,  in 
order  that  her  son  might  have  the  advantages  of  an 

79 


PYTHAGORAS 


Egyptian  education.  ^  Women  were  not  allowed  to 
know  the  divine  secrets — only  just  a  few  little  ones. 
This  woman  wanted  to  know,  and  she  said  her  son 
would  learn,  and  tell  her. 

The  family  had  become  fairly  rich  by  this  time,  and 
influential.  Letters  were  gotten  from  the  great  ones  of 
Samos  to  the  Secretary  of  State  in  Egypt.  And  so**" 
Pythagoras,  aged  twenty,  **  the  youth  with  the  beauti- 
ful hair,*'  went  on  his  journey  to  Egypt  and  knocked 
boldly  at  the  doors  of  the  temples  at  Memphis,  where 
knowledge  was  supposed  to  be  in  stock.  Religion  then 
monopolized  all  schools  and  continued  to  do  so  for 
quite  some  time  after  Pythagoras  was  dead. 
He  was  turned  away  with  the  explanation  that  no 
foreigner  could  enter  the  sacred  portals — that  the 
initiates  must  be  those  born  in  the  shadows  of  the 
temples  and  nurtured  in  the  faith  from  infancy  by 
holy  virgins. 

Pythagoras  still  insisted,  and  it  was  probably  then  that 
he  found  a  sponsor  who  made  for  him  the  claim  that 
he  was  a  son  of  Apollo.  And  the  holy  men  peeped  out 
of  their  peep-holes  in  holy  admiration  for  any  one  who 
could  concoct  as  big  a  lie  as  they  themselves  had  ever 
invented  33  3S 

The  boy  surely  looked  the  part.  Perhaps,  at  last,  here 
was  one  who  was  what  they  pretended  to  be!  Frauds 
believe  in  frauds,  and  rogues  are  more  easily  captured 
by  roguery  than  are  honest  men. 
80 


PYTHAGORAS 


His  admittance  to  the  university  became  a  matter  of 
international  diplomacy.  At  last,  being  too  hard-pressed, 
the  wise  ones  who  ran  the  mystery  monopoly  gave  in, 
and  Pythagoras  was  informed  that  at  midnight  of  a 
certain  night,  he  should  present  himself,  naked,  at  the 
door  of  a  certain  temple  and  he  would  be  admitted. 
flOn  the  stroke  of  the  hour,  at  the  appointed  time, 
Pythagoras,  the  youth  with  the  beautiful  hair,  W2is 
there,  clothed  only  in  his  beautiful  hair.  He  knocked 
on  the  great,  bronze  doors,  but  the  only  answer  was  a 
faint,  hollow  echo. 

Then  he  got  a  stone  and  pounded,  but  still  no  answer. 
^  The  wind  sprang  up  fresh  and  cold.  The  young  man 
was  chilled  to  the  bone,  but  still  he  pounded  and  then 
called  aloud  demanding  admittance.  His  answer  now 
was  the  growling  and  barking  of  dogs,  within.  Still  he 
pounded!  After  an  interval  a  hoarse  voice  called  out 
through  a  little  slide,  ordering  him  to  be  gone  or  the 
dogs  would  be  turned  loose  upon  him. 
He  demanded  admittance. 

**  Fool,  do  you  not  know  that  the  law  says  these  doors 
shall  admit  no  one  except  at  sunrise?  " 
**  I  only  know  that  I  was  told  to  be  here  at  midnight 
and  I  would  be  admitted." 

"All  that  may  be  true,  but  you  were  not  told  when  you 
would  be  admitted — ^wait,  it  is  the  will  of  the  gods." 
So  Pythagoras  waited,  numbed  and  nearly  dead  3S 
The  dogs  which  he  had  heard  had,  in  some  way, 

81 


PYTHAGORAS 


gotten  out,  and  came  tearing  around  the  comer  of  the 
great  stone  building.  He  fought  them  with  desperate 
strength.  The  effort  seemed  to  warm  his  blood,  and 
whereas  before  he  was  about  to  retreat  to  his  lodgings 
he  now  remained. 

The  day  broke  in  the  east,  and  gangs  of  slaves  went 
by  to  work.  They  jeered  at  him  and  pelted  him  with 
pebbles  53  3S 

Suddenly  across  the  desert  sands  he  saw  the  faint  pink 
rim  of  the  rising  sun.  On  the  instant  the  big  bronze 
doors  against  which  he  was  leaning  swung  suddenly 
in.  He  fell  with  them,  and  coarse,  rough  hands  seized 
his  hair  and  pulled  him  into  the  hall. 
The  doors  swung  to  and  closed  with  a  clang.  Pythagoras 
was  in  dense  darkness,  lying  on  the  stone  floor. 
A  voice,  seemingly  coming  from  afar,  demanded,  "Do 
you  still  wish  to  go  on?  ** 
And  his  answer  was,  **  I  desire  to  go  on." 
A  black-robed  figure,  wearing  a  mask,  then  appeared 
with  a  flickering  light,  and  Pythagoras  was  led  into  a 
stone  cell. 

His  head  was  shaved,  and  he  was  given  a  coarse  robe 
and  then  left  alone.  Toward  the  end  of  the  day  he  was 
given  a  piece  of  black  bread  and  a  bowl  of  water.  This 
he  was  told  was  to  fortify  him  for  the  ordeal  to  come. 
^  What  that  ordeal  was  we  can  only  guess,  save  that 
it  consisted  partially  in  running  over  hot  sands  where 
he  sank  to  his  waist.  At  a  point  where  he  seemed  about 
82 


PYTHAGORAS 


to  perish  a  voice  called  loudly,  **  Do  you  yet  desire  to 
go  on? 

And  his  answer  was,  **  I  desire  to  go  on." 
Returning  to  the  inmost  temple  he  was  told  to  enter 
a  certain  door  and  wait  therein.  He  was  then  blind- 
folded and  when  he  opened  the  door  to  enter,  he  walked 
off  into  space  and  fell  into  a  pool  of  ice-cold  water  53 
While  floundering  there  the  voice  again  called,  **  Do 
you  yet  desire  to  go  on?  ** 
And  his  answer  was,  **  I  desire  to  go  on." 
At  another  time  he  was  tied  upon  the  back  of  a  donkey 
and  the  donkey  was  led  along  a  rocky  precipice,  where 
lights  danced  and  flickered  a  thousand  feet  below. 
**  Do  you  yet  want  to  go  on?  "  called  the  voice. 
And  Pythagoras  answered,  **  I  desire  to  go  on." 
The  priests  here  pushed  the  donkey  off  the  precipice, 
which  proved  to  be  only  about  two  feet  high,  the  gulf 
below  being  an  illusion  arranged  with  the  aid  of  lights 
that  shone  through  apertures  in  the  wall. 
These  pleasing  little  diversions  Pythagoras  afterward 
introduced  into  the  college  which  he  founded,  so  to 
teach  the  merry  freshmen  that  nothing,  at  the  last, 
was  as  bad  as  it  seemed,  and  that  most  dangers  are 
simply  illusions. 

The  Egyptians  grew  to  have  such  regard  for  Py thagorets 
that  he  was  given  every  opportunity  to  know  the  inmost 
secrets  of  the  mysteries.  He  said  he  encompassed  them 
all,  save  those  alone  which  were  incomprehensible. 

83 


PYTHAGORAS 


This  was  probably  true.  ^The  years  spent  in  Egypt 
were  not  wasted — ^he  learned  astronomy,  mathematics, 
and  psychology,  a  thing  then  not  named,  but  pretty 
well  understood — the  management  of  men. 
It  was  twenty  years  before  Pythagoras  returned  to 
Samos.  His  mother  was  dead,  so  she  passed  away  in 
ignorance  of  the  secrets  of  the  gods-which  perhaps 
was  just  as  well. 

Samos  now  treated  Pythagoras  with  great  honor  38 
Crowds  flocked  to  his  lectures,  presents  were  given 
him,  royalty  paid  him  profound  obeisance. 
But  Samos  soon  tired  of  Pythagoras.  He  was  too 
austere,  too  severe;  and  when  he  began  to  rebuke  the 
officials  for  their  sloth  and  indifference,  he  was  invited 
to  go  elsewhere  and  teach  his  science  of  life.  And  so 
he  journeyed  into  Southern  Italy,  and  at  Crotona  built 
his  Temple  to  the  Muses  and  founded  the  Pythagorean 
School.  He  was  the  wisest  as  well  as  the  most  learned 
man  of  his  time. 


84 


PYTHAGORAS 


OME  unkind  person  has  said  that  Pythagorsts 
was  the  original  charter  member  of  the 
Jesuits  Society,  The  maxim  that  the  end 
justifies  the  means  was  the  cornerstone  of 
Egyptian  theology.  When  Pythagoras  left  Egypt  he 
took  with  him  this  cornerstone  as  a  souvenir.  That  the 
priests  could  hold  their  power  over  the  masses  only 
through  magic  and  miracle  was  fully  believed,  and  as  a 
good  police  system  the  value  of  organized  religion  was 
highly  appreciated.  In  fact,  no  ruler  could  hold  his 
place,  unsupported  by  the  priest.  Both  were  divine 
propositions.  One  searches  in  vain  for  simple  truth 
among  the  sages,  solons,  philosophers,  poets  and 
prophets  that  existed  down  to  the  time  of  Socrates. 

/Truth   for   truth's  sake   was   absolutely  unimagined; 

(  freethought  was  unguessed. 

NExpediency  was  always  placed  before  truth. 
Truth  was  furnished  with  frills — the  people  otherwise 
would  not  be  impressed.  Chants,  robes,  ritual,  proces- 
sions, banging  of  bells,  burning  of  incense,  strange 
sounds,  sights  and  smells:  these  were  considered 
necessary  factors  in  teaching  divine  truth. 
To  worship  with  a  noise  seems  to  us  a  little  like  making 
love  with  a  brass  band. 

Pythagorzis  was  a  very  great  man,  but  for  him  to 
eliminate  theological  chaff  entirely  was  impossible.  So 
we  find  that  when  he  was  about  to  speak,  red  fire  filled 
the  building  as  soon  as  he  arose.  It  was  all  a  little  like 

85 


PYTHAGORAS 


the  alleged  plan  of  the  late  Reverend  T.  DeWitt 
Talmage,  who  used  to  have  an  Irishman  let  loose  a 
white  pigeon  from  the  organ-loft  at  an  opportune  time. 
^  When  Pythagoras  burned  the  red  fire,  of  course  the 
audience  thought  a  miracle  was  taking  place,  unable 
to  understand  a  simple  stage-trick  which  all  the  boys 
in  the  gallery  who  delight  in  **  Faust  "  now  understand. 
^  However,  the  Pythagorean  School  had  much  virtue 
on  its  side,  and  made  a  sincere  and  earnest  effort  to 
solve  certain  problems  that  yet  are  vexing  us. 
The  Temple  of  the  Muses,  built  by  Pythagoras  at 
Crotona,  is  described  by  lamblichus  as  a  stone  struc- 
ture with  walls  twenty  feet  thick,  the  light  being 
admitted  only  from  the  top.  It  was  evidently  con- 
structed after  the  Egyptian  pattern,  and  the  intent  was 
to  teach  there  the  esoteric  doctrine.  But  Pythagoras 
improved  upon  the  Egyptian  methods  and  opened  his 
temple  on  certain  days  to  all  and  any  who  desired  to 
come.  Then  at  times  he  gave  lectures  to  women  only, 
and  then  to  men  only,  and  also  to  children,  thus  show- 
ing that  modern  revival  methods  are  not  wholly  modern. 
^  These  lectures  contain  the  very  essence  of  Pythago- 
rean philosophy,  and  include  so  much  practical  com- 
monsense  that  they  are  still  quoted.  These  are  some  of 
the  sayings  that  impressed  Socrates,  Pericles,  Aristotle 
and  Pliny.  What  the  Egyptians  actually  taught  we 
really  do  not  know — it  was  too  gaseous  to  last.  Only 
the  good  endures.  Says  Pythagoras: 
86 


PYTHAGORAS 


Cut  not  into  the  grape.  Exaltation  coming  from  wine 
is  not  good.  You  hope  too  much  in  this  condition,  so 
are  afterwards  depressed.  Wise  men  are  neither  cast 
down  in  defeat  nor  exalted  by  success.  Eat  moderately, 
bathe  plentifully,  exercise  much  in  the  open  air,  walk 
far,  and  climb  the  hills  alone. 
X  Above  all  things,  learn  to  keep  silence — ^hear  all  and 
speak  little.  If  you  are  defamed,  answer  not  back.  Talk 
convinces  no  one.  Your  life  and  character  proclaim  you 
more  than  any  argument  you  can  put  forth.  Lies  return 
to  plague  those  who  repeat  them. 

The  secret  of  power  is  to  keep  an  even  temper,  and 
remember  that  no  one  thing  that  can  happen  is  of  much 
moment.  The  course  of  justice,  industry,  courage, 
moderation,  silence,  means  that  you  shall  receive  your 
due  of  every  good  thing.  The  gods  may  be  slow,  but 
they  never  forget. 

It  is  not  for  us  to  punish  men  nor  avenge  ourselves  for 
slights,  wrongs  and  insults — ^wait,  and  you  will  see  that 
Nemesis  unhorses  the  man  intent  on  calumny. 
A  woman's  ornaments  should  be  modesty,  simplicity, 
truth,  obedience.  If  a  woman  would  hold  a  man  captive 
she  can  only  do  it  by  obeying  him.  Violent  women  are 
even  more  displeasing  to  the  gods  than  violent  men — 
both  are  destroying  themselves.  Strife  is  always  defeat. 
^  Debauchery,  riot,  splendor,  luxury,  are  attempts  to 
get  a  pleasure  out  of  life  that  is  not  our  due,  and  so  Nem- 
esis provides  her  penalty  for  the  idle  and  gluttonous  53 
Fear  and  honor  the  gods.  They  guide  our  ways  and 
watch  over  us  in  our  sleep.  After  the  gods,  a  man's 
first  thought  should  be  of  his  father  and  mother.  Next 
to  these  his  wife,  then  his  children. 

87 


PYTHAGORAS 


So  great  was  this  power  of  Pythagoras  over  the  people 
that  many  of  the  women  who  came,  hearing  his  dis- 
course on  the  folly  of  pride  and  splendor,  threw  off 
their  cloaks,  and  left  them  with  their  rings,  anklets 
and  necklaces  on  the  altar. 

With  these  and  other  offerings  Pythagoras  built  another 
temple,  this  time  to  Apollo,  and  the  Temple  to  the 
Muses  was  left  open  all  the  time  for  the  people. 
His  power  over  the  multitude  alarmed  the  magistrates, 
so  they  sent  for  him  to  examine  him  as  to  his  influence 
and  intents.  He  explained  to  them  that  as  the  Muses 
were  never  at  variance  among  themselves,  always  living 
in  subjection  to  Apollo,  so  should  magistrates  agree 
among  themselves  and  think  only  of  being  loyal  to  the 
king.  All  royal  edicts  and  laws  are  reflections  of  divine 
law,  and  therefore  must  be  obeyed  without  question. 
And  as  the  Muses  never  interrupt  the  harmony  of 
Heaven,  but  in  fact  add  to  it,  so  should  men  ever  keep 
harmony  among  themselves. 

All  officers  of  the  government  should  consider  them- 
selves as  runners  in  the  Olympian  games,  and  never 
seek  to  trip,  jostle,  harass  or  annoy  a  rival,  but  run 
the  race  squarely  and  fairly,  satisfied  to  be  beaten  if 
the  other  is  the  stronger  and  better  man.  An  unfair 
victory  gains  only  the  anger  of  the  gods. 
All  disorders  in  the  State  come  from  ill  education  of 
the  young.  Children  not  brought  up  to  be  patient,  to 
endure,  to  work,  to  be  considerate  of  their  elders  and 


PYTHAGORAS 


respectful  to  all,  gmw^disea^jsedjmi^^^  find  relief 

at  last  in  anarchy  and  rebellion.  So  to  take  great  care 
of  children  in  their  infancy,  and  then  leave  them  at 
puberty  to  follow  their  own  inclinations,  is  to  sow 
disorder.  Children  well  loved  and  kept  close  to  their 
parents  grow  up  into  men  and  women  who  are  an 
ornament  to  the  State  and  a  joy  to  the  gods.  Lawless, 
complaining,  restless,  idle  children  grieve  the  gods  and 
bring  trouble  upon  their  parents  and  society. 
The  magistrates  were  here  so  pleased,  and  satisfied 
in  their  own  minds  that  Pythagoras  meant  the  State 
no  harm,  that  they  issued  an  order  that  all  citizens 
should  attend  upon  his  lectures  at  least  once  a  week, 
and  take  their  wives  and  children  with  them. 
They  also  offered  to  pay  Pythagoras — that  is,  put  him 
on  the  payroll  as  a  public  teacher — but  he  declined  to 
accept  money  for  his  services.  In  this,  lamblichus  says, 
he  was  very  wise,  since  by  declining  a  fixed  fee,  ten  times 
as  much  was  laid  upon  the  altar  of  the  Temple  of  the 
Muses,  and  not  knowing  to  whom  to  return  it,  Pythago- 
rets  was  obliged  to  keep  it  for  himself  and  the  poor. 


89 


PYTHAGORAS 


HURCHMEN  of  the  Middle  Ages  worked  the 
memory  of  Pythagoras  great  injustice  by 
quoting  him  Hterally  in  order  to  prove  how 
much  they  were  beyond  him.  Symbols  and 
epigrams  require  a  sympathetic  hearer,  otherwise  they 
are  as  naught  33  33 

For  instance,  Pythagoras  remarks,  **  Sit  thou  not  down 
upon  a  bushel  measure/*  What  he  probably  meant  was, 
get  busy  and  fill  the  measure  with  grain  rather  than  use 
it  for  a  seat. 

**  Eat  not  the  heart  '* — do  not  act  so  as  to  harrow  the 
feelings  of  your  friends,  and  do  not  be  morbid. 
**  Never  stir  the  fire  with  a  sword  *' — do  not  inflame 
people  who  are  wrathful. 

**  Wear  not  the  image  of  God  upon  your  jewelry  '* — 
do  not  make  religion  a  proud  or  boastful  thing. 
**  Help  men  to  a  burden,  but  never  unburden  them." 
This  saying  was  used  by  Saint  Francis  to  prove  that  the 
pagan  philosophers  had  no  tenderness,  and  that  the 
humanities  came  at  a  later  date.  We  can  now  easily 
understand  that  to  relieve  men  of  responsibilities  is  no 
help;  rather  do  we  grow  strong  by  carrying  burdens. 
^** Leave  not  the  mark  of  the  pot  upon  the  ashes" 
— wipe  out  the  past,  forget  it,  look  to  the  future. 
**  Feed  no  animal  that  has  crooked  claws  '* — do  not 
encourage  rogues  by  supplying  them  a  living. 
**  Eat  no  fish  whose  fins  are  black  " — ^have  nothing  to 
do  with  men  whose  deeds  are  dark. 
90 


PYTHAGORAS 


"Always  have  salt  upon  your  table" — this  seems  the 
original  of  "cum  grano  salis"  of  the  Romans. 
**  Leave  the  vinegar  at  a  distance  " — ^keep  sweet. 
**  Speak  not  in  the  face  of  the  sun  " — even  Erasmus 
thought  this  referred  to  magic.  To  us  it  is  quite  reason- 
able to  suppose  that  it  meant,  **  do  not  talk  too  much 
in  public  places." 

**  Pick  not  up  what  falls  from  the  table  " — Plutarch  calls 
this  superstition,  but  we  can  just  as  easily  suppose  it 
was  out  of  consideration  for  cats,  dogs  or  hungry  men. 
The  Bible  has  a  command  against  gleaning  too  closely, 
and  leaving  nothing  for  the  traveler. 
**  When  making  sacrifice,  never  pare  your  nails  ** — that 
is  to  say,  do  one  thing  at  a  time;  wind  not  the  clock 
at  an  inopportune  time. 

**  Eat  not  in  the  chariot  " — ^when  you  travel,  travel. 
^  **  Feed  not  yourself  with  your  left  hand  " — get  your 
living  openly  and  avoid  all  left-handed  dealings. 
And  so  there  are  hundreds  of  these  Pythagorean  say- 
ings that  have  vexed  our  classic  friends  for  over  two 
thousand  years.  All  Greek  scholars  who  really  pride 
themselves  on  their  scholarship  have  taken  a  hand  at 
them,  and  agitated  the  ether  just  as  the  members  of 
the  Kokomo  Woman's  Club  discuss  obscure  passages 
in  Bliss  Carman  or  Ella  Wheeler  Wilcox.  Learned 
people  are  apt  to  comprehend  anything  but  the  obvious. 


91 


PYTHAGORAS 


HE  School  of  Pythagoras  grew  until  It  became 
the  chief  attraction  of  Crotona.  The  size  of 
the  town  was  doubled  through  the  pilgrims 
who  came  to  study  music,  mathematics, 
medicine,  ethics  and  the  science  of  government. 
The  Pythagorean  plan  of  treating  the  sick  by  music 
was  long  considered  as  mere  incantation,  but  there 
is  a  suspicion  now  that  it  was  actual  science.  Once 
there  was  a  man  who  rode  a  hobby  all  his  life;  and 
long  after  he  was  dead,  folks  discovered  it  was  a  real 
live  horse  and  had  carried  the  man  long  miles. ' 
»-''''^ythagoras  reduced  the  musical  scale  to  a  mathemati- 
cal science^^In  astronomy  he  anticipated  Copernicus, 
and  indeed,  it  was  cited  as  the  chief  offense  of  Coperni- 
cus that  he  had  borrowed  from  a  pagan.  Copernicus, 
it  seems,  set  the  merry  churchmen  digging  into  Greek 
literature  to  find  out  just  how  bad  Pythagoras  was. 
This  did  the  churchmen  good,  but  did  not  help  the 
cause  of  Copernicus. 

Pythagoras  for  a  time  sought  to  popularize  his  work, 
but  he  soon  found  to  his  dismay  that  he  was  attracting 
cheap  and  unworthy  people,  who  came  not  so  much 
out  of  a  love  of  learning  as  to  satisfy  a  morbid  curiosity 
and  gain  a  short  cut  to  wisdom.  They  wanted  secrets, 
and  knowing  that  Pythagoras  had  spent  twenty  years 
in  Egypt,  they  came  to  him,  hoping  to  get  them. 
Said  Pythagoras,  **  He  who  digs,  always  ^nds/^  At 
another  time,  he  puttKe  same  idea  reversely,  thus, 
92 


PYTHAGORAS 


**  He  who  digs  not,  never  finds.'*  ^  Pythagoras  was  well 
past  forty  when  he  married  a  daughter  of  one  of  the 
chief  citizens  of  Crotona.  It  seems  that,  inspired  by  his 
wife,  who  was  first  one  of  his  pupils  and  then  a  disciple, 
he  conceived  a  new  mode  of  life,  which  he  thought  would 
soon  overthrow  the  old  manner  of  living. 
Pythagoras  himself  wrote  nothing,  but  all  his  pupils 
kept  tablets,  and  Athens  in  the  century  following 
Pythagoras  was  full  of  these  Pythagorean  notebooks, 
and  these  supply  us  the  scattered  data  from  which  his 
life  was  written. 

Pythagoras,  like  so  many  other  great  men,  had  his 
dream  of  Utopia:  it  was  a  college  or,  literally,  **a  col- 
lection of  people,**  where  all  were  on  an  equality. 
Everybody  worked,  everybody  studied,  everybody 
helped  everybody,  and  all  refrained  from  disturbing  or 
distressing  any  one.  It  was  the  Oneida  Community 
taken  over  by  Brook  Farm  and  fused  into  a  religious 
and  scientific  New  Harmony  by  the  Shakers. 
One  smiles  to  see  the  minute  rules  that  were  made 
for  the  guidance  of  the  members.  They  look  like  a 
transcript  from  a  sermon  by  John  Alexander  Dowie, 
revised  by  the  shade  of  Robert  Owen. 
This  Pythagorean  Community  was  organized  out  of  a 
necessity  in  order  to  escape  the  blow- ins  who  sailed 
across  from  Greece  intent  on  some  new  thing,  but 
principally  to  get  knowledge  and  a  living  without  work. 
^  And   so   Pythagoras   and   his   wife   formed   a   close 

93 


PYTHAGORAS 


corporation.  For  each  member  there  was  an  initiation, 
strict  and  severe,  the  intent  of  which  was  absolutely  to 
bar  the  transient  triflers.  Each  member  was  to  turn 
over  to  the  Common  Treasury  all  the  money  and  goods 
he  had  of  every  kind  and  quality.  They  started  naked, 
just  as  did  Pythagoras  when  he  stood  at  the  door  of 
the  temple  in  Egypt. 

Simplicity,  truth,  honesty  and  mutual  service  were  to 
govern.  It  was  an  outcrop  of  the  monastic  Impulse, 
save  that  women  were  admitted,  also.  Unlike  the 
Egyptians,  Pythagoras  believed  now  in  the  equality  of 
the  sexes,  and  his  wife  daily  led  the  women's  chorus, 
and  she  also  gave  lectures.  The  children  were  especially 
cared  for  by  women  set  apart  as  nurses  and  teachers. 
By  rearing  perfect  children,  it  was  hoped  and  expected 
to  produce  in  turn  a  perfect  race. 

The  whole  idea  was  a  phase  of  totemism  and  tabu. 
^That  it  flourished  for  about  thirty  years  is  very 
certain.  Two  sons  and  a  daughter  of  Pythagoras  grew 
to  maturity  in  the  college,  and  this  daughter  was  tried 
by  the  Order  on  the  criminal  charge  of  selling  the 
secret  doctrines  of  her  father  to  outsiders. 
One  of  the  sons  It  seems  made  trouble,  also.  In  an 
attempt  to  usurp  his  father's  place  and  take  charge  of 
affairs,  as  **  next  friend."  One  generation  is  about  the 
limit  of  a  Utopian  Community.  When  those  who  have 
organized  the  community  weaken  and  one  by  one  pass 
away,  and  the  young  assumeauthority,  the  old  ideas 
94 


PYTHAGORAS 


of  austerity  are  forgotten  and  dissipation  and  disinte- 
gration enter.  So  do  we  move  in  circles. 
The  final  blow  to  the  Pythagorean  College  came  through 
jealousy  and  misunderstanding  of  the  citizens  outside. 
It  was  the  old  question  of  Town  versus  Gown.  The 
Pythagoreans  numbered  nearly  three  hundred  people. 
They  held  themselves  aloof,  and  no  doubt  had  an  exas- 
perating pride.  No  strangers  were  ever  allowed  inside 
the  walls — they  were  a  law  unto  themselves. 
Internal  strife  and  tales  told  by  dissenters  excited  the 
curiosity,  and  then  the  prejudice,  of  the  townspeople. 
^Then  the  report  got  abroad  that  the  Pythagoreans 
were  collecting  arms  and  were  about  to  overthrow  the 
local  government  and  enslave  the  officials. 
On  a  certain  night,  led  by  a  band  of  drunken  soldiers,  a 
mob  made  an  assault  upon  the  college.  The  buildings 
were  fired,  and  the  members  were  either  destroyed  in 
the  flames  or  killed  as  they  rushed  forth  to  escape. 
Tradition  has  it  that  Pythagoras  was  later  seen  by  a 
shepherd  on  the  mountains,  but  the  probabilities  are 
that  he  perished  with  his  people.  But  you  can  not 
dispose  of  a  great  man  by  killing  him.  Here  we  are 
reading,  writing  and  talking  yet  of  Pythagoras. 


95 


PLATO 


How  well  I  remember  the  aged  poet  Sophocles,  when  in 

answer  to  the  question,  **  How  does  love  suit  with  age, 

Sophocles — ^are  you  still  the  man  you  were?  *' 

**  Peace,*'  he  replied;  **  most  gladly  have  I  escaped  that, 

and  I  feel  as  if  I  had  escaped  from  a  mad  and  furious 

master.** 

That  saying  of  his  has  often  come  into  my  mind  since, 

and  seems  to  me  still  as  good  as  at  the  time  when  I 

heard  him.  For  certainly  old  age  has  a  great  sense  of 

calm  and  freedom;  when  the  passions  relax  their  hold, 

then,  as  Sophocles  says,  you  have  escaped  from  the 

control  not  of  one  master  only,  but  of  many.  And  of 

these  regrets,  as  well  as  of  the  complaint  about  relations, 

Socrates,  the  cause  is  to  be  sought,  not  in  men's  ages, 

but  in  their  characters  and  tempers;  for  he  who  is  of  a 

calm  and  happy  nature  will  hardly  feel  the  pressure  of 

age,  but  he  who  is  of  an  opposite  disposition  will  find 

youth  and  age  equally  a  burden. 

—    The  Republic 


PLATO 


PLATO 


THINKING  man  is  one  of  the  most 
recent  productions  evolved  from 
Nature's  laboratory.  The  first  man 
of  brains  to  express  himself  about 
the  world  in  an  honest,  simple  and 
natural  way,  just  as  if  nothing  had 
been  said  about  it  before,  was 
Socrates  Si  Si 
Twenty-four  centuries  have  passed  since  Socrates  was 
put  to  death  on  the  charge  of  speaking  disrespectfully  of 
the  gods  and  polluting  the  minds  of  the  youths  of 
Athens.  During  ten  of  these  centuries  that  have  passed 
since  then,  the  race  lost  the  capacity  to  think,  through 
the  successful  combination  of  the  priest  and  the  soldier. 
These  men  blocked  human  evolution.  The  penalty  for 
making  slaves  is  that  you  become  one. 
To  suppress  humanity  is  to  suppress  yourself. 
The  race  is  one.  So  the  priests  and  the  soldiers  who  in 
the  Third  Century  had  a  modicum  of  worth  themselves, 
sank  and  were  submerged  in  the  general  slough  of 
superstition  and  ignorance.  It  was  a  panic  that  con- 
tinued for  a  thousand  years,  all  through  the  endeavor  of 
faulty  men  to  make  people  good  by  force.  At  all  times, 
up  to  within  our  own  decade,  frank  expression  on 
religious,  economic  and  social  topics  has  been  fraught 
with  great  peril.  Even  yet  any  man  who  hopes  for 

99 


PLATO 

popularity  as  a  writer,  orator,  merchant  or  politician, 
would  do  well  to  conceal  studiously  his  inmost  beliefs. 
On  such  simple  themes  as  the  taxation  of  real  estate, 
regardless  of  the  business  of  the  owner,  and  a  payment 
of  a  like  wage  for  a  like  service  without  consideration 
of  sex,  the  statesman  who  has  the  temerity  to  speak 
out  will  be  quickly  relegated  to  private  life.  Successful 
merchants  depending  on  a  local  constituency  find  it 
expedient  to  cater  to  popular  superstitions  by  heading 
subscription-lists  for  the  support  of  things  in  which 
they  do  not  believe.  No  avowed  independent  thinker 
would  be  tolerated  as  chief  ruler  of  any  of  the  so-called 
civilized  countries. 

The  fact,  however,  that  the  penalty  for  frank  expres- 
sion is  limited  now  to  social  and  commercial  ostracism 
is  very  hopeful — a  few  years  ago  it  meant  the  scaffold. 
^  We  have  been  heirs  to  a  leaden  legacy  of  fear  that 
has  well-nigh  banished  joy  and  made  of  life  a  long 
nightmare  5S  5S 

In  very  truth,  the  race  has  been  insane. 
Hallucinations,  fallacies,  fears,  have  gnawed  at  our 
hearts,  and  men  have  fought  men  with  deadly  frenzy. 
The  people  who  interfered,  trying  to  save  us,  we  have 
killed.  Truly  did  we  say,  **  There  is  no  health  in  us," 
which  repetition  did  not  tend  to  mend  the  malady  5S 
We  are  now  getting  convalescent.  We  are  hobbling 
out  into  the  sunshine  on  crutches.  We  have  discharged 
most  of  our  old  advisers,  heaved  the  dulling  and  deadly 
100 


PLATO 

bottles  out  of  the  windows,  and  are  Intent  on  studying 
and  understanding  our  own  case.  Our  motto  Is  twenty- 
four  centuries  old — ^it  is  simply  this :  KNOW  THYSELF. 


101 


PLATO 


[OCRATES  was  a   street   preacher,   with   a 
beautiful  indifference  as  to  whether  people 
liked  him  or  not.  To  most  Athenians  he  was 
the  town  fool.  Athens  was  a  little  city  (only 
about  one  hundred  fifty  thousand),   and  everybody 
knew  Socrates.  The  popular  plays  caricatured  him;  the 
topical  songs  misquoted  him;  the  funny  artists  on  the 
street-corners  who  modeled  things  in  clay,  while  you 
waited,  made  figures  of  him. 
Everybody  knew  Socrates — I  guess  so! 
r  Plato,  the  handsome  youth  of  nineteen,  wearing  a  purple 
)  robe,  which  marked  him  as  one  of  the  nobility,  paused 
,'  to  listen  to  this  uncouth  man  who  gave  everything  and 
vwanted  nothing. 
Ye  gods  I  But  it  is  no  wonder  they  caricatured  him — 
he  was  a  temptation  too  great  to  resist. 
/  Plato  smiled — he  never  laughed,  being  too  well-bred 
vfor  that.  Then  he  sighed,  and  moved  a  little  nearer  in, 
^  **  Individuals  are  nothing.  The  State  is  all.  To  offend 
the  State  is  to  die.  The  State  is  an  organization  and  we 
are  members  of  it.  The  State  is  only  as  rich  as  its 
poorest  citizen.  We  are  all  given  a  little  sample  of 
divinity  to  study,  model  and  marvel  at.  To  understand 
the  State  you  must  KNOW  THYSELF." 
Plato  lingered  until  the  little  crowd  had  dispersed,  and 
when  the  old  man  with  the  goggle-eyes  and  full-moon 
face  went  shuffling  slowly  down  the  street,   he  ap- 
proached and  asked  him  a  question. 
102 


PLATO 

This  man  Socrates  wsls  no  fool — the  populace  was 
wrong — he  was  a  man  so  natural  and  free  from  cant 
that  he  appeared  to  the  triflers  and  pretenders  like  a 
pretender,  and  they  asked,  **  Is  he  sincere?  ** 

WhajLElato  -was  by-biftlv-Jjj^eeding  and  inheritance^ v 

Socrates  was  by  nature:7;:;;gjnjDbM  jpaBlL     -...-. 

Upjto  this  time  the^mbitiQn^-oi-£latQ^JiadJ3een.-fQr  .  _ 

place  and  power — to  make  the  right  impression  on  the 

people  in  order  to  gain  political  preferment.  He  had 

^'^en  educated  in  the  schooFof^the  Sophists,  and  his_ 
principal  studies  were,  poe try ,^  rhetoric  and  deportment. 
fl  And  now  straightway  he  destroyed  the  manuscript 
of  his  poems,  for  in  their  writing  he  had  suddenly  dis- 
covered that  he  had  not  written  what  he  inwardly 
believed  was  true,  but  simply  that  which  he  thought 
was  proper  and  nice  to  say.  In  other  words,  hisjiter^ 
ati^ire  had  been  a  form  of  pretense.  *^ 

Daily  thereafter,  where  wentSocrates^jdberejy^lvt  Plato^^     y 
Bide  by  side  they  sat  on  the  curb — Socrates  talking, 
questioning  the  bystanders,  accosting  the  passers-by; 
Plato  talking  little,  but  listening  much. 
Socrates  was  short,  stout  and  miles  around.  Plato  was    «^ 
jail,  athletic  and  broad-shouldered.  In  fact,  the  word, 
**  plato,"  or  **  pjaton,*'  means  broad,  and  it  was  given 
him  gis^a  nickname  by  his  comrades.  His  correct  name 
waS-Aristocles,  but  **  Plato  '^_suitei_hini_  betters-sine^ 
it^ jymbols^^hat  he  was  not  only  broad  of  shoulder, 
but  likewise  in  mind.  He  was  not  only  noble  by  birth, 

103 


PLATO 

but  noble  In  appearance./vfl  Emerson  calls  him  the 
universal  man.  He  absorbed  all  the  science,  all  the  art, 
all  the  philosophy  of  his  day.  He  was  handsome,  kindly, 
graceful,  gracious,  generous,  and  lived  and  died  a 
bachelor.  He  never  collided  with  either  poverty  or 
matrimony. 


104 


PLATO 


LATO  was  twenty-eight  years  old  when 
Socrates  died.  For  eight  years  th^  had  been 
together  daily.  After  the  death  of  Socrates, 
Plato  lived  Tor  forty-six  years,  just  to  keep 
alive  the  name  and  fame  of  the  great  philosopher  53 
Socrates  comes  to  us  through  Plato.  Various  other 
contemporaries  mention  Socrates  and  quote  him,  some 
to  his  disadvantage,  but  it  was  left  for  Plato  to  give  us 
the  heart  of  his  philosophy,  and  limn  his  character  for 
all  time  in  unforgetable  outline. 

Plato  is  called  the  **  Pride  of  Greece."  His  contribu-  ■/ 
tion  to  the  wealth  of  the  world  consists  in  the  fact 
that  he  taught  the  joys  of  the  intellect — tjiajsupreme 
satisfaction  that  comes  through  thinking.  JfThis  is  the 

pure   Platonic  philosophy:   l-n^prl   nnr  orraH'firal-inrts  in 

exalted  thought  and  not  in  bodily  indulgence.  Plato's  j 
theory^that  five  years  should  be  given  in  early  man-  \ 
hood  to  abstract  thought,  abstaining  from  all  practical 
affairs,  so  as  to  acquire  a  love  for  learning,  has  been 
grafted  upon  a  theological  stalk  and  comes  down  to 
our  present  time.  It  has,  however,  now  been  discarded  / 
by  the  world's  best  thinkers  as  a  fallacy.  The  unit  of  j 
man's  life  is  the  day,  not  the  month  or  year,  much  less 
a  period  of  five  years.  Each  day  we  must  exercise  the 
mind,  just  as  each  day  we  must  exercise  the  body. 
We  can  not  store  up  health  and  draw  upon  it  at  will 
over  long-deferred  periods.  The  account  must  be  kept 
active.    To    keep   physical   energy   we    must    expend 

105 


PLATO 

physical  energy  every  day.  The  opinion  of  Herbert 
Spencer  that  thought  is  a  physical  function — a,  vibra- 
tion set  up  in  a  certain  area  of  brain-cells — ^is  an  idea 
never  preached  by  Plato.  The  brain,  being  an  organ, 
must  be  used,  not  merely  in  one  part  for  five  years  to 
the  exclusion  of  all  other  parts,  but  all  parts  should 
be  used  daily.  To  this  end  the  practical  things  of  life 
should  daily  engage  our  attention,  no  less  than  the 
contemplation  of  beauty  as  manifest  in  music,  poetry, 
art  or  dialectics.  The  thought  that  every  day  we  should 
look  upon  a  beautiful  picture,  read  a  beautiful  poem,  or 
listen  for  a  little  while  to  beautiful  music,  is  highly 
scientific,  for  this  contemplation  and  appreciation  of 
harmony  is  a  physical  exercise  as  well  as  a  spiritual  one, 
and  through  it  we  grow,  develop,  evolve. 
That  we  could  not  devote  five  years  of  our  time  to 
purely  esthetic  exercises,  to  the  exclusion  of  practical 
things,  without  very  great  risk,  is  now  well  known. 
And  when  I  refer  to  practical  affairs,  I  mean  the  effort 
which  Nature  demands  we  should  put  forth  to  get  a 
living.  Every  man  should  live  like  a  poor  man,  regard- 
less of  the  fact  that  he  may  have  money.  Nature  knows 
nothing  of  bank-balances.  In  order  to  have  an  appetite 
for  dinner,  you  must  first  earn  your  dinner.  If  you 
would  sleep  at  night,  you  must  first  pay  for  sweet  sleep 
by  physical  labor. 


106 


PLATO 

LATO  was  born  on  the  Island  of  i^gina»  ^ 
where  his  father  owned  an  estate.  His  mother 
was  a  direct  descendant  of  Solon,  and  his 
father,  not  to  be  outdone,  traced  to  Codrus. 
^The  father  of  Socrates  was  a  stonecutter  and  his 
mother  a  midwife,  so  very  naturally  the  son  had  a  beau- 
tiful contempt  for  pedigree.  Socrates  once  said  to  Plato, 
"Anybody  can  trace  to  Codrus — ^by  paying  enough  to 
the  man  who  makes  the  family-tree.*'  This  seems  to 
show  that  genealogy  was  a  matter  of  business  then  as 
now,  and  that  nothing  is  new  under  the  sun.  Yet  with 
all  his  contempt  for  heredity,  we  find  Socrates  often 
expressing  pride  in  the  fact  that  he  was  a  **  native  son,** 
whereas  Plato,  Aspasia,  the  mother  of  Themistocles, 
and  various  other  fairly  good  people,  were  Athenian 
importations  5S  5S 

Socrates  belonged  to  the  leisure  class  and  had  plenty 
of  time  for  extended  conversazione,  so  just  how  much 
seriousness  we  should  mix  in  his  dialogues  is  still  a 
problem.  Each  palate  has  to  season  to  suit.  Also,  jvve 
can  never  know  how  much  is  Socrates  and  how  much 
essence  of  Plato.  Socrates. JAoioto^  nothing,  and  Plato 
ascribes  all  of  his  wisdom  to  jiis^ master.  Whether  this 
'was  simple  prudence^rmagnanimity  is  still  a  question.  CsL^ 
^  The  death  of  Socrates  must  have  been  a  severe  blow      r 
to  Plat<x  He^tLonce  lef t  Athene.  It  was  his  first  inten- 
tion never  to  return^He  traveled  througlTthe  cil:ies  of_ 
Greece.    Southern    Italy   andL_dpwn    to_Egypt,    and 

"  107 


PLATO 

everywhere  was  treated  with  royal  courtesies.  ^  After 
many  solicitatiofistrom  Dionysius,  Tyrant  oftSyracuseJ 
he  went  to  visit  that  worthy,  who  had  a  case  of  philo- 
sophic  and  literary  scabies.  Dionysius  prided  himself  on 
being    a    Beneficent    Autocrat,    with    a    literary    and 
artistic   attachment.    He   ruled   his   people,    educated 
them,  cared  for  them,  disciplined  them. 
Some  people   call   this    slavery;    others  term  it  ap- 
/plied  socialism.  Dionysius  wanted  Syracuse  to  be  the 
;  philosophic  center  of  the  world,  and  to  this  end  Plato 
}  was  importuned  to  make  Syracuse  his  home  and  dis- 
v^pense  his  specialty — truth. 
This  he  consented  to  do. 

It  was  all  very  much  like  the  arrangement  between 
-  Maecenas  and  Horace,  or  Voltaire  and  Frederick  the 
Great.  The  patron  is  a  man  who  patronizes — he  wants 
something,   and  the  particular  thing  that  Dionysius 
wanted  was  to  have  Plato  hold  a  colored  light  upon 
the  performances  of  His  Altruistic,  Beneficent,  Royal 
Jackanapes.  Put  Plato  was  a  simple,  honest  anrLdu^ftnt 
man^  he  had  caught  the  habit  from  Socrates. 
Charles  Ferguson  says  that  the  simple  life  does  not 
\  consist  in  living  in  the  woods  and  wearing  overalls  and 
J  sandals,  but  in  getting  the  cant  out  of  one's  cosmos  and 
V  eliminating  the  hypocrisy  from  one's  soul. 
Plato  lived  the  simple  life.  When  he  spoke  he  stated 
what  he  thought.  He  discussed  exploitation,  war,  tax- 
ation, and  the  Divine  Right  of  Kings.  Kings  are  very 
108 


PLATO 

unfortunate — they  are  shut  off  and  shielded  from  truth 
on  every  side.  They  get  their  facts  at  second  hand  and 
are  lied  to  all  day  long.  Consequently  they  become  in 
time  incapable  of  digesting  truth.  A  court,  being  an 
artificial  fabric,  requires  constant  bracing.  Next  to 
capital,  nothing  is  so  timid  as  a  king.  Heine  says  that 
kings  have  to  draw  their  nightcaps  on  over  their 
crowns  when  they  go  to  bed,  in  order  to  keep  them  from 
being  stolen,  and  that  they  are  subject  to  insomnia. 
^Walt  Whitman,  with  nothing  to  lose — not  even  a 
reputation  or  a  hat — ^was  much  more  kingly  walking 
bareheaded  past  the  White  House  than  Nicholas  of 
Russia  or  Alfonso  of  Spain  can  ever  possibly  be. 
Dionysius  thought  that  he  wanted  a  philosophic  court, 
*But  all  he  wanted  was  to  make  folks  think  he  had  a 
philosophic  court  Plato  supplied^  him  ^the  genuine 
article,  and  very  naturally  Plato  was  soon  invited  to 
vacate  5S  SS 

After  he  had  gone,  Dionysius,  fearful  that  Plato  would  \ 
give  him  a  bad  reputation  in  Athens — somewhat  after   \ 
the  manner  and  habit  of  the  **  escaped  nun  " — sent  a      ) 
fast-rowing  galley  after  him.  Plato  was  arrested  and  / 
sold  into  slavery  on  his  own  isle  of  i^gina.  /^ 

This  all  sounds  very  tragic,  but  the  real  fact  is  it  was  a 
sort  of  comedy  of  errors — as  a  king's  doings  are  when 
viewed  from  a  safe  and  convenient  distance.  De  Wolf 
Hopper's  kings  are  the  real  thing.  Dionysius  claimed 
that  Plato  owed  him  money.and  so  he  got  out  a  body- 

\w^ 


PLATO 

attachment,  and  sold  the  philosopher  to  the  highest 
bidderj^"^ 

This  was  a  pf;rfer.t1v  legal  proceeding,    being  simply 
peonage,  a  thing  which  exists  in  someparts  of  the  United 
States    today.    I    state    the    fact    without    prejudice, 
merely  to  show  how  hard  custom  dies. 
^  Plato  was  too  big  a  man  conveniently  either  to  secrete 

iL^c^^^  or  kill.  Certain  people  in  Athens  plagiarized  Doctor 
c^  J^  Johnson  who,  on  hearing  that  Goldsmith  had  debts  of 
several  thousand  pounds,  in  admiration  exclaimed, 
**  Was  ever  poet  so  trusted  before!  **  Other  good  friends 
ascertained  the  amount  of  the  claim  and  paid  it,  just 
as  Colonel  H.  H.  Rogers  graciously  cleared  up  the 
liabilities  of  Mark  Twain,  after  the  author  of  **  Huckle- 
berry Finn  **  had  landed  his  business  craft  on  a  sandbar. 
^  And  so  Plato  went  free,  arriving  back  in  Athens,  aged 
forty,  a  wiserand  a  better  man  than  whenTTie  left  5S 


c 


no 


PLATO 

OTHING  absolves  a  reputation  like  silence 
and  absence,  or  what  the  village  editors  call 
**  the  grim  reaper.*'  To  live  is  always  more  or 
less   of   an   offense,    especially   if   you   have 
thoughts  and  express  them.  Athens  exists,  in  degree, 
because  she  killed  Socrates,  just  as  Jerusalem  is  unfor- 
getable  for  a  similar  reason.  The  South  did  not  realize 
that  Lincoln  was  her  best  friend  until  the  assassin's 
bullet  had  found  his  brain.  Many  good  men  in  Chicago 
did  not  cease  to  revile  their  chiefest  citizen,  until  the 
ears  of  Altgeld  were  stopped  and  his  hands  stiffened  by 
death.  The  lips  of  the  dead  are  eloquent, 
r  Plato's  ten  years  of  absence  had  given  him  prestige. 
)  He  was  honored  because  he  had  been  the  near  and 
\  dear  friend  of  Socrates,  a  great  and  good  man  who 
/  was  killed  through  mistake. 
Most  murders  and  killings  of  men,  judicial  and  other- 
wise, are  matters  of  misunderstandings. 
Plato  had  been  driven  out  of  Syracuse  for  the  very 
reasons  that  Socrates  had  been  killed  at  Athens.  And 
now  behold,   when   Dionysius  saw  how  Athens  was 
ihonoring  Plato,  he  discovered  that  it  was  all  a  mistake 
of  his  bookkeeper,  so  he  wrote  to  Plato  to  come  back 
^nd  all  would  be  forgiven. 


s 


111 


PLATO 


HOSE  who  set  out  to  live  the  Ideal  Life  have  a 
hard  trail  to  travel.  The  road  to  Jericho  is  a 
rocky  one — especially  if  we  are  a  little  in 
doubt  as  to  whether  it  really  is  the  road  to 
Jericho  or  not.  Perhaps  if  we  ever  find  the  man  who 
lives  the  Ideal  Life  he  will  be  quite  unaware  of  it,  so 
occupied  will  he  be  in  his  work — ^so  forgetful  of  self  58 
("Time  had  taught  Plato  diplomacy.  He  now  saw  that 
to  teach  people  who  did  not  want  to  be  taught  was  an 
error  in  judgment  for  which  one  might  forfeit  his  head. 
^  Socrates  was  the  first  Democrat :  he  stood  for  the 
demos— the  people.  Plato  wpuld  have  done  the  same, 
but  he  saw  that  the  b)usiness  was  extra  hazardous,  to 
use  the  phrase  of  our  insurance  friends.  He  who  works 
for  the  people  will  be  destroyed  by  the  people.  Hemlock 
is  such  a  rare  and  precious  commodity  that  few  can 
afford  it;  the  cross  is  a  privilege  so  costly  that  few  care 
to  pay  the  price. 

The  genius  is  a  man  who  first  states  truths;  and  all 
truths  are  unpleasant  on  their  first  presentation.  That 
which  is  uncommon  is  offensive.  **  Who  ever  heard 
anything  like  that  before?  "  ask  the  literary  and  philo- 
sophic hill  tribes  in  fierce  indignation.  Says  James 
Russell  Lowell,  "  I  blab  unpleasant  truths,  you  see, 
that  none  may  need  to  state  them  after  me." 

C Plato  was  a  teacher  by  nature:  this  was  his  business, 
his  pastime,  and  the  only  thing  in  life  that  gave  him 
joy.  But  he  dropped  back  to  the  good  old  ways  of 
112 


PLATO 

making  truth  esoteric  as  did  the  pLrjest 
instead  of  exoteric  as  did  Socrates.  CHe  founded  his 
college  in  the  grove  of  his  old  friend  AcademusT^mile 
^t  ot  Athens  on  the  road  to  Eleusis^  Injionor  of 
Academus  the  school  was  called  "  i  he  Academy."  It 
was  secluded,  safe,  beautiful  for  situation.  In  time 
Plato  bought  a  tract  of  land  adjoining  that  of  Academus, 
and  this  was  set  apart  as  the  permanent  school.  AH  the 
teaching  was  done  out  of  doors,  master  and  pupils 
seated  on  the  marble  benches,  by  thOountain^'side,  or 
stiplling  through  the  grounds,  rich  wi^th^  shrubs  and 
flowers  and  enlivened  by ^he  song  of^birds.  The  climate 
ofAthens  was  about  Tike  that  of  Southern  California, 
where  the  sun  shines  three  hundred  days  in  the  year  58 
^lato  emphasized  the  value  of  the  spoken  word  over 
the  written,  a  thing  he  could  well  afford  to  do,  since 
he  was  a  remarkably  good  writer/)This  for  the  same 
reason  that  the  only  man  who  can  afford  to  go  ragged 
is  the  man  with  a  goodly  bank-balance.  The  shibboleth 
of  the  modern  schools  of  oratory  is,  **  Wp^ovir  ihiuug] 
ejiicession."  And  Plato  was  the  man  who  first  said  it. 
Plato's  teaching  was  all  in  the  form  of  the  "  quiz," 
because  he  believed  that  truth  was  not  a  thing  to  b§/ 
acquired  from  another — ^it  is  self -discovery. 
Indeed,  we  can  imagine  it  was  very  delightful — this 
walking,  strolling,  lying  on  the  grass,  or  seated  in 
semicircles,  indulging  in  endless  talk,  easy  banter, 
with  now  and  then  a  formal  essay  read  to  start  the 

113 


PLATO 

vibrations.  ^  Here  it  was  that  Aristotle  came  from  his 
wild  home  inthe  mountains  of  Macedonia,  to  remain  for 
twenty  years  and  to  evolve  into  a  rival  of  the  master  58 
We  can  well  imagine  how  Aristotle,  the  mountain- 
climber  and  horseman,  at  times  grew  heartily  tired  of 
the  faultily  faultless  garden  with  its  high  wall  and 
graveled  walks  and  delicate  shrubbery,  and  shouted 
aloud  in  protest,  **  The  whole  world  of  mountain, 
valley  and  plain  should  be  our  Academy,  not  this 
pent-up  Utica  that  contracts  our  powers.*' 
Then  followed  an  argument  as  to  the  relative  value  of 
talking  about  things  or  doing  them,  or  Poetry  versus 
Science  33  58 

yPoetry,  philosophy  and  religion  are  very  old  themes, 
and  they  were  old  even  in  Plato's  day;  but  natural 
science  came  in  with  Aristotle.  And  science  is  only  the 
classification  of  the  common  knowledge  of  the  common 
people.  It  was  Aristotle  who  named  things,  not  Adam. 
He  contended  that  the  classification  and  naming  of 
plants,  rocks  and  animals  was  quite  as  important  as  to 
classify  ideas  about  human  happiness  and  make  guesses 
at  the  state  of  the  soul  after  death. 
Of  course  he  got  himself  beautifully  misunderstood, 
because  he  was  advocating  something  which  had  never 
been  advocated  before.  In  this  lay  his  virtue,  that  he 
outran  human  sympathy,  even  the  sympathy  of  the 
great  Plato, 

Yet  for  a  while  the  unfolding  genius  of  this  young 
114 


PLATO 

barbarian  was  a  great  joy  to  Plato,  as  the  earnest, 
eager  Intellect  of  an  ambitious  pupil  always  Is  to  his 
teacher. yPIa to  was  great  In  speculation;  Aristotle  was 
great  In  observation.  Well  has  It  been  said  that  It  was 
Aristotle  who  discovered  the  world.  And  Aristotle  In 
his  old  age  said,  **  My  attempts  to  classify  the  objects 
of  Nature  all  came  through  Plato's  teaching  me  first  how 
to  classify  Ideas.'*  And  forty  years  before  this  Plato  had 
said,  **  It  was  Socrates  who  taught  me  this  game  of  the 
correlation  and  classification  of  thoughts/'j 


115 


A 


PLATO 

HE  writings  of  Plato  consist  of  thirty-five 
dialogues,  and  one  essay,  wJudbuitriiOL  cast    ^^ 
m — the  dfftmatic    form — -^the — Apology;^ 
These  dialogues  vary  in  length  from  twenty 
pages,   of,  say,  four  hundred    words    each,    to   three 
hundred  pages.  In  addition   to  these  books  are  many 
quotations  from   Plato  and  references  to  him  by  con- 
temporary writers.  Plato's  work   is  as  impersonal  as 
that  of  Shakespeare.vXU  human  ideas,  jliuiloui  uf  belief,^ jVf 
emotions  and  desires  pass  through  the  colander  of  his 
mind.  He  allows  everybody  to  have  his  say.^ 
What  Plato  himself  thought  can  only  be  ^erred. 
-  thij jDacJjuii..adiU^->xiQe&- J^  We  tuiisliULl  oui' 

man  Plato  in  our  own  image.  A  rritir'n  highlit  rnr\ 
ceptiun  uf  PlciLo's  plulosopliyTsTKeTEiglie^^^ 
of  the  critir*^  own.  ^B,  liovvuvui,^^^^^a6onabl3r  safe 
ssuining  lliat''PfatT3^'gWirideas  weie-iJut-Tnto  the 
mouth-of-Soi;iaLc3,  fui  the  one  inleiilnof  Plato's  life 
was-4o  redeem  Socrates  from^ -the— charges^  that  itad 
beea.jnad£..agajnst  hiTgjTh^  charactGro  Shaliocpcare 

I  Plato's  position  in  life  was  that  of  a  spectator  rather 
than  that  of  an  actor.  He  stood  and  saw  the  procession 
pass  by,  and  as  it  passed,  commented  on  ijf  He  charged 
cu  his  pupils  no  tuition  and  accepted  no  fees,  claiming  that 
to  sell  one's  influence  or  ideas  was  immoral^ 
It  will  be  remembered  that  Byron  held  a  similar 
116 


PLATO 

position  at  the  beginning  of  his  literary  career,  and 
declared  i'  faith,  he  **  would  not  prostitute  his  genius 
for  hire/*  He  gave  his  poems  to  the  world.  Later,  when 
his  income  was  pinched,  he  began  to  make  bargains 
with  Barabbas  and  became  an  artist  in  per  centum, 
collecting  close,  refusing  to  rhyme  without  collateral. 
^  Byron's  humanity  is  not  seriously  disputed.  Plato 
also  was  human.  He  had  a  fixed  income  and  so  knew 
the  worthlessness  of  riches.  He  issued  no  tariff,  but 
the  goodly  honorarium  left  mysteriously  on  a  marble 
bench  by  a  rich  pupil  he  accepted,  and  for  it  gave 
thanks  to  the  gods.  He  said  many  great  things,  but  he 
never  said  this:  **  I  would  have  every  man  poor  that 
hejuight  know  the  value  of  money." 

Th^JRepublic  **  is  the  best  known  and  best  read  of 
any  of  Plato's  dialogues.  It  outlines  an  ideal  formof~^ 
govemmentwhere  everybody  wmild_h^  b^a^lt^hy,  happy 
aiid__prospexous.    It  has  servedas  inspiration  to  Sir 
Thomas    More,    Erasmus,    Jean    Jacques    Rousseau, 
William  Morris,   Edward  Bellamy,   Brigham  Young, 
John  Humphrey  Noyes  and  Eugene  Deb^lhe  sub- 
division of  labor,  by  setting  apart  certampersons  to 
do  certain  things — ^for  instance,  to  care  for  the  childrenj 
— has  made  its  appeal  to  Upton  Sinclair,  who  jumped 
from  his  Utopian  woodshed  into  a  rubber-plant  and 
bounced  off  into  oblivion. 
^  Plato's  plan  was  intended  to  relieve  marriage  from 
Vthe  danger  of  becoming  a  form  of  slavery.  The  rulers, 

^TT7 


PLATO 

teachers  and  artists  especially  were  to  be  free,  and  the 
j;j|^JIS±ate._was  to  assume^iirresponslbilities.  The  reason  is 
plain:  he  wanted  them  to  reproduce  themselves.  But 
whether  genius  is  an  acquirement  or  a  natural  endow- 
ment he  touches  on  but  lightj^  Also,  he  seemingly  did 
^ot  realize  **  that  no  hovel  is  safe  from  it.*' 
L  If  all  marriage-laws  were  done  away  with,  Plato  thought 
„    (    that  the  men  and  women  who  were  mated  would  still 
^P"^     ^  be  true  to  each  other,  and  that  the  less  the  police  inter- 
"^  j  fered  in  love-relations,  the  better. 

Vin  one  respect  at  least,  Ekito  was  certainly  right:  he 
advocated  the  equality  of  the  sexes,  andjeclared^that 
ng  woman_§hould  be  owned^by  a  man  nor  forced  into  a 
mode  of  life,  either  by  economic  exigency  or  marriage, 
that  was  repulsive  to  her.  Also,  that  her  right  to  bear 
children  or  not  should  be  strictly  her  own  affair,  and 
to  dictate  to  a  mother  as  to  who  should  father  her 
children  tended  to  the  production  of  a  slavish  race. 
[51  The  eugenics  of  **  The  Republic "  were  tried  for 
thirty  years  by  the  Oneida  Community  with  really 
good  results,  but  one  generation  of  communal  mar- 
riages was  proved  to  be  the  limit,  a  thing  Plato  now 
knows  from  his  heights  in  Elysium,  but  which  he  in 
his  bachelor  dreams  on  earth  did  not  realiz^^ 
In  his  division  of  labor  each  was  to  do  the  thing  he  was 
best  fitted  to  do.  and  which  he  likeA-to_^do.  It  was_^ 
assumed  that  each  person  had  a  gift,  and  that  to  use 
this  gift  all  that  was  necessary  was  to  give  him  an'^ 
118 


PLATO 

opportunity.  That  very  modern  cry  of  **  equality  of 
opporlimity  **  harks  back  to  Plato.  "^ 

The  monastic  impulse  was  a  very  old  thing,  even  in 
the  time  of  Plato.  The  monastic  impulse  is  simply 
cutting  for  sanctuary  when  the  pressure  of  society 
gets  intense — a  getting  rid  of  the  world  by  running 
away  from  it.  This  usually  occurs  when  the  novitiate 
has  exhausted  his  capacity  for  sin,  and  so  tries  saintship 
in  the  hope  of  getting  a  new  thrill. 
Plato  had  been  much  impressed  by  the  experiments 
of  Pythagoras,  who  had  actually  done  the  thing  of 
which  Plato  only  talked.  Plato  now  picked  the  weak 
points  in  the  Pythagorean  philosophy  and  sought,  in 
imagination,  to  construct  a  fabric  that  would  stand  the 
test  of  time. 

However,  all  Utopias,  like  all  monasteries  and  peni- 
tentiaries, are  made  up  of  picked  people.  The  Oneida 
Community  was  not  composed  of  average  individuals, 
but  of  people  who  were  selected  with  great  care,  and 
only  admitted  after  severe  tests.  And  great  as  was 
Platq^J^_coiilcL not  outline  an_ideaJ4>laD.jajL]ifg_except 
for  an  ideal^eople./^" 
To  remain  in  the  world  of  work  and  share  the  burdens 
of  all — to  ask  for  nothing  which  other  people  can  not 
have  on  like  terms — not  to  consider  yourself  peculiar, 
unique  and  therefore  immune  and  exempt — is  now  the 
ideal  of  the  best  minds.  We  have  small  faith  in  monas- 
ticism   or    monotheism,  but   we   do  have  great  faith 

119 


) 


PLATO 

in  monism.  We  believe  in  the  Solidarity  of  the  Race. 

We  must  all  progress  together.  Whether  Pythagoras, 

John    Humphrey    Noyes   and    Brigham    Young   were 

ahead  of  the  world  or  behind  it  is  really  not  to  the 

point — the  many  would  not  tolerate  them.  So  their 

idealism  was  diluted  with  danger  until  it  became  as 

somber,  sober  and  slaty-gray  as  the  average  existence, 

and  fades  as  well  as  shrinks  in  the  wash. 

A  private  good  is  no  more  possible  for  a  community 

than  it  is  for  an  individual.  We  help  ourselves  only  as 

we  advance  the  race^-we  are  happy  only  as  we  minister 

to  the  whole.  The  race  is  one,  and  this  is  monism  58 

And  here  Socrates  and  Plato  seemingly  separate,  for 

operates  in  his  life  wanted  nothing,  not  even  joy,  and 

I  Plato's  desire  was  for  peace  and  happiness.  Yet  the 

ideal  of  justice  in  Plato's  philosophy  is  very  exalted. 

/'^  No  writer  in  that  flowering  time  of  beauty  and  reason 

/  which  we  call  *'  The  Age  of  Pericles  "  exerted  so  pro- 

^ound   an    influence   as    Plato.    All    the   philosophers 

"^     that  follow  him  were  largely  inspired  by  him.  Those 

who  berated  him  most  were,  very  naturally,  the  ones 

he  had  most  benefited.  XTeach  a  boy  to  write,  and  the 

probabilities  are  that  his  first  essay,  when  he  has  cut 

loose   from   his   teacher's   apron-strings   and   starts   a 

brownie  bibliomag,  will  be  in  denunciation  of  the  man 

who  taught  him  to  push  the  pen  and  wield  the  Faber. 

^  Xenophon  was  more  indebted,  intellectually,  to  Plato 

than  to  any  other  living  man,  yet  he  speaks  scathingly 

120 


PLATO 

of  his  master.  Plutarch,  Cicero,  lamblichus,  Pliny, 
Horace  and  all  the  other  Roman  writers  read  Plato 
religiously.  The  Christian  Fathers  kept  his  work  alive, 
and  passed  it  on  to  Dante,  Petrarch  and  the  early 
writers  of  the  Renaissance,  so  all  of  their  thought  is 
well  flavored  with  essence  of  Plato.  Well  does  Addison 
put  into  the  mouth  of  Cato  those  well-known  words: 

It  must  be  so — Plato,  thou  reasonest  well! — 

Else  whence  this  pleasing  hope,  this  fond  desire. 

This  longing  after  immortality? 

Or  whence  this  secret  dread,  and  inward  horror. 

Of  falling  into  nought  ?  Why  shrinks  the  soul 

Back  on  herself,  and  startles  at  destruction  ? 

*T  is  the  divinity  that  stirs  within  us ; 

'T  is  heaven  itself,  that  points  out  an  hereafter, 

And  intimates  eternity  to  man. 

All  of  that  English  group  of  writers  in  Addison's  day 
knew  their  Plato,  exactly  as  did  Cato  and  the  other 
great  Romans  of  near  two  thousand  years  before.  From, 
Plato  you  can  prove  that  there  is  a  life  af ter_this  Jor. 
each  individual  soul,  as  Francis  of  Assisi  proved,  or  you 
can  take  your  Plato,  as^d  Hume,  and  show  that  man 
lives  only  in  his  influence,  his  individual  life  returning 
to  the  mass  and  becoming  a  part  of  all  the  great  pulsing 
existence  that  ebbs  and  flows  through  plant  and  tree 
and  flower  and  flying  bird.  And  today  we  turn  to 
Plato  and  find  the  corroboration  of  our  thought  that 
to  live  now  and  here,   up  to  our  highest  and  best, 

121 


PLATO 

is  the  acme  of  wisdom.  We  prepare  to  live  by  living. 
If  there  is  another  world  we  better  be  getting  ready 
for  it.  If  heaven  is  an  Ideal  Republic  it  is  founded  on 
unselfishness,  truth,  reciprocity,  equanimity  and  co- 
operation, and  only  those  will  be  at  home  there  who 
have  practised  these  virtues  here.  Man  was  made  for 
mutual  service.  This  way  lies  Elysium. 
Plato  was  a  teacher  of  teachers,  and  like  every  other 
great  teacher  who  has  ever  lived,  his  soul  goes  marching 
on,  for  to  teach  is  to  influence,  and  influence  never  dies. 
Hail,  Plato! 


122 


KING  ALFRED 


A  saint  without  superstition,  a  scholar  without  ostenta- 
tion, a  warrior  who  fought  only  in  defense  of  his  country, 
a  conqueror  whose  laurels  were  never  stained  with 
cruelty,  a  prince  never  cast  down  by  adversity,  nor 
lifted  up  to  insolence  in  the  hour  of  triumph — there  is 

no  other  name  in  English  history  to  compare  with  his. 

— Freeman 


KING  ALFRED 


KING  ALFRED 


ULIUS  Ci^AR,  the  greatest  man 
of  initiative  the  world  heis  ever  seen, 
had  a  nephew  known  as  Caesar 
Augustus  53  53 

The  grandeur  that  was  Rome 
occurred  in  the  reign  of  Augustus. 
It  was  Augustus  who  said,  **  I  found 
your  city  mud  and  I  left  it  marble !  *' 
The  impetus  given  to  the  times  by  Julius  Caesar  was 
conserved  by  Augustus.  He  continued  the  work  his 
uncle  had  planned,  but  before  he  had  completed  it,  he 
grew  very  weary,  and  the  weariness  he  expressed  was 
also  the  old  age  of  the  nation.  There  was  lime  in  the 
bones  of  the  boss. 

When  Caesar  Augustus  said,  **  Rome  is  great  enough — 
here  we  rest,**  he  merely  meant  that  he  had  reached 
his  limit,  and  had  had  enough  of  road-building.  At  the 
boundaries  of  the  Empire  and  the  end  of  each  Roman 
road  he  set  up  a  statue  of  the  god  Terminus.  This  god 
gave  his  blessing  to  those  going  beyond,  and  a  welcome 
to  those  returning,  just  as  the  Stars  and  Stripes  welcome 
the  traveler  coming  to  America  from  across  the  sea. 
This  god  Terminus  also  supplied  the  world,  especially 
the  railroad  world,  a  word. 

Julius  Caesar  reached  his  terminus  and  died,  aged  fifty- 
six,  from  compulsory  vaccination. 

125 


KING    ALFRED 


Augustus,  aged  seventy-seven,  died  peacefully  in  bed. 
^  The  reign  of  Augustus  marks  the  crest  of  the  power 
of  Rome,  and  a  crest  is  a  place  where  no  man  nor 
nation  stays — ^when  you  reach  it,  you  go  over  and 
down  on  the  other  side. 

When  Augustus  set  up  his  Termini,  announcing  to 
all  mankind  that  this  was  the  limit,  the  enemies  of 
Rome  took  courage  and  became  active.  The  Goths 
and  Vandals,  hanging  on  the  skirts  of  Rome,  had 
learned  many  things,  and  one  of  the  things  was  that, 
for  getting  rich  quick,  conquest  is  better  than  pro- 
duction. The  barbarians,  some  of  whom  evidently 
had  a  sense  of  humor,  had  a  way  of  picking  up  the 
Termini  and  carrying  them  inward,  and  finally  they 
smashed  them  entirely,  somewhat  as  country  boys, 
out    hunting,    shoot    railroad-signs    full    of    holes  Si 


126 


KING    ALFRED 


N  the  Middle  Ages  the  soldier  was  supreme, 
and  in  the  name  of  protecting  the  people  he 
robbed  the  people,  a  tradition  much  respected, 
but  not  in  the  breach. 
To  escape  the  scourge  of  war,  certain  families  and  tribes 
moved  northward.  It  was  fight  and  turmoil  in  Southern 
Europe  that  settled  Norway,  Sweden  and  Denmark,  and 
produced  the  Norsemen.  And  in  making  for  them- 
selves a  home  in  the  wilderness,  battling  with  the 
climate  and  unkind  conditions,  there  was  evolved  a 
very  strong  and  sturdy  type  of  man. 
On  the  north  shore  of  the  Baltic  dwelt  the  Norsemen. 
Along  the  southern  shore  were  scattered  several  small 
trijjes  or  families  who  were  not  strong  enough  in  num- 
bers to  fight  the  Goths,  and  so  sought  peace  with  them, 
and  were  taxed — or  pillaged — often  to  the  point  of 
starvation.  They  were  so  poor  and  insignificant  that 
jthe  Romans  really  never  heard  of  them,  and  they  never 
heard  of  the  Romans,  save  in  myth  and  legend.  They 
lived  in  caves  and  rude  stone  huts.  They  fished,  hunted, 
raised  goats  and  farmed,  and  finally,  about  the  year 
Three  Hundred,  they  secured  horses,  which  they  bought 
from  the  Goths,  who  stole  them  from  the  Romans. 
^  Their  Government  was  the  Folkmoot,  the  germ  of 
the  New  England  Town  Meeting.  All  the  laws  were 
passed  by  all  the  people,  and  in  the  making  of  these 
laws,  the  women  had  an  equal  voice  with  the  men. 
^  When  important  steps  were  to  be  taken  where  the 

127 


KING    ALFRED 


interests  of  the  whole  tribe  were  at  stake,  great  defer- 
ence was  paid  to  the  opinions  of  the  mothers.  For  the 
mother  spoke  not  only  for  herself,  but  for  her  children. 
The  mother  was  the  home-maker.  The  word  **  wife  ** 
means  weaver;  and  this  deference  to  the  one  member 
of  the  family  who  invented,  created,  preparing  both 
the  food  and  the  clothing,  is  a  marked  Teutonic  instinct. 
Its  survival  is  seen  yet  in  the  sturdy  German  of  the 
middle  class,  who  takes  his  wife  and  children  with  him 
when  he  goes  to  the  concert  or  to  the  beer-garden.  So 
has  he  always  taken  his  family  with  him  on  his  migra- 
tions; whereas  the  Greeks  and  the  Romans  left  their 
women  behind. 

South  America  was  colonized  by  Spanish  men.  And 
the  Indians  and  the  Negroes  absorbed  the  haughty 
grandee,  yet  preserved  the  faults  and  failings  of  both. 
^  The  German  who  moves  to  America  comes  to  stay — 
his  family  is  a  part  of  himself.  The  Italian  comes  alone, 
and  his  intent  is  to  make  what  he  can  and  return.  This 
is  a  modified  form  of  conquest. 

The  Romans  who  came  to  Brittany  in  Caesar's  time 
were  men.  Those  who  remained  **  took  to  themselves 
wives  among  the  daughters  of  Philistia,*'  as  strong  men 
ever  are  wont  to  do  when  they  seek  to  govern  savage 
tribes.  And  note  this — instead  of  raising  the  savages  or 
barbarians  to  their  level,  they  sink  to  theirs.  The  child 
takes  the  status  of  the  mother.  The  white  man  who 
marries  an  Indian  woman  becomes  an  Indian  and  their 
128 


KING    ALFRED 


children  are  Indians.  With  the  Negro  race  the  same 
law  holds. 

The  Teutonic  races  have  conquered  the  world  because 
they  took  their  women  with  them  on  their  migrations, 
mental  and  physical.  And  the  moral  seems  to  be  this, 
that  the  men  who  progress  financially,  morally  and 
spiritually  are  those  who  do  not  leave  their  women-folk 
behind  5S  5S 


129 


KING    ALFRED 


HEN  we  think  of  the  EngUsh,  we  usually  have 
in  mind  the  British  Isles.  But  the  original 
England  was  situated  along  the  southern 
shore  of  the  Baltic  Sea.  This  was  the  true 
Eng-Land,  the  land  of  the  Engles  or  Angles.  To  one 
side  lay  Jute-Land,  the  home  of  the  Jutes.  On  the  other 
was  Saxony,  where  dwelt  the  Saxons. 
Jute-Land  still  lives  in  Jutland;  the  land  of  the  Saxons 
is  yet  so  indicated  on  the  map;  but  Eng-Land  was 
transported  bodily  a  thousand  miles,  and  her  original 
territory  became  an  abandoned  farm  where  barbarians 
battled  53  5S 

And  now  behold  how  England  has  diffused  herself  all 
over  the  world,  with  the  British  Isles  as  a  base  of  sup- 
plies, or  a  radiating  center.  Behind  this  twenty  miles 
of  water  that  separates  Calais  and  Dover  she  found 
safety  and  security,  and  there  her  brain  and  brawn 
evolved  and  expanded.  So  there  are  now  Anglo-Amer- 
icans, Anglo- Africans,  Anglo-Indians,  Anglo- Austra- 
lians, and  Anglo-New-Zealanders.  As  the  native  Indians 
of  America  and  the  Maoris  of  New  Zealand  have  given 
way  before  the  onward  push  and  persistence  of  the 
English,  so  likewise  did  the  ancient  Britons  give  way 
and  were  absorbed  by  the  Anglo-Saxons;  and  then  the 
Saxons,  being  a  little  too  fine  for  the  stern  competitor, 
allowed  the  Engles  to  take  charge.  And  as  Dutch, 
Germans,  Slavs  and  Swedes  are  transformed  with  th« 
second  generation  into  Ejiglish-Americans  when  they 
130 


KING    ALFRED 


come  to  America,  so  did  the  people  from  Eng-Land 
fuse  Saxons,  Norsemen,  Jutes,  Celts  and  Britons  into 
one  people  and  fix  upon  them  the  indelible  stamp  of 
Eng-Land  5S  53 

Yet  it  is  obvious  that  the  characters  of  the  people  of 
England  have  been  strengthened,  modified  and  refined 
by  contact  with  the  various  races  she  has  met,  mixed 
with  and  absorbed.  To  influence  others  is  to  grow.  Had 
England  been  satisfied  to  people  and  hold  the  British 
Isles,  she  would  ere  this  have  been  outrun  and  absorbed 
by  Spain  or  France.  To  stand  still  is  to  retreat.  It  is 
the  same  with  men  as  it  is  with  races.  England's 
Colonies  have  been  her  strength.  They  have  given  her 
poise,  reserve,  ballast — ^and  enough  trouble  to  prevent 
either  revolution,  stagnation  or  introspection. 
Nations  have  their  periods  of  youth,  manhood  and  old 
age.  Whether  England  is  now  passing  into  decline, 
living  her  life  in  her  children,  the  Colonies,  might  be 
indelicate  to  ask.  Perhaps  as  Briton,  Celt,  Jute  and 
Saxon  were  fused  to  make  that  hardy,  courageous, 
restless  and  sinewy  man  known  as  the  Englishman, 
so  are  the  English,  the  Dutch,  the  Swede,  the  German, 
the  Slav,  transplanted  into  America,  being  fused  into  a 
composite  man  who  shall  surpass  any  type  that  the 
world  has  ever  seen.  In  the  British  Isles,  just  as  in  the 
great  cities,  mankind  gets  pot-bound.  In  the  newer 
lands,  the  roots  strike  deep  into  the  soil,  and  find  the 
sustenance  the  human  plant  requirea 

131 


KING    ALFRED 


Walls  keep  folks  in  as  well  as  shut  other  folks  out. 
The  British  Isles,  rock-faced  and  sea-girted,  shut  out 
the  enemies  of  England  without  shutting  the  English 
in.  A  country  surrounded  by  the  sea  produces  sailors, 
and  England's  position  bred  a  type  of  man  that  made 
her  mistress  of  the  seas.  As  her  drum-taps,  greeting  the 
rising  sun,  girdle  the  world,  so  do  her  lighthouses 
flash  protection  to  the  mariner  wherever  the  hungry 
sea  lies  in  wait  along  rocky  coasts,  the  round  world 
over.  England  has  sounded  the  shallows,  marked  the 
rocks  and  reefs,  and  mapped  the  coasts. 
The  first  settlement  of  Saxons  in  Britain  occurred  in 
the  year  Four  Hundred  Forty-nine.  They  did  not  come 
as  invaders,  as  did  the  Romans  five  hundred  years 
before;  their  numbers  were  too  few,  and  their  arms 
too  crude  to  mean  menace  to  the  swarthy,  black-haired 
Britons.  These  fair  stranger-folk  were  welcomed  as 
curiosities  and  were  allowed  to  settle  and  make  them- 
selves homes.  Word  was  sent  back  to  Saxony  and  Jute- 
Land  and  more  settlers  came.  In  a  few  years  came  a 
shipload  of  Engles,  with  their  women  and  children, 
red-haired,  freckled,  tawny.  They  tilled  the  soil  with  a 
faith  and  an  intelligence  such  as  the  Britons  never 
brought  to  bear:  very  much  sis  the  German  settlers 
follow  the  pioneers  aind  grow  rich  where  the  Mudsock 
fails.  Naturally  the  fair-haired  girls  found  favor  in  the 
sight  of  the  swarthy  Britons.  Marriages  occurred,  and 
a  new  type  of  man-child  appeared  as  the  months  went  by. 
132 


KING    ALFRED 


More  Engles  came.  A  century  passed,  and  the  coast, 
from  Kent  to  the  Firth  of  Forth,  was  dotted  with  the 
farms  and  homes  of  the  people  from  the  Baltic.  There 
were  now  occasional  protests  from  the  original  holders, 
and  fights  followed,  when  the  Britons  retreated  before 
the  strangers,  or  else  were  very  glad  to  make  terms. 
Victory  is  a  matter  of  staying-power.  The  Engles  had 
come  to  stay. 

But  a  new  enemy  had  appeared — the  Norsemen  or 
Danes.  These  were  sea-nomads  who  acknowledged  no 
man  as  master.  Rough,  bold,  laughing  at  disaster,  with 
no  patience  to  build  or  dig  or  plow,  they  landed  but  to 
ravish,  steal  and  lay  waste,  and  then  boarded  their 
craft,  sailing  away,  joying  in  the  ruin  they  had  wrought. 
^The  next  year  they  came  back.  The  industry  and 
the  thrift  of  the  Engles  made  Britain  a  land  of  promise, 
a  storehouse  where  the  good  things  of  life  could  be 
secured  much  more  easily  than  by  creating  or  producing 
them.  And  so  now,  before  this  common  foe,  the  Britons, 
Jutes,  Celts,  Saxons  and  Engles  united  to  punish  and 
expel  the  invaders. 

The  calamity  was  a  blessing — as  most  calamities  are. 
From  being  a  dozen  little  kingdoms,  Britain  now  became 
one.  A  **  Cyng,**  or  captain,  was  chosen — an  Engle, 
strong  of  arm,  clear  of  brain,  blue  of  eye,  with  long 
yellow  hair.  He  was  a  man  who  commanded  respect 
by  his  person  and  by  his  deeds.  His  name  was  Egbert. 
fl  King  Alfred,  or  Elfred,  was  born  at  Wantage,  Berk- 

133 


KING    ALFRED 


shire,  in  the  year  Eight  Hundred  Forty-nine.  He  was  the 
grandson  of  Egbert,  a  great  man,  and  the  son  of 
Ethelwulf,  a  man  of  mediocre  qualities.  Alfred  was 
shrewd  enough  to  inherit  the  courage  and  persistence 
of  his  grandfather.  Our  D.  A.  R.  friends  are  right  and 
Mark  Twain  is  wrong — ^it  is  really  more  necessary  to 
have  a  grandfather  than  a  father. 

English  civilization,  begins  with  Alfred.  If  you  will 
refer  to  the  dictionary  you  will  find  that  the  word 
**  civilization  **  simply  means  to  be  civil.  That  is,  if  you 
are  civilized  you  are  gentle  instead  of  violent — gaining 
your  ends  by  kindly  and  persuasive  means,  instead  of 
through  coercion,  intimidation  and  force. 
Alfred  was  the  first  English  gentleman,  and  let  no  joker 
add  **  and  the  last.**  Yet  it  is  needless  and  quite 
irrelevant  to  say  that  civilized  people  are  not  always 
civil;  nor  are  gentlemen  always  gentle — so  little  do 
words  count.  Many  gentlemen  are  only  gents. 
Alfred  was  civil  and  gentle.  He  had  been  sent  to  Rome 
in  his  boyhood,  and  this  transplantation  had  done  him 
a  world  of  good.  Superior  men  are  always  transplanted 
men:  people  who  do  not  travel  have  no  perspective. 
To  stay  at  home  means  getting  pot-bound.  You  neither 
search  down  in  the  soil  for  color  and  perfume  nor  reach 
out  strong  toward  the  sunshine. 

It  was  only  a  few  years  before  the  time  of  Alfred  that 
a  Christian  monk  appeared  at  Edin-Borough,  and  told 
the  astonished  Engles  and  Saxons  of  the  gentle  Jesus, 
134 


KING    ALFRED 


who  had  been  sent  to  earth  by  the  All-Father  to  tell 
men  they  should  love  their  enemies  and  be  gentle  and 
civil  and  not  violent,  and  should  do  unto  others  as  they 
would  be  done  by.  The  natural  religion  of  the  Great 
Spirit  which  the  ancient  Teutonic  people  held  had  much 
in  it  that  was  good,  but  now  they  were  prepared  for 
something  better — they  had  the  hope  of  a  heaven  of 
rest  and  happiness  after  death. 

Christianity  flourishes  best  among  a  downtrodden,  poor, 
subdued  and  persecuted  people.  Renan  says  it  is  a 
religion  of  sorrow.  And  primitive  Christianity — the 
religion  of  conduct — ^is  a  beautiful  and  pure  doctrine 
that  no  sane  person  ever  flouted  or  scoffed. 
The  parents  of  Alfred,  filled  with  holy  zeal,  allowed 
one  of  the  missionary  monks  to  take  the  boy  to  Rome, 
The  idea  was  that  he  should  become  a  bishop  in  the 
Church  5S  5S 

Ethelred,  the  elder  brother  of  Alfred,  had  succeeded 
£thelwulf ,  his  father,  as  King.  The  Danes  had  overrun 
and  ravished  the  country.  For  many  years  these 
marauding  usurpers  had  fed  their  armies  on  the  products 
of  the  land.  And  now  they  had  more  than  two-thirds  of 
the  country  under  their  control,  and  the  fear  that  they 
would  absolutely  subjugate  the  Anglo-Saxons  was 
imminent.  Ethelwulf  gave  up  the  struggle  in  despair 
and  died.  Ethelred  fell  in  battle.  And  as  the  Greeks  of 
old  in  their  terror  cast  around  for  the  strongest  man 
they  could  find  to  repel  the  Persian  invaders,  and  picked 

135 


KING    ALFRED 


on  the  boy  Alexander,  so  did  the  Anglo-Saxons  turn  to 
Alfred,  the  gentle  and  silent.  He  was  only  twenty- three 
years  old.  In  build  he  was  slight  and  slender,  but  he 
had  given  token  of  his  courage  for  four  years,  fighting 
with  his  brother.  He  had  qualities  that  were  closely 
akin  to  those  of  both  Alexander  and  Caesar.  He  had  a 
cool,  clear  and  vivid  intellect  and  he  had  invincible 
courage.  But  he  surpassed  both  of  the  men  just  named 
in  that  he  had  a  tender,  sympathetic  heart. 
The  Danes  were  overconfident,  and  had  allowed  their 
discipline  to  relax.  Alfred  had  at  first  evidently  encour- 
aged them  in  their  idea  that  they  had  won,  for  he  struck 
feebly  and  then  withdrew  his  army  to  the  marshes, 
where  the  Danish  horsemen  could  not  follow. 
The  Danes  went  into  winter  quarters,  fat  and  feasting. 
Alfred  made  a  definite  plan  for  a  campaign,  drilled  his 
men,  prayed  with  them,  and  filled  their  hearts  with  the 
one  idea  that  they  were  going  forth  to  certain  victory. 
And  to  victory  they  went.  They  fell  upon  the  Danes 
with  an  impetuosity  as  unexpected  as  it  was  invincible, 
and  before  they  could  get  into  their  armor,  or  secure 
their  horses,  they  were  in  a  rout.  Every  timid  Engle 
and  Saxon  now  took  heart — ^it  was  the  Lord's  victory 
— they  were  fighting  for  home — the  Danes  gave  way. 
This  was  not  all  accomplished  quite  as  easily  as  I  am 
writing  it,  but  difficulties,  deprivations  and  disaster 
only  brought  out  new  resources  in  Alfred.  He  was  as 
serenely  hopeful  as  was  Washington  at  Valley  Forge, 
136 


KING    ALFRED 


and  his  soldiers  were  just  as  ragged.  He,  too,  like 
Thomas  Paine,  cried,  **  These  are  the  times  that  try 
men's  souls — be  grateful  for  this  crisis,  for  it  will  give 
us  opportunity  to  show  that  we  are  men.**  He  had 
aroused  his  people  to  a  pitch  where  the  Danes  would 
have  had  to  kill  them  all,  or  else  give  way.  As  they 
could  not  kill  them  they  gave  way.  Napoleon  at  twenty- 
six  was  master  of  France  and  had  Italy  under  his  heel, 
and  so  was  Alfred  at  the  same  age  supreme  in  Southern 
Britain — including  Wessex  and  Mercia.  He  rounded  up 
the  enemy,  took  away  their  weapons,  and  then  held  a 
revival-meeting,  asking  everybody  to  come  forward  to 
the  mourners* -bench.  There  is  no  proof  that  he  coerced 
them  into  Christianity.  They  were  glad  to  accept  it. 
Alfred  seemed  to  have  the  persuasive  power  of  the 
Reverend  Doctor  Torrey.  Guthrum,  the  Danish  King, 
who  had  come  over  to  take  a  personal  hand  in  the  loot- 
ing, was  captured,  baptized,  and  then  Alfred  stood 
sponsor  for  him  and  gave  him  the  name  of  Ethelstan. 
He  was  made  a  bishop. 

This  acceptance  of  Christianity  by  the  leaders  of  the 
Danes  broke  their  fierce  spirit,  and  peace  followed. 
Alfred  told  the  soldiers  to  use  their  horses  to  plow  the 
fields.  The  two  armies  that  had  fought  each  other  now 
worked  together  at  road-making  and  draining  the 
marshes.  Some  of  the  Danes  fled  in  their  ships,  but  very 
many  remained  and  became  citizens  of  the  country.  The 
Danish  names  are  still  recognizable.  Names  beginning 

137 


KING    ALFRED 


with  the  aspirate,  say  Herbert,  Hulett,  Hubbard, 
Hubbs,  Harold,  Hancock,  are  Danish,  and  are  the 
cause  of  that  beautiful  muddling  of  the  **  H  *'  that  still 
perplexes  the  British  tongue,  the  rule  governing  which 
is  to  put  it  on  where  it  is  not  needed  and  leave  it  off 
where  it  is.  The  Danes  called  the  Elngles,  **  Hengles," 
and  the  Engles  called  a  man  by  the  name  of  Henry, 
"  Enry."  5S  33 

;In  saving  Wessex,  Alfred  saved  England  for  the  English 
people;  for  it  was  from  Wessex,  as  a  center,  that  his 
successors   began   the   task  of   reconquering   England 

*  from  the  Danes. 


138 


KING    ALFRED 


ITH  the  rule  of  Alfred  begins  the  England  that 
we  know.  As  we  call  Herodotus  the  father  of 
history,  so  could  we,  with  equal  propriety, 
call  Asser,  who  wrote  in  the  time  of  Alfred, 
the  father  of  English  history.  The  oldest  English  book  is 
the  **  Life  of  Alfred  *'  by  Asser  the  monk. 
That  Asser  was  a  dependent  on  his  subject  and  very 
much  in  love  with  him,  doubtless  gave  a  very  strong 
bias  to  the  book.  That  it  is  right  in  the  main,  although 
occasionally  wrong  as  to  details,  is  proved  by  various 
corroborating  records. 

The  king's  word  in  Alfred's  time  was  law,  and  Alfred 
proved  his  modesty  by  publicly  proclaiming  that  a  king 
was  not  divine,  but  only  a  man,  and  therefore  a  king's 
edicts  should  be  endorsed  by  the  people  in  Folkmoot. 
Here  we  get  the  genesis  of  popular  government,  and 
about  the  only  instance  that  I  can  recall  where  a  very 
strong  man  acting  as  chief  ruler  renounced  a  part 
of  his  power  to  the  people,  of  his  own  accord.  Kings 
usually  have  to  be  trimmed,  and  it  is  revolution  that 
does  the  shearing.  It  is  the  rule  that  men  do  not  relin- 
quish power  of  their  own  accord — they  have  to  be 
disannexed  from  it. 

Alfred,  however,  knew  the  popular  heart — he  was  very 
close  to  the  common  people.  He  had  slept  on  the  ground 
with  his  soldiers,  fared  at  table  with  the  swineherd's 
family,  tilled  the  soil  with  the  farmer  folk.  His  heart 
went  out  to  humanity.  He  did  not  overrate  the  average 

139 


KING    ALFRED 


mind,  nor  did  he  underrate  it.  He  had  faith  in  mankind, 
and  knew  that  at  the  last  power  was  with  the  people. 
He  did  not  say,  **  Vox  populi,  vox  Dei,**  but  he  thought 
it.  Therefore  he  set  himself  to  educating  the  plain  people. 
He  prophesied  a  day  when  all  grown  men  would  be 
able  to  read  and  write,  and  when  all  would  have  an 
intelligent,  personal  interest  in  the  government. 
There  have  been  periods  in  English  history  when 
Britain  lagged  woefully  behind,  for  England  has  had 
kings  who  forgot  the  rights  of  mankind,  and  instead  of 
seeking  to  serve  their  people,  have  battened  and  fat- 
tened upon  them.  They  governed.  George  the  Third 
thought  that  Alfred  was  a  barbarian,  and  spoke  of  him 
with  patronizing  pity. 

Alfred  introduced  the  system  of  trial  by  jury,  although 
the  fact  has  been  pointed  out  that  he  did  not  originate 
it.  It  goes  back  to  the  hardy  Norseman  who  acknowl- 
edged no  man  as  master,  harking  back  to  a  time  when 
there  was  no  law,  and  to  a  people  whose  collective 
desire  was  supreme.  In  fact,  it  has  its  origin  in  **  Lynch 
Law,*'  or  the  rule  of  the  Vigilantes.  From  a  village 
turning  loose  on  an  offender  and  pulling  him  limb  from 
limb,  a  degree  of  deliberation  comes  in  and  a  committee 
of  twelve  are  selected  to  investigate  the  deed  and 
report  their  verdict. 

The  jury  system  began  with  pirates  and  robbers,  but 
it  is  no  less  excellent  on  that  account,  and  we  might 
add  that  freedom  also  began  with  pirates  and  robbers, 
140 


KING    ALFRED 


for  they  were  the  people  who  cried,  **  We  acknowledge 

no  man  as  master.** 

The  early  Greeks  had  trials  by  jury — Socrates  was 
tried  by  a  jury  of  five  hundred  citizens. 
But  let  the  fact  stand  that  Alfred  was  the  man  who 
first  introduced  the  jury  system  into  England.  He  had 
absolute  power.  He  was  the  sole  judge  and  ruler,  but 
on  various  occasions  he  abdicated  the  throne  and  said: 
**  I  do  not  feel  able  to  try  this  man,  for  as  I  look  into 
my  heart  I  see  that  I  am  prejudiced.  Neither  will  I 
name  men  to  try  him,  for  in  their  selection  I  might  also 
be  prejudiced.  Therefore  let  one  hundred  men  be  called, 
and  from  these  let  twelve  be  selected  by  lot,  and  they 
shall  listen  to  the  charges  and  weigh  the  defense,  and 
their  verdict  shall  be  mine.** 

We  sometimes  say  that  English  Common  Law  is  built 
on  the  Roman  Law,  but  I  can  not  find  that  Alfred  ever 
studied  the  Roman  Law,  or  ever  heard  of  the  Justinian 
Code,  or  thought  it  worth  while  to  establish  a  system 
of  jurisprudence.  His  government  was  of  the  simplest 
sort.  He  respected  the  habits,  ways  and  customs  of  the 
common  people,  and  these  were  the  Common  Law.  If 
the  people  had  a  footpath  that  was  used  by  their 
children  and  their  parents  and  their  grandparents,  then 
this  path  belonged  to  the  people,  and  Alfred  said  that 
even  the  King  could  not  take  it  from  them. 
This  deference  to  the  innocent  ways,  habits  and  natural 
rights  of  the  people  mark  Alfred  as  supremely  great, 

141 


KING    ALFRED 


because  a  great  man  is  one  great  in  his  sympathies. 
Alfred  had  the  imagination  to  put  himself  in  the  place 
of  the  lowly  and  obscure. 

The  English  love  of  law,  system  and  order  dates  from 
Alfred.  The  patience,  kindliness,  good-cheer  and  desire 
for  fair  play  were  his,  plus.  He  had  poise,  equanimity, 
unfaltering  faith  and  a  courage  that  never  grew  faint. 
He  was  as  religious  as  Cromwell,  as  firm  as  Washington, 
as  stubborn  as  Gladstone.  In  him  were  combined  the 
virtues  of  the  scholar  and  patriot,  the  efficiency  of  the 
man  of  affairs  with  the  wisdom  of  the  philosopher.  His 
character,  both  public  and  private,  is  stainless,  and  his 
whole  life  was  one  of  enlightened  and  magnanimous 
service  to  his  country. 


142 


KING    ALFRED 


N  the  age  of  Augustus  there  was  one  study 
that  was  regarded  as  more  important  than 
all  others,  and  this  was  rhetoric,  or  the  art  of 
the  rhetor.  The  rhetor  was  a  man  whose  busi- 
ness it  was  to  persuade  or  convince. 
The  public  forum  has  its  use  in  the  very  natural  town- 
meeting,  or  the  powwow  of  savages.  But  in  Rome  it  had 
developed  and  been  refined  to  a  point  where  the  public 
had  no  voice,  although  the  boasted  forum  still  existed. 
The  forum  was  monopolized  by  the  professional  orators 
hired  by  this  political  clique  or  that. 
It  was  about  like  the  political  **  forum  "  in  America 
today  3S  53 

The  greatest  man  in  Rome  was  the  man  who  could 
put  up  the  greatest  talk.  So  all  Roman  mammas  and 
matrons  had  their  boys  study  rhetoric.  The  father  of 
Seneca  had  a  school  of  oratory  where  rich  Roman 
youths  were  taught  to  mouth  in  orotund  and  gesticulate 
in  curves.  He  must  have  been  a  pretty  good  teacher, 
for  he  had  two  extraordinary  sons,  one  of  whom  is 
mentioned  in  the  Bible,  and  a  most  exemplary  daughter. 
^  Oratory  as  an  end  we  now  regard  as  an  unworthy  art. 
The  first  requisite  is  to  feel  deeply — to  have  a  message 
— and  then  if  you  are  a  person  of  fair  intelligence  and 
in  good  health,  you  *11  impress  your  hearers.  But  to  hire 
out  to  impress  people  with  another's  theme  is  to  be  a 
pettifogger,  and  the  genus  pettifogger  has  nearly  had 
his  day. 

143 


KING    ALFRED 


History  moves  in  circles.  The  Chicago  Common  Council, 
weary  of  rhetoric,  has  recently  declined  to  listen  to 
paid  attorneys;  but  any  citizen  who  speaks  for  himself 
and  his  neighbors  can  come  before  the  Council  and 
state  his  case. 

Chief  Justice  Fuller  has  given  it  as  his  opinion  that 
there  will  come  a  day  in  America  when  damage-cases 
will  be  taken  care  of  by  an  automatic  tribunal,  without 
the  help  of  lawyers.  And  as  a  man  fills  out  a  request 
for  a  money-order  at  the  Post-Office,  so  will  he  file  his 
claim  for  damages,  and  it  will  have  attention.  The 
contingent  fee  will  yet  be  a  misdemeanor.  Also,  it  will 
be  possible  for  plain  citizens  to  be  able  to  go  before  a 
Court  of  Equity  and  be  heard  without  regard  to  law 
and  precedent  and  attorney's  quillets  and  quibbles, 
which  so  often  hamper  justice.  Justice  should  be  cheap 
and  easy,  instead  of  costly  and  complex. 
Evidently  the  Chief  Justice  had  in  mind  the  usages  in 
the  time  of  King  Alfred,  when  the  barrister  was  an 
employee  of  the  court,  and  his  business  was  to  get  the 
facts  and  then  explain  them  to  the  King  in  the  fewest 
p)Ossible  words. 

Alfred  considered  a  paid  advocate,  or  even  a  counselor, 
as  without  the  pale,  and  such  men  were  never  allowed 
at  court.  If  the  barrister  accepted  a  fee  from  a  man 
suing  for  justice,  he  was  disbarred. 
Finally,  however,  the  practise  of  feeing  in  order  to 
renew  the  zeal  of  a  barrister  grew  so  that  it  had  to  be 
144 


KING    ALFRED 


tolerated,  because  things  we  can't  suppress  we  license, 
and  a  pocket  was  placed  on  each  barrister's  back 
between  his  shoulders  where  he  could  not  reach  it 
without  taking  off  his  gown,  and  into  this  pocket  clients 
were  allowed  slyly  to  slip  such  gratuities  as  they  could 
afford  53  3S 

But  the  general  practise  of  the  client  paying  the 
barrister,  instead  of  the  court,  was  not  adopted  for 
several  hundred  years  later,  and  then  it  was  regarded 
as  an  expeditious  move  to  keep  down  litigation  and 
punish  the  client  for  being  fool  enough  not  to  settle  his 
own  troubles. 

In  England  the  rudimentary  pocket  still  survives,  like 
the  buttons  on  the  back  of  a  coat,  which  were  once  used 
to  support  the  sword-belt. 

In  America  we  have  done  away  with  wigs  and  gowns 
for  attorneys,  but  attorneys  are  still  regarded  as 
attaches  of  the  court,  even  though  one-half  of  them, 
according  to  Judge  DeCourcy  of  Boston,  are  engaged 
most  of  the  time  in  attempts  to  bamboozle  and  befog  the 
judge  and  jury  and  defeat  the  ends  of  justice.  Likewise, 
we  still  use  the  word  **  Court,"  signifying  the  place 
where  lives  royalty,  even  for  the  dingy  office  of  a  country 
J.  P.,  where  sawdust  spittoons  are  the  bric-a-brac  and 
patent-office  reports  loom  large,  and  justice  is  dispensed 
with.  We  now  also  commonly  call  the  man  **  the  Court/* 


145 


KING    ALFRED 


LFRED  was  filled  with  a  desire  to  educat^^ 
and  to  this  end  organized  a  school  at  the  Ox 
Ford,  where  his  friend  Asser  taught.  This 
school  was  the  germ  of  the  University  of  Ox- 
ford. Attached  to  this  school  was  a  farm,  where  the 
boys  were  taught  how  to  sow  and  plant  and  reap  to  the 
best  advantage.  Here  they  also  bred  and  raised  horses 
and  cattle,  and  the  care  of  livestock  was  a  part  of  the 
curriculum.  It  was  the  first  College  of  Agriculture. 
^  It  comes  to  us  as  somewhat  of  a  surprise  to  see  how 
we  are  now  going  back  to  simplicity,  and  the  agricul- 
tural college  is  being  given  the  due  and  thoughtful 
consideration  which  it  deserves.  Twenty  years  ago  our 
agricultural  college  was  considered  more  or  less  of  a 
joke,  but  now  that  which  adds  greatly  to  the  wealth  of 
the  nation,  and  the  happiness  and  well-being  of  the 
people,  is  looked  upon  as  worthy  of  our  support  and 
highest  respect. 

Up  to  the  time  of  Alfred,  England  had  no  navy.  For  the 
government  to  own  ships  seemed  quite  preposterous, 
since  the  people  had  come  to  England  to  stay,  and  were 
not  marauders  intent  on  exploitation  and  conquest,  like 
the  Norsemen. 

But  after  Alfred  had  vanquished  the  Danes  and  they 
had  settled  down  as  citizens,  he  took  their  ships, 
refitted  them,  built  more  and  said:  **  No  more  marauders 
shall  land  on  these  shores.  If  we  are  threatened  we  will 
meet  the  enemy  on  the  sea/* 
146 


KING    ALFRED 


In  a  few  years  along  came  a  fleet  of  marauding  Norse. 
The  English  ships  on  the  lookout  gave  the  alarm,  and 
England's  navy  put  out  to  meet  them.  The  enemy 
were  taken  by  surprise,  and  the  fate  that  five  hundred 
years  later  was  to  overtake  the  Spanish  Armada,  was 
theirs  53  53 

From  that  time  to  this,  England  has  had  a  navy  that 
has  gradually  grown  in  power. 

Let  no  one  imagine  that  peace  and  rest  came  to  Alfred. 
His  life  was  a  battle,  for  not  only  did  he  have  to  fight 
the  Danes,  but  he  had  to  struggle  with  ignorance, 
stupidity  and  superstition  at  home.  To  lead  men  out  of 
captivity  is  a  thankless  task.  They  always  ask  when 
you  take  away  their  superstition,  **  What  are  you 
going  to  give  us  in  return?  **  They  do  not  realize  that 
superstition  is  a  disease,  and  that  to  give  another  dis- 
ease in  return  is  not  nice,  necessary  or  polite. 


147 


KING    ALFRED 


LFRED  died,  at  the  age  of  fifty-two,  worn  out 
with  his  ceaseless  labors  of  teaching,  building, 
planning,  inventing  and  devising  methods  and 
means  for  the  betterment  and  benefit  of  his 
people.  ^  After  his  death,  the  Danes  were  successful, 
and  Canute  became  King  of  England.  But  he  was  proud 
to  be  called  an  Englishman,  and  declared  he  was  no 
longer  a  Dane. 

And  so  England  captured  him. 

Then  came  the  Norman  William,  claiming  the  throne 
by  right  of  succession,  and  successfully  battling  for  it; 
but  the  English  people  reckoned  the  Conqueror  as  of 
their  own  blood — their  kith  and  kin — and  so  he  was. 
He  issued  an  edict  forbidding  any  one  to  call  him  or 
his  followers  **  Norman,**  **  Norse  '*  or  **  Norsemen,** 
and  declared  there  was  a  United  England.  And  so  he 
lived  and  died  an  Englishman;  and  after  him  no  ruler, 
these  nine  hundred  years,  has  ever  sat  on  the  throne 
of  the  Engles  by  right  of  conquest. 
Both  Canute  and  William  recognized  and  prized  the 
worth  of  Alfred's  rule.  The  virtues  of  Alfred  are  the 
virtues  that  have  made  it  possible  for  the  Teutonic 
tribes  to  girdle  the  globe.  It  was  Alfred  who  taught 
the  nobility  of  industry,  service,  education,  patience, 
loyalty,  persistence,  and  the  faith  and  hope  that  abide. 
By  pen,  tongue,  and  best  of  all  by  his  life,  Alfred 
taught  the  truths  which  we  yet  hold  dear.  And  by 
this  sign  shall  ye  conquer! 
148 


ERASMUS 


We  see  not  a  few  mortals  who,  striving  to  emulate  this 

divine  virtue  with  more  zeal  than  success,  fall  into  a 

feeble  and  disjointed  loquacity,  obscuring  the  subject 

and  burdening  the  wretched  ears  of  their  hearers  with  a 

vacant  mass  of  words  and  sentences  crowded  together 

beyond  all  possibility  of  enjoyment.  And  writers  who 

have  tried  to  lay  down  the  principles  of  this  art  have 

gained  no  other  result  than  to  display  their  own  poverty 

while  expounding  abundance. 

—Erasmus  on  "  Preaching  ** 


^ 


ERASMUS 


ERASMUS 


RASMUS  was  born  in  Fourteen 
Hundred  Sixty-six,  and  died  in 
Fifteen  Hundred  Thirty-six.  No 
thinker  of  his  time  influenced  the 
world  more.  He  stood  at  a  pivotal 
point,  and  some  say  he  himself  was 
the  intellectual  pivot  of  the  Renais- 
sance 53  53 

The  critics  of  the  times  were  unanimous  in  denouncing 
him — which  fact  recommends  him  to  us. 
Several  Churchmen,  high  in  power,  live  in  letters  for  no 
other  reason  than  because  they  coupled  their  names  with 
that  of  Erasmus  by  reviling  him.  Let  the  critics  take 
courage — they  may  outwit  oblivion  yet,  even  though 
they  do  nothing  but  carp.  Only  let  them  be  wise,  and 
carp,  croak,  cough,  cat-call  and  sneeze  at  some  one  who 
is  hitching  his  wagon  to  a  star.  This  way  immortality 
lies.  Erasmus  was  a  monk  who  flocked  by  himself,  and 
found  diversion  in  ridiculing  monkery.  Also,  he  was  the 
wisest  man  of  his  day.  Wisdom  is  the  distilled  essence 
of  intuition,  corroborated  by  experience.  Learning  is 
something  else.  Usually,  the  learned  man  is  he  who  has 
delved  deep  and  soared  high.  But  few  there  be  who 
dive,  that  fish  the  murex  up.  Among  those  who  soar, 
the  ones  who  come  back  and  tell  us  of  what  they  have 
seen,  are  few.  Like  Lazarus,  they  say  nothing. 

151 


ERASMUS 


Erasmus  had  a  sense  of  humor.  Humor  is  a  life-preserver 
and  saves  you  from  drowning  when  you  jump  ofif  into  a 
sea  of  sermons.  A  theologian  who  can  not  laugh  is  apt 
to  explode — ^he  is  very  dangerous.  Erasmus,  Luther, 
Beecher,  Theodore  Parker,  Roger  Williams,  Joseph 
Parker — ^all  could  laugh.  Calvin,  Cotton  Mather  and 
Jonathan  Exiwards  never  gurgled  in  glee,  nor  chortled 
softly  at  their  own  witticisms — or  those  of  others. 
Erasmus  smiled.  He  has  been  called  the  Voltaire  of  his 
day.  What  Rousseau  was  to  Voltaire,  Luther  was  to 
Erasmus.  Well  did  Diderot  say  that  Erasmus  laid  the 
egg  which  Luther  hatched.  Erasmus  wrote  for  the 
educated,  the  refined,  the  learned — Luther  made  his 
appeal  to  the  plain  and  common  mind. 
Luther  split  the  power  of  the  Pope.  Erasmus  thought  it 
a  calamity  to  do  so,  because  he  believed  that  strife  of 
sects  tended  to  make  men  lose  sight  of  the  one  essential 
in  religion — ^harmony — and  cause  them  simply  to 
struggle  for  victory.  Erasmus  wanted  to  trim  the  wings 
of  the  papal  office  and  file  its  claws — Luther  would  have 
destroyed  it.  Erasmus  considered  the  Church  a  very 
useful  and  needful  organization — for  social  reasons.  It 
tended  to  regulate  life  and  conduct  and  made  men 
"  decentable.**  It  should  be  a  school  of  ethics,  and  take 
a  leading  part  in  every  human  betterment.  Man  being 
a  gregarious  animal,  the  congregation  is  in  the  line  of 
natural  desire.  The  excuse  for  gathering  together  is 
religion — let  them  gather.  The  Catholic  Church  is  not 
152 


ERASMUS 


two  thousand  years  old — it  is  ten  thousand  years  old 
and  goes  back  to  Egypt.  The  birth  of  Jesus  formed 
merely  a  psychosis  in  the  Church's  existence. 
Here  he  parted  company  with  Luther,  who  was  a 
dogmatist  and  wanted  to  debate  his  ninety-five  theses. 
Erasmus  laughed  at  all  religious  disputations  and  called 
them  mazes  that  led  to  cloudland.  Very  naturally, 
people  said  he  was  not  sincere,  since  the  mediocre  mind 
never  knows  that  only  the  paradox  is  true.  Hence 
Erasmus  was  hated  by  Catholics  and  denounced  by 
Protestants. 

The  marvel  is  that  the  men  with  fetters  and  fagots  did 
not  follow  him  with  a  purpose.  Fifty  years  later  he 
would  have  been  snuffed  out.  But  at  that  time  Rome 
was  so  astonished  to  think  that  any  one  should  criticize 
her  that  she  lost  breath.  Besides,  it  was  an  age  of 
laughter,  of  revolt,  of  contests  of  wit,  of  love-bouts  and 
love-scrapes,  and  the  monks  who  lapsed  were  too  many 
to  discipline.  Everybody  was  busy  with  his  own  affairs. 
Happy  time! 

Erasmus  was  part  and  parcel  of  the  Italian  Renaissance. 
Over  his  head  blazes,  in  letters  that  burn,  the  unfor- 
getable  date.  Fourteen  Hundred  Ninety-two.  He  was  a 
part  of  the  great  unrest,  and  he  helped  cause  the  great 
unrest.  Every  great  awakening,  every  renaissance,  is  an 
age  of  doubt.  An  age  of  conservatism  is  an  age  of  moss, 
of  lichen,  of  rest,  rust  and  ruin.  We  grow  only  as  we 
question.  As  long  as  we  are  sure  that  the  present  order 

153 


ERASMUS 


is  perfect,  we  button  our  collars  behind,  a  thing  which 
Columbus,  Luther,  Melanchthon,Erasmus,  Michelangelo, 
Leonardo  and  Gutenberg,  who  all  lived  at  this  one  time, 
never  did.  The  year  of  Fourteen  Hundred  Ninety-two, 
like  the  year  Seventeen  Hundred  Seventy-six,  was 
essentially  **  infidelic,**  just  as  the  present  age  is  con- 
structively iconoclastic.  We  are  tearing  down  our  barns 
to  build  greater.  The  railroadman  who  said,  **  I  throw 
an  engine  on  the  scrap-heap  every  morning  before 
breakfast,**  expressed  a  great  truth.  We  are  discarding 
bad  things  for  good  ones,  and  good  things  for  better  ones. 


154 


ERASMUS 


OTTERDAM  has  the  honor  of  being  the 
birthplace  of  Erasmus.  A  storm  of  calumny 
was  directed  at  him  during  his  Ufe  concerning 
the  irregularity  of  his  birth.  **  He  had  no 
business  to  be  born  at  all,**  said  a  proud  prelate,  as  he 
gathered  his  robes  close  around  his  prebendal  form.  But 
souls  knock  at  the  gates  of  life  for  admittance,  and  the 
fact  that  a  man  exists  is  proof  of  his  right  to  live.  The 
word  "  illegitimate  '*  is  not  in  the  vocabulary  of  God. 
If  you  do  not  know  that,  you  have  not  read  His  instruc- 
tive and  amusing  works. 

The  critics  variously  declared  the  mother  of  Erasmus 
was  a  royal  lady,  a  physician's  only  daughter,  a  kitchen- 
wench,  a  Mother  Superior — all  according  to  the 
prejudices  preconceived.  In  one  sense  she  was  surely  a 
Mother  Superior — let  the  lies  neutralize  one  another  58 
The  fact  is,  we  do  not  know  who  the  mother  of  Erasmus 
was.  All  we  know  is  that  she  was  the  mother  of  Ersismus. 
Here  history  halts.  Her  son  once  told  Sir  Thomas  More 
that  she  was  married  to  a  luckless  nobody  a  few  months 
after  the  birth  of  her  first  baby,  and  amid  the  cares  of 
raising  a  goodly  brood  of  nobodies  on  a  scant  allowance 
of  love  and  rye-bread,  she  was  glad  to  forget  her  early 
indiscretions.  Not  so  the  father.  The  debated  question 
of  whether  a  man  really  has  any  parental  love  is 
answered  here. 

The  father  of  Erasmus  was  Gerhard  von  Praet,  and  the 
child  was  called  Gerhard   Gerhards — or   the   son   of 

155 


ERASMUS 


Gerhard.  The  father  was  a  man  of  property  and  held 
office  under  the  State.  At  the  time  of  the  birth  of  the 
illustrious  baby,  Gerhard  von  Praet  was  not  married, 
and  it  is  reasonable  to  suppose  that  the  reason  he  did 
not  wed  the  mother  of  his  child  was  because  she  belonged 
to  a  different  social  station.  In  any  event  the  baby  was 
given  the  father's  name,  and  every  care  and  attention 
was  paid  the  tiny  voyager.  This  father  was  as  foolish  as 
most  fond  mothers,  for  he  dreamed  out  a  great  career 
for  the  motherless  one,  and  made  sundry  prophecies  58 
At  six  years  of  age  the  child  was  studying  Latin,  when 
he  should  have  been  digging  in  a  sand-pile.  At  eight  he 
spoke  Dutch  and  French,  and  argued  with  his  nurse  in 
Greek  as  to  the  value  of  buttermilk. 
In  the  meantime  the  father  had  married  and  settled 
down  in  honorable  obscurity  as  a  respectable  squire. 
Another  account  has  it  that  he  became  a  priest.  Anyway, 
the  little  maverick  was  now  making  head  alone  in  a 
private  school. 

When  the  lad  was  thirteen  the  father  died,  leaving  a 
will  in  which  he  provided  well  for  the  child.  The  amount 
of  property  which  by  this  will  would  have  belonged  to 
our  hero  when  he  became  of  age  would  have  approxi- 
mated forty  thousand  dollars. 

Happily,  the  trustees  of  the  fund  were  law-wolves.  They 
managed  to  break  the  will,  and  then  they  showed  the 
court  that  the  child  was  a  waif,  and  absolutely  devoid 
of  legal  rights  of  any  and  every  kind.  He  was  then 
156 


ERASMUS 


committed  to  an  orphan  asylum  to  be  given  **  a  right 
religious  education/*  It  *s  a  queer  old  world,  Terese,  and 
what  would  have  become  of  Gerhard  Gerhards  had  he 
fallen  heir  to  his  father's  titles  and  estate,  no  man  can 
say.  He  might  have  accumulated  girth  and  become  an 
honored  burgomaster.  As  it  was  he  became  powder- 
monkey  to  a  monk,  and  scrubbed  stone  floors  and  rushed 
the  growler  for  cowled  and  pious  prelates. 
Then  he  did  copying  for  the  Abbe,  and  proved  himself  a 
boy  from  Missouri  Valley. 

He  was  small,  blue-eyed,  fair-haired,  slender,  slight, 
with  a  long  nose  and  sharp  features.  **  With  this  nose," 
said  Albrecht  Durer,  many  years  later,  **he  successfully 
hunted  down  everything  but  heresy.** 
At  eighteen  he  became  a  monk  and  proudly  had  his 
flaxen  poll  tonsured.  His  superior  was  fond  of  him,  and 
prophesied  that  he  would  become  a  bishop  or  something. 
^  Children  do  not  suffer  much,  nor  long.  God  is  good  to 
them.  They  slide  into  an  environment  and  accept  it. 
This  child  learned  to  dodge  the  big  bare  feet  of  the 
monks — got  his  lessons,  played  a  little,  worked  his  wit 
against  their  stupidity,  and  actually  won  their  admira- 
tion— or  as  much  of  it  as  men  who  are  alternately 
ascetics  and  libertines  can  give. 

It  was  about  this  time  that  the  lad  was  taunted  with 
having  no  name.  **  Then  I  *11  make  one  for  myself,**  was 
his  proud  answer. 

Having  entered  now  upon  his  novitiate,  he  was  allowed 

157 


ERASMUS 


to  take  a  new  name,  and  being  dead  to  the  world,  the 
old  one  was  forgotten. 

They  called  him  Brother  Desiderius,  or  the  Desired  One. 
He  then  amended  this  Latin  name  with  its  Greek 
equivalent,  Erasmus,  which  means  literally  the  Well- 
Beloved.  As  to  his  pedigree,  or  lack  of  it,  he  was  need- 
lessly proud.  It  set  him  apart  as  different.  He  had  half- 
brothers  and  half-sisters,  and  these  he  looked  upon  as 
strangers.  When  they  came  to  see  him,  he  said,  "  There 
is  no  relationship  between  souls  save  that  of  the  spirit.** 
^  His  sense  of  wit  came  in  when  he  writes  to  a  friend : 
**  Two  parents  are  the  rule;  no  parents  the  exception;  a 
mother  but  no  father  is  not  uncommon;  but  I  had  a 
father  and  never  had  a  mother.  I  was  nursed  by  a  man, 
and  educated  by  monks,  all  of  which  shows  that  women 
are  more  or  less  of  a  superfluity  in  creation.  God  Himself 
is  a  man.  He  had  one  son,  but  no  daughters.  The 
cherubim  are  boys.  All  of  the  angels  are  masculine,  and 
so  far  as  Holy  Writ  informs  us,  there  are  no  women  in 
heaven.**  5S  3S 

That  it  was  a  woman,  however,  to  whom  Erasmus 
wrote  this,  lets  him  out  on  the  severity  of  the  argument. 
He  was  a  joker.  And  while  women  did  not  absorb  much 
of  his  time,  we  find  that  on  his  travels  he  often  turned 
aside  to  visit  with  intellectual  women — no  other  kind 
interested  him,  at  all. 


158 


ERASMUS 


O  belong  to  a  religious  order  is  to  be  owned 
by  it.  You  trade  freedom  for  protection.  The 
soul  of  Erasmus  revolted  at  life  in  a  monas- 
tery. He  hated  the  typical  monks — their 
food,  their  ways  of  life,  their  sophistry,  their  stupidity. 
To  turn  glutton  and  welcome  folly  as  a  relief  from 
religion,  he  said,  was  the  most  natural  thing  in  the 
world,  when  men  had  once  started  in  to  lead  an  unnat- 
ural life.  Good  food,  daintily  served,  only  goes  with  a 
co-ed  mental  regimen.  Men  eat  with  their  hands,  out 
of  a  pot,  unless  women  are  present  to  enforce  the 
decencies.  Women  alone  are  a  little  more  to  be  pitied 
than  men  alone,  if  *t  were  possible. 
Through  emulation  does  the  race  grow.  Sex  puts  men 
and  women  on  their  good  behavior. 
Meui's  desire  for  power  has  caused  him  to  enslave 
himself.  Writes  Erasmus,  **  In  a  monastery,  no  one  is 
on  his  good  behavior,  except  when  there  are  visitors, 
but  I  am  told  that  this  is  so  in  families.** 
The  greasy,  coarse  cooking  brought  on  a  nice  case  of 
dyspepsia  for  poor  Erasmus — a  complaint  from  which 
he  was  never  free  as  long  as  he  lived.  His  system  was 
too  fine  for  any  monastic  general  trough,  but  he  found 
a  compensation  in  having  his  say  at  odd  times  and  sun- 
dry. At  one  time  we  hear  of  his  printing  on  a  card  this 
legend,  **  If  I  owned  hell  and  a  monastery,  I  would 
sell  the  monastery  and  reside  in  hell.*'  Thereby  did 
Erasmus  supply  General  Tecumseh  Sherman  the  germ 

159 


ERASMUS 


of  a  famous  orphic.  Sherman  was  a  professor  in  a  college 
at  Baton  Rouge  before  the  War,  and  evidently  had 
moused  in  the  Latin  classics  to  a  purpose. 
Connected  with  the  monastery  where  Erasmus  lived 
was  a  printing-outfit.  Our  versatile  young  monk  learned 
the  case,  worked  the  ink-balls,  manipulated  the  lever, 
and  evidently  dispelled,  in  degree,  the  monotony  of  the 
place  by  his  ready  pen  and  eloquent  tongue.  When  he 
wrote,  he  wrote  for  his  ear.  All  was  tested  by  reading 
the  matter  aloud.  At  that  time  great  authors  were  not  so 
wise  or  so  clever  as  printers,  and  it  fell  to  the  lot  of 
Erasmus  to  improve  upon  the  text  of  much  of  the  copy 
that  was  presented. 

Erasmus  learned  to  write  by  writing ;  and  among  modern 
prose-writers  he  is  the  very  first  who  had  a  distinct 
literary  style.  His  language  is  easy,  fluid,  suggestive.  His 
paragraphs  throw  a  shadow,  and  are  pregnant  with 
meaning  beyond  what  the  lexicon  supplies.  This  is 
genius — to  be  bigger  than  your  words. 
If  Erasmus  had  been  possessed  of  a  bit  more  patience 
and  a  jigger  of  diplomacy,  he  would  have  been  in  line 
for  a  bishopric.  That  thing  which  he  praised  so  lavishly. 
Folly,  was  his  cause  of  failure  and  also  his  friend. 
At  twenty-six  he  was  the  best  teacher  and  the  most 
clever  scholar  4n  the  place.  Also,  he  was  regarded  as  a 
thorn  in  the  side  of  the  monkery,  since  he  refused  to 
take  it  seriously.  He  protested  that  no  man  ever  became 
a  monk  of  his  own  accord — he  was  either  thrust  into  a 
160 


ERASMUS 


religious  order  by  unkind  kinsmen  or  kicked  into  it  by 
Fate  5S  58 

And  then  comes  the  Bishop  of  Cambray,  with  an  attack 
of  literary  scabies,  looking  for  a  young  religieux  who 
could  correct  his  manuscript.  The  Bishop  was  going  to 
Paris  after  important  historical  facts,  and  must  have  a 
competent  secretary.  Only  a  proficient  Latin  and  Greek 
scholar  would  do.  The  head  of  the  monastery  recom- 
mended Erasmus,  very  much  as  Artemus  Ward  vol- 
unteered all  of  his  wife's  relatives  for  purposes  of  war. 
^  Andrew  Carnegie  once,  when  about  to  start  for 
Europe,  said  to  his  ironmaster.  Bill  Jones,  **  I  am  never 
so  happy  or  care-free.  Bill,  as  when  on  board  ship, 
headed  for  Europe,  and  the  shores  of  Sandy  Hook  fade 
from  sight." 

And  Bill  solemnly  replied,  **  Mr.  Carnegie,  I  can  truth- 
fully say  for  myself  and  fellow-workers,  that  we  are 
never  so  happy  and  care-free  as  when  you  are  on  board 
ship,  headed  for  Europe." 

Very  properly  Mr.  Carnegie  at  once  raised  Bill's  salary 
five  thousand  a  year. 

The  Carthusian  Brothers  parted  with  Erasmus  in  pre- 
tended tears,  but  the  fact  was  they  were  more  relieved 
than  bereaved. 

And  then  began  the  travels  of  Erasmus. 
The  Bishop  was  of  middle  age,  with  a  dash  of  the 
cavalier  in  his  blood,  which  made  him  prefer  a  saddle 
to  the  cushions  of  a  carriage.  And  so  they  started  away 

161 


ERASMUS 


on  horseback,  the  Bishop  ahead,  followed  at  a  discreet 

distance   by   Erasmus,    his   secretary;   and   ten   paces 

behind  with  well-loaded  panniers,   rode  a  servant  as 

rear-guard. 

To  be  free  and  face  the  world  and  on  a  horse!  Erasmus 

lifted  up  his  heart  in  a  prayer  of  gratitude.  He  said 

that  it  was  the  first   feeling  of   thankfulness  he  had 

ever  experienced,   and    it    was  the  first   thing  which 

had  ever  come  to  him  worth  gratitude. 

And  so  they  started  for  Paris. 

Erasmus  looked  back  and  saw  the  monastery,  where  he 

had  spent  ten  arduous  years,  fade  from  view. 

It  was  the  happiest  moment  he  had  ever  known.  The 

world  lay  beyond. 


162 


ERASMUS 


HE  Bishop  of  Cambray  introduced  Erswmus 
to  a  mode  of  life  for  which  he  was  eminently 
fitted.  It  consisted  in  traveling,  receiving 
honors,  hospitality  and  all  good  things  in  a 
material  way,  and  giving  his  gracious  society  in  return. 
Doors  flew  open  on  the  approach  of  the  good  Bishop. 
Everywhere  he  went  a  greeting  was  assured.  He  was  a 
Churchman — that  was  enough.  Erasmus  shared  in  the 
welcomes,  for  he  was  handsome  in  face  and  figure,  had  a 
ready  tongue,  and  could  hold  his  own  with  the  best  58 
Europe  was  then  dotted  with  monasteries,  nunneries 
and  other  church  institutions.  Their  remains  are  seen 
there  yet — one  is  really  never  out  of  sight  of  a  steeple. 
But  the  exclusive  power  of  the  Church  is  gone,  and  in 
many  places  there  are  only  ruins  where  once  were 
cloisters,  corridors,  chapels,  halls  and  gardens  teeming 
with  life  and  industry. 

The  **  missions  **  of  California  were  founded  on  the 
general  plan  of  the  monasteries  of  Europe.  They  afforded 
a  lodging  for  the  night — a  resting-place  for  travelers — 
and  were  a  radiatory  center  of  education — at  leetst  all 
of  the  education  that  then  existed. 
In  California  these  **  missions  **  were  forty  miles  apart 
— one  day*s  journey.  In  France,  Italy  and  Germany 
they  were,  say,  ten  miles  apart.  Between  them,  trudged 
or  rode  on  horseback  or  in  carriages,  a  picturesque  array 
of  pilgrims,  young  and  old,  male  and  female.  To  go 
anywhere  and  be  at  home  everywhere,  this  was  the 

163 


ERASMUS 


happy  lot  of  a  church  dignitary.  ^  The  parts  in  church 
institutions  were  interchangeable;  and  by  a  system  of 
migration,  life  was  made  agreeable,  and  reasonable 
honesty  was  assured.  I  have  noticed  that  certain 
Continental  banking  institutions,  with  branches  in 
various  cities,  keep  their  cashiers  rotating.  The  idea  was 
gotten  from  Rome.  Rome  was  very  wise — ^her  policies 
were  the  crystallizations  of  the  world-wisdom  of  cen- 
turies. The  church-militant  battle-cry,  **  The  world  for 
Christ,*'  simply  means  man's  lust  for  ownership,  with 
Christ  as  an  excuse.  If  ever  there  was  a  man-made 
institution,  it  is  the  Church.  To  control  mankind  has 
been  her  desire,  and  the  miracle  is  that,  with  a  promise 
of  heaven,  a  threat  of  hell,  and  a  firm  grip  on  temporal 
power — social  and  military — she  was  ever  induced  par- 
tially to  loosen  her  grip.  To  such  men  as  Savonarola, 
Luther  and  Erasmus,  do  we  owe  our  freedom.  These  men 
cared  more  for  truth  than  for  power,  and  their  influence 
was  to  disintegrate  the  ankylosis  of  custom  and  make 
men  think.  And  a  thought  is  mental  dynamite.  No 
wonder  the  Church  has  always  feared  and  hated  a 
thinker!  3S  33 

The  Bishop  of  Cambray  was  not  a  thinker.  Fenelon, 
who  was  later  to  occupy  his  office,  was  to  make  the 
bishopric  of  Cambray  immortal.  Conformists  die,  but 
heretics  live  on  forever.  They  are  men  who  have 
redeemed  the  cross  and  rendered  the  gallows  glorious. 

164 


ERASMUS 


ND  so  the  Bishop  of  Cambray  and  his  little 
light-haired  secretary  fared  forth  to  fame 
and  fortune — the  Bishop  to  be  remembered 
because  he  had  a  secretary,  and  the  secre- 
tary to  be  remembered  because  he  grew  into  a  great 
teacher   3S   5S 

At  each  stopping-place  the  Bishop  said  mass — the 
workers,  students  and  novitiates  quitting  their  tasks 
to  hear  the  words  of  encouragement  from  the  lips  of 
the  great  man.  Occasionally  Erasmus  Wcis  pushed  for- 
ward to  say  a  few  words,  by  the  Bishop,  who  had  to 
look  after  his  own  personal  devotions.  The  assembled 
friends  liked  the  young  man — he  was  so  bright  and 
witty  and  free  from  cant.  They  even  laughed  out  loud, 
and  so,  often  two  smiles  were  made  to  grow  where 
there  were  no  smiles  before. 

Leisurely  they  rode — stopping  at  times  for  several  days 
at  places  where  the  food  and  drink  were  at  their  best, 
and  the  society  sulphide.  At  nunneries  and  monasteries 
were  always  guest-chambers  for  the  great,  and  they 
were  usually  occupied. 

Thus  it  was  that  every  church-house  was  a  sort  of 
university,  depending  of  course  on  the  soul-size  of  the 
Superior  or  Abbe.  These  constant  journeyings  and 
pilgrimages  served  in  lieu  of  the  daily  paper,  the 
Western  Union  Telegraph,  and  the  telephone.  Things 
have  slipped  back,  I  fear  me,  for  now  Mercury  merely 
calls  up  his  party  on   the   long-distance,   instead  of 

165 


ERASMUS 


making  a  personal  visit — the  Angel  Gabriel  as  well. 
We  save  time,  but  we  miss  the  personal  contact. 
The  monastic  impulse  was  founded  on  a  human  need. 
Like  most  good  things,  it  has  been  sadly  perverted ;  but 
the  idea  of  a  sanctuary  for  stricken  souls — a  place  of 
refuge,  where  simplicity,  service  and  useful  endeavor 
rule — ^will  never  die  from  out  the  human  heart.  The 
hospice  stands  for  hospitality,  but  we  have  now  only  a 
hotel  and  a  hospital. 

The  latter  stands  for  iodoform,  carbolic  acid  and  formal- 
dehyde; the  former  often  means  gold,  glitter,  gluttony 
and  concrete  selfishness,  with  gout  on  one  end,  paresis  at 
the  other  and  Bright*s  Disease  between. 
The  hospice  was  a  part  of  the  monastery.  It  was  a  home 
for  the  homeless.  There  met  men  of  learning — men  of 
wit — men  of  brains  and  brawn.  You  entered  and  were 
at  home.  There  was  no  charge — you  merely  left  some- 
thing for  the  poor. 

Any  man  who  has  the  courage,  and  sufficient  faith  in 
humanity  to  install  the  hospice  system  in  America  will 
reap  a  rich  reward.  If  he  has  the  same  faith  in  his  guests 
that  Judge  Lindsey  has  in  his  bad  boys,  he  will  succeed; 
but  if  he  hesitates,  defers,  doubts,  and  begins  to  plot 
and  plan,  the  Referee  in  Bankruptcy  will  beckon. 
The  early  universities  grew  out  of  the  monastic  impulse. 
Students  came  and  went,  and  the  teachers  were  a  part 
of  a  great  itinerancy.  Man  is  a  migratory  animal.  His 
evolution  has  come  about  through  change  of  environ- 
166 


ERASMUS 


ment.  Transplantation  changes  weeds  into  roses,  and 
the  forebears  of  all  the  products  of  our  greenhouses  and 
gardens  once  grew  in  hedgerows  or  open  fields,  choked 
by  unkind  competition  or  trampled  beneath  the  feet  of 
the  heedless. 

The  advantage  of  university  life  is  in  the  transplanta- 
tion. Get  the  boy  out  of  his  home  environment;  sever 
the  cord  that  holds  him  to  his  **  folks  **;  let  him  meet 
new  faces,  see  new  sights,  hear  new  sermons,  meet  new 
teachers,  and  his  efforts  at  adjustment  will  work  for 
growth.  Alexander  Humboldt  was  right — one  year  at 
college  is  safer  than  four.  One  year  inspires  you — four 
may  get  you  pot-bound  with  pedant  prejudice. 
The  university  of  the  future  will  be  industrial — all  may 
come  and  go.  All  men  will  be  university  men,  and  thus 
the  pride  in  an  imaginary  proficiency  will  be  diluted 
to  a  healthful  attenuation.  To  work  and  to  be  useful — 
not  merely  to  memorize  and  recite — ^will  be  the  only 
initiation  33  58 

The  professors  will  be  interchangeable,  and  the  rotation 
of  intellectual  crops  will  work  for  health,  harmony  and 
effectiveness. 

The  group,  or  college,  will  be  the  unit,  not  the  family. 
The  college  was  once  a  collection  of  men  and  women 
grouped  for  a  mutual  intellectual,  religious  or  economic 
good  5S  5S 

To  this  group  or  college  idea  will  we  return. 
Man  is  a  gregarious  animal,  and  the  Christ-thought  of 

167 


ERASMUS 


giving  all,  eoid  receiving  all,  some  day  in  the  near  future 
will  be  found  practical.  The  desire  for  exclusive  owner- 
ship must  be  sloughed. 

Universities  devoted  to  useful  work — art  in  its  highest 
sense:  head,  hand  and  heart — ^will  yet  dot  the  civilized 
world.  The  hospice  will  return  higher  up  the  scale,  and 
the  present  use  of  the  word  **  hospitality  **  will  be 
drowned  in  its  pink  tea,  choked  with  cheese-wafers, 
rescued  from  the  nervous  clutch  of  the  meoiaging  mama, 
and  the  machinations  of  the  chaperone.  A  society  built 
on  the  sands  of  silliness  must  give  way  to  the  universal 
university,  and  the  strong,  healthful,  helpful,  honest 
companionship  and  comradeship  of  men  and  women 
prevail  5S  Si 


168 


ERASMUS 


HE  objective  point  of  the  Bishop  was  the 
University  of  Paris. 

Here  in  due  time,  after  their  lingering  ride 
from  Holland,  the  Bishop  and  his  secretary 
arrived.  They  settled  down  to  literary  work ;  and  in  odd 
hours  the  beauty  and  wonder  of  Paris  became  familiar 
to  Erasmus.  The  immediate  task  completed,  the  Bishop 
proposed  going  home,  and  thought,  of  course,  his 
secretary  was  a  fixture  and  would  go  with  him.  But 
Erasmus  had  evolved  ideas  concerning  his  own  worth. 
He  had  already  collected  quite  a  little  circle  of  pupils 
about  him,  and  these  he  held  by  his  glowing  personality. 
At  this  time  the  vow  of  poverty  was  looked  upon  lightly. 
And  anyway,  poverty  is  a  comparative  term.  There 
were  monks  who  always  trudged  afoot  with  staff  and 
bag,  but  not  so  our  Erasmus.  He  was  Bishop  of  the 
Exterior  38  3S 

The  Bishop  of  Cambray,  on  parting  with  Erasmus, 
thought  so  much  of  him  that  he  presented  him  with  the 
horse  he  rode. 

Erasmus  used  to  take  short  excursions  about  Paris, 
taking  with  him  a  student  and  often  two,  as  servants  or 
attendants.  Teaching  then  was  mostly  on  an  indepen- 
dent basis,  each  pupil  picking  his  tutors  and  paying 
them  direct. 

Among  other  pupils  whom  Erasmus  had  at  Paris  was  a 
young  Englishman  by  the  name  of  Lord  Mountjoy. 
A  great  affection  arose  between  these  two,  and  when 

169 


ERASMUS 


Lord  Mountjoy  returned  to  England  he  was  accom- 
panied by  Erasmus, 
-y  At  London,  Erasmus  met  on  absolute  equality  many  of 
^  the  learned  men  of  England.  We  hear  of  his  dining  at 
the  house  of  the  Lord  Mayor  of  London,  and  there 
meeting  Sir  Thomas  More  and  crossing  swords  with 
that  worthy  in  wordy  debate. 

Erasmus  seems  to  have  carried  the  **  New  Humanism  " 
into  England.  It  has  been  said  that  the  world  Wcts  dis- 
covered in  Fourteen  Hundred  Ninety-two,  but  Man  was 
not  discovered  until  Seventeen  Hundred  Seventy-six. 
This  is  hardly  literal  truth,  since  in  Fourteen  Hundred 
Ninety-two,  there  was  a  theologico-scientific  party  of 
young  men  in  all  of  the  European  Universities  who  were 
reviving  the  Greek  culture,  and  with  it  arose  the  idea 
of  the  dignity  and  worth  of  Man.  To  this  movement 
Erasmus  brought  the  enthusiasm  of  his  nature.  Perhaps 
he  did  as  much  as  any  other  to  fan  the  embers  which 
grew  into  a  flame  called  **  The  Reformation.** 
He  constantly  ridiculed  the  austerities,  pedantry,  prig- 
gishness  and  sciolism  of  the  old-time  Churchmen,  and 
when  a  new  question  came  up,  he  asked,  **  What  good 
is  there  in  it?  *' 

Everything  was  tested  by  him  in  the  light  of  common- 
sense.  What  end  does  it  serve  and  how  is  humanity  to 
be  served  or  benefited  by  it  ? 

(Thus  the  good  of  humanity,  not  the  glory  of  God,  was 
the  shibboleth  of  this  rising  party. 
170 


ERASMUS 


Erasmus  gave  lectures  and  taught  at  Cambridge, 
Oxford  and  London. 

Italy  had  been  the  objective  point  of  his  travels,  but 
England  had,  for  a  time,  turned  him  aside.  In  the  year 
Fifteen  Hundred,  Erasmus  landed  at  Calais,  saddled  his 
horse,  and  started  southward,  visiting,  writing,  teach- 
ing, lecturing,  as  he  went.  The  stimulus  of  meeting  new 
people  and  seeing  new  scenes,  all  tended  toward  intel- 
lectual growth. 

The  genus  monk  made  mendicancy  a  fine  art,  and  Eras- 
mus was  heir  to  most  of  the  instincts  of  the  order.  His 
associations  with  the  laity  were  mostly  with  the  nobility 
or  those  with  money.  He  was  not  slow  in  asking  for 
what  he  wanted,  whether  it  was  a  fur-lined  cloak,  a 
saddle,  top  riding-boots,  a  horse,  or  a  prayer-book.  He 
made  no  apologies — but  took  as  his  divine  right  all  that 
he  needed.  And  he  justified  himself  in  taking  what  he 
needed  by  the  thought  that  he  gave  all  he  had.  He  sup- 
plied Sir  Thomas  More  the  germ  of  **  Utopia,*'  for 
Erasmus  pictured  again  and  again  an  ideal  society 
where  all  would  have  enough,  and  none  suffer  from 
either  want  or  surfeit — a  society  in  which  all  would  be 
at  home  wherever  they  went. 

Had  Erasmus  seen  fit  to  make  England  his  home,  his 
head,  too,  would  have  paid  the  forfeit,  as  did  the  head 
that  wrote  **  Utopia.**  What  an  absurd  use  to  make  of  a 
head — to  separate  it  from  the  man's  body! 
Italy  received  Erasmus  with  the  same  royal  welcome 

171 


ERASMUS 


that  Elngland  had  supplied.  Scholars  who  knew  the 
Greek  and  Roman  classics  were  none  too  common.  Most 
monks  stopped  with  the  writings  of  the  saints,  as  South 
Americans  balk  at  long  division. 

Eraismus  could  illumine  an  initial,  bind  a  book,  give 
advice  to  printers,  lecture  to  teachers,  give  lessons  on 
rhetoric  and  oratory,  or  entertain  the  ladies  with 
recitations  from  the  Iliad  and  the  Odyssey. 
So  he  went  riding  back  and  forth,  stopping  at  cities  and 
towns,  nunneries  and  monasteries,  until  his  name 
became  a  familiar  one  to  every  scholar  of  England, 
Germany  and  Italy.  Scholarly,  always  a  learner,  always 
a  teacher,  gracious,  direct,  witty,  men  began  to  divide 
on  an  Erasmus  basis.  There  were  two  parties:  those  for 
Erasmus  and  those  against  him. 

In  Fifteen  Hundred  Seventeen,  came  Luther  with  his 
bombshells  of  defiance.  This  fighting  attitude  was  far 
from  Erstsmus — his  weapons  were  words.  Between  bouts 
with  prelates,  Luther  sent  a  few  thunderbolts  at 
Ersismus,  accusing  him  of  vacillation  and  cowardice. 
Elrasmus  replied  with  dignity,  and  entered  into  a 
lengthy  dispute  with  Melanchthon,  Luther's  friend,  on 
the  New  Humanism  which  was  finding  form  in  revo- 
lution Si  5S 

Erasmus  prophesied  that  by  an  eetsy  process  of  evolu- 
tion, through  education,  the  monasteries  would  all 
become  schools  and  workshops.  He  would  not  destroy 
them,  but  convert  them  into  something  different.  He 
172 


ERASMUS 


fell  into  disfavor  with  the  CathoUcs,  and  was  invited  by 
Henry  the  Eighth  to  come  to  England  and  join  the  new 
religious  regime.  But  this  English  Catholicism  was  not 
to  the  liking  of  Erasmus.  What  he  desired  was  to  reform 
the  Church,  not  to  destroy  it  or  divide  it. 
His  affairs  were  becoming  critical:  monasteries  where  he 
had  once  been  welcomed  now  feared  to  have  him  come 
near,  lest  they  should  be  contaminated  and  entangled. 
It  was  rumored  that  warrants  of  arrest  were  out.  He 
was  invited  to  go  to  Rome  and  explain  his  position  5S 
Erasmus  knew  better  than  to  acknowledge  receipt  of 
the  letter.  He  headed  his  horse  for  Switzerland,  the  land 
of  liberty.  At  Basel  he  stopped  at  the  house  of  Froben, 
the  great  printer  and  publisher.  He  put  his  horse  in  the 
barn,  unsaddled  him,  and  said,  **  Froben,  I  Ve  come  to 
stay."  5S   58 


173 


ERASMUS 


WAS  mousing  around  the  other  day  in  a  book 
that  Is  somewhat  disjointed  and  disconnected, 
and  yet  interesting — **  The  Standard  Dic- 
tionary " — when  I  came  across  the  word 
**  scamp."  It  is  a  handy  word  to  fling,  and  I  am  not  sure 
but  that  it  has  been  gently  tossed  once  or  twice  in  my 
direction.  Condemnation  is  usually  a  sort  of  subtle 
flattery,  so  I  'm  not  sad.  To  scamp  means  to  cut  short, 
to  be  superficial,  slipshod,  careless,  indifferent — to  say, 
**  Let  'er  go,  who  cares — this  is  good  enough!  "If  any- 
body ever  was  a  stickler  for  honest  work,  I  am  that 
bucolic  party.  I  often  make  things  so  fine  that  only  one 
man  out  of  ten  thousand  can  buy  them,  and  I  have  to 
keep  'em  myself. 

You  know  that,  when  you  get  an  idea  in  your  head,  how 
everything  you  read  contains  allusions  to  the  same 
thing.  Knowledge  is  mucilaginous.  Well,  next  day  after 
I  was  looking  up  that  pleasant  word  **  scamp,"  I  was 
reading  in  the  Amusing  Works  of  Erasmus,  when  I  ran 
across  the  word  again,  but  spelled  in  Dutch,  thus, 
**  schamp."  Now  Erasmus  was  a  successful  author,  and 
he  was  also  the  best  authority  on  paper,  inks,  bindings, 
and  general  bookmaking  in  Italy,  Holland  or  Germany. 
Being  a  lover  of  learning,  and  listening  to  the  lure  of 
words,  he  never  wallowed  in  wealth.  But  in  his  hunt  for 
ideas  he  had  a  lot  of  fun.  Kipling  says,  **  There  is  no 
hunt  equal  to  a  man  hunt."  But  Kip  is  wrong — to  chase 
a  thought  is  twice  the  sport.  Erasmus  chased  ideas,  and 
174 


ERASMUS 


very  naturally  the  preachers  chased  Erasmus — out  of 
England,  through  France,  down  to  Italy  and  then  he 
found  refuge  at  Basel  with  Froben,  the  great  Printer 
and  Publisher. 

Up  in  Frankfort  was  a  writer-printer,  who,  not  being 
able  to  answer  the  arguments  of  Erasmus,  called  him 
bad  names.  But  this  gentle  pen-pusher  in  Frankfort, 
who  passed  his  vocabulary  at  Froben's  proofreader, 
Erasmus  in  time  calls  a  **  schamp,'*  because  he  used 
cheap  paper,  cheap  ink  and  close  margins.  Soon  after, 
the  word  was  carried  to  England  and  spelled  **  scamp  *' 
— a  man  who  cheats  in  quality,  weight,  size  and  count. 
But  the  first  use  merely  meant  a  printer  who  scamps  his 
margins  and  so  cheats  on  paper.  I  am  sorry  to  see  that 
Erasmus  imitated  his  enemies  and  at  times  was  ambi- 
dextrous in  the  use  of  the  literary  stinkpot.  His  vocabu- 
lary was  equal  to  that  of  Muldoon.  Erasmus  refers  to 
one  of  his  critics  as  a  **  scenophylax-stikken,**  and 
another  he  calls  a  **  schnide  enchologion-schistosomus." 
And  perhaps  they  may  have  been — I  really  do  not  know, 
^  But  as  an  authority  on  books  Erasmus  can  still  be 
read.  He  it  was  who  fixed  the  classic  page  margin — 
twice  as  wide  at  the  top  as  on  the  inside;  twice  as  wide 
at  the  outside  as  the  top ;  twice  as  wide  at  the  bottom  as 
at  the  side.  And  any  printer  who  varies  from  this  dis- 
plays his  ignorance  of  proportion.  Erasmus  says,  **  To 
use  poor  paper  marks  the  decline  of  taste,  both  in 
printer  and  in  patron.'*  After  the  death  of  Erasmus, 

175 


ERASMUS 


Froben's  firm  failed  because  they  got  to  making  things 
cheap.  **  Compete  in  quality,  not  in  price,**  was  the 
working  motto  of  Erasmus. 

All  of  the  great  bookmaking  centers  languished  when 
they  began  to  scamp.  That  worthy  wordissimus  at 
Frankfort  who  called  Erasmus  names  gave  up  business 
and  then  the  ghost,  and  Erasmus  wrote  his  epitaph, 
and  thus  supplied  Benjamin  Franklin  an  idea — **  Here 
lies  an  old  book,  its  cover  gone,  its  leaves  torn,  the 
worms  at  work  on  its  vitals." 

The  wisdom  of  doing  good  work  still  applies,  just  as  it 
did  in  the  days  of  Erasmus. 

Erasmus  proved  a  very  valuable  acquisition  to  Froben. 
He  became  general  editor  and  literary  adviser  of  this 
great  publishing-house,  which  was  then  the  most 
important  in  the  world. 

Besides  his  work  as  editor,  Erasmus  also  stood  sponsor 
for  numerous  volumes  which  we  now  know  were 
written  by  literary  nobodies,  his  name  being  placed  on 
the  title-page  for  commercial  reasons. 
At  that  time  and  for  two  hundred  years  later,  the  matter 
of  attributing  a  book  to  this  man  or  that  was  considered 
a  trivial  affair.  Piracies  were  prevalent.  All  printers 
revised  the  work  of  classic  authors  if  they  saw  fit,  and 
often  they  were  specially  rewarded  for  it  by  the  Church. 
It  was  about  this  time  that  some  one  slipped  that 
paragraph  into  the  works  of  Josephus  about  Jesus. 
The  "Annals  "  of  Tacitus  were  similarly  doctored,  if  in 
176 


ERASMUS 


fact  they  were  not  written  entire,  during  the  Sixteenth 
Century.  It  will  be  remembered  that  the  only  two 
references  in  contemporary  literature  to  Jesus  are  those 
in  Josephus  and  Tacitus,  and  these  the  Church  proudly 
points  to  yet. 

During  the  last  few  years  of  his  life  Ereismus  accumu- 
lated considerable  property.  By  his  will  he  devised  that 
this  money  should  go  to  educate  certain  young  men  and 
women,  grandchildren  and  nephews  and  nieces  of  his 
old  friend,  Johann  Froben.  He  left  no  money  for  masses, 
after  the  usual  custom  of  Churchmen,  and  during  his 
last  illness  was  not  attended  by  a  priest.  For  several 
years  before  his  death  he  made  no  confessions  and  very 
seldom  attended  church  service.  He  said,  **  I  am  much 
more  proud  of  being  a  printer  than  a  priest." 
A  statue  of  Erasmus  in  bronze  adorns  one  of  the  public 
squares  in  Rotterdam,  and  Basel  and  Freiburg  have 
honored  themselves,  and  him  also,  in  like  manner. 
^  As  a  sample  of  the  subtle  and  keen  literary  style  of 
Erasmus,  I  append  the  following  from  **  In  Praise  of 
Folly:" 

The  happiest  times  of  life  are  youth  and  old  age,  and 
this  for  no  reason  but  that  they  are  the  times  most 
completely  under  the  rule  of  folly,  and  least  controlled 
by  wisdom.  It  is  the  child's  freedom  from  wisdom  that 
makes  it  so  charming  to  us;  we  hate  a  precocious  child. 
So  women  owe  their  charm,  and  hence  their  power,  to 
their  **  folley,'*  that  is,  to  their  obedience  to  the  impulse. 
But  if.  perchance,  a  woman  wants  to  be  thought  wise, 

177 


ERASMUS 


she  only  succeeds  in  being  doubly  a  fool,  as  if  one  should 
train  a  cow  for  the  prize-ring,  a  thing  wholly  against 
Nature.  A  woman  will  be  a  woman,  no  matter  what 
mask  she  wear,  and  she  ought  to  be  proud  of  her  folly 
and  make  the  most  of  it. 

Is  not  Cupid,  that  first  father  of  all  religion,  is  not  he 
stark  blind,  that  he  can  not  himself  distinguish  of  colors, 
so  he  would  make  us  as  mope-eyed  in  judging  falsely  of 
all  love  concerns,  and  wheedle  us  into  a  thinking  that 
we  are  always  in  the  right?  Thus  every  Jack  sticks  to 
his  own  Jill ;  every  tinker  esteems  his  own  trull ;  and  the 
hobnailed  suitor  prefers  Joan  the  milkmaid  before  any 
of  milady's  daughters.  These  things  are  true,  and  are 
ordinarily  laughed  at,  and  yet,  however  ridiculous  they 
seem,  it  is  hence  only  that  all  societies  receive  their 
cement  and  consolidation. 

Fortune  we  still  find  favoring  the  blunt,  and  flushing 
the  forward;  strokes  smooth  up  fools,  crowning  all 
their  undertakings  with  success ;  but  wisdom  makes  her 
followers  bashful,  sneaking  and  timorous,  and  therefore 
you  commonly  see  that  they  are  reduced  to  hard  shifts; 
must  grapple  with  poverty,  cold  and  hunger;  must  lie 
recluse,  despised,  and  unregarded;  while  fools  roll  in 
money,  are  advanced  to  dignities  and  offices,  and  in  a 
word  have  the  whole  world  at  command.  If  any  one 
thinks  it  happy  to  be  a  favorite  at  court,  and  to  manage 
the  disposal  of  places  and  preferments,  alas,  this  happi- 
ness is  so  far  from  being  attainable  by  wisdom,  that  the 
very  suspicion  of  it  would  put  a  stop  to  advancement. 
Has  any  man  a  mind  to  raise  himself  a  good  estate? 
Alas,  what  dealer  in  the  world  would  ever  get  a  far- 
thing, if  he  be  so  wise  as  to  scruple  at  perjury,  blush  at  a 
178 


ERASMUS 


lie,  or  stick  at  a  fraud  and  overreaching?  ^  It  is  the 
public  charter  of  all  divines,  to  mold  and  bend  the 
sacred  oracles  till  they  comply  with  their  own  fancy, 
spreading  them  (as  Heaven  by  its  Creator)  like  a 
curtain,  closing  together,  or  drawing  them  back,  as 
they  please.  Thus,  indeed.  Saint  Paul  himself  minces 
and  mangles  some  citations  he  makes  use  of,  and  seems 
to  wrest  them  to  a  different  sense  from  what  they  were 
first  intended  for,  as  is  confessed  by  the  great  linguist. 
Saint  Hieron.  TTius  when  that  apostle  saw  at  Athens 
the  inscription  of  the  altar,  he  draws  from  it  an  argu- 
ment for  the  proof  of  the  Christian  religion ;  but  leaving 
out  great  parts  of  the  sentence,  which  perhaps  if  fully 
recited  might  have  prejudiced  his  cause,  he  mentions 
only  the  last  two  words,  namely,  **  To  the  Unknown 
God*';  and  this,  too,  not  without  alteration,  for  the 
whole  inscription  runs  thus:  **  To  the  Gods  of  Asia, 
Europe,  and  Africa,  to  all  Foreign  and  Unknown  Gods." 
^  *T  is  an  imitation  of  the  same  pattern,  I  will  warrant 
you,  that  our  young  divines,  by  leaving  out  four  or  five 
words  in  a  place  and  putting  a  false  construction  on  the 
rest,  can  make  any  passage  serviceable  to  their  own 
purpose;  though  from  the  coherence  of  what  went 
before,  or  follows  after,  the  genuine  meaning  appears 
to  be  either  wide  enough,  or  perhaps  quite  contradictory 
to  what  they  would  thrust  and  impose  upon  it.  In  which 
knack  the  divines  are  grown  now  so  expert  that  the 
lawyers  themselves  begin  to  be  jealous  of  an  encroach- 
ment on  what  was  formerly  their  sole  privilege  and 
practise.  And  indeed  what  can  they  despair  of  proving, 
since  the  forementioned  commentator  did  upon  a  text 
of  Saint  Luke  put  an  interpretation  no  more  agreeable 

179 


ERASMUS 


to  the  meaning  or  the  place  than  one  contrary  quality 
is  to  another. 

But  because  it  seemed  expedient  that  man,  who  was  born 
for  the  transaction  of  business,  should  have  so  much  wis- 
dom as  should  fit  and  capacitate  him  for  the  discharge 
of  his  duty  herein,  and  yet  lest  such  a  measure  as  is  req- 
uisite for  this  purpose  might  prove  too  dangerous 
and  fatal,  I  was  advised  with  for  an  antidote,  and  pre- 
scribed this  infallible  receipt  of  taking  a  wife,  a  creature 
so  harmless  and  silly,  and  yet  so  useful  and  convenient, 
as  might  mollify  and  make  pliable  the  stiffness  and 
morose  humor  of  man.  Now  that  which  made  Plato 
doubt  under  what  genus  to  rank  woman,  whether 
among  brutes  or  rational  creatures,  was  only  meant  to 
denote  the  extreme  stupidness  and  Folly  of  that  sex,  a 
sex  so  unalterably  simple  that  for  any  one  of  them  to 
thrust  forward  and  reach  at  the  name  of  wise,  is  but  to 
make  themselves  the  more  remarkable  fools,  such  an 
endeavor  being  but  a  swimming  against  the  stream, 
nay,  the  turning  the  course  of  Nature,  the  bare  attempt- 
ing whereof  is  as  extravagant  as  the  eflFecting  of  it  is 
impossible:  for  as  it  is  a  trite  proverb,  that  an  ape  will 
be  an  ape,  though  clad  in  purple,  so  a  woman  will  be  a 
woman,  that  is,  a  fool,  whatever  disguise  she  takes  up. 
And  yet  there  is  no  reason  women  should  take  it  amiss 
to  be  thus  charged,  for  if  they  do  but  rightly  consider, 
they  will  find  to  Folly  they  are  beholden  for  those 
endowments  wherein  they  so  far  surpass  and  excel 
Man ;  as  first  for  their  unparalleled  beauty,  by  the  charm 
whereof  they  tyrannize  over  the  greatest  of  tyrants; 
for  what  is  it  but  too  great  a  smatch  of  wisdom  that 
makes  men  so  tawny  and  thick-skinned,  so  rough  and 
180 


ERASMUS 


prickly-bearded,  like  an  emblem  of  winter  or  old  age, 
while  women  have  such  dainty,  smooth  cheeks,  such  a 
low,  gentle  voice,  and  so  pure  a  complexion,  as  if  Nature 
had  drawn  them  for  a  standing  pattern  of  all  symmetry 
and  comeliness?  Besides,  what  greater  or  juster  aim 
and  ambition  have  they  than  to  please  their  husbands? 
In  order  whereunto  they  garnish  themselves  with  paint, 
washes,  curls,  perfumes,  and  all  other  mysteries  of 
ornament ;  yet,  after  all,  they  become  acceptable  to  them 
only  for  their  Folly.  Wives  are  always  allowed  their 
humor,  yet  it  is  only  in  exchange  for  titillation  and 
pleasure,  which  indeed  are  but  other  names  for  Folly; 
as  none  can  deny,  who  consider  how  a  man  must  dandle, 
and  kittle,  and  play  a  hundred  little  tricks  for  his  help- 
mate 5S  33 

But  now  some  blood-chilled  old  men,  that  are  more  for 
wine  than  wenching,  will  pretend  that  in  their  opinion 
the  greatest  happiness  consists  in  feasting  and  drinking. 
Grant  it  be  so;  yet  certainly  in  the  most  luxurious 
entertainments  it  is  Folly  must  give  the  sauce  and  relish 
to  the  daintiest  delicacies ;  so  that  if  there  be  no  one  of 
the  guests  naturally  fool  enough  to  be  played  upon  by 
the  rest,  they  must  procure  some  comical  buffoon,  that 
by  his  jokes  and  flouts  and  blunders  shall  make  the 
whole  company  split  themselves  with  laughing;  for  to 
what  purpose  were  it  to  be  stuffed  and  crammed  with 
so  many  dainty  bits,  savory  dishes,  and  toothsome 
rarities,  if  after  all  this  epicurism,  the  eyes,  the  ears, 
and  the  whole  mind  of  man,  were  not  so  well  foisted 
and  relieved  with  laughing,  jesting,  and  such  like  diver- 
tisements,  which,  like  second  courses,  serve  for  the  pro- 
moting of  digestion?  And  as  to  all  those  shoeing-horns 

181 


ERASMUS 


of  drunkenness,  the  keeping  every  one  his  man,  the 
throwing  high  jinks,  the  filUng  of  bumpers,  the  drinking 
two  in  a  hand,  the  beginning  of  mistresses*  healths ;  and 
then  the  roaring  out  of  drunken  catches,  the  calUng  in 
a  fiddler,  the  leading  out  every  one  his  lady  to  dance, 
and  such  like  riotous  pastimes — these  were  not  taught  or 
dictated  by  any  of  the  wise  men  of  Greece,  but  of 
Gojtham  rather,  being  my  invention,  and  by  me  pre- 
scribed as  the  best  preservative  of  health :  each  of  which, 
the  more  ridiculous  it  is,  the  more  welcome  it  finds. 
And  indeed,  to  jog  sleepingly  through  the  world,  in  a 
dumpish,  melancholy  posture,  can  not  properly  be  said 
to  Hve    3i  58 


182 


BOOKER  T.  WASHINGTON 


There  is  something  in  human  nature  which  always 
makes  people  reward  merit,  no  matter  under  what 
color  of  skin  merit  is  found.  I  have  found,  too,  that  it  is 
the  visible,  the  tangible,  that  goes  a  long  way  in  soften- 
ing prejudices.  The  actual  sight  of  a  good  house  that  a 
Negro  has  built  is  ten  times  more  potent  than  pages  of 
discussion  about  a  house  that  he  ought  to  build,  or 
perhaps  could  build.  The  individual  who  can  do  some- 
thing that  the  world  wants  done  will,  in  the  end,  make 

his  way  regardless  of  his  race. 

— Booker  T.  IVashingion 


BOOKER  T.  WASHINGTON 


HIS  is  a  story  about  a  Negro.  The 
story  has  the  peculiarity  of  being 
true.  The  man  was  born  a  slave  in 
Virginia.  His  mother  was  a  slave, 
and  was  thrice  sold  in  the  market- 
place. This  man  is  Booker  T.  Wash- 
ington 53  S& 

The  name  Booker  was  a  fanciful 
one  given  to  the  lad  by  playmates  on  account  of  his 
love  for  a  certain  chance  dog-eared  spelling-book. 
Before  this  he  was  only  Mammy's  Pet.  The  T.  stood  for 
nothing,  but  later  a  happy  thought  made  it  Taliaferro. 
^  Most  Negroes,  fresh  from  slavery,  stood  sponsor  to 
themselves,  and  chose  the  name  Washington;  if  not 
this,  then  Lincoln,  Clay  or  Webster. 
This  lad  when  but  a  child,  being  suddenly  asked  for 
his  name,  exclaimed,  **  Washington,*'  and  stuck  to  it. 
^  The  father  of  this  boy  was  a  white  man;  but  children 
always  take  the  status  of  the  mother,  so  Booker  T. 
Washington  is  a  Negro,  and  proud  of  it,  as  he  should  be, 
for  he  is  standard  by  performance,  even  if  not  by 
pedigree  53  53 

This  Negro's  father  is  represented  by  the  sign  x.  By 
remaining  in  obscurity  the  fond  father  threw  away  his 
one  chance  for  immortality.  We  do  not  even  know  his 
name,  his  social  position,  or  his  previous  condition  of 

185 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


turpitude.  We  assume  he  was  happily  married  and 
respectable.  Concerning  him  legend  is  silent  and  fable 
dumb.  As  for  the  child,  we  are  not  certain  whether  he 
was  born  in  Eighteen  Hundred  Fifty-eight  or  Eighteen 
Hundred  Fifty-nine,  and  we  know  not  the  day  or  the 
month.  There  were  no  signs  in  the  East. 
The  mother  Uved  in  a  log  cabin  of  one  room,  say  ten  by 
twelve.  This  room  was  also  a  kitchen,  for  the  mother 
was  cook  to  the  farmhands  of  her  owner.  There  were  no 
windows  and  no  floor  in  the  cabin  save  the  hard-trodden 
clay.  There  were  a  table,  a  bench  and  a  big  fireplace. 
There  were  no  beds,  and  the  children  at  night  simply 
huddled  and  cuddled  in  a  pile  of  straw  and  rags  in  the 
corner.  Doubtless  they  had  enough  food,  for  they  ate 
the  crumbs  that  fell  from  the  rich  man's  table — ^who, 
by  the  way,  was  n't  so  very  rich. 

One  of  the  earliest  recollections  of  Black  Baby  Booker 
was  of  being  awakened  in  the  middle  of  the  night  by  his 
mother  to  eat  fried  chicken.  Imagine  the  picture — ^it  is 
past  midnight.  No  light  in  the  room  save  the  long, 
flickering  streaks  that  dance  on  the  rafters.  Outside  the 
wind  makes  mournful,  sighing  melody.  In  the  corner 
huddled  the  children,  creeping  close  together  with  inter- 
twining arms  to  get  the  warmth  of  each  little  half- 
naked  body. 

The  dusky  mother  moves  swiftly,  deftly,  half-frightened 
at  her  task. 

She  has  come  in  from  the  night  with  a  chicken  I  Where 
186 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


did  she  get  it?  Hush!  Where  do  you  suppose  oppressed 
colored^  people  get  chickens  ? 

She  picks  the  bird — ^prepares  it  for  the  skillet — ^fries  it 
over  the  coals.  And  then  when  it  is  done  just  right, 
Maryland  style,  this  mother  full  of  mother-love,  an 
ingredient  which  God  never  omits,  shakes  each  little 
piccaninny  into  wakefulness,  and  gives  him  the  for- 
bidden dainty-<lrumstick,  wishbone,  gizzard,  white 
meat,  or  the  part  that  went  through  the  fence  last — 
anything  but  the  neck. 

Feathers,  bones,  waste  are  thrown  into  the  fireplace, 
and  what  the  village  editor  calls  the  "  devouring  ele- 
ment '*  hides  all  trace  of  the  crime.  Then  all  lie  down  to 
sleep,  until  the  faint  flush  of  pink  comes  into  the  East, 
and  jocund  day  stands  tiptoe  on  the  mountain-tops. 


187 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


HIS  ex-slave  remembers  a  strange  and  trying 
time,  when  all  of  the  colored  folk  on  the 
plantation  were  notified  to  assemble  at  the 
"  big  house."  They  arrived  and  stood  around 
in  groups,  waiting  and  wondering,  talking  in  whispers. 
The  master  came  out,  and  standing  on  the  veranda 
read  from  a  paper  in  a  tremulous  voice.  Then  he  told 
them  that  they  were  all  free,  and  shook  hands  with  each. 
Everybody  cried.  However,  they  were  very  happy  in 
spite  of  the  tears,  for  freedom  to  them  meant  heaven — 
a  heaven  of  rest.  Yet  they  bore  only  love  towards  their 
former  owners. 

Most  of  them  began  to  wander — they  thought  they  had 
to  leave  their  old  quarters.  In  a  few  days  the  wisest 
came  back  and  went  to  work  just  as  usual.  Booker  T.*s 
mother  quit  work  for  just  half  a  day. 
But  in  a  little  while  her  husband  arrived — a  colored  man 
to  whom  she  had  been  married  years  before,  and  who 
had  been  sold  and  sent  away.  Now  he  came  and  took 
her  and  the  little  monochrome  brood,  and  they  all 
started  away  for  West  Virginia,  where  they  heard  that 
colored  men  were  hired  to  work  in  coalmines  and  were 
paid  wages  in  real  money. 

It  took  months  and  months  to  make  the  journey.  They 
carried  all  their  belongings  in  bundles.  They  had  no 
horses — no  cows — no  wagon — they  walked.  If  the 
weather  was  pleasant  they  slept  out  of  doors;  if  it 
rained  they  sought  a  tobacco-shed,  a  barn,  or  the 
188 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


friendly  side  of  a  straw-stack.  For  food  they  depended 
on  a  little  cornmeal  they  carried,  with  which  the  mother 
made  pone-cakes  in  the  ashes  of  a  campfire.  Kind 
colored  people  on  the  way  replenished  the  meal-bag,  for 
colored  people  are  always  generous  to  the  hungry  and 
needy  if  they  have  anything  to  be  generous  with.  Then 
Providence  sent  stray,  ownerless  chickens  their  way,  at 
times,  just  as  the  Children  of  Israel  were  fed  on  quails 
in  the  wilderness.  Once  they  caught  a  possum — ^and 
there  was  a  genuine  banquet,  where  the  children  ate 
until  they  were  tight  as  drums. 

Finally  they  reached  the  promised  land  of  West  Virginia, 
and  at  the  little  village  of  Maiden,  near  Charleston,  where 
a  man  by  the  name  of  John  Brown  was  hanged,  they 
stopped,  for  here  were  the  coalmine  and  the  salt-works 
where  colored  men  were  hired  and  paid  in  real  money. 
^  Booker's  stepfather  found  a  job,  and  he  also  found  a  job 
for  little  Booker.  They  had  nothing  to  live  on  until  pay- 
day, so  the  kind  man  who  owned  the  mine  allowed  them 
to  get  things  at  the  store  on  credit.  This  w£is  a  brand- 
new  experience — and  no  doubt  they  bought  a  few  things 
they  did  not  need,  for  prices  and  values  were  absolutely 
out  of  their  realm.  Besides,  they  did  not  know  how  much 
wages  they  were  to  get,  neither  could  they  figure  the 
prices  of  the  things  they  bought.  At  any  rate,  when  pay- 
day came  they  were  still  in  debt,  so  they  saw  no  real 
money — certainly  little  Booker  at  this  time  of  his  life 
never  did, 

189 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


ENERAL  LEWIS  RUFFNER  owned  the 
salt-works  and  the  coalmine  where  little 
Booker  worked.  He  was  stern,  severe,  strict. 
But  he  believed  Negroes  were  human  beings, 
and  there  were  those  then  who  disputed  the  proposition. 
^  Ruffner  organized  a  night-school  for  his  helpers,  and 
let  a  couple  of  his  bookkeepers  teach  it.  At  this  time 
there  was  not  a  colored  person  in  the  neighborhood  who 
could  spell  cat,  much  less  write  his  name.  A  few  could 
count  five.  Booker  must  have  been  about  ten  years  old 
when  one  day  he  boasted  a  bit  of  his  skill  in  mathe- 
matics. The  foreman  told  him  to  count  the  loads  of  coal 
as  they  came  out  of  the  mine.  The  boy  started  in 
bravely,  **  One — two — three — ^four — dere  goes  one,  dere 
goes  anoder,  anoder,  anoder,  anoder,  anoder! " 
The  foreman  laughed. 

The  boy  was  abashed,  then  chagrined.  **  Send  me  to  the 
night-school  and  in  a  month  I  *11  show  you  how  to 
count!  "  58  5S 

The  foreman  wrote  the  lad  an  order  which  admitted 
him  to  the  night-school. 

But  now  there  was  another  difficulty — the  boy  worked 
until  nine  o*clock  at  night,  the  last  hour's  work  being  to 
sweep  out  the  office.  The  night-school  began  at  nine 
o'clock  and  it  was  two  miles  away. 
The  lad  scratched  his  head  and  thought  and  thought.  A 
great  idea  came  to  him — he  would  turn  the  office  clock 
ahead  half  an  hour.  He  could  then  leave  at  nine  o'clock, 
190 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


and  by  running  part  of  the  way  could  get  to  school  at 
exactly  nine  o'clock. 

The  scheme  worked  for  two  days,  when  one  of  the 
clerks  in  the  office  said  that  a  spook  was  monkeying 
with  the  clock.  They  tried  the  plan  of  locking  the  case, 
and  all  was  well. 

Booker  must  have  been  about  twelve  years  old,  goin* 
on  thirteen,  when  one  day  as  he  lay  on  his  back  in  the 
coalmine,  pushing  out  the  broken  coal  with  his  feet,  he 
overheard  two  men  telling  of  a  very  wonderful  school 
where  colored  people  were  taught  to  read,  write  and 
cipher — also,  how  to  speak  in  public.  The  scholars  were 
allowed  to  work  part  of  the  time  to  pay  for  their  board. 
^  The  lad  crawled  close  in  the  darkness  and  listened  to 
the  conversation.  He  caught  the  names  **  Hampton  ** 
and  "Armstrong.'*  Whether  Armstrong  was  the  place 
and  Hampton  was  the  name  of  the  man,  he  could  not 
make  out,  but  he  clung  to  the  names. 
Here  was  a  school  for  colored  people — he  would  go 
there!  That  night  he  told  his  mother  about  it.  She 
laughed,  patted  his  kinky  head,  and  indulged  him  in  his 
dream  3S  S& 

She  was  only  a  poor  black  woman;  she  could  not  spell 
ab,  nor  count  to  ten,  but  she  had  a  plan  for  her  boy — 
he  would  some  day  be  a  preacher. 

This  was  the  very  height  of  her  imagination — a  preacher! 
Beyond  this  there  was  nothing  in  human  achievement. 
The  night-school  came  after  a  day  of  fourteen  hours* 

191 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


work.  Little  Booker  sat  on  a  bench,  his  feet  dangling 
about  a  foot  from  the  floor.  As  he  sat  there  one  night 
trying  hard  to  drink  in  knowledge,  he  went  to  sleep.  He 
nodded,  braced  up,  nodded  again,  and  then  pitched 
over  in  a  heap  on  the  floor,  to  the  great  amusement  of 
the  class,  and  his  own  eternal  shame. 
The  next  day,  however,  as  he  was  feeling  very  sorrowful 
over  his  sad  experience,  he  heard  that  Mrs.  Ruffner 
wanted  a  boy  for  general  work  at  the  big  house. 
Here  was  a  chance.  Mrs.  Ruffner  was  a  Vermont 
Yankee,  which  meant  that  she  had  a  great  nose  for 
dirt,  and  would  not  stand  for  a  **  sassy  nigger."  Her 
reputation  had  gone  abroad,  and  of  how  she  pinched 
the  ears  of  her  **  help,**  and  got  them  up  at  exactly  a 
certain  hour,  and  made  them  use  soap  and  water  at 
least  once  a  day,  and  even  compelled  them  to  use  a 
toothbrush ;  all  this  was  history,  well  defined. 
Booker  said  he  could  please  her,  even  if  she  was  a 
Yankee.  He  applied  for  the  job  and  got  it,  with  wages 
fixed  at  a  dollar  a  week,  with  a  promise  of  twenty-five 
cents  extra  every  week,  if  he  did  his  work  without 
talking  back  and  breaking  a  tray  of  dishes. 


192 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


EN  I  US!    No  hovel   is  safe  from  it!"  says 
Whistler  5S  3S 

Genius  consists  in  doing  the  right  thing  with- 
out being  told  more  than  three  times. 
Booker  silently  studied  the  awful  Yankee  woman  to 
see  what  she  really  wanted.  He  finally  decided  that  she 
desired  her  servants  to  have  clean  skins,  fairly  neat 
clothing,  do  things  promptly,  finish  the  job  and  keep 
still  when  they  had  nothing  to  say. 
He  set  himself  to  please  her — and  he  did. 
She  loaned  him  books,  gave  him  a  lead-pencil,  and 
showed  him  how  to  write  with  a  pen  without  smearing 
his  hands  and  face  with  ink. 

He  told  her  of  his  dream  and  asked  about  Armstrong 
and  Hampton.  She  told  him  that  Armstrong  was  the 
man  and  Hampton  the  place. 

At  last  he  got  her  consent  to  leave  and  go  to  Hampton. 
fl  When  he  started  she  gave  him  a  comb,  a  toothbrush, 
two  handkerchiefs  and  a  pair  of  shoes.  He  had  been 
working  for  her  for  a  year,  and  she  thought,  of  course, 
he  saved  his  wages.  He  never  told  her  that  his  money 
had  gone  to  keep  the  family,  because  his  stepfather  had 
been  on  a  strike  and  therefore  out  of  work. 
So  the  boy  started  away  for  Hampton.  It  was  five  hun- 
dred miles  away.  He  did  n't  know  how  far  five  hundred 
miles  is — nobody  does  unless  he  has  walked  it. 
He  had  three  dollars,  so  he  gsiily  paid  for  a  seat  in  the 
stage.  At  the  end  of  the  first  day  he  was  forty  miles 

193 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


from  home  and  out  of  money.  He  slept  In  a  barn,  and  a 
colored  woman  handed  him  a  ham-bone  and  a  chunk 
of  bread  out  of  the  kitchen-window,  and  looked  the 
other  way. 

He  trudged  on  east — always  and  forever  east — towards 
the  rising  sun. 

He   walked   weeks — months — ^years,    he   thought.    He 
-  kept  no  track  of  the  days.  He  carried  his  shoes  as  a 
matter  of  economy. 

Finally  he  sold  the  shoes  for  four  dollars  to  a  man  who 
paid  him  ten  cents  cash  down,  and  promised  to  pay  the 
rest  when  they  should  meet  at  Hampton.  Nearly  forty 
years  have  passed  and  they  have  never  met. 
On  he  walked — on  and  on — east,  and  always  forever 
east  53  si 

He  reached  the  city  of  Richmond,  the  first  big  city  he 
had  ever  seen.  The  wide  streets — the  sidewalks — the 
street-lamps  entranced  him.  It  was  just  like  heaven. 
But  he  was  hungry  and  penniless,  and  when  he  looked 
wistfully  at  a  pile  of  cold  fried  chicken  on  a  street- 
stand  and  asked  the  price  of  a  drumstick,  at  the  same 
time  telling  he  had  no  money,  he  discovered  he  was  not 
in  heaven  at  all.  He  was  called  a  lazy  nigger  and  told  to 
move  on. 

Later  he  made  the  discovery  that  a  **  nigger  "  is  a 
colored  person  who  has  no  money. 
He  pulled  the  piece  of  rope  that  served  him  for  a  belt 
a  little  tighter,  and  when  no  one  was  looking,  crawled 

194 

i 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


under  a  sidewalk  and  went  to  sleep,  disturbed  only  by 

the  trampling  overhead. 

When  he  awoke  he  saw  he  was  near  the  dock,  where  a 

big  ship  pushed  its  bowsprit  out  over  the  street.  Men 

were  unloading  bags  and  boxes  from  the  boat.  He  ran 

down  and  asked  the  mate  if  he  could  help.  **  Yes!  "  was 

the  gruflF  answer. 

He  got  in  line  and  went  staggering  under  the  heavy 

loads  53  33 

He  was  little,  but  strong,  and  best  of  all,  willing,  yet  he 

reeled  at  the  work. 

**  Have  you  had  any  breakfast?  Yes,  you  liver-colored 

boy — you,  I  say,  have  you  had  your  breakfast?"   53 

**  No,  sir,**  said  the  boy;  **  and  no  supper  last  night  nor 

dinner  yesterday!  '* 

**  Well,  I  reckoned  as  much.  Now  you  take  this  quarter 

and  go  over  to  that  stand  and  buy  you  a  drumstick,  a 

cup  of  coffee  and  two  fried  cakes!  " 

The  lad  did  n't  need  urging.  He  took  the  money  in  his 

palm,  went  over  to  the  man  who  the  night  before  had 

called  him  a  lazy  nigger,  and  showing  the  silver,  picked 

out  his  piece  of  chicken. 

The  man  hastened  to  wait  on  him,  and  said  it  was  a 

fine  day  and  hoped  he  was  well. 


195 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


RRIVING  at  Hampton,  this  colored  boy,  who 
had  tramped  the  long,  weary  miles,  stood 
abashed  before  the  big  brick  building  which 
he  knew  was  Hampton  Institute. 
He  was  so  little — the  place  was  so  big — by  what  right 
could  he  ask  to  be  admitted  ? 

Finally  he  boldly  entered,  and  in  a  voice  meant  to  be 
firm,  but  which  was  very  shaky,  said,  **  I  am  here!  *' 
and  pointed  to  the  bosom  of  his  hickory  shirt. 
The  Yankee  woman  motioned  him  to  a  chair.  Negroes 
coming  there  were  plentiful.  Usually  they  wanted  to 
live  the  Ideal  Life.  They  had  a  call  to  preach — and  the 
girls  wanted  to  be  music-teachers. 
The  test  was  simple  and  severe:  would  they  and  could 
they  do  one  useful  piece  of  work  well  ? 
Booker  sat  and  waited,  not  knowing  that  his  patience 
was  being  put  to  the  test. 

Then  Miss  Priscilla,  in  a  hard,  Neill  Burgess  voice, 
**  guessed  '*  that  the  adjoining  recitation-room  needed 
sweeping  and  dusting.  She  handed  Booker  a  broom  and 
dust-cloth,  motioned  to  the  room,  and  went  away. 
Oho !  Little  did  she  know  her  lad.  The  colored  boy  smiled 
to  himself — sweeping  and  dusting  were  his  specialties — 
he  had  learned  the  trade  from  a  Yankee  woman  from 
Vermont!  He  smiled. 

Then  he  swept  that  room — ^moved  every  chair,   the 
table,  the  desk.  He  dusted  each  piece  of  furniture  four 
times.  He  polished  each  rung  and  followed  around  the 
196 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


baseboard  on  hands  and  knees.  ^  Miss  Priscilla  came 
back — ^pushed  the  table  around  and  saw  at  once  that 
the  dirt  had  not  been  concealed  beneath  it.  She  took 
out  her  handkerchief  and  wiped  the  table  top,  then  the 
desk  5S  5S 

She  turned,  looked  at  the  boy,  and  her  smile  met  his 
half-suppressed  triumphant  grin. 
**  You  *11  do,"  she  said. 


197 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


ENERAL  SAMUEL  C.  ARMSTRONG,  the 
founder  of  Hampton  Institute,  and  the  grand- 
father of  Tuskegee,  was  a  white  man  who 
fought  the  South  valiantly  and  well. 
He  seems  about  the  only  man  in  the  North  who,  at  the 
close  of  the  war,  clearly  realized  that  the  war  had  just 
begun — that  the  real  enemies  were  not  subdued^  and 
that  these  enemies  were  ignorance,  superstition  and 
incompetence. 

The  pitiable  condition  of  four  million  human  beings, 
flung  from  slavery  into  freedom,  thrown  upon  their  own 
resources,  with  no  thought  of  responsibility,  and  with 
no  preparation  for  the  change,  meant  for  them  only 
another  kind  of  slavery. 

General  Armstrong's  heart  went  out  to  them — he 
desired  to  show  them  how  to  be  useful,  helpful,  self- 
reliant,  healthy.  For  the  whites  of  the  South  he  had 
only  high  regard  and  friendship.  He,  of  all  men,  knew 
how  they  had  suffered  from  the  war — and  he  realized 
also  that  they  had  fought  for  what  they  believed  was 
right.  In  his  heart  there  was  no  hate.  He  resolved  to  give 
himself — ^his  life — ^his  fortune — his  intellect — his  love — 
his  all,  for  the  upbuilding  of  the  South.  He  saw  with 
the  vision  of  a  prophet  that  indolence  and  pride  were 
the  actual  enemies  of  white  and  black  alike.  The  blacks 
must  be  taught  to  work — to  know  the  dignity  of  human 
labor — to  serve  society — to  help  themselves  by  helping 
others.  He  realized  that  there  are  no  menial  tasks — that 
198 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


all  which  serves  is  sacred.  ^  And  this  Is  the  man  who 
sowed  the  seeds  of  truth  in  the  heart  of  the  nameless 
black  boy — Booker  Washington.  Armstrong's  shib- 
boleth, too,  was,  **  With  malice  toward  none,  but  with  I 
charity  for  all,  let  us  finish  the  work  God  has  given 
us  to  do/* 


199 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


DO  not  know  very  much  about  this  subject 
of  education,  yet  I  believe  I  know  as  much 
about  what  others  know  about  it  as  most 
people.  I  have  visited  the  principal  colleges 
of  America  and  Europe,  and  the  methods  of  Preparatory 
and  High  Schools  are  to  me  familiar.  I  know  the  night- 
schools  of  the  cities,  the  **  Ungraded  Rooms,"  the 
Schools  for  Defectives,  the  educational  schemes  in 
prisons,  the  Manual-Training  Schools,  the  New  Edu- 
cation (first  suggested  by  Socrates)  as  carried  out  by 
G.  Stanley  Hall,  John  Dewey,  and  dozens  of  other  good 
men  and  women  in  America.  I  am  familiar  with  the 
School  for  the  Deaf  at  Malone,  New  York,  and  the 
School  for  the  Blind  at  Batavia,  where  even  the  sorely 
stricken  are  taught  to  be  self-sufficient,  self-supporting 
and  happy.  I  have  tumbled  down  the  circular  fire-escape 
at  Lapeer  with  the  inmates  of  the  Home  of  Epileptics, 
and  heard  the  shouts  of  laughter  from  lips  that  neyer 
laughed  before.  I  have  seen  the  Jewish  Manual  Train- 
ing School  of  Chicago  transform  Russian  refugees  into 
useful  citizens — capable,  earnest  and  excellent.  I  know 
a  little  about  Swarthmore,  Wellesley,  Vassar,  Radcliffe, 
and  have  put  my  head  into  West  Point  and  Annapolis, 
and  had  nobody  cry,  **  Genius!  ** 

Of  Harvard,  Yale  and  Princeton  I  know  something, 
having  done  time  in  each.  I  have  also  given  jobs  to 
graduates  of  Oxford,  Cambridge  and  Heidelberg,  to  my 
sorrow  and  their  chagrin.  This  does  not  prove  that 
200 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


graduates  of  the  great  universities  are,  as  a  rule,  out  of 
work,  or  that  they  are  incompetent.  It  simply  means 
that  it  is  possible  for  a  man  to  graduate  at  these  institu- 
tions and  secure  his  diploma  and  yet  be  a  man  who  has 
nothing  the  world  really  wants,  either  in  way  of  ideas 
or  services. 

The  reason  that  my  **  cum  laude  '*  friends  did  not  like 
me,  and  the  cause  of  my  having  to  part  with  them — 
getting  them  a  little  free  transportation  from  your 
Uncle  George — ^was  not  because  they  lacked  intelligence, 
but  because  they  wanted  to  secure  a  position,  while  I 
simply  offered  them  a  job. 

They  were  like  Cave-of-the- Winds  of  Oshkosh,  who  is 
an  ice-cutter  in  August,  and  in  winter  is  an  out-of-door 
horticulturist — a  hired  man  is  something  else. 
As  a  general  proposition,  I  believe  this  will  not  now  be 
disputed:  thgjobject  of  education  is  that  a  man  may 
benefit  himself  bv  servipg  gnripfry. 

To  benefit  others,  you  must  be  reasonably  happy :  there 
must  be  animation  through  useful  activity,  good-cheer, 
kindness  and  health — health  of  mind  and  health  of 
body.  And  to  benefit  society  you  must  also  have 
patience,  persistency,  and  a  firm  determination  to  do 
the  right  thing,  and  to  mind  your  own  business  so  that 
others,  too,  may  mind  theirs.  Then  all  should  be 
tinctured  with  a  dash  of  discontent  with  past  achieve- 
ments, so  you  will  constantly  put  forth  an  effort  to  do 
more  and  better  work. 

201 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


When  what  you  have  done  in  the  past  looks  large  to  you, 
you  have  n't  done  much  today. 

So  there  you  get  the  formula  of  Education :  health  and 
happiness  through  useful  activity — ^animation,  kind- 
ness, good-cheer,  patience,  persistency,  willingness  to 
give  and  take,  seasoned  with  enough  discontent  to 
prevent  smugness,  which  is  the  scum  that  grows  over 
every  stagnant  pond. 

Of  course  no  college  can  fill  this  prescription — ^no  insti- 
tution can  supply  the  ingredients — all  that  the  college 
can  do  is  to  supply  the  conditions  so  that  these  things 
can  spring  into  being.  Plants  need  the  sunlight — mush- 
rooms are  different. 

The  question  is,  then,  what  teaching  concern  in  America 
supplies  the  best  quality  of  actinic  ray? 
And   I    answer,   Tuskegee   is   the  place,   and  Booker 
Washington  is  the  man. 

**  What!  '*  you  exclaim.  **  The  Ideal  School  a  school  for 
Negroes,  instituted  by  a  Negro,  where  only  Negroes 
teach,  and  only  Negroes  are  allowed  to  enter  as  stu- 
dents? "  53  3S 

And  the  answer  is,  **  Exactly  so." 

At  Tuskegee  there  are  nearly  two  thousand  students, 
and  over  one  hundred  fifty  teachers.  There  are  two 
classes  of  students — **  day-school  "  and  ** night-school" 
students.  The  night-school  students  work  all  day  at 
any  kind  of  task  they  are  called  upon  to  do.  They 
receive  their  board,  clothing  and  a  home — they  pay 
202 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


no  tuition,  but  are  paid  for  their  labor,  the  amount 
being  placed  to  their  credit,  so  when  fifty  dollars  is 
accumulated  they  can  enter  as  **  day  students." 
The  **  day  students  **  make  up  the  bulk  of  the  scholars. 
Each  pays  fifty  dollars  a  year.  These  all  work  every 
other  day  at  manual  labor  or  some  useful  trade. 
Tuskegee  has  fully  twice  as  many  applicants  as  it  can 
accommodate;  but  there  is  one  kind  of  applicant  who 
never  receives  any  favor.  This  is  the  man  who  says  he 
has  the  money  to  pay  his  way,  and  wishes  to  take  the 
academic  course  only.  The  answer  always  is:  **  Please 
go  elsewhere — there  are  plenty  of  schools  that  want 
your  money.  The  fact  that  you  have  money  will  not 
exempt  you  here  from  useful  labor." 
This  is  exactly  what  every  college  in  the  world  should  say. 
^  The  Tuskegee  farm  consists  of  about  three  thousand 
acres.  There  are  four  hundred  head  of  cattle,  about  five 
hundred  hogs,  two  hundred  horses,  great  flocks  of 
chickens,  geese,  ducks  and  turkeys,  and  many  swarms  of 
bees.  It  is  the  intention  to  raise  all  the  food  that  is  con- 
sumed on  the  place,  and  to  manufacture  all  supplies. 
There  are  wagon-shops,  a  sawmill,  a  harness-shop,  a  shoe- 
shop,  a  tailor-shop,  a  printing-plant,  a  model  laundry, 
a  canning  establishment.  Finer  fruit  and  vegetables  I 
have  never  seen,  and  the  thousands  of  peach,  plum  and 
apple  trees,  and  the  vast  acreage  of  berries  that  have 
been  planted,  will  surely  some  day  be  a  goodly  source  of 
srevenue  33  S& 

203 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


The  place  is  religious,  but  not  dogmatically  so — the 
religion  being  merely  the  natural  safety-valve  for  emo- 
tion. At  Tuskegee  there  is  no  lacrimose  appeal  to  confess 
your  sins — they  do  better — they  forget  them. 
I  never  heard  more  inspiring  congregational  singing,  and 
the  use  of  the  piano,  organ,  orchestra  and  brass  band 
^  are  important  factors  in  the  curriculum)  In  the  chapel  I 
spoke  to  an  audience  so  attentive,  so  alert,  so  receptive, 
so  filled  with  animation,  that  the  whole  place  looked 
like  a  vast  advertisement  for  Sozodont. 
j  No  prohibitive  signs  are  seen  at  Tuskegee.  All  is  afHrm- 
/  ative,  yet  it  is  understood  that  some  things  are  tabu — 
tobacco,  for  instance,  and  strong  drink, 'of  course  58 
We  have  all  heard  of  Harvard  Beer  and  Yale  Mixture, 
but  be  it  said  in  sober  justice.  Harvard  runs  no  brewery, 
and  Yale  has  no  official  brand  of  tobacco.  Yet  Harvard 
men  consume  much  beer,  and  many  men  at  Yale 
smoke.  And  if  you  want  to  see  the  cigarette-fiend  on  his 
native  heath,  you  '11  find  him  like  the  locust  on  the 
campus  at  Cambridge  and  New  Haven.  But  if  you  want 
to  see  the  acme  of  all  cigarette-bazaars,  just  ride  out  of 
Boylston  Street,  Boston,  any  day  at  noon,  and  watch 
the  boys  coming  out  of  the  Institute  of  Technology. 
^  I  once  asked  a  Tech  Professor  if  cigarette-smoking 
was  compulsory  in  his  institution.  **  Yes,**  he  replied; 
**  but  the  rule  is  not  strictly  enforced,  as  I  know  three 
students  who  do  not  smoke." 

Tuskegee  stands  for  order,  system,  cleanliness,  industry, 
204 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


courtesy  and  usefulness.  There  are  no  sink-holes  around 
the  place,  no  **  back  yards/'  Everything  is  beautiful, 
wholesome  and  sanitary.j  All  trades  are  represented. 
The  day  is  crammed  so  full  of  work  from  sunrise  to 
sunset  that  there  is  no  time  for  complaining,  misery  or 
faultfinding — three  things  that  are  usually  born  of 
idleness.  At  Tuskegee  there  are  no  servants.  All  of  the 
work  is  done  by  the  students  and  teachers — everybody 
works — everybody  is  a  student,  and  all  are  teachers  5S 
..  We  are  all  teachers,  whether  we  will  it  or  not — we  teach 
by  example,  and  all  students  who  do  good  work  are 
good  teachers. 

(When  the  Negro  is  able  to  do  skilled  work,  he  ceases  to 
be  a  problem — ^he  is  a  man.  (The  fact  that  Alexandre 
Dumas  was  a  Negro  does  not  count  against  him  in  the 
world's  assize. 

The  old-time  academic  college,  that  cultivated  the 
cerebrum  and  gave  a  man  his  exercise  in  an  indoor 
gymnasium,  or  not  at  all,  has  ruined  its  tens  of  thou- 
sands. To  have  top — head  and  no  lungs — ^is  not  wholly 
desirable.  The  student  was  made  exempt  from  every 
useful  thing,  just  as  the  freshly  freed  slave  hoped  and 
expected  to  be,  and  after  four  years  it  was  often  impos- 
sible for  him  to  take  up  the  practical  lessons  of  life.  He 
had  gotten  used  to  the  idea  of  one  set  of  men  doing  all 
the  work  and  another  set  of  men  having  the  culture.  To 
a  large  degree  he  came  to  regard  culture  as  the  aim  of 
life.  And  when  a  man  begins  to  pride  himself  upon  his 

205 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


culture,  he  has  n't  any  to  sp)eak  of.  Culture  must  be 
merely  incidental,  and  to  clutch  it  is  like  capturing  a 
butterfly:  you  do  not  secure  the  butterfly  at  all — you 
get  only  a  grub. 

Let  us  say  right  here  that  there  is  only  one  way  in 
which  a  Negro,  or  a  white  man,  can  ever  make  himself 
respected.  Statute  law  will  not  do  it;  rights  voted  him 
by  the  State  are  of  small  avail;  making  demands  will 
not  secure  the  desired  sesame.  If  we  ever  gain  the 
paradise  of  freedom  it  will  be  because  we  have  earned  it 
— because  we  deserve  it.  A  make-believe  education  may 
suffice  for  a  white  man — especially  if  he  has  a  rich 
father,  but  a  Negro  who  has  to  carve  out  his  own 
destiny  must  be  taught  order,  system,  and  quiet,  per- 
sistent, useful  effort. 

A  college  that  has  its  students  devote  one-half  their 
time  to  actual,  useful  work  is  so  in  line  with  common- 
sense  that  we  are  amazed  that  the  idea  had  to  be  put 
into  execution  by  the  ex-slave  as  a  life-saver  for  his 
disenfranchised  race.  Our  great  discoveries  are  always 
accidents:  we  work  for  one  thing  and  get  another.  I 
expect  that  the  day  will  come,  and  erelong,  when  the 
great  universities  of  the  world  will  have  to  put  the 
Tuskegee  Idea  into  execution  in  order  to  save  themselves 
from  being  distanced  by  the  Colored  Race. 
If  life  were  one  thing  and  education  another,  it  might  be 
all  right  to  separate  them.  Culture  of  the  head  over  a 
desk,  and  indoor  gymnastics  for  the  body,  are  not  the 
206 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


ideal,  and  that  many  succeed  in  spite  of  the  handicap 
is  no  proof  of  the  excellence  of  the  plan.  Ships  that  go 
around  the  world  accumulate  many  barnacles,  but 
barnacles  as  a  help  to  the  navigator  are  an  iridescent 
dream  5S   53 

A  little  regular  manual  labor,  rightly  mixed  with  the 
mental,  eliminates  draw-poker,  highballs,  brawls,  broils. 
Harvard  Beer,  Yale  Mixture,  Princeton  Pinochle, 
Chippee  dances,  hazing,  roistering,  rowdyism  and  the 
bulldog  propensity.  The  Heidelberg  article  of  cocked 
hat  and  insolent  ways  is  not  produced  at  Tuskegee.  At 
Tuskegee  there  is  no  place  for  those  who  lie  in  wait  for 
insults  and  regard  scrapping  as  a  fine  art.  As  for  college 
athletics  at  the  Orthodox  Universities,  only  one  man 
out  of  ten  ever  does  anything  at  it  anyway — the  college 
man  who  needs  the  gymnasium  most  is  practically 
debarred  from  everything  in  it  and  serves  as  a  laughing- 
stock whenever  he  strips.  Coffee,  cocaine,  bromide, 
tobacco  and  strong  drink  often  serve  in  lieu  of  exercise 
and  ozone,  and  Princeton  winks  her  woozy  eye  in 
innocency  53  53 

Freedom  can  not  be  bestowed — it  must  be  achieved. 
Education  can  not  be  given— it  must  be  earned.  Lincoln 
did  not  free  the  slaves — ^he  only  freed  himself.  The 
Negroes  did  not  know  they  were  slaves,  and  so  they 
had  no  idea  of  what  freedom  meant.CUntil  a  man  wants 
to  be  free,  each  kind  of  freedom  is  only  another  form  of 
slavery.  Booker  Washington  is  showing  the  colored  man 

207 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


/how  to  secure  a  genuine  freedom  through  useful  activity. 

(QTo^get  freedom  you  must  shoulder  responsibiUty. 
If  college  education  were  made  compulsory  by  the  State, 
and  one-half  of  the  curriculum  consisted  of  actual, 
useful  manual  labor,  most  of  our  social  ills  would  be 
solved,  and  we  would  be  well  out  on  the  highway 
towards  the  Ideal  City. 

Without  animation,  man  is  naught — nothing  is  accom- 
plished, nothing  done.  People  who  inspire  other  people 
have  animation  plus. 

And  animation  plus  is  ecstacy.  In  ecstasy  the  spirit 
rushes  out,  runs  over  and  saturates  all.  Oratory  is  an 
ecstasy  that  inundates  the  hearer  and  makes  him  ride 
upon  the  crest  of  another's  ideas. 

Art  is  born  of  ecstasy — art  is  ecstasy  in  the  concrete. 
Beautiful  music  is  ecstsisy  expressed  in  sound,  regulated 
into  rhythm,  cadence  and  form.  **  Statuary  is  frozen 
music,"  said  Heine. 

A  man  who  is  not  moved  into  ecstasy  by  ecstasy  is 
hopeless.  A  people  that  has  not  the  surging,  uplifting, 
onward  power  that  ecstasy  gives,  is  decadent — dead  3S 
The  Negro  is  easily  moved  to  ecstasy.  Very  little  musical 
training  makes  him  a  power  in  song.  At  Tuskegee  the 
congregational  singing  is  a  feature  that,  once  heard,  is 
never  to  be  forgotten.  Fifteen  hundred  people  lifting 
up  their  hearts  in  an  outburst  of  emotion — song! 
Fifteen  hundred  people  of  one  mind,  doing  anything  in 
unison — do  you  know  what  it  means?  Ecstasy  is 
208 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


essentially  a  matter  of  sex.  In  art  and  religion  sex  can 
not  be  left  out  of  the  equation.  The  simple  fact  that  in 
forty  years  the  Negro  race  in  America  has  increased 
from  four  million  to  ten  million  tells  of  their  ecstasy  as 
a  people.  **  Only  happy  beings  reproduce  themselves," 
says  Darwin.  Depress  your  animal  and  it  ceases  to 
breed;  so  there  are  a  whole  round  of  animals  that  do 
not  reproduce  in  captivity.  But  in  slavery  or  freedom 
the  Negro  sings,  and  reproduces — he  is  not  doomed  nor 
depressed — his  soul  arises  superior  to  circumstance  3S 
Without  animation,  education  is  impossible.  And  the 
problem  of  the  educator  is  to  direct  this  singing,  flowing, 
moving  spirit  of  the  hive  into  useful  channels. 
Education  is  simply  the  encouragement  of  right  habits — 
the  fixing  of  good  habits  until  they  become  a  part  of 
one's  nature,  and  are  exercised  automatically. 
The  man  who  is  industrious  by  habit  is  the  only  man 
who  wins.  The  man  who  is  not  industrious  except  when 
driven  to  it,  or  when  it  occurs  to  him,  accomplishes 
little  3S  5S 

Man  gets  his  happiness  by  doing:  and  work  to  a  slave 
is  always  distasteful.  The  power  of  mimicry  and  imita- 
tion is  omitted — the  owner  does  not  work — the  strong 
man  does  not  work.  Ergo — to  grow  strong  means  to 
cease  work.  To  be  strong  means  to  be  free — to  be  free 
means  no  work! 

It  has  been  a  frightfully  bad  education  that  the  Negro 
has  had — ^work  distasteful,  and  work  disgraceful!  And 

209 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


the  slave-owner  suffered  most  of  all,  for  he  came  to 
regard  work  as  debasing. 

And  now  a  Negro  is  teaching  the  Negro  that  work  is 
beautiful — that  work  is  a  privilege — that  only  through 
^^illing^seryice  can  he^ ever  win  his  freedoniiArchitecture 
is  fixed  ecstasy,  inspired  always  by  a  strong  man  who 
gives  a  feeling  of  security.  Athens  was  an  ecstasy  in 
marble  5S  53 

Tuskegee  is  an  ecstasy  in  brick  and  mortar. 
Don't  talk  about  the  education  of  the  Negro!  The 
experiment  has  really  never  been  tried,  except  spas- 
modically, of  educating  either  the  whites  or  the  blacks 
in  the  South — or  elsewhere. 

A  Negro  is  laying  hold  upon  the  natural  ecstasy  of  the 
Negro,  and  directing  it  into  channels  of  usefulness  and 
excellence.  Can  you  foretell  where  this  will  end — this 
formation  of  habits  of  industry,  sobriety  and  con- 
tinued, persistent  effort  towards  the  right? 
BookerWashington,  child  of  a  despised  race,  has  done 
aliaira^bi^at  the  comH^^^d^edagogic  a^lZ^rii^d^ 
wisdom  of  ages  has  failed  to  do.  He  is  the  Moses  who 
by  his  example  is  leading  the  children  of  his  former 
oppressors  out  into  the  light  of  social,  mental,  moral 
_and  economic  freedom., 

I  am  familiar  in  detail  with  every  criticism  brought 
against  Tuskegee.  On  examination  these  criticisms  all 
reduce  themselves  down  to  three: 
1  •  A  V8ist  sum  of  money  has  been  collected  by  Booker 
210 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


Washington  for  his  own  aggrandizement  and  benefit. 

2.  Tuskegee  is  a  show-place  where  all  the  really  good 
work  is  done  by  picked  men  from  the  North. 

3.  Booker  Washington  is  a  tyrant,  a  dictator  and  an 
egotist.  ^  If  I  were  counsel  for  Tuskegee — as  I  am  not — 
I  would  follow  the  example  of  the  worthy  accusers,  and 
submit  the  matter  without  argument.  Booker  Washing- 
ton can  afford  to  plead  guilty  to  every  charge;  and  he 
has  never  belittled  himself  by  answering  his  accusers. 
^But  let  the  facts  be  known,  that  this  man  heis  collected 
upward  of  six  million  dollars,  mostly  from  the  people  of 
the  North,  and  has  built  up  the  nearest  perfect  educa- 
tional institution  in  the  world. 

It  is  probably  true  that  many  of  his  teachers  and  best 
workers  are  picked  people — but  they  are  Negroes,  and 
were  selected  by  a  Negro.  The  great  general  reveals  his 
greatness  in  the  selection  of  his  generals:  it  was  the 
marshals  whom  Napoleon  appointed  who  won  for  him 
his  victories;  but  his  spirit  animated  theirs,  and  he 
chose  them  for  this  one  reason — ^he  could  dominate 
them.  He  infused  into  their  souls  a  goodly  dash  of  his 
own  enthusiasm. 

Booker  Washington  is  a  greater  general  than  Napoleon. 
For  the  Tuskegee  idea  no  Waterloo  awaits.  And  as  near 
as  I  can  judge,  Booker  Washington's  most  noisy  critics 
are  merely  camp-followers. 

That  the  man  is  a  tyrant  and  a  dictator  there  is  no 
doubt.  He  is  a  beneficent  tyrant,  but  a  tyrant  still,  for 

211 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


he  always,  invariably,  has  his  own  way  in  weighty 
matters — in  trivialities  others  can  have  theirs.  And  as 
for  dictatorship,  the  man  who  advances  on  chaos  and 
transforms  it  into  cosmos  is  perforce  a  dictator  and  an 
egotist  3S  53 

Booker  Washington  believes  he  is  in  the  right,  and  he 
makes  no  effort  to  conceal  the  fact  that  he  is  on  earth. 
In  him  there  is  no  disposition  to  run  and  peep  about, 
and  find  himself  a  dishonorable  grave.  All  live  men  are 
egotists,  and  they  are  egotists  just  in  proportion  as  they 
have  life.  Dead  men  are  not  egotists.  Booker  Washing- 
ton has  life  in  abundance,  and  through  him  I  truly 
believe  runs  the  spirit  of  Divinity,  if  ever  a  living  man 
had  it.  A  man  like  this  is  the  instrument  of  Deity. 
Tuskegee  Institute  has  applications  ahead  all  the  time, 
from  all  over  America,  for  competent  colored  men  and 
women  who  can  take  charge  of  important  work  and  do 
it.  Dressmakers,  housekeepers,  cooks,  farmers,  stock- 
men, builders,  gardeners,  are  in  demand.  The  world  has 
never  yet  had  enough  people  to  bear  its  burdens. 
Recently  we  have  heard  much  of  the  unemployed,  but 
a  very  little  search  will  show  that  the  people  out  of  work 
are  those  of  bad  habits,  which  make  them  unreliable 
and  untrustworthy.  The  South,  especially,  needs  the 
willing  worker  and  the  practical  man.  And  best  of  all  the 
South  knows  it,  and  stands  ready  to  pay  for  the  service. 
^  A  few  years  ago  there  was  a  fine  storm  of  protest  from 
Northern  Negroes  to  the  effect  that  Booker  Washington 
212 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


was  endeavoring  to  limit  the  Negro  to  menial  service — 
that  is,  thrust  him  back  into  servility.  The  first  ambi- 
tion of  the  Negro  was  to  get  an  education  so  that  he 
might  become  a  Baptist  preacher.  To  him,  education 
meant  freedom  from  toil,  and  of  course  we  do  not  have 
to  look  far  to  see  where  he  got  the  idea.  Then  when 
Tuskegee  came  forward  and  wanted  to  make  black- 
smiths, carpenters  and  brick-masons  out  of  black  men, 
there  was  a  cry,  **  If  this  means  education,  we  will  none 
of  it — treason,  treason!  "It  was  assumed  that  the  Negro 
who  set  other  Negroes  to  work  was  not  their  friend. 
This  phase  of  the  matter  requires  neither  denial  nor 
apology.  We  smile  and  pass  on. 

In  Eighteen  Hundred  Seventy-seven,  the  Negro  was 
practically  disenfranchised  throughout  the  South,  by 
being  excluded  from  the  primaries.  He  had  no  recognized 
ticket  in  the  field.  For  both  the  blacks  and  the  whites 
this  hats  been  well.  To  most  of  the  blacks  freedom 
meant  simply  exemption  from  work.  So  there  quickly 
grew  up  a  roistering,  turbulent,  idle  and  dangerous 
class  of  black  men  who  were  used  by  the  most  ambitious 
of  their  kind  for  political  ends.  To  preserve  the  peace  of 
the  community,  the  whites  were  forced  to  adopt  heroic 
measures,  with  the  result  that  we  now  have  the  dis- 
enfranchised Negro. 

Early  in  the  Eighties,  Booker  Washington  realized  that, 
politically,  there  was  no  hope  for  his  race.  He  saw, 
however,  that  commerce  recognized  no  color  line.  We 

213 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


would  buy,  sell  and  trade  with  the  black  man  on  abso- 
lute equality.  Life-insurance  companies  would  insure 
him,  banks  would  receive  his  deposits,  and  if  honest  and 
competent,  would  loan  him  money.  If  he  could  shoe  a 
horse,  we  waived  his  complexion ;  and  in  every  sort  and 
kind  of  craftsmanship  he  stood  on  absolute  equality 
with  the  whites.  The  only  question  ever  asked  was, 
**  Can  you  do  the  work?  " 

And  Booker  Washington  set  out  to  help  the  Negro  win 
success  for  himself  by  serving  society  through  becoming 
skilled  in  doing  useful  things.  And  so  it  became  Head, 
Hand  and  Heart.  The  manual  was  played  off  against 
the  intellectual. 

I  But  over  and  beyond  the  great  achievement  of  Booker 
Washington  in  founding  and  carrying  to  a  successful 
issue  the  most  complete  educational  scheme  of  this  age, 
or  any  other,  stands  the  man  himself.  He  is  one  without 
hate,  heat  or  prejudice.jNo  one  can  write  on  the  lintels 
of  his  doorpost  the  word,  **  Whim.*'  He  is  half -white, 
but  calls  himself  a  Negro.  He  sides  with  the  disgraced 
and  outcast  black  woman  who  gave  him  birth,  rather 
than  with  the  respectable  white  man  who  was  his  sire. 
^  He  rides  in  the  Jim  Crow  cars,  and  on  long  trips,  if  it 
is  deemed  expedient  to  use  a  sleeping-car,  he  hires  the 
stateroom,  so  that  he  may  not  trespass  or  presume  upon 
those  who  would  be  troubled  by  the  presence  of  a 
colored  man.  Often  in  traveling  he  goes  for  food  and 
shelter  to  the  humble  home  of  one  of  his  own  people. 
214 


BOOKER    T.    WASHINGTON 


\ 


At  hotels  he  receives  and  accepts,  without  protest  or 
resentment,  the  occasional  contumely  of  the  inferior 
whites — ^whites  too  Ignorant  to  appreciate  that  one  of 
God's  noblemen  stands  before  them.  For  the  whites  of 
the  South  he  has  only  words  of  kindness  and  respect ; 
the  worst  he  says  about  them  Is  that  they  do  not  under- 
stand. His  modesty,  his  patience,  his  forbearance,  are 
sublime.  /He  Is  a  true  FaBian — ^he^oes^what  he jg3J? 
^ke  flie  foyd^lfeiJ^croT^  oppoftumst^thaF^g'^)  Every 
petty  annoyance  Is  passed  over;  the  gibes  and  jeers  and 
the  Ingratitude  of  his  own  race  are  forgotten.  **  They 
do  not  understand,**  he  calmly  says.  He  does  his  work. 
He  Is  respected  by  the  best  people  of  North  and  South. 
He  has  the  confidence  of  the  men  of  affairs — he  is  a 
safe  man. 


215 


THOMAS  ARNOLD 


Let  me  mind  my  own  personal  work;  keep  myself  pure 

and  zealous  and  believing;  laboring  to  do  God*s  will  in 

this  fruitful  vineyard  of  young  lives  committed  to  my 

charge,  as  my  allotted  field,  until  my  work  be  done. 

—Thomas  Arnold 


THOMAS  ARNOLD 


THOMAS  ARNOLD 


HOMAS  ARNOLD  was  born  in 
Seventeen  Hundred  Ninety-five, 
and  died  in  Eighteen  Hundred 
Forty-two.  His  life  was  short,  as 
men  count  time,  but  he  Uved  long 
enough  to  make  for  himself  a  name 
and  a  fame  that  are  both  lasting  and 
luminous.  Though  he  was  neither  a 
great  writer  nor  a  great  preacher,  yet  there  were  times 
when  he  thought  he  was  both.  He  was  only  a  school- 
teacher. However,  he  was  an  artist  in  schoolteaching, 
and  art  is  not  a  thing — it  is  a  way.  It  is  the  beautiful 
way — the  effective  way. 

Schoolteachers  have  no  means  of  proving  their  prowess 
by  conspicuous  waste,  and  no  time  to  convince  the 
world  of  their  excellence  through  conspicuous  leisure; 
consequently,  for  histrionic  purposes,  a  schoolteacher's 
cosmos  is  a  plain,  slaty  gray.  Schoolteachers  do  not 
wallow  in  wealth  nor  feed  fat  at  the  public  trough.  No 
one  ever  accuses  them  of  belonging  to  the  class  known 
as  the  predatory  rich,  nor  of  being  millionaire  male- 
factors. They  have  to  do  their  work  every  day  at 
certain  hours  and  dedicate  its  results  to  time. 
For  many  years  Thomas  Arnold  has  been  known  as  the 
father  of  his  son.  Several  great  men  have  been  thus  over- 
shadowed. The  father  of  Disraeli,  for  instance,  was 

219 


THOMAS    ARNOLD 


favored  by  fame  and  fortune,  until  his  gifted  son  moved 
into  the  limelight,  and  after  that  Pater  shone  mostly 
in  a  reflected  glory.  Jacopo  Bellini  was  the  greatest 
painter  in  Venice  until  his  two  sons,  Gian  and  Gentile, 
surpassed  him,  and  history  writes  him  down  as  the 
father  of  the  Bellinis.  Lyman  Beccher  was  regarded  as 
America's  greatest  preacher  until  Henry  Ward  moved 
the  mark  up  a  few  notches.  The  elder  Pitt  was  looked 
upon  as  a  genuine  statesman  until  his  son  graduated 
into  the  Cabinet,  and  then  **  the  terrible  cornet  of 
horse  "  became  known  as  the  father  of  Pitt.  Now  that 
both  are  dust,  and  we  are  getting  the  proper  perspective, 
we  see  that  **  the  great  commoner  **  was  indeed  a  great 
man,  and  so  they  move  down  the  corridors  of  time 
together,  arm  in  arm,  this  father  and  son.  That  excellent 
person  who  carried  the  gripsacks  of  greatness  so  long 
that  he  thought  the  luggage  was  his  own,  Major  James 
B.  Pond,  launched  at  least  one  good  thing.  It  was  this: 
**  Matthew  Arnold  gave  fifty  lectures  in  America,  and 
nobody  ever  heard  one  of  them;  those  in  his  audience 
who  could  no  longer  endure  the  silence  slipped  quietly 
out."  3S  53 

Matthew  Arnold  was  a  critic  and  writer  who,  having 
secured  a  tuppence  worth  of  success  through  being  the 
son  of  his  father,  and  thus  securing  the  speaker's  eye, 
finally  got  an  oratorical  bee  in  his  bonnet  and  went 
a-barnstorming.  He  cultivated  reserve  and  indifference, 
both  of  which  he  was  told  were  necessary  factors  of 
220 


THOMAS    ARNOLD 


success  in  a  public  speaker.  ^  And  this  is  true.  But  they 
will  not  make  an  orator,  any  more  than  long  hair,  a 
peculiar  necktie,  and  a  queer  hat  will  float  a  poet  on  the 
tide  of  time  safely  into  the  Hall  of  Fame. 
Matthew  Arnold  cultivated  repose,  but  instead  of  con- 
vincing the  audience  that  he  had  power,  he  only  made 
them  think  he  was  sleepy.  Major  Pond,  having  lived 
much  with  orators,  and  thinking  the  trick  easy,  tried 
oratory  on  his  own  account,  and  succeeded  as  well  as 
did  Matthew  Arnold.  No  one  ever  heard  Major  Pond: 
his  voice  fell  over  the  footlights,  dead,  into  the  orchestra ; 
only  those  with  opera-glasses  knew  he  was  talking  5S 
But  to  be  unintelligible  is  not  a  special  recommendation. 
Men  may  be  moderate  for  two  reasons — through  excess 
of  feeling  and  because  they  are  actually  dull. 
Matthew  Arnold  has  slipped  back  into  his  true  position 
— that  of  a  man  of  letters.  The  genius  is  a  man  of  affairs. 
Humanity  is  the  theme,  not  books.  Books  are  usually 
written  about  the  thoughts  of  men  who  wrote  books. 
Books  die  and  disintegrate,  but  humanity  is  an  endless 
procession,  and  the  souls  that  go  marching  on  are  those 
who  fought  for  freedom,  not  those  who  speculate  on 
abstrusities  5S  5S 

The  credential  of  Thomas  Arnold  to  immortality  is  not 
that  he  was  the  father  of  Matthew  and  eight  other  little 
Arnolds,  but  it  lies  in  the  fact  that  he  fought  for  a  wider 
horizon  in  life  through  education.  He  lifted  his  voice  for 
liberty.  He  believed  in  the  divinity  of  the  child,  not  in 

221 


THOMAS    ARNOLD 


its  depravity.  Arnold  of  Rugby  was  a  teacher  of  teach- 
ers, as  every  great  teacher  is.  The  pedagogic  world  is 
now  going  back  to  his  philosophy,  just  as  in  statesman- 
ship we  are  reverting  to  Thomas  Jefferson.  These  men 
who  spoke  classic  truth,  not  transient — truth  that  fits 
in  spite  of  fashion,  time  and  place — are  the  true  proph- 
ets of  mankind.  Such  was  Thomas  Arnold! 


222 


THOMAS    ARNOLD 


F  Thomas  Arnold  had  been  just  a  little  bigger, 
the  world  probably  would  never  have  heard 
of  him,  for  an  interdict  would  have  been 
placed  upon  his  work.  The  miracle  is  that,  as 
it  was,  the  Church  and  the  State  did  not  snuff  him  out. 
fl  He  stood  for  sweet  reasonableness,  but  unintention- 
ally created  much  opposition.  His  life  was  a  warfare. 
Yet  he  managed  to  make  himself  acceptable  to  a  few; 
so  for  fourteen  years  this  head  master  of  a  preparatory 
school  for  boys  lived  his  life  and  did  his  work.  He  sent 
out  his  radiating  gleams,  and  grew  straight  in  the 
strength  of  his  spirit,  and  lived  out  his  life  in  the  light. 
^  His  sudden  death  sanctified  and  sealed  his  work 
before  he  was  subdued  and  ironed  out  by  the  conven- 
tions 38  53 

Happy  Arnold!  If  he  had  lived,  he  might  have  met  the 
fate  of  Arnold  of  Brescia,  who  was  also  a  great  teacher. 
Arnold  of  Brescia  was  a  pupil  of  Abelard,  and  was 
condemned  by  the  Church  as  a  disturber  of  the  peace 
for  speaking  in  eulogy  of  his  master.  Later,  he  attacked 
the  profligacy  of  the  idle  prelates,  as  did  Luther, 
Savonarola  and  all  the  other  great  church-reformers. 
When  ordered  into  exile  and  silence,  he  still  protested 
his  right  to  speak.  He  was  strangled  on  order  of  the 
Pope,  his  body  burned,  and  the  ashes  thrown  into  the 
Tiber.  The  Baptists,  I  believe,  claim  Arnold  of  Brescia 
SIS  the  forerunner  of  their  sect,  and  certain  it  is  that  he 
was  of  the  true  Roger  Williams  type. 

223 


THOMAS    ARNOLD 


Thomas  Arnold,  too,  was  filled  with  a  passion  for  right- 
eousness. His  zeal  for  the  upright,  manly  life  constituted 
hisstrength.  Of  course  he  would  not  have  been  executed, 
as  was  Arnold  of  Brescia — the  times  had  changed — ^he 
would  simply  have  been  shelved,  poohpoohed,  deprived 
of  his  living  and  socially  Crapseyized.  Death  saved  him 
— aged  forty-seven — and  his  soul  goes  marching  on! 


224 


THOMAS    ARNOLD 


HE  parents  of  Thomas  Arnold  belonged  to 
the  great  Middle  Class — that  class  which 
Disraeli  said  never  did  any  thinking  on  its 
own  account,  but  to  the  best  of  its  ability 
deferred  to  and  imitated  the  idle  rich  in  matters  of 
religion,  education  and  politics. 

Doctor  Johnson  maintained  that  if  members  of  the 
Middle  Class  worked  hard  and  economized,  it  was  in 
the  hope  that  they  might  leave  money  and  name  for 
their  children  and  make  them  exempt  from  all  useful 
effort  53  33 

**  To  indict  a  class,**  said  Burke,  **  is  neither  reasonable 
nor  right/*  But  certain  it  is  that  a  vast  number  of 
fairly  intelligent  people  in  England  and  elsewhere 
regard  the  life  of  the  **  aristocracy  **  as  very  desirable 
and  beautiful. 

To  this  end  they  want  their  boys  to  become  clergymen, 
lawyers,  doctors  or  army  officers. 

**  Only  two  avenues  of  honor  are  open  to  aspiring  youth 
in  England,**  said  Gladstone — **  the  Army  and  the 
Church.**  53  53 

The  father  of  Thomas  Arnold  was  Collector  of  Customs 
at  Cowes,  Isle  of  Wight.  Holding  this  petty  office  under 
the  Government,  with  a  half-dozen  men  at  his  com- 
mand, we  can  easily  guess  his  caliber,  habits,  belief  and 
mode  of  life.  He  was  respectable ;  and  to  be  respectable, 
a  Collector  of  Customs  must  be  punctilious  in  Church 
matters,  in  order  to  be  acceptable  to  Church  people,  for 

225 


THOMAS    ARNOLD 


of  such  is  the  Kingdom  of  Heaven.  The  parents  of 
Thomas  Arnold  very  naturally  centered  their  ambitions 
for  him  on  the  Church,  as  he  was  not  very  strong. 
When  the  child  was  only  six  years  old,  the  father  died 
from  **  spasm  of  the  heart.'*  At  this  time  the  boy  had 
begun  to  take  Latin,  and  his  education  was  being  looked 
after  by  a  worthy  governess,  who  daily  drilled  his 
mental  processes  and  took  him  walking,  leading  him  by 
the  hand.  On  Sundays  he  wore  a  wide,  white  collar, 
shiny  boots  and  a  stiff  hat.  The  governess  cautioned 
him  not  to  soil  his  collar,  nor  to  get  mud  on  his  boots. 
fl  In  later  years  he  told  how  he  looked  covetously  at 
the  boys  who  wore  neither  hats  nor  boots,  and  who  did 
not  have  a  governess. 

His  mother  had  a  fair  income,  and  so  this  prim,  precise, 
exact  and  crystallized  m.ode  of  education  was  con- 
tinued. Out  of  her  great  love  for  her  child,  the  mother 
sent  him  away  from  home  when  he  was  eight  years  old. 
Of  course  there  were  tears  on  both  sides;  but  now  a 
male  man  must  educate  him,  and  women  were  to  be 
dropped  out  of  the  equation — this  that  the  evil  in  the 
child  should  be  curbed,  his  spirit  chastened,  and  his 
mind  disciplined. 

The  fact  that  a  child  rather  liked  to  be  fondled  by  his 
mother,  or  that  his  mother  cared  to  fondle  him,  was 
proof  of  total  depravity  on  the  part  of  both. 
The  Reverend  Doctor  Griffiths,  who  took  charge  of  the 
boy  for  two  years,  was  certainly  not  cruel,  but  at  the 
226 


THOMAS    ARNOLD 


same  time  he  was  not  exactly  human.  In  Nature  we 
never  hear  of  a  she-lion  sending  her  cubs  away  to  be 
looked  after  by  a  denatured  lion.  It  is  really  doubtful 
whether  you  could  ever  raise  a  lion  to  lionhood  by  this 
method.  Some  goat  would  come  along  and  butt  the  life 
out  of  him,  even  after  he  had  evolved  whiskers  and  a 
mane  53  53 

After  two  years  with  Doctor  Griffiths,  young  Arnold  was 
sent  to  Manchester,  where  he  remained  in  a  boys* 
boarding-house  from  his  tenth  to  his  fourteenth  year. 
To  the  teachers  here — all  men — he  often  paid  tribute, 
but  uttered  a  few  heretical  doubts  as  to  whether 
discipline  as  a  substitute  for  mother-love  was  not  an 
error  of  pious  but  overzealous  educators. 
At  sixteen  years  of  age  he  was  transferred  to  Corpus 
Christi  College  at  Oxford.  In  Eighteen  Hundred  Fifteen, 
being  then  twenty  years  of  age,  he  was  elected  a  Fellow 
of  Oriel  College,  and  there  he  resided  until  he  wsis 
twenty-four  53  53 

He  was  a  prizeman  in  Latin,  Greek  and  English,  and 
was  considered  a  star  scholar — both  by  himself  and  by 
others.  Ten  years  afterwards  he  took  a  backward 
glance,  and  said:  **At  twenty- two  I  was  proud,  precise, 
stiff,  formal,  uncomfortable,  unhappy,  and  uninten- 
tionally made  everybody  else  unhappy  with  whom  I 
came  in  contact.  The  only  people  I  really  mixed  with 
were  those  whose  lives  were  dedicated  to  the  ablative." 
^  When  twenty-four  he  was  made  a  deacon  and  used 

227 


THOMAS    ARNOLD 


to  read  prayers  at  neighboring  chapels,  for  which 
service  he  was  paid  five  shillings.  Being  now  thrown  on 
his  own  resources,  he  did  the  thing  a  prizeman  always 
does:  he  showed  others  how.  As  a  tutor  he  was  a  success: 
more  scholars  came  to  him  than  he  could  really  take 
care  of.  But  he  did  not  like  the  work,  since  all  the 
pupil  desired,  and  all  the  parents  desired,  was  that  he 
should  help  the  backward  one  get  his  marks,  and  glide 
through  the  eye  of  a  needle  into  pedagogic  paradise  58 
At  twenty-six  he  was  preaching,  teaching  and  writing 
learned  essays  about  things  he  did  not  understand. 
^  From  this  brief  sketch  it  will  be  seen  that  the  early 
education  of  Thomas  Arnold  was  of  the  kind  and  type 
that  any  fond  parent  of  the  well-to-do  Middle  Class 
would  most  desire.  He  had  been  shielded  from  all 
temptations  of  the  world;  he  could  do  no  useful  thing 
with  his  hands;  his  knowledge  of  economics — ^ways  and 
means — ^was  that  of  a  child;  of  the  living  present  he 
knew  little,  but  of  the  dead  past  he  assumed  and  believed 
he  knew  much. 

It  was  purely  priestly,  institutional  education.  It  was 
the  kind  of  education  that  every  well-to-do  Briton  would 
like  to  have  his  sons  receive.  It  was,  in  short,  England's 
Ideal  5S  5S 


228 


THOMAS    ARNOLD 


UGBY  GRAMMAR  SCHOOL  was  endowed 
in  Sixteen  Hundred  Fifty-three  by  one 
Laurence  Sherif,  a  worthy  grocer.  The  orig- 
inal gift  was  comparatively  small,  but  the 
investment  being  in  London  real  estate,  has  increased  in 
value  until  it  yields  now  an  income  of  about  thirty-five 
thousand  dollars  a  year. 

In  the  time  of  Arnold  there  were  about  three  hundred 
pupils.  It  is  not  a  large  school  now;  there  are  high 
schools  in  a  hundred  cities  of  America  that  surpass  it 
in  many  ways. 

Rugby's  claim  to  special  notice  lies  in  its  traditions — 
the  great  men  who  were  once  Rugby  boys,  and  the 
great  men  who  were  Rugby  teachers.  Also,  in  the  fact 
that  Thomets  Hughes  wrote  a  famous  story  called, 
**  Tom  Brown  at  Rugby." 

Rugby  Grammar  School  was  one  hundred  twenty-five 
years  old  when  Sir  Joshua  Reynolds  commissioned 
Lord  Cornwallis  to  go  to  America  and  fetch  George 
Washington  to  England,  that  Sir  Joshua  might  paint 
his  portrait. 

For  a  hundred  years  prior  to  the  time  of  Arnold,  there 
had  not  been  a  perceptible  change  in  the  methods  of 
teaching.  The  boys  were  herded  together.  They  fought, 
quarreled,  divided  into  cliques;  the  big  boys  bullied  the 
little  ones.  Fagging  was  the  law;  so  the  upper  forms 
enslaved  the  lower  ones.  There  was  no  home  life,  and 
the  studies  were  made  irksome  and  severe,  purposely, 

229 


THOMAS    ARNOLD 


as  it  was  thought  that  pleasant  things  were  sinful. 
^  If  any  better  plan  could  have  been  devised  to  make 
study  absolutely  repulsive,  so  the  student  would 
shun  it  as  soon  as  he  was  out  of  school,  we  can  not 
guess  it. 

The  system  was  probably  born  of  inertia  on  the  part  of 
the  teachers.  The  pastor  who  pushes  through  his  pre- 
scribed services,  with  mind  on  other  things,  and  thus 
absolves  his  conscience  for  letting  his  congregation  go 
drifting  straight  to  Gehenna,  was  duplicated  in  the 
teacher.  He  did  his  duty — and  nothing  more. 
Selfishness,  heartlessness  and  brutality  manipulated  the 
birch.  Head  was  all ;  heart  and  hand  nothing.  This  was 
schoolteaching.  As  a  punishment  for  failure  to  memorize 
lessons,  there  were  various  plans  to  disgrace  and  dis- 
courage the  luckless  ones.  Standing  in  the  corner  with 
face  to  the  wall,  and  the  dunce-cap,  had  given  place  to 
a  system  of  fines,  whereby  **  ten  lines  of  Vergil  for 
failure  to  attend  prayers,"  and  ten  more  for  failure  to 
get  the  first,  often  placed  the  boy  in  hopeless  bank- 
ruptcy. If  he  was  a  fag,  or  slave  of  a  higher-form  boy, 
cleaning  the  other's  boots,  scrubbing  stairs,  running  on 
foolish  and  needless  errands,  getting  cuffs  and  kicks  by 
way  of  encouragement,  he  saw  his  fines  piling  up  and 
no  way  ever  to  clear  them  off  and  gain  freedom  by 
promotion  33  38 

Viewed  from  our  standpoint,  the  thing  has  a  ludicrous 
bouffe  air  that  makes  us  smile.  But  to  the  boy  caught  in 
230 


THOMAS    ARNOLD 


the  toils  it  was  tragic.  To  work  and  evolve  in  an  environ- 
ment of  such  brutaUty  was  impossible  to  certain 
temperaments.  Success  lay  in  becoming  calloused  and 
indifferent.  If  the  boy  of  gentle  habits  and  slight 
physical  force  did  not  sink  into  mental  nothingness,  he 
was  in  danger  of  being  bowled  over  by  disease  and 
death  33  33 

Indeed,  the  physical  condition  of  the  pupils  was  very 
bad:  smallpox,  fevers,  consumption,  and  breaking  out 
with  sores  and  boils,  were  common. 
Thomas  Arnold  was  thirty-three  years  old  when  he  was 
called  as  head  master  to  Rugby.  He  was  married,  and 
babies  were  coming  along  with  astonishing  regularity. 
He  had  taken  priestly  orders  and  was  passing  rich  on 
one  hundred  pounds  a  year.  Poverty  and  responsibiltiy 
had  given  him  ballast,  and  love  for  his  own  little  brood 
had  softened  his  heart  and  vitalized  his  soul. 
As  a  writer  and  speaker  he  had  made  his  presence  felt  at 
various  college  commencements  and  clergymen's  meet- 
ings. He  had  challenged  the  brutal,  indifferent,  lazy  and 
so-called  disciplinary  methods  of  teaching. 
And  so  far  as  we  know,  he  is  the  first  man  in  England  to 
declare  that  the  teacher  should  be  the  foster-parent  of 
the  child,  and  that  all  successful  teaching  must  be  born 
of  love  33  33 

The  well-upholstered  conservatives  twiddled  their 
thumbs,  coughed,  and  asked:  **  How  about  the  doctrine 
of  total  depravity?  Do  you  mean  to  say  that  the  child 

231 


THOMAS    ARNOLD 


should  not  be  disciplined?  What  does  Solomon  say  about 
the  use  of  the  rod?  Does  the  Bible  say  that  the  child  is 
good  by  nature?  *' 

But  Thomas  Arnold  could  not  explain  all  he  knew. 
Moreover,  he  did  not  wish  to  fight  the  Church — ^he 
believed  in  the  Church — to  him  it  was  a  divine  institu- 
tion. But  there  were  methods  and  practises  in  the 
Church  that  he  would  have  liked  to  forget. 
**  My  sympathies  go  out  to  inferiority,*'  he  said.  The 
weakling  often  needed  encouragement,  not  discipline. 
The  bad  boy  must  be  won,  not  suppressed. 
In  one  of  these  conferences  of  clergymen,  Arnold  said: 
fl  **  I  once  chided  a  pupil,  a  little,  pale,  stupid  boy — 
undersized  and  seemingly  half -sick — for  not  being  able 
to  recite  his  very  simple  lesson.  He  looked  up  at  me  and 
said  v/ith  a  touch  of  spirit:  *  Sir,  why  do  you  get  angry 
with  me?  Do  you  not  know  I  am  doing  the  best 
lean?*"  5S  5S 

One  of  the  clergymen  present  asked  Arnold  how  he 
punished  the  boy  for  his  impudence. 
And  Arnold  replied:  **  I  did  not  punish  him — he  had 
properly  punished  me.  I  begged  his  pardon.** 
The  idea  of  a  teacher  begging  the  pardon  of  a  pupil  was 
a  brand-new  thing. 

Several  clergymen  present  laughed — one  scowled — two 
sneezed.  But  a  Bishop,  shortly  after  this,  urged  the 
name  of  Thomas  Arnold  as  master  of  Rugby,  and  added 
to  his  recommendation  this  line:  **  If  elected  to  the 
232 


THOMAS    ARNOLD 


office  he  will  change  the  methods  of  schoolteaching  in 
every  public  school  in  England/' 

The  ayes  had  it,  and  Arnold  was  called  to  Rugby.  The 
salary  was  so-so,  the  pupils  between  two  and  three 
hundred  in  number — many  were  home  on  sick-leave — 
the  Sixth  Form  was  in  charge. 


233 


THOMAS    ARNOLD 


HE  genius  of  Arnold  was  made  manifest,  almost 
as  soon  as  he  went  to  Rugby,  by  the  way  in 
which  he  managed  the  boys  who  bullied  the 
whole  school,  and  what  is  worse,  did  it  legally. 


^  Fagging  was  official. 

The  Sixth  Form  was  composed  of  thirty  boys  who  stood 
at  the  top,  and  these  boys  ran  the  school.  They  were 
boys  who,  by  reason  of  their  size,  strength,  aggressive- 
ness and  mental  ability,  got  the  markings  that  gave 
them  this  autocratic  power.  They  were  now  immune 
from  authority — they  were  free.  In  a  year  they  would 
gravitate  to  the  University. 

We  can  hardly  understand  now  how  a  bully  could  get 
markings  through  his  bullying  propensities;  but  a 
rudimentary  survival  of  the  idea  may  yet  be  seen  in 
big  football-players,  who  are  given  good  marks,  and 
very  gentle  mental  massage  in  class.  If  the  same 
scholars  were  small  and  skinny,  they  would  certainly 
be  plucked. 

The  faculty  found  freedom  in  shifting  responsibility  for 
discipline  to  the  Sixth  Form. 

Read  the  diary  of  Arnold,  and  you  will  be  amazed  on 
seeing  how  he  fought  against  taking  from  the  Sixth 
Form  the  right  to  bodily  chastise  any  scholar  in  the 
school  that  the  king  of  the  Sixth  Form  declared  deserved 
it  53  58 

If  a  teacher  thought  a  pupil  needed  punishment,  he 
turned  the  luckless  one  over  to  the  Sixth  Form.  Can  we 
234 


THOMAS    ARNOLD 


now  conceive  of  a  system  where  the  duty  of  certain 
scholars  was  to  whip  other  scholars  ?  Not  only  to  whip 
them,  but  to  beat  them  into  insensibility  if  they  fought 
back?  53  33 

Such  was  schoolteaching  in  the  public  schools  of 
England  in  Eighteen  Hundred  Thirty. 
Against  this  brutality  there  was  now  a  growing  senti- 
ment— ^a  piping  voice  bidding  the  tide  to  stay! 
But  now  that  Arnold  was  in  charge  of  Rugby,  he  got 
the  ill-will  of  his  directors  by  declaring  that  he  did  not 
intend  to  curtail  the  powers  of  the  Sixth  Form — he 
proposed  to  civilize  it.  To  try  out  the  new  master,  the 
Sixth  Form,  proud  in  their  prowess,  sent  him  word  that 
if  he  interfered  with  them  in  any  way,  they  would  first 
•*  bust  up  the  school,'*  and  then  resign  in  a  body.  More- 
over, they  gave  it  out  that  if  any  pupil  complained  to 
the  master  concerning  the  Sixth  Form,  the  one  so  com- 
plaining would  be  taken  out  by  night  and  drowned  in 
the  classic  Avon. 

There  were  legends  among  the  younger  boys  of  strange 
disappearances,  and  these  were  attributed  to  the  swift 
vengeance  of  **  The  Bloody  Sixth.** 
Above  the  Sixth  Form  there  was  no  law. 
Every  scholar  took  off  his  hat  to  a  **  Sixth.*'  A  Sixth 
uncovered  to  nobody,  and  touched  his  cap  only  to  a 
teacher  53  53 

And  custom  had  become  so  rooted  that  the  Sixth  Form 
was  regarded  as  a  sort  of  police  necessity — ^a  caste  which 

235 


THOMAS    ARNOLD 


served  the  school  just  as  the  Army  served  the  Church. 
To  reach  the  Sixth  Form  were  paradise — it  meant 
Uberty  and  power — Uberty  to  do  as  you  pleased,  and 
power  to  punish  all  who  questioned  your  authority  Si 
To  uproot  the  power  of  the  Sixth  Form  was  the  intent 
of  a  few  reformers  in  pedagogics. 

There  were  two  ways  to  deal  with  the  boys  of  the  Sixth 
— fight  them  or  educate  them. 

Arnold  called  the  Rugby  Sixth  together  and  assured 
them  that  he  could  not  do  without  their  help.  He 
needed  them:  he  wanted  to  make  Rugby  a  model  school, 
a  school  that  would  influence  all  England — ^would  they 
help  him? 

The  dogged  faces  before  him  showed  signs  of  interest. 
He  continued,  without  waiting  for  their  reply,  to  set 
before  them  his  ideal  of  an  English  Gentleman.  He 
persuaded  them,  melted  them  by  his  glowing  personal- 
ity, shook  hands  with  each,  and  sent  them  away. 
The  next  day  he  again  met  them  in  the  same  intimate 
way,  and  one  of  the  boys  made  bold  to  assure  him  that 
if  he  wanted  anybody  licked — pupils  or  teachers — they 
stood  ready  to  do  his  bidding. 

He  thanked  the  boy,  but  assured  him  that  he  was  of  the 
opinion  that  it  would  not  be  necessary  to  do  violence  to 
any  one ;  he  was  going  to  unfold  to  them  another  way — 
a  new  way,  which  was  very  old,  but  which  as  yet 
England  had  not  tried. 

236 


THOMAS    ARNOLD 


HE  great  teacher  is  not  the  one  who  imparts 

the  most  facts — he  is  the  one  who  inspires  by 

supplying  a  nobler  ideal. 

Men  are  superior  or  inferior  just  in  the  ratio 
that  they  possess  certain  qualities.  Truth,  honor,  frank- 
ness, health,  system,  industry,  kindliness,  good-cheer 
and  a  spirit  of  helpfulness  are  so  far  beyond  any  mental 
acquisition  that  comparisons  are  not  only  odious,  but 
absurd  53  33 

Arnold  inspired  qualities,  and  in  this  respect  his  work 
at  Rugby  forms  a  white  milestone  on  the  path  of  prog- 
ress in  pedagogy. 
To  an  applicant  for  a  position  as  teacher,  Arnold  wrote : 

What  I  want  is  a  man  who  is  a  Christian  and  a  gentle- 
man, an  active  man,  and  one  who  has  commonsense, 
and  understands  boys.  I  do  not  so  much  care  about 
scholarship,  as  he  will  have  immediately  under  him  the 
lowest  forms  in  the  school,  but  yet,  on  second  thought, 
I  do  care  about  it  very  much,  because  his  pupils  may 
be  in  the  highest  forms;  and  besides,  I  think  that  even 
the  elements  are  best  taught  by  a  man  who  has  a 
thorough  knowledge  of  the  matter.  However,  if  one 
must  give  way,  I  prefer  activity  of  mind  and  an  interest 
in  his  work  to  high  scholarship;  for  the  one  may  be 
acquired  far  more  easily  than  the  other.  I  should  wish  it 
also  to  be  understood  that  the  new  master  may  be 
called  upon  to  take  boarders  in  his  house,  it  being  my 
intention  for  the  future  to  require  this  of  all  masters  as 
I  see  occasion,  that  so  in  time  the  school-barracks 
may  die  a  natural  death.  With  this  to  offer,  I  think  I 

237 


THOMAS    ARNOLD 


have  a  right  to  look  rather  high  for  the  man  whom 
I  fix  upon,  and  it  is  my  great  object  to  get  here  a  society 
of  intelUgent,  gentlemanly  and  active  men,  who  may 
permanently  keep  up  the  character  of  the  school,  and 
if  I  were  to  break  my  neck  tomorrow,  carry  it  on. 

^  Ideas  are  in  the  air,  and  great  inventions  are  worked 
out  in  different  parts  of  the  world  at  the  same  time. 
Rousseau  had  written  his"  Emile,**  but  we  are  not  aware 
that  Arnold  ever  read  it. 

And  if  he  had,  he  probably  would  have  been  shocked, 
not  inspired,  by  its  almost  brutal  frankness.  The  French 
might  read  it — the  English  could  not. 
Pestalozzi  was  working  out  his  ideas  in  Switzerland,  and 
Froebel,  an  awkward  farmer  lad  in  Germany,  was 
dreaming  dreams  that  were  to  come  true.  But  Thomas 
Arnold  caught  up  the  threads  of  feeling  in  England  and 
expressed  them  in  the  fabric  of  his  life. 
His  plans  were  scientific,  but  his  reasons,  unlike  those  of 
Pestalozzi,  will  not  always  stand  the  test  of  close  analy- 
sis. Arnold  was  true  to  the  Church,  but  he  found  it 
convenient  to  forget  much  for  which  the  Church  stood. 
He  went  back  to  a  source  nearer  the  fountainhead.  All 
reforms  in  organized  religion  lie  in  returning  to  the 
primitive  type.  The  religion  of  Jesus  was  very  simple; 
that  of  a  modern  church  dignitary  is  very  complex.  One 
can  be  understood;  the  other  has  to  be  explained  and 
expounded,  and  usually  several  languages  are  required. 
^Arnold  would  have  his  boys  evolve  into  Christian 
238 


THOMAS    ARNOLD 


gentlemen.  And  his  type  of  English  gentleman  he  did 
not  get  out  of  books  on  theology — it  was  his  own  com- 
posite idea.  But  having  once  evolved  it,  he  cast  around 
to  justify  it  by  passages  of  Scripture.  This  was  beautiful, 
too,  but  from  our  standpoint  it  was  n't  necessary  38 
From  his  it  was. 

A  gentleman  to  him  was  a  man  who  looked  for  the 
best  in  other  people,  and  not  for  their  faults;  who 
overlooked  slights;  who  forgot  the  good  he  had  done; 
who  was  courteous,  kind,  cheerful,  industrious  and 
clean  inside  and  out;  who  was  slow  to  wrath,  fervent 
in  spirit,  serving  the  Lord.  And  the  **  Lord  **to  Arnold 
was  embodied  in  Church  and  State. 
Arnold  used  to  say  that  schoolteaching  should  not  be 
based  upon  religion,  but  it  should  be  religion.  And  to 
him  religion  and  conduct  were  one. 
That  he  reformed  Rugby  through  the  Sixth  Form  is  a 
fact.  He  infused  into  the  big  boys  the  thought  that 
they  must  help  the  little  ones;  that  for  a  first  offense  a 
lad  must  never  be  punished;  that  he  should  have  the 
matter  fully  explained  to  him,  and  be  shown  that  he 
should  do  right  because  it  is  right,  and  not  for  fear  of 
punishment  5S  53 

The  Sixth  Form  was  taught  to  unbend  its  dignity  and 
enter  into  fellowship  with  its  so-called  inferiors.  To 
this  end  Arnold  set  the  example  of  playing  cricket  with 
the  **  scrubs.'*  53  He  never  laughed  at  a  poor  player 
nor  at  a  poor  scholar.  He  took  dull  pupils  into  his  own 

239 


THOMAS    ARNOLD 


house,  and  insisted  that  his  helpers,  the  other  teachers, 
should  do  the  same.  He  showed  the  Sixth  Form  how 
much  better  it  was  to  take  the  part  of  the  weak,  and 
stop  bullying  the  lower  forms,  than  to  set  the  example 
of  it  in  the  highest.  Before  Arnold  had  been  at  Rugby 
a  year,  the  Sixth  Form  had  resolved  itself  into  a  Recep- 
tion Committee  that  greeted  all  newcomers,  got  them 
located,  introduced  them  to  the  other  boys,  showed 
them  the  sights,  and  looked  after  their  wants  like  big 
brothers  or  foster-fathers. 

Christianity  to  Arnold  was  human  service.  In  his  zeal 
to  serve,  to  benefit,  to  bless,  to  inspire,  he  never  tired  5S 
Such  a  disposition  as  this  is  contagious.  In  every  big 
business  or  school,  there  is  one  man's  mental  attitude 
that  animates  the  whole  institution.  Everybody  par- 
takes of  it.  When  the  leader  gets  melancholia,  the  shop 
has  it — the  whole  place  becomes  tinted  with  ultra- 
marine. The  best  helpers  begin  to  get  out,  and  the 
honeycombing  process  of  dissolution  is  on. 
A  school  must  have  a  soul,  just  as  surely  as  a  shop, 
a  bank,  a  hotel,  a  store,  a  home,  or  a  church  has  to 
have.  When  an  institution  grows  so  great  that  it  has 
no  soul — simply  a  financial  head  and  a  board  of  direc- 
tors— dry-rot  sets  in  and  disintegration  in  a  loose 
wrapper  is  at  the  door. 

This  explains  why  the  small  colleges  are  the  best,  when 
they  are :  there  is  a  personality  about  them,  an  animating 
spirit  that  is  pervasive  and  preservative. 
240 


THOMAS    ARNOLD 


Thomas  Arnold  was  not  a  man  of  vast  learning,  nor 
could  one  truthfully  say  he  had  a  surplus  of  intellect; 
but  he  had  soul,  plus.  He  never  sought  to  save  himself. 
He  gave  himself  to  the  boys  of  Rugby.  His  heart  went 
out  to  them,  he  believed  in  them — and  he  believed 
them  even  when  they  lied,  and  he  knew  they  lied.  He 
knew  that  humanity  was  sound  at  heart;  he  believed 
in  the  divinity  of  mankind,  and  tried  hard  to  forget 
the  foolish  theology  that  taught  otherwise. 
Like  Thomas  Jefferson,  who  installed  the  honor  system 
in  the  University  of  Virginia,  he  trusted  young  men. 
He  made  his  appeal  to  that  germ  of  goodness  which 
is  in  every  human  soul.  In  some  ways  he  anticipated 
Ben  Lindsey  in  his  love  for  the  boy,  and  might  have 
conjured  forth  from  his  teeming  brain  the  Juvenile 
Court,  and  thus  stopped  the  creation  of  criminals, 
had  his  life  not  been  consumed  in  a  struggle  with 
stupidity  and  pedantry  gone  to  seed  that  cried  to 
him,  "  Oh,  who  ever  heard  of  such  a  thing  as  that! " 
^The  Kindergarten  utilizes  the  propensity  to  play; 
and  Arnold  utilizes  the  thirst  for  authority.  Altruism 
is  flavored  with  a  desire  for  approbation. 
The  plan  of  self-government  by  means  of  utilizing  the 
Sixth  Form  was  quite  on  the  order  of  our  own  **  George 
Junior  Republic."  **  A  school,**  he  said,  **  should  be 
self-governing  and  cleanse  itself  from  that  which  is 
harmful.**  And  again  he  says:  "  If  a  pupil  can  gratify 
his  natural  desire  for  approbation  by  doing  that  which 

241 


THOMAS    ARNOLD 


Is  right,  proper  and  best,  he  will  work  to  this  end  instead 
of  being  a  hero  by  playing  the  rowdy.  It  is  for  the 
scholars  to  set  the  seal  of  their  approval  on  character, 
and  they  will  do  so  if  we  as  teachers  speak  the  word. 
If  I  find  a  room  in  a  tumult,  I  blame  myself,  not  the 
scholars.  It  is  I  who  have  failed,  not  they.  Were  I  what 
I  should  be,  every  one  of  my  pupils  would  reflect  my 
worth.  I  key  the  situation,  I  set  the  pace,  and  if  my 
soul  is  in  disorder,  the  school  will  be  in  confusion." 
^  Nothing  is  done  without  enthusiasm.  It  is  heart  that 
wins,  not  head,  the  round  world  over.  And  yet  head 
must  systematize  the  promptings  of  the  heart.  Arnold 
had  a  way  of  putting  soul  into  a  hand-clasp.  His  pupils 
never  forgot  him.  Wherever  they  went,  no  matter  how 
long  they  lived,  they  proclaimed  the  praises  of  Arnold 
of  Rugby.  How  much  this  earnest,  enthusiastic,  loving 
and  sincere  teacher  has  influenced  civilization,  no  man 
can  say.  But  this  we  know,  that  since  his  day  there  has 
come  about  a  new  science  of  teaching.  The  birch  has 
gone  with  the  dunce-cap.  The  particular  cat-o'-nine- 
tails that  was  burned  in  the  house  of  Thomas  Arnold 
as  a  solemn  ceremony,  when  the  declaration  was  made, 
**  Henceforth  I  know  my  children  will  do  right  !  "  has 
found  its  example  in  every  home  of  Christendom  5S 
We  no  longer  whip  children.  Schools  are  no  longer 
places  of  dread,  pain  and  suffering,  and  we  as  teachers 
are  repeating  with  Friedrich  Froebel  the  words  of  the 
Nazarene,  **  Suffer  little  children  to  come  unto  me, 
242 


THOMAS    ARNOLD 


and  forbid  them  not,  for  of  such  is  the  Kingdom  of 

Heaven.** 

Also,  we  say  with  Thomas  Arnold:  **  The  boy  is  father 

to  the  man.  A  race  of  gentlemen  can  only  be  produced 

by  fostering  in  the  boy  the  qualities  that  make  for 

health,  strength  and  a  manly  desire  to  bless,  benefit 

and  serve  the  race." 


243 


FRIEDRICH  FROEBEL 


The  purpose  of  the  Kindergarten  is  to  provide  the 
necessary  and  natural  help  which  poor  mothers  require 
who  have  to  be  about  their  work  all  day,  and  must  leave 
their  children  to  themselves.  The  occupations  pursued 
in  the  Kindergarten  are  the  following:  free  play  of  a 
child  by  itself;  free  play  of  several  children  by  them- 
selves; associated  play  under  the  guidance  of  a  teacher; 
gymnastic  exercises;  several  sorts  of  handiwork  suited 
to  little  children;  going  for  walks;  learning  music,  both 
instrumental  and  vocal;  learning  the  repetition  of 
poetry;  story- telling ;  looking  at  really  good  pictures; 

aiding  in  domestic  occupations;  gardening. 

— Froebel 


FRIEDRICH  FROEBEL 


RIEDRICH  FROEBEL  was  born  in 
a  Thuringian  village,  April  Twenty- 
first,  Seventeen  Hundred  Eighty- 
two.  His  father  was  pastor  of  the 
Lutheran  Church.  When  scarcely  a 
year  old  his  mother  died.  Erelong 
a  stepmother  came  to  fill  her  place 
— but  did  n*t.  This  stepmother  was 
the  kind  we  read  about  in  the  **  Six  Best  Sellers.**  5S 
Her  severity,  lack  of  love,  and  needlessly  religious  zeal 
served  the  future  Kindergartner  a  dark  background 
on  which  to  paint  a  joyous  picture.  Froebel  was  edu- 
cated by  antithesis.  His  home  was  the  type  etched  so 
unforgetably  by  Colonel  Ed.  Howe  in  his  **  Story  of  a 
Country  Town,**  which  is  n*t  bad  enough  to  be  one  of 
the   Six   Best   Sellers. 

At  the  age  of  ten,  out  of  pure  pity,  young  Friedrich 
was  rescued  from  the  cuckoo* s  nest  by  an  uncle  who 
had  a  big  family  of  his  own  and  love  without  limit. 
There  was  a  goodly  brood  left,  so  little  Friedrich,  slim, 
slender,  yellow,  pensive  and  sad,  was  really  never  missed. 
^The  uncle  brought  the  boy  up  to  work,  but  treated  him 
like  a  human  being,  answering  his  questions,  even 
allowing  him  to  have  stick  horses  and  little  log  houses 
and   a   garden   of   his   own. 

At  fifteen  his  nature  had  begun  to  awaken,  and  the 

247 


FRIEDRICH    FROEBEL 


uncle,  harkening  to  the  boy's  wish,  apprenticed  him 
for  two  years  to  a  forester.  The  young  man's  first  work 
was  to  make  a  Ust  of  the  trees  in  a  certain  tract  and 
approximate  their  respective  ages.  The  night  before 
his  work  began  he  lay  awake  thinking  of  the  fun  he 
was  going  to  have  at  the  job.  In  after-years  he  told  of 
this  incident  in  showing  that  it  was  absurd  to  try  to 
divorce  work  from  play.  ^  The  two  years  as  forester's 
apprentice,  from  fifteen  to  seventeen,  were  really  better 
for  him  than  any  university  could  have  been.  His  step- 
mother's instructions  had  mostly  been  in  the  line  of 
prohibition.  From  earliest  babyhood  he  had  been 
warned  to  **  look  out."  When  he  went  on  the  street 
it  was  with  a  prophecy  that  he  would  get  run  over  by 
a  cart,  or  stolen  by  the  gypsies,  or  fall  off  the  bridge 
and  be  drowned.  The  idea  of  danger  had  been  dinged 
into  his  ears  so  that  fear  had  become  a  part  of  the 
fabric  of  his  nature.  Even  at  fifteen,  he  took  pains  to 
get  out  of  the  woods  before  sundown  to  avoid  the  bears. 
At  the  same  time  his  intellect  told  him  there  were  no 
bears  there.  But  the  shudder  habit  was  upon  him  38 
Yet  by  degrees  the  work  in  the  woods  built  up  his  body 
and  he  grew  to  be  at  home  in  the  forest,  both  day  and 
night.  His  duties  taught  him  to  observe,  to  describe, 
to  draw,  to  investigate,  to  decide.  Then  it  was  trans- 
plantation, and  perhaps  the  best  of  college  life  con- 
sists in  taking  the  youth  out  of  the  home  environment 
and  supplying  him  new  surroundings. 
248 


FRIEDRICH    FROEBEL 


Forestry  In  America  is  a  brand-new  science.  To  clear 
the  ground  has  been  our  desire,  and  so  to  strip,  burn 
and  destroy,  saving  only  such  logs  as  appealed  to  us 
for  **  lumber,**  was  the  desideratum.  But  now  we  are 
seriously  considering  the  matter  of  tree-planting  and 
tree-preservation,  and  perhaps  it  would  be  well  to  ask 
ourselves  if  two  years  at  forestry,  right  out  of  doors, 
in  contact  with  Nature,  wrestling  with  the  world  of 
wood,  rock,  plant  and  living  things,  would  n't  be  better 
for  the  boy  than  double  the  time  in  stuffy  dormitories 
and  still  more  stuffy  recitation-rooms — listening  to 
stuffy  lectures  about  things  that  are  foreign  to  life  3S 
I  would  say  that  a  boy  is  a  savage,  but  I  do  not  care  to 
give  offense  to  fond  mammas.  To  educate  him  in  the 
line  of  his  likes,  as  the  race  has  been  educated,  seems 
sensible  and  right.  How  would  Yellowstone  Park 
answer  for  a  National  University,  with  Captain  Jack 
Crawford,  William  Muldoon,  John  Burroughs,  John 
Dewey,  Stanley  Hall  and  a  mixture  of  men  of  these 
types,  for  a  faculty  ? 

Froebel  thought  his  two  years  in  the  forest  saved  him 
from  consumption,  and  perhaps  from  insanity,  for  it 
taught  him  to  look  out,  not  in,  and  to  lend  a  hand.  At 
times  he  was  a  little  too  sentimental,  as  it  was,  and  a 
trifle  more  of  morbidity  and  sensitiveness  would  have 
ruined  his  life,  absolutely. 

The  woods  and  God's  great  out-of-doors  gave  him  bal- 
ance and  ballast,  good  digestion  and  sweet  sleep  o'  nights. 

249 


FRIEDRICH    FROEBEL 


The  two  years  past,  he  went  to  Jena,  where  he  had  an 
elder  brother.  This  brother  was  a  star  scholar,  and 
Friedrich  looked  up  to  him  as  a  pleiad  of  pedagogy. 
He  became  a  professor  in  a  Jena  preparatory  school 
and  then  practised  medicine;  but  he  never  had  the 
misfortune  to  affront  public  opinion,  and  so  oblivion 
lured  and  won  him,  and  took  him  as  her  own. 
At  Jena  poor  Froebel  did  not  make  head.  His  prepara- 
tory work  had  n*t  prepared  him.  He  floundered  in 
studies  too  deep  for  one  of  his  age,  then  followed  some 
foolish  advice  and  hired  a  tutor  to  help  him  along. 
Then  he  fell  down,  was  plucked,  got  into  debt,  and 
also  into  the  **  career,"  where  he  boarded  for  nine  weeks 
at  the  expense  of  the  State. 

In  the  career  he  did  n't  catch  up  with  his  studies,  quite 
naturally,  and  the  imprisonment  almost  broke  his 
health.  Had  he  been  in  the  career  for  dueling,  he  would 
have  emerged  a  hero.  But  debt  meant  that  he  had 
neither  money  nor  friends.  When  he  was  given  his 
release,  as  an  economic  move,  he  slipped  away  between 
two  days  and  made  his  way  to  the  Forestry  Office, 
where  he  applied  for  a  job  as  laborer.  He  got  it.  In  a 
few  days  he  was  promoted  to  chief  of  apprentices  Si 
Forestry  meant  a  certain  knowledge  of  surveying,  and 
this  Froebel  soon  acquired.  Then  came  map-making, 
and  that  was  only  fun.  From  map-making  to  architec- 
ture is  but  a  step,  and  Froebel  quit  the  woods  to  work 
as  assistant  to  an  architect  at  ten  pounds  a  year  and 
250 


FRIEDRICH    FROEBEL 


found.  It  was  confining  work,  and  a  trifle  more  exacting 
than  he  had  expected — it  required  a  deal  of  mathematics, 
and  mathematics  was  FroebeFs  short  suit.  Froebel  was 
disappointed  and  so  was  his  employer — ^when  something 
happened.  It  usually  does  in  books,  and  in  life,  always. 


251 


FRIEDRICH     FROEBEL 


ENIUS  has  its  prototype.  Before  Froebel 
comes  Pestalozzi,  the  Swiss,  who  studied 
theology  and  law,  and  then  abandoned  them 
both  as  futile  to  human  evolution,  and  turned 
his  attention  to  teaching.  Pestalozzi  was  inspired  by 
Jean  Jacques  Rousseau,  and  read  his  **  Emile  *'  religi- 
ously. To  teach  by  natural  methods  and  mix  work  and 
study,  and  make  both  play,  was  his  theme.  Pestalozzi 
believed  in  teaching  out  of  doors,  because  children  are 
both  barbaric  and  nomadic — they  want  to  go  some- 
where. His  was  the  Aristotle  method,  as  opposed  to 
those  of  the  closet  and  the  cloister.  But  he  made  the 
mistake  of  saying  that  teaching  should  be  taken  out 
of  the  hands  and  homes  of  the  clergy,  and  then  the 
clergy  said  a  few  things  about  him. 
Pestalozzi  at  first  met  with  very  meager  encouragement. 
Only  poor  and  ignorant  people  entrusted  their  children 
to  his  care,  and  some  of  the  parents  were  actually  paid 
in  money  for  the  services  of  the  children.  The  thought 
that  the  children  were  getting  an  education  and  being 
useful  at  the  same  time  was  quite  beyond  their  com- 
prehension 38  5S 

Pestalozzi  educated  by  stealth.  At  first  he  took  several 
boys  and  girls  of  eight,  ten  or  twelve  years  of  age,  and 
had  them  work  with  him  in  his  garden.  They  cared  for 
fowls,  looked  after  the  sheep,  milked  the  cows.  The 
master  worked  with  them,  and  as  they  worked  they 
talked.  Going  to  and  from  their  duties,  Pestalozzi  would 
252 


FRIEDRICH    FROEBEL 


call  their  attention  to  the  wild  birds,  and  to  the  flowers, 
plants  and  weeds.  They  would  draw  pictures  of  things, 
make  collections  of  leaves  and  flowers,  and  keep  a  record 
of  thdir  observations  and  discoveries.  Through  keeping 
these  records  they  learned  to  read  and  write  and 
acquired  the  use  of  simple  mathematics.  Things  they 
did  not  understand  they  would  read  about  in  the  books 
found  in  the  teacher's  library.  But  books  were  second- 
ary and  quite  incidental  in  the  scheme  of  study.  When 
work  seemed  to  become  irksome  they  would  all  stop 
and  play  games.  At  other  times  they  would  sit  and 
just  talk  about  what  their  work  happened  to  suggest. 
If  the  weather  was  unpleasant,  there  was  a  shop  where 
they  made  hoes  and  rakes  and  other  tools  they  needed. 
They  also  built  bird-houses,  and  made  simple  pieces  of 
furniture,  so  all  the  pupils,  girls  and  boys,  became  more 
or  less  familiar  with  carpenter's  and  blacksmith's  tools. 
They  patched  their  shoes,  mended  their  clothing,  and 
at  times  prepared  their  own  food. 
Pestalozzi  found  that  the  number  of  pupils  he  could 
look  after  in  this  way  was  not  more  than  ten.  But  to 
his  own  satisfaction,  at  least,  he  proved  that  children 
taught  by  his  method  surpassed  those  who  were  given 
the  regular  set  courses  of  instruction.  His  chief  diffi- 
culties lay  in  the  fact  that  the  home  did  not  co-operate 
with  the  school,  and  that  there  was  always  a  tendency 
to  **  return  to  the  blanket." 

Pestalozzi  wrote    accounts    of    his    experiments    and 

253 


FRIEDRICH    FROEBEL 


emphasized  his  belief  that  we  should  educate  through 
the  child's  natural  activities ;  also  that  all  growth  should 
be  pleasurable.  His  shibboleth  was,  **  From  within, 
out/*  He  thought  education  was  a  development  and 
not  an  acquirement. 

One  of  Pestalozzi*s  little  pamphlets  fell  into  the  hands 
of  Friedrich  Froebel,  architect's  assistant,  at  Frank- 
fort 58  5S 

Froebel  was  twenty-two  years  old,  and  Fate  had  tossed 
him  around  from  one  thing  to  another  since  babyhood. 
All  of  his  experiences  had  been  of  a  kind  that  prepared 
his  mind  for  the  theories  that  Pestalozzi  expressed  58 
Besides  that,  architecture  had  begun  to  pall  upon  him. 
**  Those  who  can,  do;  those  who  can't,  teach."  This 
was  said  in  derision,  but  it  holds  a  grain  of  truth  58 
Froebel  had  a  great  desire  to  teach.  Now,  in  Frankfort 
there  was  a  Model  School  or  a  school  for  teachers,  of 
which  one  Herr  Gruner  was  master.  This  school  was 
actually  carrying  out  some  of  the  practical  methods 
suggested  by  Pestalozzi.  Quite  by  accident  Gruner  and 
Froebel  met.  Gruner  wanted  a  teacher  who  could  teach 
by  the  Pestalozzi  methods.  Froebel  straightway  applied 
to  Herr  Gruner  for  the  position.  He  was  accepted  as  a 
combination  janitor  and  instructor  and  worked  for  his 
board  and  ten  marks,  or  two  and  a  half  dollars  a  week. 
^The  good-cheer  and  enthusiasm  of  Froebel  won 
Gruner's  heart.  Together  they  discussed  Pestalozzi 
and  his  works,  read  all  that  he  had  written,  and  opened 
254 


FRIEDRICH    FROEBEL 


up  a  correspondence  with  the  great  man.  This  led  to 
an  invitation  that  Froebel  should  visit  him  at  his  farm- 
school,  near  Yverdon,  in  Switzerland. 
Gruner  supplied  Froebel  the  necessary  money  to  replace 
his  very  seedy  clothes  for  something  better,  and  the 
young  man  started  away.  It  was  a  walk  of  more  than 
two  hundred  miles,  but  youth  and  enthusiasm  count 
such  a  tramp  as  an  enjoyable  trifle.  Froebel  wore  his 
seedy  clothes  and  carried  his  good  ones,  and  so  he 
appeared  before  the  master  spick  and  span. 
Pestalozzi  was  sixty  years  old  at  this  time,  and  his 
hopes  for  the  **  new  method  "  were  still  high.  He  had 
met  opposition,  ridicule  and  indifference,  and  had  spent 
most  of  his  little  fortune  in  the  fight,  but  he  was  still 
at  it  and  resolved  to  die  in  the  harness. 
Froebel  was  not  disappointed  in  Pestalozzi,  and  cer- 
tainly Pestalozzi  was  delighted  and  a  bit  amused  at 
the  earnestness  of  the  young  man.  Pestalozzi  was 
working  in  a  very  economical  way,  but  all  the  place 
lacked  Froebel,  in  his  exuberant  imagination,  made  good. 
^  Froebel  found  much,  for  he  had  brought  much  with 
him  33  53 


255 


FRIEDRICH    FROEBEL 


ROEBEL  returned  to  Frankfort  from  his 
visit  to  Pestalozzi,  full  of  enthusiasm,  and 
that  is  the  commodity  without  which  no 
teacher  succeeds.  Gruner  allowed  him  to 
gravitate.  And  soon  FroebeFs  room  was  the  central 
point  of  interest  for  the  whole  school.  But  trouble 
was   ahead   for   Froebel. 

He  had  no  college  degrees.  His  pedagogic  pedigree  was 
very  short.  He  hoped  to  live  down  his  university  record, 
but  it  followed  him.  Gruner*s  school  was  under  govern- 
ment inspection,  and  the  gentlemen  with  double  chins, 
who  came  from  time  to  time  to  look  the  place  over, 
asked  who  this  enthusiastic  young  person  was,  and  why 
had  the  worthy  janitor  and  ex-forester  been  so  honored 
by  promotion  58  53 

In  truth,  during  his  life,  Froebel  never  quite  escaped 
the  taunt  that  he  was  not  an  educated  man.  That  is 
to  say,  no  college  had  ever  supplied  him  an  alphabetic 
appendage.  He  had  been  a  forester,  a  farmer,  an  archi- 
tect,  a  guardian  for  boys  and  a  teacher  of  women,  but  no 
institution  had  ever  said  officially  he  was  fit  to  teach  men. 
^  Gruner  tried  to  explain  that  there  are  two  kinds  of 
teachers:  people  who  are  teachers  by  nature,  and  those 
who  have  acquired  the  methods  by  long  study.  The 
first,  having  little  to  learn,  and  a  love  for  the  child,  with 
a  spontaneous  quality  of  giving  their  all,  succeed  best. 
^But  poor  Gruner's  explanation  did  not  explain. 
Then  the  matter  was  gently  explained  to  Froebel,  and 
256 


FRIEDRICH    FROEBEL 


he  saw  that  in  order  to  hold  a  place  as  teacher  he  must 
acquire  a  past.  **  Time  will  adjust  it,"  he  said,  and 
started  away  on  a  second  visit  to  Pestalozzi.  His  plan 
was  to  remain  with  the  master  long  enough  so  he  could 
secure  a  certificate  of  proficiency. 
Again  Pestalozzi  welcomed  the  young  man,  and  he 
slipped  easily  into  the  household  and  became  both  pupil 
and  teacher.  His  willingness  to  work — to  do  the  task 
that  lay  nearest  him — his  good-nature,  his  gratitude, 
won   all   hearts. 

At  this  time  the  plan  of  sending  boys  to  college  with  a 
tutor  who  was  both  a  companion  and  a  teacher,  was 
in  vogue  with  those  who  could  afford  it.  It  will  be 
remembered  that  William  and  Alexander  von  Hum- 
boldt received  their  early  education  in  this  way — going 
with  their  tutor  from  university  to  university,  teacher 
and  pupils  entering  as  special  students,  getting  into 
the  atmosphere  of  the  place,  soaking  themselves  full 
of  it,  and  then  going  on. 

And  now  behold,  through  Gruner  or  Pestalozzi  or  both, 
a  woman  of  wealth  with  three  boys  to  educate  applied 
to  Froebel  to  come  over  into  Macedonia  and  help  her  38 
It  was  in  Eighteen  Hundred  Seven  that  Froebel  became 
tutor  in  the  Von  Holzhausen  family.  He  was  twenty-five 
years  old,  and  this  was  his  first  interview  with  wealth 
and  leisure.  That  he  was  hungry  enough  to  appreciate 
it   need   not   be   emphasized. 

He  got  goodly  glimpses  of  Gottingen,  Berlin,  and  was 

257 


FRIEDRICH    FROEBEL 


long  enough  at  Jena  to  rub  the  blot  oflF  the  'scutcheon. 
A  stay  at  Weimar,  in  the  Goethe  country,  completed 
the  four  years'  course. 

The  boys  had  grown  to  men,  and  proved  their  worth 
in  after-years;  but  whether  they  had  gotten  as  much 
from  the  migrations  as  their  teacher  is  very  doubtful. 
He  was  ripe  for  opportunity — they  had  had  a  surfeit 
of  it  5S  53 

Then  came  war.  The  order  to  arms  and  the  rush  of 
students  to  obey  their  country's  call  caught  Froebel 
in  the  patriotic  vortex,  and  he  enlisted  with  his  pupils. 
^  His  service  was  honorable,  even  if  not  brilliant,  and 
it  had  this  advantage :  the  making  of  two  friends,  com- 
panions in  arms,  who  caught  the  Pestalozzian  fever, 
and  lived  out  their  lives  preaching  and  teaching  "  the 
new  method." 

These  men  were  William  Middendorf  and  Henry  Lan- 
genthal.  This  trinity  of  brothers  evolved  a  bond  as 
beautiful  as  it  is  rare  in  the  realm  of  friendship.  Forty 
years  after  their  first  meeting,  Middendorf  gave  an 
oration  over  the  dead  body  of  Froebel  that  lives  as  a 
classic,  breathing  the  love  and  faith  that  endure  58 
And  then  Middendorf  turned  to  his  work,  and  dared 
prison  and  disgrace  by  upholding  the  Kindergarten 
System  and  the  life  and  example  of  his  dear,  dead 
friend.  The  Kindergarten  Idea  would  probably  have 
been  buried  in  the  grave  with  Froebel — ^interred  with 
his  bones — ^were  it  not  for  Middendorf  and  Langenthal. 

258 


FRIEDRICH    FROEBEL 


HE  first  Kindergarten  was  established  in 
Eighteen  Hundred  Thirty-six,  at  Blanken- 
burg,  a  little  village  near  Keilhau.  Froebel 
was  then  fifty-four  years  old,  happily  married 
to  a  worthy  woman  who  certainly  did  not  hamper  his 
work,  even  if  she  did  not  inspire  it.  He  was  childless, 
that  all  children  might  call  him  father. 
The  years  had  gone  in  struggles  to  found  Normal  Schools 
in  Germany  after  the  Pestalozzian  and  Gruner  methods. 
But  disappointment,  misunderstanding  and  stupidity 
had  followed  Froebel.  The  set  methods  of  the  clergy, 
accusations  of  revolution  and  heresy,  tilts  with  pious 
pedants  as  to  the  value  of  dead  languages,  all  combined 
with  his  own  lack  of  business  shrewdness,  had  wrecked 
his  various  ventures. 

Froebel's  argument  that  women  were  better  natural 
teachers  than  men  on  account  of  the  mother-instinct, 
brought  forth  a  retort  from  a  learned  monk  to  the  effect 
that  it  was  indelicate  if  not  sinful  for  an  unmarried  fe- 
male, who  was  not  a  nun,  to  study  the  natures  of  children. 
^  Parents  with  children  old  enough  to  go  to  school  would 
not  entrust  their  darlings  with  the  teaching  experimenter 
— this  on  the  advice  of  their  pastors. 
Middendorf  and  Langenthal  were  still  with  him,  part- 
ners in  the  disgrace  or  failure,  for  none  weis  willing  to 
give  up  the  fight  for  education  by  the  natural  methods. 
^  A  great  thought  and  a  great  word  came  to  them,  all 
at   once — out   on   the   mountainside! 

259 


FRIEDRICH    FROEBEL 


Begin  with  the  children  before  the  school  age,  and  call 
it  the  Kindergarten! 

Hurrah!  They  shouted  for  joy,  and  ran  down  the  hiH 
to  tell  Frau  Froebel. 

The  schools  they  had  started  before  had  been  called, 
"  The  Institution  for  Teaching  According  to  the  Pesta- 
lozzi  Method  and  the  Natural  Activities  of  the  Child," 
**  Institution  for  the  Encouragement  and  Development 
of  the  Spontaneous  Activities  of  the  Pupil,"  and  'Tried- 
rich  FroebeFs  School  for  the  Growth  of  the  Creative 
Instinct  Which  Makes  for  a  Useful  Character.** 
A  school  with  such  names,  of  course,  failed.  No  one 
could  remember  it  long  enough  to  send  his  child  there 
— it  meant  nothing  to  the  mind  not  prepared  for  it  58 
What  *s  in  a  name?  Everything.  Books  sell  or  become 
dead  stock  on  the  name.  Commodities  the  same.  Railroads 
must  have  a  name  people  are  not  afraid  to  pronounce. 
^  The  officers  of  the  law  came  and  asked  to  see  FroebeFs 
license  for  manufacturing.  Others  asked  as  to  the 
nature  of  his  wares,  and  one  dignitary  called  and  asked, 
"Is  Herr  Pestalozzi  in?** 

The  Kindergarten!  The  new  name  took.  The  children 
remembered  it.  Overworked  mothers  liked  the  word 
and  were  glad  to  let  the  little  other-mothers  take  the 
children  to  the  Kindergarten,  certainly. 
Froebel  had  grown  used  to  disappointments — ^he  was 
an  optimist  by  nature.  He  saw  the  good  side  of  every- 
thing, including  failure. 
260 


FRIEDRICH    FROEBEL 


He  made  the  best  of  necessity.  And  now  It  was  very- 
clear  to  him  that  education  must  begin  **  a  hundred 
years  before  the  child  is  born/*  He  would  reach  the 
home  and  the  mother  through  the  children.  **  It  will 
take  three  generations  to  prove  the  truth  of  the  Kinder- 
garten Idea/*  he  said. 

And  so  the  songs,  the  gifts,  the  games — all  had  to  be 
invented,  defended,  tried  and  tried  again.  Pestalozzi 
had  a  plan  for  teaching  the  youth;  now  a  plan  had  to 
be  devised  for  teaching  the  child.  Love  was  the  key- 
stone, and  joy,  unselfishness  and  unswerving  faith  in 
the  Natural  or  Divine  impulses  of  humanity  crowned 
the  structure. 


261 


FRIEDRICH    FROEBEL 


ROEBEL  invented  the  schoolma'am.  That  is, 
he  discovered  the  raw  product  and  adapted 
it.  He  even  coined  the  word,  and  it  struck 
the  world  as  being  so  very  funny  that  we 
forthwith  adopted  it  as  a  term  of  provincial  pleasantry 
and  quasi-reproach.  The  original  term  used  was  **  school 
mother,'*  but  when  it  reached  these  friendly  shores  we 
translated  it  **  schoolmarm/*  Then  we  tittered,  also 
sneezed  53  33 

Froebel  died  in  Eighteen  Hundred  Fifty-two.  His  first 
Kindergarten  was  not  a  success  until  he  was  nearly 
sixty  years  old,  but  the  idea  had  been  perfecting  itself 
in  his  mind  more  or  less  unconsciously  for  over  thirty 
years  33  33 

He  had  been  thinking,  writing,  working,  experimenting 
all  these  years  on  the  subject  of  education,  and  he  had 
become  well-nigh  discouraged.  He  had  observed  that 
six  was  the  **  school  age.*'  That  is,  no  child  could  go  to 
school  until  he  was  six  years  old — then  his  education 
began  33  33 

But  Froebel  had  been  teaching  in  a  country  school 
and  boarding  'round,  and  he  had  discovered  that  long 
before  this  the  child  had  been  learning  by  observing 
and  playing,  and  that  these  were  formative  influences, 
quite  as  potent  as  actual  school. 

In  the  big  families  where  Froebel  boarded,  he  noticed 
that  the  older  girls  took  charge  of  the  younger  ones. 
So,  often  a  girl  of  ten,  with  dresses  to  her  knees,  carried 
262 


FRIEDRICH    FROEBEL 


one  baby  in  her  arms  and  two  toddled  behind  her,  and 
this  child  of  ten  was  really  the  other-mother.  The  true 
mother  worked  in  the  fields  or  toiled  at  her  housework, 
and  the  little  other-mother  took  the  children  out  to  play 
and  thus  amused  them  while  the  mother  worked  58 
The  desire  of  Froebel  wets  to  educate  the  race,  but  what 
are  a  few  hours  a  day  in  a  schoolroom  with  a  totally 
unsympathetic  home  environment! 
To  reach  and  interest  the  mother  in  the  problem  of 
education  W£is  well-nigh  impossible.  Toil,  deprivation, 
poverty,  had  killed  all  the  romance  and  enthusiasm  in 
her  heart.  She  was  the  victim  of  arrested  development; 
but  the  little  other-mother  was  a  child,  impressionable, 
immature,  and  she  could  be  taught.  The  home  must 
co-operate  with  the  school,  otherwise  all  the  school 
can  teach  will  be  forgotten  in  the  home.  Froebel  saw, 
too,  that  often  the  little  other-mother  was  so  over- 
worked in  the  care  of  her  charges  that  she  was  taken 
from  school.  Besides,  the  idea  was  abroad  that  educa- 
tion was  mostly  for  boys,  anyway. 
And  here  Froebel  stepped  in  and  proved  himself  a  law- 
breaker, just  as  Ben  Lindsey  was  when  he  inaugurated 
the  juvenile  court  and  waived  the  entire  established 
legal  procedure,  even  to  the  omission  of  swearing  his 
witnesses,  and  believed  in  the  little  truant  even  though 
he  lied.  Froebel  told  the  little  other-mothers  to  come 
to  school  anyway  and  bring  the  babies  with  them  5S 
And  then  he  set  to  work  showing  these  girls  how  to 

263 


FRIEDRICH    FROEBEL 


amuse,  divert  and  teach  the  babies.  And  he  used  to 
say  the  babies  taught  him. 

Some  of  these  half-grown  girls  showed  a  rare  adapta- 
bility as  teachers.  They  combined  mother-love  and  the 
teaching  instinct  3S  Froebel  utilized  their  services  in 
teaching  others  in  order  that  he  might  teach  them  58 
He  saw  that  the  teacher  is  the  one  who  gets  the  most 
out  of  the  lessons,  and  that  the  true  teacher  is  a  learner. 
These  girl  teachers  he  called  school-mothers,  and  thus 
was  evolved  the  word  and  the  person. 
Froebel  founded  the  first  normal  and  model  school  for 
the  education  of  women  as  teachers,  and  this  was  less 
than  a  hundred  years  ago. 

The  years  went  by  and  the  little  mothers  had  children 
of  their  own,  and  these  children  were  the  ones  that 
formed  the  first  actual,  genuine  kindergarten  3S  Also, 
these  were  the  mothers  who  formed  the  first  mothers' 
clubs  5S  And  it  was  the  success  of  these  clubs  that 
attracted  the  attention  of  the  authorities,  who  could 
not  imagine  any  other  purpose  for  a  club  than  to  hatch 
a  plot  against  the  government. 

Anyway,  a  system  which  taught  that  women  were  just 
as  wise,  just  as  good  and  just  as  capable  as  men — just 
as  well  fitted  by  nature  to  teach — ^would  upset  the 
clergy.  If  women  can  break  into  the  school,  they  will 
also  break  into  the  church.  Moreover,  the  encourage- 
ment of  play  was  atrocious.  Mein  Gott,  or  words  to 
that  effect,  play  in  a  schoolroom!  Why,  even  a  fool 
264 


FRIEDRICH    FROEBEL 


would  know  that  that  is  the  one  thing  that  stood  in 
the  way  of  education,  the  one  fly  in  the  pedagogic  oint- 
ment. If  Mynheer  Froebel  would  please  invent  a  way 
to  do  away  with  play  in  schoolrooms,  he  would  be  given 
a  pension. 

The  idea  that  children  were  good  by  nature  was  rank 
heresy.  Where  does  the  doctrine  of  regeneration  come 
in,  and  how  about  being  born  again!  The  natural  man 
is  at  enmity  toward  God.  We  are  conceived  in  sin  and 
born  in  iniquity.  The  Bible  says  it  again  and  again  3& 
And  here  comes  a  man  who  thinks  he  knows  more 
than  all  the  priests  and  scholars  who  have  ever  lived, 
and  fills  the  heads  of  fool  women  with  the  idea  that 
they  are  born  to  teach  instead  of  to  work  in  the  fields 
and  keep  house  and  wait  on  men. 

Mein  Gott  in  Himmel,  the  women  know  too  much, 
already!  If  this  thing  keeps  on,  men  will  have  to  get 
off  the  earth,  and  women  and  children  will  run  the 
world,  and  do  it  by  means  of  play.  Aha!  What  does 
Solomon  say?  Spare  the  rod  and  spoil  the  child.  Aber 
nicht,  say  these  girls. 

This  thing  has  got  to  stop  before  Germany  becomes 
the  joke  of  mankind — the  cat-o* -nine- tails  for  anybody 
who  uses  the  word  kindergarten! 


265 


FRIEDRICH    FROEBEL 


UFFER  little  children  to  come  unto  me,  and 
forbid  them  not,  for  of  such  is  the  Kingdom 
of  Heaven."  Had  the  man  who  uttered  these 
words  been  given  a  little  encouragement,  he 
probably  would  have  inaugurated  a  child-garden  and 
provided  a  place  and  environment  where  little  souls 
could  have  bloomed  and  blossomed.  He  was  by  nature 
a  teacher,  and  his  best  pupils  were  women  and  children. 
Male  men  are  apt  to  think  they  already  know  and  so 
are  immune  from  ideas. 

Jerusalem,  nineteen  hundred  years  ago,  was  about 
where  Berlin  was  in  Eighteen  Hundred  Fifty.  In  both 
instances  the  proud  priest  and  the  aristocrat-soldier 
were  supreme.  And  both  were  quite  satisfied  with  their 
own  mental  attainments  and  educational  methods.  They 
were  sincere.  It  was  a  very  similar  combination  that 
crucified  Jesus  to  that  which  placed  an  interdict  on 
Friedrich  Froebel,  making  the  Kindergarten  a  crime, 
and  causing  the  speedy  death  of  one  of  the  gentlest, 
noblest,  purest  men  who  have  ever  blessed  this  earth. 
^  Froebel  was  just  seventy  when  he  passed  out.  **  His 
eye  was  not  dimmed  nor  his  natural  force  abated  " — 
he  was  filled  with  enthusiasm  and  hope  as  never  before. 
His  ideas  were  spreading — success,  at  last,  was  at  the 
door,  he  had  interested  the  women  and  proved  the 
fitness  of  women  to  teach — his  mothers'  clubs  were 
numerous — love  was  the  watchword.  And  in  the  midst 
of  this  flowering  time,  the  official  order  came,  without 
266 


FRIEDRICH    FROEBEL 


warning,  apology  or  explanation,  and  from  which  there 
was  no  appeal.  The  same  savagery,  chilled  with  fear, 
that  sent  Richard  Wagner  into  exile,  crushed  the  life 
and  broke  the  heart  of  Friedrich  Froebel.  But  these 
names  now  are  the  pride  and  glory  of  the  land  that 
once  scorned  them.  Men  who  govern  should  be  those 
with  a  reasonable  doubt  concerning  their  own  infalli- 
bility, and  an  earnest  faith  in  men,  women  and  children. 
To  teach  is  better  than  to  rule.  We  are  all  children  in 
the  Kindergarten  of  God. 


267 


HYPATIA 


Neo-Platonism  is  a  progressive  philosophy,  and  does 
not  expect  to  state  final  conditions  to  men  whose  minds 
"^  are  finite.  Life  is  an  unfoldment,  and  the  further  we 
travel  the  more  truth  we  can  comprehend.  To  under- 
stand the  things  that  are  at  our  door  is  the  best  prepa- 

I         ration  for  understanding  those  that  lie  beyond. 

\  — Hypatia 


\ 


Tkc^y^'  '■  • 


^., 


,.^ 


r^..^ 


HYPATIA 


HYPATIA 


HE  father  of  Hypatia  was  Theon, 
a  noted  mathematician  and  astron- 
omer of  Alexandria.  He  would  have 
been  regarded  as  a  very  great  man 
had  he  not  been  cast  into  the  shadow 
by  his  daughter.  Let  male  parents 
beware  53  53 
"*  At  that  time,  astronomy  and  astrol- 
ogy were  one.  Mathematics  was  useful,  not  for  purposes 
of  civil  engineering,  but  principally  in  figuring  out  where 
a  certain  soul,  born  under  a  given  planet,  would  be  at 
a  certain  time  in  the  future. 

No  information  comes  to  us  about  the  mother  of 
Hypatia — ^she  was  so  busy  with  housework  that  her 
existence  is  a  matter  of  assumption  or  a  priori  reasoning ; 
thus,  given  a  daughter,  we  assume  the  existence  of  a 
mother  53  53 

Hypatia  was  certainly  the  daughter  of  her  father.  He 
was  her  tutor,  teacher,  playmate.  All  he  knew  he  taught 
to  her,  and  before  she  was  twenty  she  had  been  in- 
formed by  him  of  a  fact  which  she  had  previously 
guessed — that  considerable  of  his  so-called  knowledge 
was  conjecture  53  53 

Theon  taught  his  daughter  that  all  systems  of  religion 
that  pretend  to  teach  the  whole  truth  were  to  a  great 
degree  false  and  fraudulent.  He  explained  to  her  that 

271 


HYPATIA 

\  his  own  profession  of  astronomy  and  astrology  was  only 
/for  other  people.  By  instructing  her  in  all  religions 
I  she  grew  to  know  them  comparatively,  and  so  none  took 
i  possession  of  her  to  the  exclusion  of  new  truth.  To  have 
a  religion  thrust  upon  you,  and  be  compelled  to  believe 
in  it  or  suffer  social  ostracism,  is  to  be  cheated  of  the 
right  to  make  your  own.  In  degree  it  is  letting  another 
live  your  life.  A  child  does  not  need  a  religion  until  he 
is  old  enough  to  evolve  it,  and  then  he  must  not  be 
robbed  of  the  right  of  independent  thinking  by  having 
a  fully-prepared  plan  of  salvation  handed  out  to  him. 
The  brain  nee^ds  exercise  as  much  as  the  body,  and 
vicarious  thinking  is  as  erroneous  as  vicarious  exercise. 
Strength  comes  from  personal  effort.  To  think  is  natural, 
and  if  not  intimidated  or  coerced  the  man  will  evolve 
a  philosophy  of  life  that  is  useful  and  beneficent  5S 
Religious  mania  is  a  result  of  dwelling  on  a  borrowed 
religion.  If  let  alone  no  man  would  become  insane  on 
religious  topics,  for  the  religion  he  would  evolve  would 
be  one  of  joy,  laughter  and  love,  not  one  of  misery  or 
horror.  The  religion  that  contemplates  misery  and  woe 
is  one  devised  by  priestcraft  for  a  purpose,  and  that 
purpose  is  to  rule  and  rob.  From  the  blunt  ways  of 
the  road  we  get  a  polite  system  of  intimidation  which 
makes  the  man  pay.  It  is  robbery  reduced  to  a  system, 
and  finally  piously  believed  in  by  the  robbers,  who  are 
hypnotized  into  the  belief  that  they  are  doing  God's 
service  53  53 
272 


HYPATIA 

"  All  formal  dogmatic  religions  are  fallacious  and  must 
never  be  accepted  by  self-respecting  persons  as  final," 
said  Theon  to  Hypatia.  **  Reserve  your  right  to  think, 
for  even  to  think  wrongly  is  better  than  not  to  think  at 
all."  5S  58 

Theon  gave  lectures,  and  had  private  classes  in  esoterics, 
wherein  the  innermost  secrets  of  divinity  were  imparted. 
Also,  he  had  a  plan  for  the  transmutation  of  metals  and 
a  recipe  for  perpetual  youth.  When  he  had  nothing  else 
to  do,  he  played  games  with  his  daughter. 
At  twenty-one  Hypatia  had  mastered  the  so-called  art 
of  Rhetoric,  or  the  art  of  expression  by  vocal  speech  5S 
It  will  be  remembered  that  the  Romans  considered 
rhetoric,  or  the  art  of  the  rhetor,  or  orator,  as  first  in 
importance.  To  impress  people  by  your  personal  pres- 
ence they  regarded  as  the  gift  of  gifts. 
This  idea  seems  to  have  been  held  by  the  polite  world 
up  to  the  Italian  Renaissance,  when  the  art  of  printing 
was  invented  and  the  written  word  came  to  be  regarded 
as  more  important  than  the  spoken.  One  lives,  and  the 
other  dies  on  the  air,  existing  only  in  memory,  growing 
attenuated  and  diluted  as  it  is  transferred.  The  revival 
of  sculpture  and  painting  also  helped  oratory  to  take 
its  proper  place  as  one  of  the  polite  arts,  and  not  a  thing 
to  be  centered  upon  to  the  exclusion  of  all  else. 
Theon  set  out  to  produce  a  perfect  human  being;  and 
whether  his  charts,  theorems  and  formulas  made  up 
a  complete  law  of  eugenics,  or  whether  it  was  dumb 

273 


HYPATIA 

luck,  this  we  know:  he  nearly  succeeded.  Hypatia  was 
five  feet  nine,  and  weighed  one  hundred  thirty-five 
pounds.  This  when  she  was  twenty.  She  could  walk 
ten  miles  without  fatigue;  swim,  row,  ride  horseback 
and  climb  mountains.  Through  a  series  of  gentle 
calisthenics  invented  by  her  father,  combined  with 
breathing  exercises,  she  had  developed  a  body  of  rarest 
^  grace.  Her  head  had  corners,  as  once  Professor  O.  S. 
Fowler  told  us  that  a  woman's  head  must  have,  if  she 
is  to  think  and  act  with  purpose  and  precision. 
So  having  evolved  this  rare  beauty  of  face,  feature  and 
bodily  grace,  convbined  with  superior  strength  and 
vitality,  Hypatia  took  up  her  father's  work  and  gave 
lectures  on  astronomy,  mathematics,  astrology  and 
rhetoric,  while  he  completed  his  scheme  for  the  trans- 
mutation of  metals.  Hypatia*s  voice  was  flute-like, 
and  used  always  well  within  its  compass,  so  as  never 
to  rasp  or  tire  the  organs.  Theon  knew  the  proper  care 
of  nose  and  throat,  a  knowledge  which  with  us  moderns 
is  all  too  rare.  Hypatia  told  of  and  practised  the  vocal 
ellipse,  the  pause,  the  glide,  the  slide  and  the  gentle, 
deliberate  tones  that  please  and  impress.  That  the 
law  of  suggestion  was  known  to  her  was  very  evident, 
and  certain  it  is  that  she  practised  hypnotism  in  her 
classes,  and  seemed  to  know  as  much  about  the  origin 
of  the  mysterious  agent  as  we  do  now,  even  though 
she  never  tagged  or  labeled  it. 

One  very  vital  thought  she  worked  out  was,  that  the 
274 


HYPATIA 

young  mind  is  plastic,  impressionable  and  accepts  with- 
out question  all  that  it  is  told.  The  young  receive  their 
ideas  from  their  elders,  and  ideas  once  impressed  upon 
this  plastic  plate  of  the  mind  can  not  be  removed  33 
Said  Hypatia:  **  Fables  should  be  taught  as  fables, 
myths  as  myths,  and  miracles  as  poetic  fancies.  To 
teach  superstitions  as  truths  is  a  most  terrible  thing. 
The  child-mind  accepts  and  believes  them,  and  only 
through  great  pain  and  perhaps  tragedy  can  he  be  in 
after-years  relieved  of  them.  In  fact,  men  will  fight  for  ) 
a  superstition  quite  2is  quickly  as  for  a  living  truth — 
often  more  so,  since  a  superstition  is  so  intangible  you 
can  not  get  at  it  to  refute  it,  but  truth  is  a  point  of 
view,  and  so  is  changeable.** 

Gradually,  over  the  mind  of  the  beautiful  and  gifted  ; 
Hypatia,    there    came    stealing    a    doubt    concerning 
the  value  of  her  own  acquirements,  since  these  were 
**  acquirements,**   and   not   evolutions  or   convictions 
gathered  from  experience,  but  things  implanted  upon 
her  plastic   mind  by  her  father. 
In  this  train  of  thought  Hypatia  had  taken  a  step  in 
advance  of  her  father,  for  he  seems  to  have  had  a  dog- 
matic belief  in  a  few  things  incapable  of  demonstration ; 
but  these  things  he  taught  to  the  plastic  mind,  just 
the  same  as  the  things  he  knew.  Theon  was  a  dogmatic 
liberal.    Possibly   the   difference   between   an   illiberal 
Unitarian  and  a  liberal  Catholic  is  microscopic.         -v 
Hypatia  clearly  saw  that  knowledge  is  the  distilled 

275 


HYPATIA 

essence  of  our  intuitions,  corroborated  by  experience. 
But  belief  is  the  impress  made  upon  our  minds  when 
we  are  under  the  spell  of  or  in  subjection  to  another  5S 
These  things  caused  the  poor  girl  many  unhappy  hours, 
which  fact,  in  itself,  is  proof  of  her  greatness.  Only 
superior  people  have  a  capacity  for  doubting. 
Probably  not  one  person  in  a  million  ever  gets  away 
far  enough  from  his  mind  to  take  a  look  at  it,  and  see 
the  wheels  go  round.  Opinions  become  ossified  and  the 
man  goes  through  life  hypnotizing  others,  never  realiz- 
ing for  an  instant  that  in  youth  he  was  hypnotized  and 
that  he  has  never  been  able  to  cast  off  the  hypnosis  S& 
This  is  what  our  pious  friends  mean  when  they  say, 
**  Give  me  the  child  until  he  is  ten  years  old  and  you 
may  have  him  afterward."  That  is,  they  can  take  the 
child  in  his  plastic  age  and  make  impressions  on  his 
mind  that  are  indelible.  Reared  in  an  orthodox  Jewish 
family  a  child  will  grow  up  a  dogmatic  Jew,  and  argue 
you  on  the  Talmud  six  nights  and  days  together  38 
Catholic,  Presbyterian,  Baptist,  the  same.  I  once  knew 
an  Arapahoe  Indian  who  was  taken  to  Massachusetts 
when  four  years  old.  He  grew  up  not  only  with  New 
England  prejudices,  but  with  a  New  England  accent, 
and  saved  his  pennies  to  give  to  missionaries  that  they 
might  **  convert  '*  the  Red  Men. 
iWhen  the  suspicion  seized  upon  the  soul  of  Hypatia 
ithat  her  mind  was  but  a  wax  impression  taken  from 
her  father's,  she  began  to  make  plans  to  get  away  from 
^       276 


HYPATIA 

him.  Her  efforts  at  explanations  were  futile,  but  when 
placed  upon  the  general  ground  that  she  wished  to 
travel,  see  the  world  and  meet  people  of  learning  and 
worth,  her  father  acquiesced  and  she  started  away  on 
her  journeyings.  He  wanted  to  go,  too,  but  this  was 
the  one  thing  she  did  not  desire,  and  he  never  knew 
nor  could  know  why. 

She  spent  several  months  at  Athens,  where  her  youth, 
beauty  and  learning  won  her  entry  into  the  houses 
of  the  most  eminent.  It  was  the  same  at  Rome  and 
in  various  other  cities  of  Italy.  Money  may  give  you 
access  to  good  society,  but  talent  is  always  an  open 
sesame.  She  traveled  like  a  princess  and  was  received 
as  one,  yet  she  had  no  title  nor  claim  to  nobility  nor 
station.  Beauty  of  itself  is  not  a  credential — rather  it 
is  an  object  of  suspicion,  unless  it  goes  with  intellect  58 
Hj^atia  gave  lectures  on  mathematics;  and  there  was 
a  fallacy  abroad  then  as  there  is  now  that  the  feminine 
mind  is  not  mathematical.  That  the  great  men  whom 
Hypatia  met  in  each  city  were  first  amazed  and  then 
abashed  by  her  proficiency  in  mathematics  is  quite 
probable.  Some  few  male  professors  being  in  that 
peculiar  baldheaded  hypnotic  state  when  feminine 
charms  dazzle  and  lure,  listened  in  rapture  as  Hypatia 
dissolved  logarithms  and  melted  calculi,  and  not  under- 
standing a  word  she  said,  declared  that  she  was  the 
goddess  Minerva,  reincarnated.  Her  coldness  on  near 
approach  confirmed  their  suspicions. 

277 


HYPATIA 


UST  how  long  a  time  Hypatia  spent  upon 
her  pilgrimage,  visiting  all  of  the  great  liv- 
ing  philosophers,    we   do   not    know.    Some 
accounts   have   it  one   year,   others   ten    3S 
Probably  the  pilgrimages  were  extended  over  a  good 
ipmany  years,   and  were  not  continuous.   Several  phi- 
/  losophers  proved  their  humanity  by  offering  to  marry 
(her,  and  a  prince  or  two  did  likewise,  we  are  credibly 
informed.  To  these  persistent  suitors,  however,  Hypatia 
gently  broke  the  news  that  she  was  wedded  to  truth, 
which  is  certainly  a  pretty  speech,  even  if  it  is  poor 
logic.  The  fact  was,  however,  that  Hypatia  never  met 
a  man  whose  mind  matched  her  own,  otherwise  logic 
would  have  bolstered  love,  instead  of  discarding  it  5S 
Travel,  public  speaking  and  meeting  people  of  note 
form  a  strong  trinity  of  good  things.  The  active  mind 
is  the  young  mind,  and  it  is  more  than  the  dream  of  a 
poet  which  declares  that  Hypatia  was  always  young 
and  always  beautiful,  and  that  even  Father  Time  was 
so  in  love  with  her  that  he  refused  to  take  toll  from 
her,  as  he  passed  with  his  hourglass  and  scythe    Si 
jln  degree  she  had  followed  the  example  of  her  great 
prototype,  Plotinus,  and  had  made  herself  master  of 
\all  religions.  She  knew  too  much  of  all  philosophies 
to  believe  implicitly  in  any.  Alexandria  was  then  the 
j intellectual  center  of  the  world.   People  who  resided 
(there  called  it  the  hub  of  the  universe.  It  was  the  meet- 
ing-place of  the  East  and  the  West. 
278 


HYPATIA 

And  Hypatia,  with  her  Thursday  lectures,  was  the  chief 
intellectual  factor  of  Alexeuidria. 
Her  philosophy  she  called  Neo-Platonism.  It  was  Plato 
distilled  through  the  psychic  alembic  of  Hypatia.  Just 
why  the  human  mind  harks  back  and  likes  to  confirm 
itself  by  building  on  another,  it  would  be  interesting 
to  inquire.  To  explain  Moses;  to  supply  a  key  to  the 
Scriptures;  to  found  a  new  School  of  Philosophy  on 
the  assumption  that  Plato  was  right,  but  was  not 
understood  until  the  Then  and  There,  is  alluring  3S 
And  now  the  pilgrims  came  from  Athens,  and  Rome, 
and  the  Islands  of  the  Sea  to  sit  at  the  feet  of  Hypatia. 


279 


HYPATIA 


1-1 


YPATI A  was  born  in  the  year  Three  Hundred 
Seventy,  and  died  in  Four  Hundred  Thirty. 
She  exerted  a|i  influence  in  Alexandria  not  un- 
Hke  that  which  Mrs.  Eddy  exerted  in  Boston. 
<i  She  was  a  person  who  divided  society  into  two  parts: 
those  who  regarded  her  as  an  oracle  of  light,  and  those 
1  who  looked  upon  her  as  an  emissary  of  darkness. 
Strong  men  paid  her  the  compliment  of  using  immoder- 
ate language  concerning  her  teaching.  But  whether  they 
spoke  ill  or  well  of  her  matters  little  now.  The  point  is 
this:  they  screeched,  sneezed,  or  smiled  on  those  who 
refused  to  acknowledge  the  power  of  Hypatia.  Some 
professors  of  learning  tried  to  waive  her;  priests  gently 
pooh-poohed  her;  and  some  elevated  an  eyebrow  and 
asked  how  the  name  was  spelled.  Others,  still,  inquired, 
**  Is  she  sincere?  ** 
^  She  was  the  Ralph  Waldo  Emerson  of  her  day.  Her 
\  philosophy  was  Transcendentalism.  In  fact,  she  might 
be  spoken  of  as  the  original  charter  member  of  the 
;  Concord  School  of   Philosophy.   Her  theme  was  the 
/  New  Thought,  for  New  Thought  is  the  oldest  form 
of  thought  of  which  we  know.  Its  distinguishing  feature 
is  its  antiquity.  Socrates  was  really  the  first  to  express 
the  New  Thought,  and  he  got  his  cue  from  Pythagoras. 
^>^  The  ambition  of  Hypatia  was  to  revive  the  flowering- 
ime  of  Greece,  when  Socrates  and  Plato  walked  arm 
in  arm  through  the  streets  of  Athens,  followed  by  the 
greatest  group  of  intellectuals  the  world  has  ever  seen  5S 
280 


HYPATIA 

It  was  charged  against  Hypatia  that  Aspasla  was  her 
ideal,  and  that  her  ambition  was  to  follow  in  the  foot- 
steps of  the  woman  who  was  beloved  by  Pericles.  If  so, 
it  was  an  ambition  worthy  of  a  very  great  soul.  Hypatia, 
however,  did  not  have  her  Pericles,  and  never  married. 
That  she  should  have  had  love  experiences  was  quite 
natural,  and  that  various  imaginary  romances  should 
have  been  credited  to  her  was  also  to  be  expected  5S 
Hypatia  was  nearly  a  thousand  years  removed  from  the 
time  of  Pericles  and  Aspasia,  but  to  bridge  the  gulf  of 
time  with  imagination  was  easy.  Yet  Hypatia  thought 
that  the  New  Platonism  should  surpass  the  old,  for 
the  world  had  had  the  Age  of  Augustus  to  build  upon. 
fl  Hypatia*s  immediate  prototype  was  Plotinus,  who 
was  born  two  hundred  four  years  after  Christ,  and 
lived  to  be  seventy.  Plotinus  was  the  first  person  to 
use  the  phrase  **  Neo-Platonism,'*  and  so  the  philosophy 
of  Hypatia  might  be  called  **  The  New  Neo-Platonism.'* 
^  To  know  but  one  religion  is  not  to  know  that  one  5S 
In  fact,  superstition  consists  in  this  one  thing — faith 
in  one  religion,  to  the  exclusion  of  all  others. 
To  know  one  philosophy  is  to  know  none.  They  are  all 
comparative,  and  each  serves  as  a  small  arc  of  the  circle. 
A  man  living  in  a  certain  environment,  with  a  certain 
outlook,  describes  the  things  he  sees;  and  out  of  these, 
plus  what  he  imagines,  is  shaped  his  philosophy  of  life. 
If  he  is  repressed,  suppressed,  frightened,  he  will  not 
see  very  much,  and  what  he  does  see  will  be  out  of  focus. 

281 


HYPATIA 

Spiritual  strabismus  and  mental  myopia  are  the  results 
of  vicarious  peeps  at  the  universe.  All  formal  religions 
have  taught  that  to  look  for  yourself  was  bad.  The 
peephole  through  the  roof  of  his  garret  cost  Copernicus 
his  liberty,  but  it  was  worth  the  price. 
Plotinus  made  a  study  of  all  philosophies — all  religions. 
He  traveled  through  Egypt,  Greece,  Assyria,  India. 
He  became  an  **  adept  '*,  and  discovered  how  easily 
the  priest  drifts  into  priestcraft,  and  fraud  steps  in  with 
legerdemain  and  miracle  to  amend  the  truth.  As  if  to 
love  humanity  were  not  enough  to  recommend  the  man, 
they  have  him  turn  water  into  wine  and  walk  on  the  water. 
^Out  of  the  labyrinth  of  history  and  speculation  Plotinus 
returned  to  Plato  £is  a  basis  or  starting-point  for  all  of 
the  truth  which  man  can  comprehend.  Plotinus  believed 
in  all  religions,  but  had  absolute  faith  in  none.  It  will 
be  remembered  that  Aristotle  and  Plato  parted  as  to 
the  relative  value  of  poetry  and  science — science  being 
the  systematized  facts  of  Nature.  Plotinus  comes  in  and 
says  that  both  were  right,  and  each  was  like  every  good 
man  who  exaggerates  the  importance  of  his  own  calling. 
In  his  ability  to  see  the  good  in  all  things,  Hypatia 
placed  Plotinus  ahead  of  Plato,  but  even  then  she  says: 
**  Had  there  been  no  Plato,  there  would  have  been  no 
Plotinus;  although  Plotinus  surpassed  Plato,  yet  it  is 
plain  that  Plato,  the  inspirer  of  Plotinus  and  so  many 
more,  is  the  one  man  whom  philosophy  can  not  spare. 
Hail  Plato!!" 
282 


HYPATIA 

HE  writings  of  Hypatia  have  all  disappeared, 
save  as  her  words  come  to  us,  quoted  by  her 
contemporaries.  If  the  Essays  of  Emerson 
should  all  be  swept  away,  the  man  would 
still  live  in  the  quotations  from  his  pen,  given  to  us  by 
every  writer  of  worth  who  has  put  pencil  to  paper  during 
the  last  fifty  years.  So  lives  Sappho,  and  thus  did  Charles 
Kingsley  secure  the  composite  of  the  great  woman  who 
lives  and  throbs  through  his  book.  Legend  pictures  her 
as  rarely  beautiful,  with  grace,  poise  and  power,  plus. 
^  She  was  sixty  when  she  died.  History  kindly  records 
it  forty-five — and  all  picture  her  as  a  beautiful  and 
attractive  woman  to  the  last.  The  psychic  effects  of  a 
gracefully-gowned  first  reader,  with  sonorous  voice, 
using  gesture  with  economy,  and  packing  the  pauses 
with  feeling,  have  never  been  fully  formulated,  analyzed 
and  explained.  Throngs  came  to  hear  Hypatia  lecture — 
came  from  long  distances,  and  listened  hungrily,  and 
probably  all  they  took  away  was  what  they  brought, 
except  a  great  feeling  of  exhilaration  and  enthusiasm. 
To  send  the  hearer  away  stepping  light,  and  his  heart 
beating  fast — this  is  oratory — which  is  n't  so  much  to 
bestow  facts,  as  it  is  to  impart  a  feeling.  This  Hypatia 
surely  did.  Her  theme  was  Neo-Platonism.  **  Neo " 
means  new,  and  all  New  Thought  harks  back  to  Plato, 
who  was  the  mouthpiece  of  Socrates.  **  Say  what  you 
will,  you  *11  find  it  all  in  Plato.*'  Neo-Platonism  is  our 
New  Thought,  and  New  Thought  is  Neo-Platonism. 

283 


i 


^ 


HYPATIA 

^  There  are  two  kinds  of  thought:  New  Thought  and 
\  Secondhand  Thought.   New  Thought  is  made  up  of 
I  thoughts  you,  yourself,  think.  The  other  kind  is  supplied 
X  i  to  you  by  jobbers.  The  distinguishing  feature  of  New 

Thought  is  its  antiquity.  Of  necessity  it  is  older  than 
\  \  Secondhand  Thought.  All  genuine  New  Thought  is  true 

»v  1  for  the  person  who  thinks  it.  It  only  turns  sour  and 

r|*      aQ        S  becomes  error  when  not  used,  and  when  the  owner 
I  forces  another  to  accept  it.  It  then  becomes  a  second- 
I  hand  revelation.  All  New  Thought  is  revelation,  and 
j  secondhand    revelations    are    errors    half -soled    with 
stupidity  and  heeled  with  greed. 
Very  often  we  are  inspired  to  think  by  others,  but  in 
our  hearts  we  have  the  New  Thought;  and  the  person, 
the  book,  the  incident,  merely  remind  us  that  it  is 
already  ours.  New  Thought  is  always  simple;  Second- 
hand Thought  is  abstruse,  complex,  patched,  peculiar, 
costly,  and  is  passed  out  to  be  accepted,  not  understood. 
That  no  one  comprehends  it  is  often  regarded  as  a 
recommendation. 

For  instance,  **  Thou  shalt  not  make  unto  thyself  any 
graven  image,"  is  Secondhand  Thought.  The  first  man 
who  said  it  may  have  known  what  it  meant,  but  surely 
it  is  nothing  to  us.  However,  that  does  not  keep  us  from 
piously  repeating  it,  and  having  our  children  memorize 
it53  5S 

We  model  in  clay  or  wax,  and  carve  if  we  can,  and 
give  honors  to  those  who  do,  and  this  is  well.  This 
284 


HYPATIA 

commandment  is  founded  on  the  fallacy  that  graven 
images  are  gods,  whatever  that  is.  The  command  adds 
nothing  to  our  happiness,  nor  does  it  shape  our  conduct, 
nor  influence  our  habits.  Everybody  knows  amd  admits 
its  futility,  yet  we  are  unable  to  eliminate  it  from  our 
theological  system.  It  is  strictly  secondhand — ^worse, 
it  is  junk. 

Conversely,  the  admonition,  **  Be  gentle  and  keep  your 
voice  low,**  is  New  Thought,  since  all  but  savages  know 
its  truth,  comprehend  its  import,  and  appreciate  its 
excellence  58  38 

Dealers  in  Secondhand  Thought  always  declare  that 
theirs  is  the  only  genuine,  and  that  all  other  is  spurious 
and  dangerous. 

Dealers  in  New  Thought  say,  **  Take  this  only  sis  it 
appeals  to  you  as  your  own — accept  it  all,  or  in  part, 
or  reject  it  all — and  in  any  event,  do  not  believe  it 
merely  because  1  say  so." 

New  Thought  is  founded  on  the  laws  of  your  own  na- 
ture, and  its  shibboleth  is,  **  Know  Thyself." 
Secondhand  Thought  is  founded  on  authority,  and  its 
war-cry  is,  **  Pay  and  Obey." 

New  Thought  offers  you  no  promise  of  paradise  or 
eternal  bliss  if  you  accept  it;  nor  does  it  threaten  you 
with  everlasting  hell,  if  you  don't.  All  it  offers  is  unend- 
ing work,  constant  effort,  new  difficulties;  beyond  each 
success  is  a  new  trial.  Its  only  satisfactions  are  that 
you  are  allowing  your  life  to  unfold  itself  according  to 

285 


HYPATIA 

the  laws  of  Its  nature.  And  these  laws  are  divine,  there- 
fore you  yourself  are  divine,  just  as  you  allow  the  divine 
to  possess  your  being.  New  Thought  allows  the  currents 
of  divinity  to  flow  through  you  unobstructed. 
Secondhand  Thought  affords  no  plan  of  elimination; 
it  tends  to  congestion,  inflammation,  disease  and  dis- 
integration si  5S 

New  Thought  holds  all  things  lightly,  gently,  easily — 
even  thought.  It  works  for  a  healthy  circulation,  and 
tends  to  health,  happiness  and  well-being  now  and 
hereafter.  It  does  not  believe  in  violence,  force,  coercion 
or  resentment,  because  all  these  things  react  on  the 
doer.  It  has  faith  that  all  men,  if  not  interfered  with 
by  other  men,  will  eventually  evolve  New  Thought, 
and  do  for  themselves  what  is  best  and  right,  beautiful 
and  true   3S   53 

Secondhand  Thought  has  always  had  first  in  its  mind 
the  welfare  of  the  dealer.  The  rights  of  the  consumer, 
beyond  keeping  him  in  subjection,  were  not  considered. 
Indeed,  its  chief  recommendation  has  been  that  **  it  is 
a  good  police  system.*' 

New  Thought  considers  only  the  user.  To  **  Know 
Thyself  **  is  all  there  is  of  it. 

When  a  creator  of  New  Thought  goes  into  the  business 
of  retailing  his  product,  he  often  forgets  to  live  it,  and 
soon  is  transformed  into  a  dealer  in  Secondhand 
Thought  38  38 

That  is  the  way  all  purveyors  in  secondhand  revelation 
286 


HYPATIA 

begin.  In  their  anxiety  to  succeed,  they  call  in  the 
police.  The  blessing  that  is  compulsory  is  not  wholly 
good,  and  any  system  of  morals  which  has  to  be  forced 
on  us  is  immoral.  New  Thought  is  free  thought.  Its  pen- 
alty is  responsibility.  You  either  have  to  live  it,  or  else 
lose  it.  Its  reward  is  Freedom. 


287 


HYPATIA 

T  was  only  a  little  more  than  a  hundred  years 
before  the  time  of  Hypatia  that  the  Roman 
Empire  became  Christian.  When  Constantine 
embraced  Christianity,  all  of  his  loyal  subjects 
were  from  that  moment  Christians — Christians  by  edict, 
but  Pagans  by  character,  for  the  natures  of  men  can  not 
be  changed  by  the  passing  of  a  resolution.  From  that 
time  every  Pagan  temple  became  a  Christian  church, 
and  every  Pagan  priest  a  Christian  preacher. 
Alexandria  was  under  the  rule  of  a  Roman  Prefect, 
or  Governor.  It  had  been  the  policy  of  Rome  to  exercise 
great  tolerance  in  religious  matters.  There  was  a  State 
Religion,  to  be  sure,  but  it  was  for  the  nobility  or  those 
who  helped  make  the  State  possible.  To  look  after  the 
thinking  of  the  plain  people  was  quite  superfluous — 
they  were  allowed  their  vagaries. 

The  Empire  had  been  bold,  brazen,  cruel,  coercive  in 
its  lust  for  power,  but  people  who  paid  were  reasonably 
safe.  And  now  the  Church  was  coming  into  competition 
with  the  State  and  endeavoring  to  reduce  spoliation 
to  a  system. 

To  keep  the  people  down  and  under  by  mental  sup- 
pression— ^by  the  engine  of  superstition — ^were  cheaper 
and  more  effective  than  to  employ  force  or  resort  to 
the  old-time  methods  of  shows,  spectacles,  pensions 
and  costly  diversions.  When  the  Church  took  on  the 
functions  of  the  State,  and  sought  to  substitute  the 
gentle  Christ  for  Caesar,  she  had  to  recast  the  teachings 
288 


HYPATIA 

of  Christ.  Then  for  the  first  time  coercion  and  love 
dwelt  side  by  side.  **  Depart  from  me,  ye  cursed,  into 
everlasting  fire  prepared  for  the  devil  and  his  angels,*' 
and  like  passages  were  slipped  into  the  Scriptures  2is 
matters  of  wise  expediency.  This  was  continued  for 
many  hundred  years,  and  was  considered  quite  proper 
and  legitimate.  It  was  slavery  under  a  more  subtle  form. 
^The  Bishop  of  Alexandria  clashed  with  Orestes  the 
Prefect.    To   hold   the   people   under   by   psychologic 
methods  was  better  than  the  old  plans  of  alternate 
bribery  and  force — so  argued  the  Bishop. 
I  Orestes  had  come  under  the  spell  of  Hypatia,  and  the 
i^Republic  of  Plato  was  saturating  his  mind. 
,5^  r*  To  rule  by  fettering  the  mind  through  fear  of  punish- 

4ment  in  another  world  is  just  as  base  as  to  use  force,*' 
jsaid  Hypatia  in  one  of  her  lectures.  Orestes  sat  in  the 
audience  and  as  she  spoke  the  words  he  clapped  his 
hands.  The  news  was  carried  to  the  Bishop,  who  gently 
declared  that  he  would  excommunicate  him. 
Orestes  sent  word  back  that  the  Emperor  should  be 
informed  of  how  this  Bishop  was  misusing  his  office 
by  making  threats  of  where  he  could  land  people  he 
did  not  like,  in  another  world.  Neither  the  Bishop  nor 
the  Prefect  could  unseat  each  other — both  derived  their 

!  power  from  the  Emperor.  For  Orestes  to  grow  interested 
in  the  teachings  of  Hypatia,  instead  of  siding  with  the 

j  Bishop,  was  looked  upon  by  the  loyalists  as  little  short 

{joi  treason  58  5S 

289 


^1 


HYPATIA 

I  Orestes  tried  to  defend  himself  by  declaring  that  the 

'  policy  of  the  Caesars  had  always  been  one  of  great 
leniency   toward  all  schools  of  philosophy.   Then  he 

<  quoted  Hypatia  to  the  effect  that  a  fixed,  formal  and 
dogmatic  religion  would  paralyze  the  minds  of  men 
and  make  the  race,  in  time,  incapable  of  thought  38 
Therefore,  the  Bishop  should  keep  his  place,  and  not 
try  to  usurp  the  functions  of  the  police.  In  fact,  it  was 
better  to  think  wrongly  than  not  to  think  at  all.  We 
learn  to  think  by  thinking,  and  if  the  threats  of  the 
Bishop  were  believed  at  all,  it  would  mean  the  death 
of  science  and  philosophy. 

The  Bishop  made  answer  by  declaring  that  Hypatia 
was  endeavoring  to  found  a  Church  of  her  own,  with 
Pagan  Greece  as  a  basis.  He  intimated,  too,  that  the 
relationship  of  Orestes  with  Hypatia  was  very  much 
the  same  as  that  which  once  existed  between  Cleopatra 
and  Mark  Antony.  He  called  her  **  that  daughter  of 
Ptolemy,"  and  by  hints  and  suggestions  made  it  appear 
that  she  would,  if  she  could,  set  up  an  Egyptian  Empire 
in  this  same  city  of  Alexandria  where  Cleopatra  once 
so  proudly  reigned. 

\The  excitement  increased.  The  followers  of  Hypatia 
Iwere  necessarily  few  in  numbers.  They  were  thinkers 
j — ^and  to  think  is  a  task.  To  believe  is  easy.  The  Bishop 

\  promised  his  followers  a  paradise  of  ease  and  rest.  He 

also  threatened  disbelievers  with  the  pains  of  hell.  A 

,  promise  on  this  side — a  threat  on  that !  Is  it  not  a  wonder 

290 


HYPATIA 

that  a  man  ever  lived  who  put  his  honest  thought  againstV 
such  teaching  when  launched  by  men  clothed  in  almost 
absolute  authority! 

Hypatia  might  have  lived  yesterday,  and  her  death  at 
the  hands  of  a  mob  was  an  accident  that  might  have 
occurred  in  Boston,  where  a  respectable  company  once 
threw  a  rope  around  the  neck  of  a  good  man  and  ran 
him  through  streets  supposed  to  be  sacred  to  liberty 
and  free  speech. 

A  mob  is  made  up  of  cotton  waste,  saturated  with  oil, 
and  a  focused  idea  causes  spontaneous  combustion. 
Let  a  fire  occur  in  almost  any  New  York  State  village, 
and  the  town  turns  wrecker,  and  loot  looms  large  in 
the  limited  brain  of  the  villager.  Civilization  is  a  veneer. 
^  When  one  sees  emotionalism  run  riot  at  an  evangel- 
istic revival,  and  five  thousand  people  are  trooping 
through  an  undesirable  district  at  midnight,  how  long, 
think  you,  would  a  strong  voice  of  opposition  be  toler- 
ated? 

Hypatia  was  set  upon  by  a  religious  mob  as  she  was 
going  in  her  carriage  from  her  lecture-hall  to  her  home. 
She  was  dragged  to  a  near-by  church  with  the  intent  I 
of  making  her  publicly  recant,  but  the  embers  became  \ 
a  blaze,  and  the  blaze  became  a  conflagration,  and  the  V 
leaders  lost  control.  The  woman's  clothes  were  torn  [ 
from  her  back,  her  hair  torn  from  her  head,  her  body  I 
beaten  to  a  pulp,  dismembered,  and  then  to  hide  all  / 
traces  of  the  crime  and  distribute  the  guilt  so  no  one  J 

291 


HYPATIA 

/  person  could  be  blamed,  a  funeral-pyre  quickly  con- 
j  sumed  the  remains  of  what  but  an  hour  before  had  been 
]  a  human  being.   Daylight  came,  and  the  sun*s  rays 
could  not  locate  the  guilty  ones. 

Orestes  made  a  report  of  the  affair,  resigned  his  office, 
asked  the  Government  at  Rome  to  investigate,  and 
fled  from  the  city.  Had  Orestes  endeavored  to  use  his 
soldiery  against  the  Bishop,  the  men  in  the  ranks  would 
.have  revolted.  The  investigation  was  postponed  from 
Ntime  to  time  for  lack  of  witnesses,  and  finally  it  was 
given  out  by  the  Bishop  that  Hypatia  had  gone  to 
Athens,  and  there  had  been  no  mob  and  no  tragedy. 
^The  Bishop  nominated  a  successor  to  Orestes,  and 
the  new  official  was  confirmed. 
Dogmatism  as  a  police  system  was  supreme. 
It  continued  until  the  time  of  Dante,  or  the  Italian 
Renaissance.  The  reign  of  Religious  Dogmatism  was 
supreme  for  well-nigh  a  thousand  years — ^we  call  it 
the  Dark  Ages. 


292 


SAINT  BENEDICT 


If  any  pilgrim  monk  come  from  distant  parts,  if  with 

wish  as  a  guest  to  dwell  in  the  monastery,  and  will  be 

content  with  the  customs  which  he  finds  in  the  place, 

and  do  not  perchance  by  his  lavishness  disturb  the 

monastery,  but  is  simply  content  with  what  he  finds: 

he  shall  be  received,  for  as  long  a  time  as  he  desires. 

If,  indeed,  he  find  fault  with  anything,  or  expose  it, 

reasonably,  and  with  the  humility  of  charity,  the  Abbot 

shall  discuss  it  prudently,  lest  perchance  God  had  sent 

for  this  very  thing.  But,  if  he  have  been  found  gossipy 

and  contumacious  in  the  time  of  his  sojourn  as  guest, 

not  only  ought  he  not  to  be  joined  to  the  body  of  the 

monastery,  but  also  it  shall  be  said  to  him,  honestly, 

that  he  must  depart.  If  he  does  not  go,  let  two  stout 

monks,  in  the  name  of  God,  explain  the  matter  to  him. 

— St  Benedict 


SAINT  BENEDICT 


ST.  BENEDICT 


S  the  traveler  journeys  through  South- 
ern Italy,  Sicily  and  certain  parts 
of  what  was  Ancient  Greece,  he  will 
see  broken  arches,  parts  of  viaducts, 
and  now  and  again  a  single,  beau- 
tiful column  pointing  to  the  sky. 
All  about  is  the  desert  or  solitary 
pastures,  and  only  this  white  mile- 
stone, marking  the  path  of  the  centuries  and  telling  in 
its  own  silent,  solemn  and  impressive  way  of  a  day  that 
is  dead. 

In  the  Fifth  Century  a  monk  called  Simeon  the  Syrian, 
and  known  to  us  as  Simeon  Stylites,  having  taken  the 
vow  of  chastity,  poverty  and  obedience,  began  to  fear 
greatly  lest  he  might  not  be  true  to  his  pledge.  And 
that  he  might  live  absolutely  beyond  reproach,  always 
in  public  view,  free  from  temptation,  and  free  from  the 
tongue  of  scandal,  he  decided  to  live  in  the  world,  and 
still  not  be  of  it.  To  this  end  he  climbed  to  the  top  of  a 
marble  column,  sixty  feet  high,  and  there  on  the  cap- 
stone he  lived  a  life  beyond  reproach. 
Simeon  was  then  twenty-four  years  old. 
The  environment  was  circumscribed,  but  there  was 
outlook,  sunshine,  ventilation — three  good  things.  But 
beyond  these  the  place  had  certain  disadvantages.  The 
capstone  was  a  little  less  than  three  feet  square,  so 

295 


ST.    BENEDICT 


Simeon  could  not  lie  down.  He  slept  sitting,  with  his 
head  bowed  between  his  knees,  and  indeed,  in  this  pos- 
ture he  passed  most  of  his  time.  Any  recklessness  in 
movement,  and  he  would  have  slipped  from  his  perilous 
position  and  been  dashed  to  death  upon  the  stones 
beneath  58  38 

As  the  sun  arose  he  stood  up,  just  for  a  few  moments, 
and  held  his  arms  out  in  greeting,  blessing  and  prayer. 
Three  times  during  the  day  did  he  thus  stretch  his 
cramped  limbs,  and  pray  with  his  face  to  the  East.  At 
such  times  those  who  stood  near  shared  in  his  prayers, 
and  went  away  blessed  and  refreshed. 
How  did  Simeon  get  to  the  top  of  the  column? 
Well,  his  companions  at  the  monastery,  a  mile  away, 
said  he  was  carried  there  in  the  night  by  a  miraculous 
power;  that  he  went  to  sleep  in  his  stone  cell  and  awoke 
on  the  pillar.  Other  monks  said  that  Simeon  had  gone 
to  pay  his  respects  to  a  fair  lady,  and  in  wrath  God  had 
caught  him  and  placed  him  on  high.  The  probabilities 
are,  however,  Terese,  as  viewed  by  an  unbeliever,  that 
he  shot  a  line  over  the  column  with  a  bow  and  arrow 
and  then  drew  up  a  rope  ladder  and  ascended  with  ease. 
^  However,  in  the  morning  the  simple  people  of  the 
scattered  village  saw  the  man  on  the  column.  All  day 
he  stayed  there.  The  next  day  he  was  still  there. 
The  days  passed,  with  the  scorching  heat  of  the  midday 
sun,  and  the  cool  winds  of  the  night. 
Still  Simeon  kept  his  place. 
296 


ST.    BENEDICT 


The  rainy  season  came  on.  When  the  nights  were  cold 
and  dark,  Simeon  sat  there  with  bowed  head,  and  drew 
the  folds  of  his  single  garment,  a  black  robe,  over  his 
face  33  53 

Another  season  passed;  the  sun  again  grew  warm,  then 
hot,  and  the  sand-storms  raged  and  blew,  when  the 
people  below  almost  lost  sight  of  the  man  on  the  column. 
Some  prophesied  he  would  be  blown  off,  but  the  morn- 
ing light  revealed  his  form,  naked  from  the  waist  up, 
standing  with  hands  outstretched  to  greet  the  rising  sun. 
fl  Once  each  day,  as  darkness  gathered,  a  monk  came 
with  a  basket  containing  a  bottle  of  goat's  milk  and  a 
little  loaf  of  black  bread,  and  Simeon  dropped  down  a 
rope  and  drew  up  the  basket. 

Simeon  never  spoke,  for  words  are  folly,  and  to  the 
calls  of  saint  or  sinner  he  made  no  reply.  He  lived  in  a 
perpetual  attitude  of  adoration. 

Did  he  suffer?  During  those  first  weeks  he  must  have 
suffered  terribly  and  horribly.  There  was  no  respite  nor 
rest  from  the  hard  surface  of  the  rock,  and  aching  mus- 
cles could  find  no  change  from  the  cramped  and  p)erilous 
position.  If  he  fell,  it  was  damnation  for  his  soul — all 
were  agreed  as  to  this. 

But  man's  body  and  mind  accommodate  themselves  to 
almost  any  condition.  One  thing  at  least,  Simeon  was 
free  from  economic  responsibilities,  free  from  social 
cares  and  intrusion.  Bores  with  sad  stories  of  unappre- 
ciated lives  and  fond  hopes  unrealized,  never  broke  in 

297 


ST.    BENEDICT 


upon  his  peace.  He  was  not  pressed  for  time.  No  frivolous 
dame  of  tarnished  fame  sought  to  share  with  him  his 
perilous  perch.  The  people  on  a  slow  schedule,  ten  min- 
utes late,  never  irritated  his  temper.  His  correspondence 
never  got  in  a  heap. 

Simeon  kept  no  track  of  the  days,  having  no  engage- 
ments to  meet,  or  offices  to  perform,  beyond  the  prayers 
at  morn,  midday  and  night. 

Memory  died  in  him,  the  hurts  became  calluses,  the 
world-pain  died  out  of  his  heart,  to  cling  became  a  habit. 
Language  was  lost  in  disuse.  The  food  he  ate  was  mini- 
mum in  quantity;  sensation  ceased,  and  the  dry,  hot 
winds  reduced  bodily  tissue  to  a  dessicated  something 
called  a  saint — loved,  feared  and  reverenced  for  his 
fortitude  33  53 

This  pillar,  which  had  once  graced  the  portal  of  a  pagan 
temple,  again  became  a  place  of  pious  pilgrimage,  and 
people  flocked  to  Simeon's  rock,  so  that  they  might  be 
near  when  he  stretched  out  his  black,  bony  hands  to  the 
East,  and  the  spirit  of  Almighty  God,  for  a  space, 
hovered  close  around. 

So  much  attention  did  the  abnegation  of  Simeon  attract 
that  various  other  pillars,  marking  the  ruins  of  art  and 
greatness  gone,  in  that  vicinity,  were  crowned  by  pious 
monks.  Their  thought  was  to  show  how  Christianity 
had  triumphed  over  heathenism.  Imitators  were  numer- 
ous. About  that  time  the  Bishops  in  assembly  asked, 
**  Is  Simeon  sincere?  **  To  test  the  matter  of  Simeon's 
298 


ST.    BENEDICT 


pride,  he  was  ordered  to  come  down  from  his  retreat. 
^  As  to  his  chastity,  there  was  Uttle  doubt,  and  his 
poverty  was  beyond  question ;  but  how  about  obedience 
to  his  superiors  ? 

The  order  was  shouted  up  to  him  in  a  Bishop's  voice 
— he  must  let  down  his  rope,  draw  up  a  ladder,  and 
descend  53  5S 

Straightway  Simeon  made  preparation  to  obey.  And 
then  the  Bishops  relented  and  cried,  **  We  have  changed 
our  minds,  and  now  order  you  to  remain!  ** 
Simeon  lifted  his  hands  in  adoration  and  thankfulness 
and  renewed  his  lease. 

And  so  he  lived  on  and  on  and  on — ^he  lived  on  the  top 
of  that  pillar,  never  once  descending,  for  thirty  years. 
^AU  of  his  former  companions  grew  a-weary;  one 
by  one  they  died,  and  the  monastery-bells  tolled  their 
requiem  as  they  were  laid  to  rest.  Did  Simeon  hear  the 
bells  and  say,  *'  Soon  it  will  be  my  turn  '*  ? 
Probably  not.  His  senses  had  flown,  for  what  good  were 
they!  The  young  monk  who  now  at  eventide  brought 
the  basket  with  the  bottle  of  goat's  milk  and  the  loaf 
of  dry  bread  was  born  since  Simeon  had  taken  his  place 
on  the  pillar.  '*  He  has  always  been  there,*'  the  people 
said,  and  crossed  themselves  hurriedly. 
But  one  evening  when  the  young  monk  came  with  his 
basket,  no  line  wets  dropped  from  above.  He  waited  and 
then  called  aloud,  but  all  in  vain. 

When  sunrise  came,  there  sat  the  monk,  his  face  between 

299 


ST.    BENEDICT 


his  knees,  the  folds  of  his  black  robe  drawn  over  his 

head.  But  he  did  not  rise  and  lift  his  hands  in  prayer. 

^  All  day  he  sat  there,  motionless. 

The  people  watched  in  whispered  silence.  Would  he 

arise  at  sundown  and  pray,  and  with  outstretched  hands 

bless  the  assembled  pilgrims? 

But  as  they  watched  a  vulture  came  sailing  slowly 

through  the  blue  ether,  and  circled  nearer  and  nearer; 

and  off  on  the  horizon  was  another — and  still  another, 

circling  nearer  and  nearer. 


300 


ST.    BENEDICT 


N  humanity's  march  of  progress  there  are  a 
vanguard  and  a  rearguard.  The  rearguard 
dwindles  away  into  a  mob  of  camp-followers, 
who  follow  for  diversion  and  to  escape  star- 
vation. Both  the  vanguard  and  the  rearguard  are  out 
of  step  with  the  main  body,  and  therefore  both  are 
despised  by  the  many  who  make  up  the  rank  and  file. 
^  And  yet,  out  of  pity,  the  main  body  supplies  ambu- 
lances and  **  slum-workers,**  who  aim  to  do  **  good  ** — 
but  this  good  is  always  for  the  rearguard  and  the  camp- 
followers,  never  for  those  who  lead  the  line  of  march, 
and  take  the  risk  of  ambush  and  massacre. 
But  this  scorn  of  the  vanguard  has  its  recompense — 
often  delayed,  no  doubt — but  those  who  compose  it 
are  the  only  ones  whom  history  honors  and  Clio  crowns. 
If  they  get  recognition  in  life,  it  is  wrung  tardily  from 
an  ungrateful  and  ungracious  world.  And  this  is  the 
most  natural  thing  in  the  world,  and  it  would  be  a 
miracle  if  it  were  otherwise,  for  the  very  virtue  of  the 
vanguard  consists  in  that  their  acts  outrun  human 
sympathy  38  3S 

Benedict  was  a  scout  of  civilization.  In  his  day  he  led 
the  vanguard.  He  found  the  prosperous  part  of  the 
world  given  over  to  greed  and  gluttony.  The  so-called 
religious  element  was  in  partnership  with  fraud,  super- 
stition, ignorance,  incompetence,  and  an  asceticism 
like  that  of  Simeon  Stylites,  leading  to  nothing. 
Men  know  the  good  and  grow  through  experience.  To 

301 


ST.    BENEDICT 


realize  the  worthlessness  of  place  and  position  and  of 
riches,  you  must  have  been  at  some  time  in  possession 
of  these.  Benedict  was  born  into  a  rich  Roman  family, 
in  the  year  Four  Hundred  Eighty.  His  parents  wished 
*  to  educate  him  for  the  law,  so  he  would  occupy  a  position 
of  honor  in  the  State. 

But  at  sixteen  years  of  age,  at  that  critical  time  when 
nerves  are  vibrating  between  manhood  and  youth, 
Benedict  cut  the  umbilical  domestic  cord,  and  leaving 
his  robes  of  purple  and  silken  finery,  suddenly  disap- 
peared, leaving  behind  a  note  which  was  doubtless 
meant  to  be  reassuring  and  which  was  quite  the  reverse, 
for  it  failed  to  tell  where  his  mail  should  be  forward- 
ed. He  had  gone  to  live  with  a  hermit  in  the  fastnesses 
of  the  mountains.  He  had  desired  to  do  something 
peculiar,  strange,  unusual,  unique  and  individual,  and 
now  he  had  done  it. 

Back  of  it  all  was  the  Cosmic  Urge,  with  a  fair  slip  of 
a  girl,  and  meetings  by  stealth  in  the  moonlight;  and 
then  those  orders  from  his  father  to  give  up  the  girl, 
which  he  obeyed  with  a  vengeance. 
Monasticism  is  a  reversal  or  a  misdirection  of  the  Cosmic 
Urge.  The  will  brought  to  bear  in  fighting  temptation 
might  be  a  power  for  good,  if  used  in  co-operation  with 
Nature.  But  Nature  to  the  priestly  mind  has  always 
been  bad.  The  worldly  mind  was  one  that  led  to  ruin. 
To  be  good  by  doing  good  was  an  idea  the  monkish 
mind  had  not  grasped.  His  way  of  being  good  was  to 
302 


ST.    BENEDICT 


be  nothing,  do  nothing — just  resist.  Successfully  to 
fight  temptation,  the  Oriental  Monk  regarded  as  an 
achievement  5S  53 

One  day,  out  on  that  perilous  and  slippery  rock  on  the 
mountain-side,  Benedict  ceased  saluting  the  Holy 
Virgin  long  enough  to  conceive  a  thought.  It  was  this: 
To  be  acceptable  to  God,  we  must  do  something  in  the 
way  of  positive  good  for  man.  To  pray,  to  adore,  to 
wander,  to  suffer,  is  not  enough.  We  must  lighten  the 
burdens  of  the  toilers  and  bring  a  little  joy  into  their 
lives.  Suffering  has  its  place,  but  too  much  suffering 
would  destroy  the  race. 

Only  one  other  man  had  Benedict  ever  heard  of,  who 
put  forth  this  argument,  and  that  was  Saint  Jerome; 
and  many  good  men  in  the  Church  regarded  Saint  Je- 
rome as  little  better  than  an  infidel.  Saint  Jerome  was  a 
student  of  the  literature  of  Greece  and  Rome — **  Pagan 
Books,**  they  were  called,  **  rivals  of  the  Bible.**  Saint 
Anthony  had  renounced  and  denounced  these  books 
and  all  of  the  learning  of  Paganism.  Saint  Anthony, 
the  father  of  Christian  Monasticism,  dwelt  on  the  terri- 
ble evils  of  intellectual  pride,  and  had  declared  that  the 
joys  of  the  mind  were  of  a  more  subtle  and  devilish 
character  than  those  of  the  flesh. 

Anthony,  assisted  by  inertia,  had  won  the  ear  of  the 
Church;  and  dirt,  rags  and  idleness  had  come  to  be 
regarded  as  sacred  things. 
Benedict  took  issue  with  Anthony. 

303 


ST.    BENEDICT 


HE  Monastic  Impulse  is  a  protest  against  the 
Cosmic  Urge,  or  reproductive  desire. 
Necessarily,  the  Cosmic  Urge  is  older  than 
the  Monastic  Impulse;  and  beyond  a  doubt 
it  will  live  to  dance  on  the  grave  of  its  rival. 
The  Cosmic  Urge  is  the  creative  instinct.  It  includes  all 
planning,  purpose,  desire,  hope,  unrest,  lust  and  ambi- 
tion. In  its  general  sense,  it  is  Unfulfilled  Desire.  It  is 
the  voice  constantly  crying  in  the  ears  of  success,  **  Arise 
and  get  thee  hence,  for  this  is  not  thy  rest.*'  It  is  the 
dissatisfaction  with  all  things  done — it  is  our  Noble 
Discontent.  In  its  first  manifestation  it  is  sex.  In  its 
letst  refinement  it  means  the  love  of  man  and  woman, 
with  the  love  of  children,  the  home-making  sense,  and 
an  appreciation  of  art,  music  and  science — ^which  is 
love  with  seeing  eyes — as  natural  results. 
Deity  creates  through  its  creatures,  of  which  man  is 
the  highest  type.  But  man,  evolving  a  small  spark  of 
intellect,  sits  in  judgment  on  his  Creator,  and  finds  the 
work  bad.  Of  all  the  animals,  man  is  the  only  one  so 
far  known  that  criticizes  his  environment,  instead  of 
accepting  it.  And  we  do  this  because,  in  degree,  we  have 
abandoned  intuition  before  we  have  gotten  control  of 
intellect  5S  5S 

The  Monastic  Instinct  is  the  disposition  ever  to  look 
outside  of  ourselves  for  help.  We  expect  the  Strong  Man 
to  come  and  give  us  deliverance  from  our  woes.  All 
nations  have  legends  of  saviors  and  heroes  who  came 
304 


ST.    BENEDICT 


and  set  the  captives  free,  and  who  will  come  again  in 
greater  glory  and  mightier  power  and  even  release  the 
dead  from  their  graves. 

The  Monastic  Impulse  is  based  on  world- weariness, 
with  disappointed  love,  or  sex  surfeit,  which  is  a  phase 
of  the  same  thing,  as  a  basis.  Its  simplest  phase  is  a 
desire  for  solitude. 

**  Mon  **  means  one,  and  monasticism  is  simply  living 
alone,  apart  from  the  world.  Gradually  it  came  to  mean 
living  alone  with  others  of  a  like  mind  or  disposition. 
^The  clan  is  an  extension  of  the  family,  and  so  is 
originally  a  monastic  impulse.  The  Group  Idea  is  a 
variant  of  monasticism,  but  if  it  includes  men  and 
women,  it  always  disintegrates  with  the  second  gener- 
ation, if  not  before,  because  the  Cosmic  Urge  catches 
the  members,  and  they  mate,  marry  and  swing  the 
circle  53  53 

Ernst  Haeckel  has  recently  intimated  his  belief  that 
monogamy,  with  its  exclusive  life,  is  a  diluted  form  of 
monasticism.  And  his  opinion  seems  to  be  that,  in 
order  to  produce  the  noblest  race  possible,  we  must 
have  a  free  society,  with  a  State  that  reverences  and 
respects  maternity  and  pensions  any  mother  who  per- 
sonally cares  for  her  child. 

Monasticism  and  enforced  monogamy  often  carry  a 
disrespect,  if  not  a  positive  contempt,  for  motherhood, 
especially  free  motherhood.  We  breed  from  the  worst, 
under  the  worst  conditions,  and  as  punishment  God  has 

305 


ST.    BENEDICT 


made  us  a  race  of  scrubs.  If  we  had  deliberately  set 
about  to  produce  the  worst,  we  could  not  do  better. 
fl  It  will  at  once  be  seen  that  a  penalized  free  mother- 
hood is  exactly  like  the  Monastic  Impulse — a  protest  and 
a  revolt  from  the  Cosmic  Urge.  Hence  Ernst  Haeckel, 
harking  back  to  Schopenhauer,  declares  that  we 
must  place  a  premium  upon  parenthood,  and  the  State 
must  subsidize  all  mothers,  visiting  them  with  tender- 
ness, gentleness,  sanctity  and  respect,  before  we  shall 
be  able  to  produce  a  race  of  demigods. 
The  Church  has  aureoled  and  sainted  the  men  and 
women  who  have  successfully  fought  the  Cosmic  Urge. 
Emerson  says,  **  We  are  strong  as  we  ally  ourselves  with 
Nature,  and  weak  as  we  fight  against  her  or  disregard 
her.**  Thus  does  Emerson  place  himself  squarely  in 
opposition  to  the  Church,  for  the  Church  has  ever 
looked  upon  Nature  as  a  lure  and  a  menace  to  holy 
living  5S  53 

Now,  is  it  not  possible  that  the  prevalency  of  the  Mon- 
astic Impulse  is  proof  that  it  is  in  itself  a  movement  in 
the  direction  of  Nature?  Possibly  its  error  lies  in  swing- 
ing out  beyond  the  norm.  A  few  great  Churchmen  have 
thought  so.  And  the  greatest  and  best  of  them,  so  far 
as  I  know,  was  Benedict.  Through  his  efforts,  monasti- 
cism  was  made  a  power  for  good,  and  for  a  time,  at 
least,  it  served  society  and  helped  humanity  on  its  way. 
^  That  the  flagellants,  anchorites,  or  monks  with  iron 
collars,  and  Simeon  Stylites  living  his  life  perched  on  a 

306 


ST.    BENEDICT 


pillar,  benefited  the  human  race — ^no  one  would  now 
argue.  Simeon  was  simply  trying  to  please  God — to 
secure  salvation  for  his  soul.  His  assumption  was  that 
the  world  was  base  and  bad.  To  be  pure  in  heart  you 
must  live  apart  from  it.  His  persistence  was  the  only 
commendable  thing  about  him,  and  this  was  the  per- 
sistence of  a  diseased  mind.  It  was  beautiful  just  as  the 
persistence  of  cancer  is  beautiful. 

Benedict,  while  agreeing  that  the  world  was  bad,  yet 
said  that  our  business  wa^  to  make  it  better,  and  that 
everything  we  did  which  was  done  merely  to  save  our 
own  souls,  was  selfish  and  unworthy.  He  advocated 
that,  in  order  to  save  our  own  souls,  we  should  make  it 
our  business  to  save  others.  Also,  to  think  too  much 
about  your  own  soul  was  to  have  a  soul  not  worth 
saving.  If  this  life  is  a  preparation  for  another,  as  Simeon 
thought,  he  was  not  preparing  himself  for  a  world  where 
we  would  care  to  go.  The  only  heaven  in  which  any  sane 
man  or  woman,  be  he  saint  or  sinner,  would  care  to 
live,  would  be  one  whose  inhabitants  would  be  at  liberty 
to  obey  the  Cosmic  Urge  just  as  freely  as  the  Monastic 
Impulse,  and  where  one  would  be  regarded  as  holy  as 
the  other.  So  thought  Saint  Benedict. 


307 


ST.    BENEDICT 


HERE  is  a  natural  law,  well  recognized  and 
defined  by  men  who  think,  called  the  Law  of 
Diminishing  Returns,  sometimes  referred  to 
as  the  Law  of  Pivotal  Points. 
A  man  starts  in  to  take  systematic  exercise,  and  he 
finds  that  his  strength  increases.  He  takes  more  exercise 
and  keeps  on  until  he  gets  **  stale  " — that  is,  he  becomes 
sore  and  lame.  He  has  passed  the  Pivotal  Point  and  is 
getting  a  Diminishing  Return. 

In  running  a  railroad-engine  a  certain  amount  of  coal 
is  required  to  pull  a  train  of  given  weight  a  mile,  say 
at  the  rate  of  fifty  miles  an  hour.  You  double  the  amount 
of  your  coal,  and  simple  folks  might  say  you  double 
your  speed,  but  railroad  men  know  better.  The  double 
amount  of  coal  will  give  you  only  about  sixty  miles 
instead  of  fifty.  Increase  your  coal  and  from  this  on 
you  get  a  Diminishing  Return.  If  you  insist  on  eighty 
miles  an  hour,  you  get  your  speed  at  a  terrific  cost  and 
a  terrible  risk. 

Another  case :  Your  body  requires  a  certain  amount  of 
food — the  body  is  an  engine;  food  is  fuel;  life  is  com- 
bustion. Better  the  quality  and  quantity  of  your  food, 
and  up  to  a  certain  point  you  increase  your  strength. 
Go  on  increasing  your  food  and  you  get  death.  Loan 
money  at  five  percent  and  your  investment  is  reasonably 
secure  and  safe.  Loan  money  at  ten  per  cent  and  you 
do  not  double  the  returns;  on  the  contrary,  you  have 
taken  on  so  much  risk.  Loan  money  at  twenty  per  cent 
308 


ST.    BENEDICT 


and  you  will  probably  lose  it ;  for  the  man  who  borrows 
at  twenty  per  cent  does  not  intend  to  pay  if  he  can  help 
it  53  58 

The  Law  of  Diminishing  Returns  was  what  Oliver 
Wendell  Holmes  had  in  mind  when  he  said,  **  Because  I 
like  a  pinch  of  salt  in  my  soup  is  no  reason  I  wish  to 
be  immersed  in  brine." 

Churches,  preachers  and  religious  denominations  are 
good  things  in  their  time  and  place,  and  up  to  a  certain 
point.  Whether  for  you  the  church  has  passed  the  Piv- 
otal Point  is  for  you  yourself  to  decide.  But  remember 
this,  because  a  thing  is  good  up  to  a  certain  point,  or 
has  been  good,  is  no  reason  why  it  should  be  perpetuated. 
The  Law  of  Diminishing  Returns  is  the  natural  refu- 
tation of  the  popular  fallacy  that  because  a  thing  is 
good  you  can  not  get  too  much  of  it. 
It  is  this  law  that  Abraham  Lincoln  had  in  mind  when 
he  said,  **  I  object  to  that  logic  which  seeks  to  imply 
that  because  I  wish  to  make  the  negro  free,  I  desire  a 
black  woman  for  a  wife." 

Benedict  had  spent  five  years  in  resistance  before  it 
dawned  upon  him  that  Monasticism  carried  to  a  certain 
point  was  excellent  and  fraught  with  good  results,  but 
beyond  that  it  rapidly  degenerated. 
To  carry  the  plan  of  simplicity  and  asceticism  to  its 
summit  and  not  go  beyond  was  now  his  desire. 
To  withdraw  from  society  he  felt  was  a  necessity,  for 
the  petty  and  selfish  ambitions  of  Rome  were  revolting. 

309 


ST.    BENEDICT 


But  the  religious  life  did  not  for  him  preclude  the  joys 
of  the  intellect.  In  his  unshaven  and  unshorn  condition, 
wearing  a  single  garment  of  goatskin,  he  dared  not  go 
back  to  his  home.  So  he  proceeded  to  make  himself 
acceptable  to  decent  people.  He  made  a  white  robe, 
bathed,  shaved  off  his  beard,  had  his  hair  cut,  and 
putting  on  his  garments,  went  back  to  his  family.  The 
life  in  the  wilderness  had  improved  his  health.  He  had 
grown  in  size  and  strength  and  he  now,  in  his  own 
person,  proved  that  a  religious  recluse  was  not  neces- 
sarily unkempt  and  repulsive. 

His  people  greeted  him  as  one  raised  from  the  dead. 
Crowds  followed  him  wherever  he  went.  He  began  to 
preach  to  them  and  to  explain  his  position. 
Some  of  his  old  school  associates  came  to  him. 
As  he  explained  his  position,  it  began  more  and  more  to 
justify  itself  in  his  mind.  Things  grow  plain  as  we  analyze 
them  to  others — by  explaining  to  another  the  matter 
becomes  luminous  to  ourselves. 

To  purify  the  monasteries  and  carry  to  them  all  that 
was  good  and  beautiful  in  the  classics,  was  the  desire 
of  Benedict.  His  wish  was  to  reconcile  the  learning  of 
the  past  with  Christianity,  which  up  to  that  time  had 
been  simply  ascetic.  It  had  consisted  largely  of  repres- 
sion, suppression  and  a  killing-out  of  all  spontaneous, 
happy,  natural  impulses. 

Very  naturally,  he  was  harshly  criticized,  and  when  he 
went  back  to  the  cave  where  he  had  dwelt  and  tried  to 
310 


ST.    BENEDICT 


teach  some  of  his  old  companions  how  to  read  and 
write,  they  flew  first  at  him,  and  then  from  him.  They 
declared  that  he  was  the  devil  in  the  guise  of  a  monk; 
that  he  wished  to  live  both  as  a  monk  and  as  a  man  of 
the  world — that  he  wanted  to  eat  his  cake  and  still 
keep  it.  By  a  sort  of  divine  right  he  took  control  of 
affairs,  and  insisted  that  his  companions  should  go  to 
work  with  him,  and  plant  a  garden  and  raise  vegetables 
and  fruits.  Instead  of  depending  upon  charity  or  going 
without  38  3S 

The  man  who  insists  that  all  folks  shall  work,  be  they 
holy  or  secular,  learned  or  illiterate,  always  has  a  hard 
road  to  travel.  Benedict's  companions  declared  that  he 
was  trying  to  enslave  them,  and  one  of  them  brewed  a 
poison  and  substituted  it  for  the  simple  herb  tea  that 
Benedict  drank.  Being  discovered,  the  man  and  his 
conspirators  escaped,  although  Benedict  offered  to 
forgive  and  forget  if  they  would  go  to  work. 
Benedict  adhered  to  his  new  inspiration  with  a  persis- 
tency that  never  relaxed — the  voice  of  God  had  called 
to  him  that  he  must  clear  the  soil  of  the  brambles  and 
plant  gardens. 

The  thorn-bush  through  which  he  had  once  rolled  his 
naked  body,  he  now  cut  down  and  burned.  He  relaxed 
the  vigils  and  limited  the  prayers  and  adorations  to  a 
few  short  exercises  just  before  eating,  sleeping  and 
going  to  work.  He  divided  the  day  into  three  parts — 
eight  hours  for  work,  eight  hours  for  study,  eight  hours 

311 


ST.    BENEDICT 


for  sleep.  Then  he  took  one-half  hour  from  each  of  these 
divisions  for  silent  prayer  and  adoration.  He  argued 
that  good  work  was  a  prayer,  and  that  one  could  pray 
with  his  heart  and  lips,  even  as  his  hands  swung  the 
ax,  the  sickle  or  the  grub-hoe.  All  that  Benedict  re- 
quired of  others,  he  did  himself,  and  through  the  daily 
work  he  evolved  a  very  strong  and  sturdy  physique. 
From  the  accounts  that  have  come  to  us  he  was  rather 
small  in  stature,  but  in  strength  he  surpassed  any  man 
in  his  vicinity. 

Miraculous  accounts  of  his  physical  strength  were 
related,  and  in  the  minds  of  his  simple  followers  he 
was  regarded  as  more  than  a  man,  which  shows  us  that 
the  ideals  of  what  a  man  should  be,  or  might  be,  were 
not  high.  We  are  told  that  near  Benedict's  first  monas- 
tery there  was  a  very  deep  lake,  made  in  the  time  of 
Nero  by  damming  up  a  mountain  stream.  Along  this 
lake  the  brambles  and  vines  had  grown  in  great  con- 
fusion. Benedict  set  to  work  to  clear  the  ground  from 
this  lake  to  his  monastery,  half  a  mile  up  the  hillside. 
One  day  a  workman  dropped  an  ax  into  the  lake.  Bene- 
dict smiled,  his  lips  moved  in  prayer  and  the  ax  came 
to  the  surface.  The  story  does  not  say  that  Benedict 
dived  to  the  bottom  and  brought  up  the  ax,  which  he 
probably  did.  The  next  day  the  owner  of  the  ax  fell 
into  the  water,  and  the  story  goes  that  Benedict  walked 
out  on  the  water  and  brought  the  man  in  on  his  shoul- 
ders. We  who  do  not  believe  that  the  age  of  miracles  has 
312 


ST.    BENEDICT 


peissed,  can  well  understand  how  Benedict  was  an 
active,  agile  and  strong  swimmer,  and  that  through 
the  natural  powers  which  he  evolved  by  living  a  sane 
and  simple  life,  he  was  able  to  perform  many  feats 
which  peasants  round  about  considered  miraculous. 
Benedict  had  what  has  been  called  the  Builder's  Itch. 
He  found  great  joy  in  planning,  creating  and  construct- 
ing. He  had  an  eye  for  architecture  and  landscape- 
gardening.  He  utilized  the  materials  of  old  Roman 
temples  to  construct  Christian  churches,  and  from  the 
same  quarry  he  took  stone  and  built  a  monastery.  A 
Roman  ruin  had  a  lure  for  him.  It  meant  building 
possibilities.  He  stocked  the  lake  with  fish,  and  then 
made  catches  that  rivaled  the  parable  of  the  loaves  and 
fishes.  Only  the  loaves  of  Benedict  were  made  from  the 
wheat  he  himself  raised,  and  the  people  he  fed  were 
the  crowds  who  came  to  hear  him  preach  the  gosp>el  he 
himself  practised — the  gospel  of  work,  moderation  and 
the  commonsense  exercise  of  head,  hand  and  heart. 


313 


ST.    BENEDICT 


O  Benedict  came  twelve  disciples.  But  further 
applications  becoming  numerous,  to  meet  the 
pressure  Benedict  kept  organizing  them  into 
groups  of  twelve,  appointing  a  superior  over 
each  group.  In  order  to  prove  his  sense  of  equality, 
he  had  but  eleven  besides  himself  in  the  monastery. 
He  recognized  that  leadership  was  a  necessity;  but  the 
clothes  he  wore  were  no  better  than,  and  the  food  he 
ate  no  different  from,  what  the  others  had.  Yet  to 
enforce  discipline,  rules  were  made  and  instant  obe- 
dience was  exacted.  Benedict  took  his  turn  at  waiting 
on  the  table  and  doing  the  coarsest  tasks. 
Were  it  not  for  the  commonsense  methods  of  life,  and 
the  element  of  human  service,  the  Christian  monastery 
and  probably  Christianity  itself  would  not  have  survived. 
The  dogma  of  religion  was  made  acceptable  by  blending 
it  with  a  service  for  humanity.  And  even  to  this  day 
the  popular  plan  of  proving  the  miracles  of  the  Old 
Testament  to  have  been  actual  occurrences  is  to  point 
to  the  schools,  hospitals  and  orphan  asylums  that 
Christian  people  have  provided. 

In  the  efforts  of  Benedict  to  combine  the  life  of  unselfish 
service  with  intellectual  appreciation  of  classic  litera- 
ture, he  naturally  was  misunderstood.  Several  times  he 
came  near  having  serious  collisions  with  the  authorities 
of  the  Church  at  Rome. 

His  preaching  attracted  the  jealous  attention  of  certain 
churchmen,  but  as  he  was  not  a  priest,  the  Pope  refused 
314 


ST.    BENEDICT 


to  take  notice  of  his  supposed  heresies.  ^  An  effort  was 
made  to  compel  him  to  become  a  priest,  but  Benedict 
refused  on  the  plea  that  he  was  not  worthy.  The  fact 
was,  however,  that  he  did  not  wish  to  be  bound  by  the 
rules  of  the  Church. 

In  one  sense,  his  was  a  religion  inside  a  religion,  and  a 
slight  accident  might  have  precipitated  an  opposition 
denomination,  just  as  the  Protestant  issue  of  Luther 
was  an  accident,  and  the  Methodism  of  the  Wesleys, 
another  53  33 

Several  times  the  opposition,  in  the  belief  that  Benedict 
was  an  enemy  of  the  Church,  went  so  far  as  to  try  to 
kill  him.  And  once  a  few  pious  persons  in  Rome  induced 
a  company  of  wanton  women  to  go  out  to  Benedict's 
monastery  and  disport  themselves  through  his  beautiful 
grounds.  This  was  done  with  two  purposes  in  view; 
one  was  to  work  the  direct  downfall  of  the  Benedictines, 
with  the  aid  of  the  trulls,  and  the  other  was  to  create  a 
scandal  among  the  visitors,  who  would  carry  the  un- 
savory news  back  to  Rome  and  supply  the  gossips 
raw  stock. 

Benedict  was  so  deeply  grieved  by  the  despicable  trick 
that  he  retired  to  his  former  home,  the  cave  in  the 
hillside,  and  there  remained  without  food  for  a  month. 
^  But  during  this  time  of  solitude  his  mind  was  busy 
L  with  new  plans.  He  now  founded  Monte  Cassino.  The 
site  is  halfway  between  Rome  and  Naples,  and  the  white, 
classic   lines  of   the  buildings  can   be   seen   from  the 

315 


ST.    BENEDICT 


railroad.  There  on  the  crags,  from  out  of  a  mass  of 
green,  has  been  played  out  for  more  than  a  thousand 
years  the  drama  of  religious  life.  Death  by  fire  and 
sword  has  been  the  fate  of  many  of  the  occupants. 
But  the  years  went  by,  new  men  came,  the  ruins  were 
repaired,  and  again  the  cloisters  were  trodden  by  pious 
feet  of  holy  men.  Goths,  Lombards,  Saracens,  Normans, 
Spaniards,  Teutons,  and  finally  came  Napoleon  Bona- 
parte, who  confiscated  the  property,  making  the  place 
his  home  for  a  brief  space.  Later  he  relented  and  took 
it  from  the  favorite  upon  whom  he  had  bestowed  it 
and  gave  it  back  to  the  Church.  It  then  remained  a 
Benedictine  monastery  until  the  edict  of  Eighteen 
Hundred  Sixty-six,  which,  with  the  help  of  Massini 
and  Garibaldi,  made  the  monastery  in  Italy  a  thing  of 
the  past.  The  place  is  now  a  school — a  school  with  a 
co-ed  proviso.  Thus  passes  away  the  glory  of  the  world, 
in  order  that  a  greater  glory  shall  appear. 
--  Six  hundred  years  before  Benedict's  day,  on  the  site  of 
the  cloister  of  Monte  Cassino  stood  a  temple  to  Apollo, 
and  just  below  was  a  grove  sacred  to  Venus. 
Two  hundred  years  before  Benedict's  time  the  Goths 
had  done  their  work  so  well  that  even  the  walls  of  the 
temple  to  Apollo  were  razed,  and  the  sacred  grove 
became  the  home  of  wild  beasts. 

To  this  deserted  place  came  Benedict  and  eleven  men, 
filled  with  a  holy  zeal  to  erect  on  this  very  spot  an 
edifice  worthy  of  the  living  God.  Here  the  practical 
316 


ST.    BENEDICT 


builder  and  the  religious  dreamer  combined.  If  you  are 
going  to  build  a  building,  why  not  build  upon  the  walls 
already  laid  and  with  blocks  ready  hewn  and  fashioned ! 
^  The  Monte  Cassino  monastery  of  Benedict  rivaled 
in  artistic  beauty  the  temple  that  it  replaced. 
Man  is  a  building  animal,  and  the  same  Creative  Energy 
that  imp)elled  the  Greeks  and  later  the  Romans  to  plan, 
devise,  toil  and  build,  now  played  through  the  good 
monk  Benedict.  His  desire  to  create  was  a  form  of  the 
great  Cosmic  Urge,  that  lives  eternally  and  is  building 
in  America  a  finer,  better  and  nobler  religion  than  the 
world  has  ever  seen — a  Religion  of  Humanity — a  religion 
of  which  at  times  Benedict  caught  vivid  passing 
glimpses,  as  one  sees  at  night  the  landscape  brilliantly 
illumined  by  the  lightning's  flash. 


317 


ST.    BENEDICT 


HE  motto  of  Benedict  was  **  Ecce  Labora/* 
These  words  were  carved  on  the  entrance  to 
every  Benedictine  Monastery. 
The  monastic  idea  originated  in  the  Orient, 
where  Nature  placed  no  special  penalty  on  idleness. 
Indeed,  labor  may  have  been  a  curse  in  Asia.  Morality 
is  crystallized  expediency,  and  both,  as  we  are  told, 
are  matters  of  geography,  as  well  as  time. 
And  truth  it  is,  that  north  of  the  Mediterranean  idleness 
is  the  curse,  not  labor. 

The  rule  of  Benedict  was  not  unlike  that  of  the  Shakers, 
for  near  every  monastery  was  a  nunnery.  The  associ- 
ation of  men  and  women,  although  quite  limited,  was 
better  for  both  than  their  absolute  separation,  as  with 
the  Trappists,  who  regard  it  as  a  sin  even  to  look  upon 
the  face  of  a  woman. 

The  thrift  and  industry  of  the  Benedictines  was  worthy 
of  Ann  Lee  and  our  friends  at  Lebanon.  A  man  who 
works  eight  hours,  with  fair  intelligence,  and  does  not 
set  out  to  make  consumption  and  waste  the  business  of 
his  life,  grows  rich.  Thoreau  was  right — an  hour  a  day 
will  support  you.  But  Thoreau  was  wrong  in  supposing 
men  work  only  to  get  food,  clothing  and  shelter.  To 
work  only  an  hour  a  day  is  to  evolve  into  a  loafer.  We 
work  not  to  acquire,  but  to  become. 
The  group  idea,  cemented  by  able  leadership  and  a 
religious  concept,  is  always  successful.  The  Mormons, 
Quakers,    Harmonyites,  Economites,    and  the  Oneida 

318 


ST.    BENEDICT 


Community,  all  grew  very  rich,  and  surpassed  their 
neighbors  not  only  in  point  of  money,  but  in  health, 
happiness,  intelligence  and  general  mental  grasp* 
Brook  Farm  failed  for  lack  of  a  leader  with  business 
instinct ;  but  as  it  was,  it  divided  up  among  its  members 
a  rich  legacy  of  spiritual  and  mental  assets.  In  family 
life,  or  what  is  called  **  Society,**  there  is  a  constant 
danger  through  rivalry,  not  in  well-doing  or  in  human 
service,  but  in  conspicuous  waste  and  conspicuous 
leisure.  The  religious  rite  of  feet-washing  is  absolutely 
lost,  both  as  a  rite  and  as  an  idea.  In  truth,  **  good 
society  **  is  essentially  predatory  in  its  instincts.  In 
communal  life,  or  the  life  of  a  group,  service  and  not 
waste  is  the  watchword.  This  must  be  so,  since  every 
group,  at  its  beginning,  is  held  together  through  the 
thought  of  service.  To  meet  and  unite  on  a  basis  of 
jealous  rivalry  and  sharp  practise  is  unthinkable,  for 
these  are  the  things  that  disintegrate  the  group. 
It  is  an  economic  law  that  a  group  founded  upon  and 
practising  the  idea  of  each  member  giving  all,  wins  all. 
Benedict's  idea  of  **  Ecce  labora  '*  made  every  Bene- 
dictine monastery  a  center  of  wealth.  Work  stops 
bickering,  strife  and  undue  waste.  It  makes  for  health 
and  strength.  The  reward  of  work  is  not  immunity 
from  toil,  but  more  work — an  increased  capacity  for 
effort  Si  Si 

De  Tocqueville  gave  this  recipe  for  success:  Subdue 
yourself — Devote  yourself. 

319 


ST.    BENEDICT 


That  is  to  say,  subdue  the  ego  to  a  point  where  it  gets 
its  gratification  in  concentrating  on  unselfish  service. 
He  who  does  this  always  succeeds,  for  not  only  is  he 
engaged  upon  a  plan  of  life  in  which  there  is  little  com- 
petition, but  he  is  working  in  line  with  a  divine  law, 
the  law  of  mutuality,  which  provides  that  all  the  good 
you  do  to  others,  you  do  for  yourself. 
Benedictine  monasticism  leads  straight  to  wealth  and 
great  power.  The  Abbot  of  the  group  became  a  Baron. 
I  took  the  vow  of  poverty,  and  it  led  to  an  income 
of  twenty  thousand  pounds  a  year.  I  took  the  vow  of 
obedience  and  find  myself  ruler  of  fifty  towns  and 
villages."  These  are  the  words  which  Sir  Walter  Scott 
puts  into  the  mouth  of  an  Abbot,  who  became  a  Baron 
through  the  simple  law  of  which  I  have  hinted.  And 
in  his  novel  of  **  The  Abbot,**  Sir  Walter  gives  a  tragic 
picture  of  how  power  and  wealth  can  be  lost  as  well  as 
won.  Feudalism  began  with  the  rule  of  the  monastery. 
^  Benedict  was  one  of  the  world's  great  Captains  of 
Industry.   And  like  all   great  entrepreneurs,   he  won 
through  utilizing  the  efforts  of  others.  In  picking  his 
Abbots,  or  the  men  to  be  **  father  *'  of  each  particular 
group,  he  showed  rare  skill.  These  men  learned  from 
him  and  he  learned  from  them.  One  of  his  best  men  was 
Cassiodorus,  the  man  who  evolved  the  scheme  of  the 
scriptorium.   **  To  study  eight  hours  a  day  was  not 
enough,'*  said  Cassiodorus.  **  We  should  copy  the  great 
works  of  literature  so  that  every  monastery  shall  have 
320 


ST.    BENEDICT 


a  library  as  good  as  that  which  we  have  at  Monte 
Cassino.**  He  himself  was  an  expert  penman,  and  he 
set  himself  the  task  of  teaching  the  monks  how 
to  write  as  well  as  how  to  read.  **  To  write  beautifully 
is  a  great  joy  to  our  God/*  he  said. 
Benedict  liked  the  idea,  and  at  once  put  it  into  execu- 
tion. Cassiodorus  is  the  patron  saint  of  every  maker  of 
books  who  loves  his  craft. 

The  systematic  work  of  the  scriptorium  originated  in 
the  brain  of  Cassiodorus,  and  he  was  appointed  by  Bene- 
dict to  go  from  one  monastery  to  another  and  inform 
the  Abbot  that  a  voice  had  come  from  God  to  Benedict 
saying  that  these  precious  books  must  be  copied,  and 
presented  to  those  who  would  prize  them. 
Cassiodorus  had  been  a  secretary  of  state  under  the 
Emperor  Theodoric,  and  he  had  also  been  a  soldier. 
He  was  seventy  years  of  age  when  he  came  under  the 
influence  of  Benedict,  through  a  chance  visit  to  Monte 
Cassino.  Benedict  at  first  ordered  him  to  take  an  ax 
and  work  with  the  servants  at  grubbing  out  underbrush 
and  preparing  a  field  for  planting.  Cassiodorus  obeyed, 
and  soon  discovered  that  there  was  a  joy  in  obedience 
he  had  before  never  guessed.  His  name  was  Brebantus 
Varus,  but  on  his  declaring  he  was  going  to  remain  and 
work  with  Benedict,  he  was  complimented  by  being 
given  the  name  of  Cassiodorus,  suggested  by  the  word 
Cassinum  or  Cassino.  Cassiodorus  lived  to  be 
ninety-two,   and  was  one  of  the  chief  factors,   after 

321 


ST.    BENEDICT 


Benedict  himself,  in  introducing  the  love  of  art  and 

beauty  among  the  Benedictines. 

Near  Monte  Cassino  was  a  nunnery  presided  over  by 

Scholastica,  the  twin  sister  of  Benedict. 

Renan  says  that  the  kinship  of  Scholastica  and  Benedict 

was  a  spiritual  tie,  not  one  of  blood.  If  so,  we  respect  it 

none  the  less.  Saint  Gregory  tells   of    the    death   of 

Benedict  thus: 

Benedict  was  at  the  end  of  his  career.  His  interview 
with  Totila  took  place  in  Five  Hundred  Forty-two,  in 
the  year  which  preceded  his  death ;  and  from  his  earliest 
days  of  the  following  year,  God  prepared  him  for  his 
last  struggle,  by  requiring  from  him  the  sacrifice  of 
the  most  tender  aflFection  he  had  retained  on  earth.  The 
beautiful  and  touching  incident  of  the  last  meeting  of 
Benedict  and  his  twin  sister,  Scholastica,  is  a  picture 
long  to  remember.  At  the  window  of  his  cell,  three  days 
after  her  death,  Benedict  had  a  vision  of  his  dear  sister's 
soul  entering  heaven  in  the  form  of  a  snowy  dove.  He 
immediately  sent  for  the  body  and  placed  it  in  a  sepul- 
cher  which  he  had  already  prepared  for  himself,  that 
death  might  not  separate  those  whose  souls  had  always 
been  united  in  God. 

The  death  of  his  sister  was  the  signal  of  departure  for 
himself.  He  survived  her  forty  days.  He  announced  his 
death  to  several  of  his  monks,  then  far  from  Monte 
Cassino.  A  violent  fever  having  seized  him,  he  caused 
himself  on  the  sixth  day  of  his  sickness  to  be  carried  to 
the  chapel  of  Saint  John  the  Baptist;  he  had  before 
ordered  the  tomb  in  which  his  sister  already  slept  to  be 
opened. 

322 


ST.    BENEDICT 


There,  supported  in  the  arms  of  his  disciples,  he  received 
the  holy  Viaticum,  then  placing  himself  at  the  side  of 
the  open  grave,  but  at  the  foot  of  the  altar,  and  with 
his  arms  extended  towards  heaven,  he  died,  standing, 
muttering  a  last  prayer.  Such  a  victorious  death  became 
that  great  soldier  of  God.  He  was  buried  by  the  side 
of  his  beloved  Scholastica,  in  a  sepulcher  made  on  the 
spot  where  stood  the  altar  of  Apollo,  which  had  been 
replaced  by  another  to  our  beloved  Savior. 


323 


ST.    BENEDICT 


N  the  very  year,  and  at  the  same  time,  that 
Justinian  and  Theodora  were  preparing  the 
Justinian  Code,  Benedict  was  busy  devising 
**  The  Monastic  Rules.**  Benedict  did  not  put 
his  rules  forth  as  final,  but  explained  that  they  were 
merely  expedient  for  their  time  and  place.  In  this  he 
was  singularly  modest.  If  one  can  divest  himself  of  the 
thought  that  there  was  anything  **  holy  **  or  "sacred  ** 
about  these  communal  groups  called  **  monasteries,** 
and  then  read  these  rules,  he  will  see  that  they  were 
founded  on  a  good  knowledge  of  economics  and  a  very 
stern  commonsense. 

Humanity  was  the  same  a  thousand  years  ago  that  it 
is  now.  Benedict  had  to  fight  inertia,  selfishness  and 
incipient  paranoia,  just  as  does  the  man  who  tries  to 
introduce  practical  socialism  today.  A  few  extracts  from 
this  very  remarkable  Book  of  Rules  will  show  the  shrewd 
Connecticut  wisdom  of  Benedict.  To  hold  the  dowdy, 
indifferent,  slipshod  and  underdone  in  their  proper 
places,  so  they  could  not  disturb  or  destroy  the  peace, 
policy  and  prosperity  of  the  efficient,  was  the  task  of 
Benedict  53  S& 

Benedict  says:  **  Written  and  formal  rules  are  necessary 
only  because  we  are  all  faulty  men,  with  a  tendency 
towards  selfishness  and  disorder.  When  men  become 
wise,  and  also  unselfish,  there  will  be  no  need  of  rules 
and  laws.** 

The  Book  of  Rules  by  Benedict  is  a  volume  of  more 
324 


ST.    BENEDICT 


than  twenty  thousand  words.  Its  scope  reveals  an  insight 
that  will  appeal  to  all  who  have  had  to  do  with  socialistic 
experiments,  not  to  mention  the  management  of  labor- 
unions.  Benedict  was  one  of  the  industrial  leaders  of  the 
world.  His  life  was  an  epoch,  and  his  influence  still  abides. 


325 


MARY  BAKER  EDDY 


The  chief  stones  in  the  temple  of  Christian  Science  are 
to  be  found  in  the  following  postulates :  that  Life  is  God, 
good  and  not  evil;  that  Soul  is  sinless,  not  to  be  found 
in  the  body;  that  Spirit  is  not  and  can  not  be  material- 
ized; that  Life  is  not  subject  to  death;  that  the  spiritual 
real  man  has  no  consciousness  of  material  life  or  death. 

— Mary  Baker  Eddy 


^> 


MARY  BAKER  EDDY 


MARY  BAKER  EDDY 


ET  the  fact  be  here  stated  that  Mary 
Baker  Eddy  was  the  founder  of 
Christian  Science.  This  woman  Uved 
long  £ind  well. 

She  was  alert,  earnest,  highly  intel- 
ligent, receptive.  She  was  ever  dis- 
covering. We  know  this  because  she 
put  out  a  new  message  every  little 
while,  or  modified  an  old  one,  having  come  in  the  mean- 
time into  a  position  to  get  a  nearer  and  clearer  view  of 
the  fact.  The  last  edition  of  **  Science  and  Health  *'  is  a 
different  book  from  the  first  one. 

Christian  Science  is  not  a  fixed,  formed,  fossilized, 
ossified  structure.  Possibly  it  may  become  so.  But  the 
probabilities  are  it  will  grow,  expand,  advance.  Life  and 
growth  consist  in  eliminating  dead  matter  and  evolv- 
ing new  tissue.  The  institution,  commercial,  artistic, 
social,  political,  religious,  that  has  ceased  to  grow 
has  begun  to  disintegrate. 

Christian  Scientists  do  not  flee  the  world,  renouncing 
and  denouncing  it.  As  a  people  they  are  well,  happy, 
hopeful,  enthusiastic  and  successful.  I  am  fairly  well 
informed  on  the  history  of  all  great  religions.  In  degree 
I  know  the  character  of  intellect  possessed  by  the  folks 
who  make  or  made  up  their  membership.  And  my  opinion 
is,  that  no   religion   that  has   ever   existed   contained 

329 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


so  large  a  percentage  of  intelligent  people,  compe- 
tent, safe  and  sane,  as  does  Christian  Science.  There  is 
an  adage  to  the  effect  that  a  prophet  is  not  without 
honor  save  in  his  own  country. 

In  the  case  of  Mary  Baker  Eddy,  the  adage  just  quoted 
goes  awry.  Mrs.  Eddy  as  long  as  she  lived,  retained  the 
good-will  of  Concord,  Boston  and  Brookline,  where  she 
chose  to  make  her  home.  Very  many  of  the  leading  men 
and  women  of  each  of  these  cities  are  Christian  Scien- 
tists 33  53 

The  Christian  Science  Church  at  Concord  cost  upwards 
of  two  hundred  thousand  dollars,  and  was  the  gift  of 
Mrs.  Eddy.  Over  the  entrance,  cut  deep  in  granite,  are 
the  words,  **  Presented  by  Mary  Baker  Eddy,  Discoverer 
and  Founder  of  Christian  Science.'*  As  to  the  argument 
that  the  truths  of  Christian  Science  have  always  been 
known  and  practised  by  a  few,  Mrs.  Eddy  issued  her 
direct  challenge.  In  all  of  her  literature  she  set  out  the 
unqualified  statement  that  she  was  **  The  Discoverer 
and  the  Founder.'*  She  was  never  apologetic ;  she  assumed 
no  modesty  she  did  not  feel;  she  sp>oke  as  one  having 
authority,  as  did  Moses  of  old,  **  Thus  saith  the  Lord!** 
^  She  entered  into  no  joint  debates;  she  did  not  answer 
back.  This  intense  conviction  which  admits  of  no  parley 
was  one  of  the  secrets  of  her  power.  For  many  years 
the  Billingsgate  Calendar  was  directed  at  her  upon 
every  possible  occasion. 

But  Mrs.  Eddy  won  out,  and   legislation   and  courts 
330 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


were  compelled  to  whistle  in  their  hounds.  Your  right 
to  keep  well  in  your  own  way  is  now  fully  recognized. 
Doctors  are  not  liable  when  they  give  innocent  sweet- 
ened water  and  call  it  medicine,  nor  do  we  place  Chris- 
tian Scientists  on  trial  if  their  patients  die,  any  more 
than  we  do  the  M.  D/s. 

In  fact,  Mrs.  Eddy  influenced  both  of  the  so-called 
sciences  of  medicine  and  theology.  Even  those  who  are 
perfectly  willing  to  deny  her,  and  noisily  discard  her 
tenets,  are  debtors  to  her. 

Homeopathy  modified  the  dose  of  all  the  Allopaths; 
and  Christian  Science  has  attenuated  the  Hahneman- 
nian  theory  of  attenuations,  it  having  been  found  that 
the  blank  tablet  often  cures  quite  as  effectively  as  the 
one  that  is  medicated.  Christian  Science  does  not  shout, 
rant,  defy  nor  preach.  It  is  poised,  silent,  sure,  and  the 
flagellants,  like  the  dervishes,  are  noticeable  by  their 
absence  33  5S 

The  Reverend  Billy  Sunday  is  not  a  Christian  Scientist. 
The  Christian  Scientist  does  not  cut  into  the  grape; 
specialize  on  the  elevated  spheroid;  devote  his  energies 
to  bridge  whist;  cultivate  the  scandal  microbe;  join  the 
anvil  chorus,  nor  shake  the  red  rag  of  wordy  warfare. 
He  is  diligent  in  business,  fervent  in  spirit,  and  accepts 
what  comes  without  protest,  finding  it  good. 
Mary  Baker  Eddy  lived  a  human  life.  Through  her 
manifold  exp)eriences  she  gathered  gear — she  was  a  very 
great  and  wise  woman.  She  was  so  great  that  she  kept 

331 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


her  own  counsel,  received  no  visitors,  made  no  calls, 
had  no  Thursday,  wrote  no  letters,  and  even  never 
went  to  the  church  that  she  presented  to  her  native 
town.  Mrs.  Eddy's  step  was  ever  light,  her  form  erect 
— a  slender,  handsome,  queenly  woman.  When  she 
passed  on,  in  December,  Nineteen  Hundred  Ten,  in 
her  ninetieth  year,  she  looked  scarce  more  than  sixty. 
Her  face  showed  experience,  but  not  extreme  age.  The 
day  I  saw  her,  a  few  years  before  her  death,  she  was 
dressed  all  in  white  satin  and  looked  like  a  girl  going 
to  a  ball. 

Her  eyes  were  not  dimmed  nor  her  face  wrinkled  33 
Her  hat  was  a  milliner's  dream;  her  gloves  came  to  the 
elbow  and  were  becomingly  wrinkled;  her  form  was 
the  form  of  Bernhardt.  Her  secretary  stood  by  the 
carriage-door,  his  head  bared.  He  did  not  offer  his  hand 
to  the  lady  nor  seek  to  assist  her  into  the  carriage.  He 
knew  his  business — a  sober,  silent,  muscular,  bronzed, 
farmer-like  man,  who  evidently  saw  everything  and 
nothing  33  33 

He  closed  the  carriage-door  and  took  his  seat  by  the 
side  of  the  driver,  who  wore  no  livery.  The  men  looked 
like  brothers.  The  big,  brown  horses  started  slowly 
away;  they  wore  no  blinders  nor  check-reins — they, 
too,  had  banished  fear.  The  coachman  drove  with  a 
loose  rein.  The  next  day  I  waited  in  Concord  to  see 
Mrs.  Eddy  again.  At  exactly  two-fifteen  the  big,  brown, 
slow-going  horses  turned  into  Main  Street.  Drays  pulled 
332 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


in  to  the  curb,  automoKiles  stopped,  people  stood  on 
the  street  corners,  and  some — the  pilgrims — uncovered. 
^  Mrs.  Eddy  sat  back  in  the  carriage,  holding  in  her 
white-gloved  hands  a  big  spray  of  apple-blossoms,  the 
same  half-smile  of  satisfaction  on  her  face — the  smile 
of  Pope  Leo  the  Thirteenth.  The  woman  was  a  veritable 
queen,  and  some  of  her  devotees,  not  without  reason, 
called  her  the  Queen  of  the  World. 
Some  doubtless  prayed  to  her — and  may  yet,  for  that 
matter.  Mrs.  Eddy  was  married  three  times.  First,  to 
Colonel  George  W.  Glover,  an  excellent  and  worthy 
man,  who  was  the  father  of  her  only  child,  a  son.  On 
the  death  of  Glover,  the  child  was  taken  by  Glover's 
mother  and  secreted  so  effectually  that  his  mother  did 
not  see  him  until  he  was  thirty-four  years  old,  and  the 
father  of  a  family. 

Her  second  husband  was  Daniel  Patterson,  who  was 
not  only  a  rogue  but  also  a  fool — a  flashy  one,  who 
turned  the  head  of  a  lone,  lorn  young  widow,  who 
certainly  was  not  infallible  in  judgment.  In  two  years 
the  wife  got  a  divorce  from  him,  on  the  grounds  of 
cruelty  and  desertion,  at  Salem,  Massachusetts.  Her 
third  marital  venture  was  Doctor  Asa  G.  Eddy,  a 
practising  physician — a  man  of  much  intelligence  and 
worth.  From  him  Mrs.  Eddy  learned  that  the  Science 
of  Medicine  was  not  much  of  a  science  after  all.  Mrs. 
Eddy  used  to  say  that  her  husband  was  her  first  convert ; 
certain  it  is  that  Dr.  Eddy  gave  up  his  practise  to  assist 

333 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


his  wife  in  putting  before  the  world  the  unreaUty  of 
disease.  That  he  did  not  fully  grasp  the  idea  is  shown 
by  the  fact  that  he  died  of  pneumonia.  This,  however, 
did  not  shake  the  faith  of  Mrs.  Eddy  in  the  doctrine 
that  sickness  was  an  error  of  mortal  mind.  For  a  good 
many  years  Mrs.  Eddy  drove  the  memory  of  her  two 
good  husbands  tandem,  hitched  by  a  hyphen,  thus: 
Mary  Baker  Glover-Eddy.  Many  a  woman  has  joined 
her  own  name  to  that  of  her  husband,  but  what  woman 
ever  before  so  honored  the  two  men  she  had  loved  by 
coupling  their  names!  Getting  married  is  a  bad  habit, 
Mrs.  Eddy  would  probably  have  said,  but  you  have  to 
get  married  to  find  it  out. 

In  Eighteen  Hundred  Seventy-nine,  Mrs.  Eddy  organ- 
ized the  First  Church  of  Christ,  Scientist,  in  Boston, 
and  became  its  pastor.  In  Eighteen  Hundred  Eighty- 
one,  being  then  sixty  years  of  age,  she  founded  the 
Massachusetts  Metaphysical  College,  in  Boston.  For 
fifteen  years  she  had  been  speaking  in  public,  affirming 
that  health  was  our  normal  condition  and  that  as  a 
man  thinketh  in  his  heart,  so  is  he.  From  her  forty-fifth 
to  her  sixtieth  year  she  was  glad  to  speak  for  what  was 
offered,  although  I  believe  that  even  then  she  had  dis- 
carded the  good  old  priestly  plan  of  taking  up  a  collec- 
tion. The  Metaphysical  College  was  started  to  prepare 
students  for  teaching  Mrs.  Eddy's  doctrines. 
The  business  ability  of  the  woman  was  shown  in  thus 
organizing  and  allowing  no  one  to  teach  who  was  not 
334 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


duly  prepared.  These  students  were  obliged  to  pay  a 
good  stiff  tuition,  which  fact  made  them  appreciative. 
In  turn  they  went  out  and  taught;  all  students  paid 
the  tidy  sum  of  one  hundred  dollars  for  the  lessons, 
which  fee  was  later  cut  to  fifty.  Salvation  may  be  free, 
but  Christian  Science  costs  money.  The  theological 
genus  piker,  with  his  long,  wrinkled,  black  coat,  his 
collar  buttoned  behind,  and  his  high  hat,  has  been 
eliminated  53  33 

Mrs.  Eddy  was  manager  of  the  best-methodized  insti- 
tution in  the  world,  save  only  the  Roman  Catholic 
Church  and  the  Standard  Oil  Company.  How  many 
million  copies  of  **Science  and  Health"  have  been  sold, 
no  man  can  say.  What  percentage  of  the  money  from 
the  lessons  went  to  Mrs.  Eddy,  only  an  Armstrong 
Committee  could  ascertain,  and  really  it  was  nobody's 
business  but  hers. 

That  Mrs.  Eddy  had  some  very  skilful  helpers  goes 
without  saying.  But  here  is  the  point — she  selected 
them,  and  reigned  supreme.  That  the  student  who  paid 
fifty  dollars  got  his  money's  worth,  I  have  no  doubt. 
Not  that  he  understood  the  lessons,  but  he  received  a 
feeling  of  courage  and  a  oneness  with  the  whole  which 
caused  health  to  flow  through  his  veins  and  his  heart 
to  beat  with  joy.  The  lesson  might  have  been  to  him 
a  jumble  of  words,  but  he  lived  in  hopes  that  he  would 
soon  grow  to  a  point  where  the  lines  were  luminous  3S 
In  the  meantime,  all  he  knew  was  that  whereas  he  was 

335 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


once  lame  he  could  now  walk.  Even  the  most  bigoted 
and  prejudiced  now  agree  that  the  cures  of  Christian 
Science  are  genuine.  People  who  think  they  have  trouble 
have  it,  and  it  is  the  same  with  pain.  Imagination  is  the 
only  sure-enough  thing  in  the  world.  Mrs.  Eddy's 
doctrines  abolish  pain  and  therefore  abolish  poverty, 
for  poverty,  in  America  at  least,  is  a  disease.  Mrs. 
Eddy's  chief  characteristics  were: 
First,  Love  of  Beauty  as  manifest  in  bodily  form,  dress 
and  surroundings. 

Second,  A  zeal  for  system,  order  and  concentrated  effort 
on  the  particular  business  she  undertakes. 
Third,  A  dignity,  courage,  self-sufficiency  and  self- 
respect  that  comes  from  a  belief  in  her  own  divinity  Si 
Fourth,  An  economy  of  time,  money,  materials,  energy 
and  emotion  that  wastes  nothing,  but  which  continually 
conserves  and  accumulates. 

Fifth,  A  liberality,  when  advisable,  which  is  only  possible 
to  those  who  also  economize. 

Sixth,  Yankee  shrewdness,  great  commonsense,  all 
flavored  with  a  dash  of  mysticism  and  indifference  to 
physical  scientific  accuracy. 

In  other  words.  Christian  Science  is  a  woman's  science 
— she  knows!  And  it  is  good  because  it  is  good — this  is 
a  science  sound  enough  for  anybody — I  guess  so! 
Christian  Science  is  scientific,  but  not  for  the  reasons 
that  its  promoters  maintain.  Male  Christian  Scientists 
do  not  growl  and  kick  the  cat. 
336 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


Women  Christian  Scientists  do  not  nag.  Christian 
Scientists  do  not  have  either  the  grouch  or  the  meddler's 
itch.  Among  them  there  are  no  dolorosos,  grumperinos 
or  beggars.  They  respect  all  other  denominations,  having 
a  serene  faith  that  all  will  yet  see  the  light — that  is  to 
say,  adopt  their  doctrines.  The  most  radical  among 
old-school  doctors  could  not  deny  that  Mrs.  Eddy's 
own  life  was  conducted  on  absolutely  scientific  lines. 
She  never  answered  the  telephone,  never  fussed  nor 
fumed  53  58 

She  hired  big,  safe  people  and  paid  them  a  big  wage. 
She  gave  her  coachman  fifty  dollars  a  week,  and  her 
cook  in  proportion,  and  thus  secured  people  who  gave 
her  peace.  She  went  to  bed  with  the  birds  and  awoke 
with  the  dawn.  At  seven  o'clock  she  was  at  her  desk, 
dictating  answers  to  the  very  few  letters  her  secretary 
deemed  it  advisable  she  should  see.  She  had  breakfast 
at  nine  o'clock — ate  anything  she  liked,  taking  her  time 
and  fletcherizing.  After  breakfast  she  worked  UF>on  her 
manuscripts  until  it  was  time  for  the  daily  ride. 
At  four  o'clock  she  dined — two  meals  a  day  being  the 
rule.  If,  however,  she  cared  to  dissipate  a  little  and  eat 
three  meals  a  day,  she  was  not  afraid  to  do  so. 
She  knew  her  horses  and  cows  and  sheep  by  name,  and 
gave  requests  as  to  their  care,  holding  that  the  laws 
of  mind  obtain  as  to  dumb  animals  the  same  as  man. 
Dogs  she  did  not  care  for,  and  if  she  ever  had  an  aversion 
it  would  have  been  cats.  Her  servants  she  called  **  My 

337 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


helpers.**  Christian  Scientists  very  naturally  believe  in 
the  equality  of  the  sexes.  When  girl  babies  are  born  to 
them  they  bless  God,  just  the  same  as  when  boy  babies 
are  born.  In  truth  they  bless  God  for  everything,  for 
to  them  all  is  beautiful  and  all  is  good.  Paid  preachers 
they  do  not  have;  they  do  not  believe  in  priests  or  cer- 
tain men  who  are  nearer  to  God  than  others.  All  have 
access  to  Eternal  Truth,  and  thus  is  the  ecclesiastic 
excluded.  To  eliminate  the  theological  middleman  is 
well,  and  as  for  the  Church  itself,  surely  Mrs.  Eddy 
eliminated  it  also;  for  she  never  entered  a  church,  or 
at  least  not  more  than  once  a  year,  and  then  it  was  only 
in  deference  to  the  architect.  A  Church!  Is  it  necessary? 
For  herself  Mrs.  Eddy  said.  No. 

But  as  for  others,  she  said.  Yes,  a  church  is  good  for 
those  who  need  it.  Mrs.  Eddy  was  the  most  successful 
author  in  the  world,  or,  indeed,  that  the  world  has  ever 
seen.  No  other  writer  ever  made  so  much  money  as  she, 
none  is  more  devoutly  read. 

Shakespeare,  with  his  fortune  of  a  quarter  of  a  million 
dollars,  fades  into  comparative  failure;  and  Arthur 
Brisbane,  with  his  salary  of  seventy-five  thousand  a 
year,  is  an  office-boy  compared  with  this  regal  woman, 
who  gave  fifty  thousand  dollars  a  year  for  good  roads. 


338 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


HE  valuable  truths  and  distinguishing  features 
of  Christian  Science  are  not  to  be  found  in 
Mrs.  Eddy*s  books,  but  in  Mrs.  Eddy's  life. 
She  was  a  much  bigger  woman  than  she  was 
a  writer.  Emerson  says  that  every  great  institution  is 
the  lengthened  shadow  of  a  single  man.  Every  great 
business  enterprise  has  a  soul — one  man's  spirit  ani- 
mates, pervades  and  tints  the  whole.  You  can  go  into 
any  hotel  or  store,  and  behold!  the  nature  or  character 
of  the  owner  or  manager  is  everywhere  proclaimed  3S 
You  do  not  have  to  see  the  man,  and  the  bigger  the 
institution  the  less  need  is  there  for  the  man  to  show 
himself.  His  work  proclaims  him,  just  as  a  farmer's 
livestock  all  moo,  whinny  and  squeal  his  virtues — 
or  lack  of  them.  As  a  boy  of  ten  I  learned  to  know  all 
of  our  neighbors  by  their  horses.  The  horses  of  a  drunk- 
ard, blanketless,  hungry,  shivering,  outside  of  the  village 
tavern,  do  they  not  proclaim  the  poor,  despised  owner 
within?  53  S& 

You  can  walk  through  the  passenger-coaches  of  a  train 
made  up  at  a  terminal  and  read  the  character  unmis- 
takably of  the  general  passenger-agent.  The  soul  of 
John  Wesley  ran  through  Methodism  and  made  it 
what  it  was.  The  Lutheranism  of  Luther  yet  lives; 
Calvinism  the  same;  and  the  soul  of  John  Knox  still 
goes  marching  on,  carrying  the  Presbyterian  banner. 
^  Every  religion  partakes  of  the  nature  of  its  founder, 
until  this  religion  is  mixed  with  that  of  another  and 

339 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


its  character  lost,  as  happened  to  the  religion  of  Christ 
when  it  was  launched  by  Paul  suid  was  finally  fused 
with  Paganism  by  the  Roman  Emperor,  Constantine. 
fl  Christian  Science  is  as  yet  the  lengthened  shadow 
of  Mary  Baker  Eddy.  Her  own  immediate,  personal 
pupils  are  still  teaching,  and  her  life  and  characteristics 
impressed  upon  them  are  given  out  to  each  and  all. 
Every  phase  of  life  is  solved  by  answering  the  question, 
**  What  would  Mrs.  Eddy  do?  **  Mrs.  Eddy's  ideas 
about  dress,  housekeeping,  business,  food,  health,  the 
management  of  servants,  the  care  of  children — all  are 
blended  into  a  composite,  and  this  composite  is  the 
Christian  Scientist  as  we  see  and  know  him. 
The  fact  that  Mrs.  Eddy  was  methodical,  industrious, 
economical,  persevering,  courageous,  hopeful,  helpful, 
neat  in  her  attire  and  smiling,  makes  all  Christian 
Scientists  exactly  so.  She  did  not  play  cards  and  indulge 
in  the  manifold  silliness  of  so-called  good  society,  and 
neither  do  they.  Indeed,  that  one  thing  which  has  been 
referred  to  as  **  the  plaster-of -Paris  smile,**  the  one 
feature  in  Christian  Science  to  which  many  good  people 
object,  is  the  direct  legacy  of  Mrs.  Eddy  to  her  pupils. 
**  Science  and  Health  **  says  nothing  about  it;  no  edict 
has  been  put  forth  recommending  it;  but  all  good 
Christian  Scientists  take  it  on — the  smile  that  refuses 
to  vacate  the  premises.  And  to  some  it  is  certainly  very 
becoming.  Mrs.  Eddy's  self-reliant,  silent,  smiling  per- 
sonality has  given  the  key  to  conduct  for  the  hundreds 
3^ 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


of  thousands  of  people  who  love  her  and  revere  her 
memory  S&  58 

Mrs.  Eddy  was  a  rare  good  listener.  She  did  not  argue. 
Once  upon  a  time,  indeed,  she  was  guilty  of  waving 
the  red  flag  of  wordy  warfare;  but  the  passing  of  the 
years  brought  her  wisdom,  and  then  her  only  answer 
to  impatience  was  the  quiet  smile.  As  for  eating,  her 
table  always  had  enough,  but  it  stopped  short  of  .surfeit; 
the  service  was  dainty,  and  all  these  things  are  now  seen 
in  the  homes  of  Christian  Scientists.  Always  in  the  home 
of  a  good  Christian  Scientist  the  bathroom  is  as  complete 
as  the  library,  and  both  are  models  of  good  housekeep- 
ing, seemingly  always  in  order  for  the  inspection  com- 
mittee 58  3i 

Mrs.  Eddy  did  not  say  much  about  hot  water,  soap 
and  clean  towels;  but  the  idea,  regardless  of  the  non- 
existence of  matter,  is  fixed  in  the  consciousness  of  every 
Christian  Scientist  that  absolute  bodily  cleanliness, 
fresh  linen  and  fresh  air  are  not  only  next  to  godliness, 
but  elements  of  it.  All  of  which  you  could  never  work 
out  of  **  Science  and  Health  with  Key  to  the  Scriptures  " 
in  a  lifetime  of  study,  any  more  than  you  could  mine  and 
smelt  the  Westminster  Catechism  out  of  the  Bible  Si 
The  vital  truths  of  right  living  come  to  us  as  a  precious 
heritage  from  the  character  of  this  great  woman.  She, 
herself,  perhaps  may  not  have  known  this;  but  before 
she  wrote  her  book  and  formulated  her  religion,  she 
lived  her  life.  Her  book  was  an  endeavor  to  explain  her 

341 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


life,  and  as  her  life  grew  better,  stronger  and  more 
refined,  she  changed  her  book.  Her  book  reacted  on  her 
life,  and  the  person  who  got  the  most  good  out  of  **  Sci- 
ence and  Health  **  was  Mary  Baker  Eddy  herself  S& 
**  Science  and  Health  **  is  mystical  and  beautifully 
human.  The  author's  oar  often  fails  to  catch  the  water. 
For  instance,  she  tries  to  show  that  animal  magnetism, 
spiritualism,  mental  science,  theosophy,  agnosticism, 
pantheism  and  infidelity  are  all  bad  things  and  opposed 
to  the  science  of  **  true  being.*' 

This  statement  presupposes  that  animal  magnetism, 
infidelity,  theosophy  and  agnosticism  are  specific 
entities  or  things,  wheresis  they  are  only  labels  that 
are  clapped  quite  indiscriminately  on  empty  casks 
or  full  ones;  and  the  contents  of  the  casks  may  be 
sea- water  or  wine,  and  are  really  unknown  to  both 
mortal  and  divine  mind,  whatever  these  things  are. 
Theosophists  like  Annie  Besant,  Spiritualists  like  Alfred 
Russel  Wallace,  Agnostics  like  Huxley  and  IngersoU, 
are  very  noble  and  beautiful  people.  They  are  good 
neighbors  and  useful  citizens. 

**  Science  and  Health  '*  is  an  attempt  to  catch  and 
hold  in  words  the  secrets  of  an  active,  honest,  healthful, 
seeking,  restless,  earnest  life,  and  as  such  is  more  or  less 
of  a  failure  53  5S 

Our  actions  are  right,  but  our  reasons  seldom  are  38 
Christian  Science  as  a  plan  of  life,  embodying  the  great 
yet  simple  virtues,  is  beautiful.  **  Science  and  Health 
342 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


with  Key  to  the  Scriptures  **  does  not  explain  the 
Scriptures.  The  book,  as  an  attempt  to  explain  and 
crystallize  truth,  is  a  failure.  It  ranks  with  that  great 
mass  of  literature,  written  and  copied  at  such  vast 
pains  and  expense,  bearing  the  high-sounding  title, 
**  Writings  of  the  Saints/* 


343 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


LL  publishers  are  familiar  with  inspired  manu- 
scripts. Such  work  always  has*  one  thing  in 
common — unintelligibility.  Good  literature  is 
lucid  to  the  average  mind.  In  fact,  that  is 
its  distinguishing  feature.  We  understand  what  the 
man  means.  No  able  writer  uses  the  same  word  over 
and  over  with  varying  sense.  Alfred  Henry  Lewis  and 
William  Marion  Reedy  use  the  mortal  mind,  and  their 
work  is  understandable.  You  can  sit  in  judgment  on 
their  conclusions  and  weigh,  sift  and  decide  for  yourself. 
They  make  an  appeal  to  your  intellect. 
But  you  can  not  sit  in  judgment  on  **  Science  and 
Health,**  because  its  language  is  not  the  language  we 
use  in  our  common,  every-day  intercourse  with  one 
another.  It  speaks  of  Christ  as  a  person,  a  principle, 
a  spirit,  a  motive;  as  **  Truth  **;  as  one  who  was  born 
of  one  parent  or  no  parents;  who  lived,  died,  or  never 
lived,  never  was  born,  and  can  not  die. 
Metaphysics  is  an  attempt  to  explain  a  thing  and 
thereby  evade  the  trouble  of  understanding  it.  You 
throw  the  burden  of  proof  on  the  other  fellow — ^and 
make  him  believe  he  does  not  comprehend  because  he 
is  too  stupid.  This  is  not  fair! 

Language  is  simply  an  agreement  between  people  that 
certain  vocal  sounds,  or  written  symbols,  shall  stand 
for  certain  ideas,  thoughts  or  things.  Inspired  writers 
string  intelligent  words  together  in  an  unintelligent 
manner,  and  thereby  give  the  reader  an  opportunity 
344 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


to  read  anything  into  them  that  his  preconceived 
thoughts  may  dictate.  Metaphysical  gibberish  is  a 
rudimentary  survival  of  the  practise  of  reading  to 
the  people  in  a  dead  language.  The  doctors  continue 
the  plan  by  writing  prescriptions  in  Latin. 
I  once  worked  in  a  studio  where  the  boys  scraped  their 
palette-knives  on  a  convenient  board.  One  day  we  took 
the  board  out  and  had  it  framed  under  glass,  with  a 
double,  deep-shadow  box.  We  gave  it  the  best  place 
in  the  studio  and  labeled  it,  **  A  Sunset  at  Sea — an 
Impression  in  Monochrome.* 

The  picture  attracted  much  attention  and  great  admir- 
ation from  certain  symbolists.  It  also  created  so  much 
controversy  that  we  were  obliged  to  take  it  down  in 
the  interests  of  amity. 

To  assume  that  God  inspired  the  Scriptures,  and  did 
the  work  so  ill  that,  after  more  than  two  thousand 
years,  it  was  necessary  to  inspire  another  person  to 
make  a  **  Key  **  to  them,  is  hardly  worthy  of  our  serious 
attention.  If  God,  being  all-wise,  all-powerful  and  all- 
loving,  turns  author,  why  does  He  produce  work  so 
muddy  that  it  requires  a  **  Key'*? 
Individuals  may  use  a  code  that  requires  a  **  Key,** 
because  they  wish  to  keep  their  matter  secret  from 
others.  There  may  be  for  them  a  penalty  on  truth, 
but  why  Deity  should  write  in  a  secret  language,  and 
then  wait  two  thousand  years  before  making  the  matter 
plain,   and  then   to  one  single  woman  in  Boston,   is 

345 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


incomprehensible.  What  the  world  wants  now  is  a 
Key  to  '*  Science  and  Health."  In  reading  a  book,  the 
question  that  interests  us  is  not,  **  Is  it  inspired  ?  *' 
but,  **  Is  it   true  ?  '* 

Mrs.  Eddy's  ranks  are  recruited  almost  entirely  from 
Orthodox  Christianity.  On  page  six  hundred  eight  of 
**  Science  and  Health,*'  pocket  edition  of  Nineteen 
Hundred  Six,  a  lawyer  gives  testimony  to  the  good  he 
has  gotten  from  Christian  Science,  and  explains  that 
he  has  long  been  a  member  of  the  Episcopal  Church. 
He  is  delighted  to  know  that  he  has  not  had  to  relin- 
quish any  of  his  old  faith,  but  has  simply  kept  the  old 
and  added  to  it  the  new. 

This  explains,  in  great  degree,  the  popularity  of  Chris- 
tian Science.  People  cling  to  the  religious  superstitions 
into  which  they  were  born.  Mrs.  Eddy's  recruits  were 
not  from  theosophy,  spiritualism,  agnosticism,  uni- 
tarianism,  universalism  or  infidelity.  You  can't  give 
a  freethinker  a  book  with  a  statement  of  what  he  must 
find  in  it  53  33 

He  has  acquired  the  habit  of  thinking  for  himself  53 
Mrs.  Eddy  had  no  faith  in  Darwin,  Spencer  or  Haeckel. 
She  quoted  Moses,  Jesus  and  Paul  to  disprove  the  evo- 
lutionists, sat  back  and  smiled  content,  innocently 
unaware  that  citations  from  Scriptures  are  in  no  sense 
proof  to  free  minds.  All  of  the  Bible  she  wished  to 
waive,  she  did.  The  cruelty  and  bestiality  of  Jehovah 
were  nothing  to  her.  Her  **  Key  "  does  not  unlock  the 
346 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


secrets  of  Deuteronomy  and  Leviticus,  nor  does  it  shed 
light  on  the  doctrines  of  eternal  punishment,  the  vicari- 
ous atonement,  or  the  efficacy  of  baptism  as  a  saving 
ordinance  33  53 

Explanations  about  mortal  mind,  divine  mind  and 
human  mind,  citing  specific  errors  of  the  human  mind, 
with  a  calm  codicil  to  the  effect  that  the  human  mind 
has  no  existence,  are  not  what  you  might  call  illuminat- 
ing literature.  The  stuff  is  simply  "  inspired/'  Mrs. 
Eddy  was  very  wise  in  not  allowing  her  **  readers  *' 
or  followers  to  sermonize  or  explain  her  writings.  These 
writings  are  simply  to  be  read.  And  so  the  hearers  sit 
steeped  in  mist  and  wrapped  in  placidity,  returning  to 
their  work  rested  and  refreshed,  without  being  influ- 
enced in  any  way,  save  by  the  soothing  calm  of  forceful 
fog  and  mental  vacuity. 

The  rest  and  relief  from  all  thought  is  good.  The  related 
experiences  of  Christian  Scientists  are  the  things  that 
convince  and  carry  weight,  not  **  Science  and  Health.'* 
**  Science  and  Health  '*  was  made  to  sell.  It  was  not 
given  to  you  to  be  understood :  it  was  to  be  bought  and 
believed.  If  you  doubt  any  portion  of  it,  at  once  you 
are  told  that  this  is  the  work  of  your  mortal  mind, 
which  is  filled  with  error.  Good  Christian  Scientists 
do  not  try  to  understand  **  Science  and  Health  '* — 
they  just  accept  and  believe  it.  **  It  is  inspired,**  they 
say,  **  so  it  must  be  true — you  will  know  when  you 
are  worthy  to  know.** 

347 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


And  so  we  see  our  old  friend  Intellectual  Tyranny  come 
back  in  another  form,  not  with  cowl  and  cape,  but 
tricked  out  with  feminine  finery  and  jewelry  and  gems 
that  lure  and  dazzle.  There  is  one  thing  quite  as  valuable 
as  health,  and  that  is  intellectual  integrity.  To  say, 
**  Oh,  *  Science  and  Health  '  is  certainly  inspired — 
just  see  how  old  Mrs.  Johnson  was  cured  of  the  rheu- 
matism! *'   is  not  reasoning. 

And  it  has  given  the  scoffers  excuse  for  calling  it 
woman's  logic.  Such  reasoning  is  on  the  plane  of, 
**  Why,  Jesus  must  have  been  the  only  begotten  son 
of  God,  born  of  a  virgin,  for  if  you  don't  believe  it, 
just  see  the  hospitals,  orphan  asylums  and  homes  for 
the  aged  that  Christianity  has  built!*'  Mrs.  Johnson 
was  surely  cured  of  the  rheumatism  all  right,  but  that 
does  not  prove  that  Mrs.  Eddy  is  correct  in  her  claim 
that  Eve  was  made  from  Adam's  rib;  that  agamogenesis 
is  a  fact  in  Nature;  that  to  till  the  soil  will  not  always 
be  necessary;  that  human  life  in  these  bodies  will  have 
no  end;  and  that  an  absent  person  can  poison  your 
health  and  happiness  through  malicious  animal  magnet- 
ism; or  that  a  good  person  can  give  you  absent  treat- 
ment and  cure  your  indigestion. 

I  agree  with  Mrs.  Eddy  as  to  the  necessity  of  eliminating 
a  medical  fetish,  but  1  disagree  with  her  about  religiously 
preserving  a  theological  one.  I  have  read  **  Science  and 
Health  with  Key  to  the  Scriptures  "  for  twenty  years, 
and  I  have  also  read  the  Scriptures  for  a  much  longer 
348 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


period.  Also,  I  have  lived  in  the  same  house  for  many 
months  with  very  intelligent  Christian  Scientists  58 
And  after  mature  consideration  I  regard  both  the 
Scriptures  and  **  Science  and  Health  *'  as  largely  made 
up  of  the  errors  of  mortal  mind.  My  intuitions  are  just 
as  valuable  to  me  as  Mrs.  Eddy's  were  to  her. 
My  conscience  is  quite  as  sacred  to  me  as  hers  was  to 
her.  And  in  being  an  agnostic  I  object  to  being  classed 
as  blind,  stubborn,  wilful,  malicious  and  degenerate. 
^We  should  honor  our  Creator  by  cleaving  to  the 
things  that  seem  to  us  to  be  true,  and  not  abandon 
the  rudder  of  our  minds  to  any  man  or  any  woman, 
be  they  living  or  dead.  Let  us  not  be  dishonest  with 
ourselves,  even  to  rid  us  of  our  physical  diseases.  As 
for  health,  I  have  all  of  it  that  Christian  Science  ever 
gave  or  can  give.  I  have  no  **  testimony  "  of  healing 
to  relate,  for  I  have  never  been  sick  an  hour.  And  I 
think  I  know  how  I  have  kept  well.  I  make  no  secret 
of  it.  It  is  all  very  simple — nothing  miraculous. 
My  knowledge  of  how  to  keep  well  is  not  inspired 
knowledge,  save  as  all  men  are  inspired  who  study 
and  know  the  Laws  of  Nature.  Health,  after  all,  is 
largely  a  matter  of  habit. 


349 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


ACK  of  the  reading-desks,  in  the  **  Mother 
Church,"  at  Boston,  are  quotations  from 
Paul  and  Mrs.  Eddy,  side  by  side.  But  the 
quotation  from  Paul,  which  is  behind  the 
desk  of  the  woman  reader,  is  not  this;  **  Let  women 
keep  silence  in  the  churches.** 

Mrs.  Eddy  believed  the  Scriptures  are  all  true,  word 
for  word.  Yet  when  she  quoted  Paul  she  picked  the 
thing  she  wanted  and  avoided  all  that  did  not  apply 
to  her  case.  Personally,  I  like  the  plan.  I  do  it  myself. 
But  I  do  not  believe  the  Scriptures  are  inspired  by  an 
all-wise  Deity.  So  far  as  I  know,  all  books  were  written 
by  men,  and  very  often  by  faulty,  human  men  at  that. 
Mrs.  Eddy's  **  Key**  does  not  unlock  anything;  and 
she  did  not  try  to  unlock  any  passages  except  the  pas- 
sages that  seemingly  had  a  bearing  on  her  belief.  That 
is,  Mrs.  Eddy  believed  things  first,  and  then  skirmished 
for  proof.  This  is  a  very  old  plan.  Says  Shakespeare: 
**  In  religion  what  damned  error  but  some  somber  brow 
will  bless  it  and  approve  it  with  a  text,  hiding  the 
grossness  thereof  with  fair  ornament.**  Let  no  one  read 
*'  Science  and  Health  **  in  the  hope  of  finding  in  it 
simple  and  sensible  statements  concerning  life  and  its 
duties.  They  are  not  there. 

I  append  a  few  quotations,  and  in  mentioning  the  page 
I  refer  to  the  pocket  or  **  Oxford  **  edition  of  Nineteen 
Hundred  Six.  On  page  one  hundred  eighty-three  of 
**  Science  and  Health  **  I  find,  **  The  Scriptures  inform 
350 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


us  that  sin,  or  error,  first  caused  the  condemnation 
of  man  to  till  the  ground,  and  indicate  that  obedience 
to  God  will  remove  this  necessity." 
Mrs.  Exldy  evidently  believed  that  work  is  a  punish- 
ment, and  that  the  day  will  come  when  God  will  remove 
the  necessity  of  farming  and  making  garden.  Can  a  sane 
person  reply  to  such  lack  of  logic? 
On  page  five  hundred  forty-seven  is  this:  **  If  one  of 
the  statements  in  this  book  is  true,  every  one  must  be 
true,  for  not  one  departs  from  its  system  and  rule.  You 
can  prove  for  yourself,  dear  reader,  the  Science  of 
healing,  and  so  ascertain  if  the  author  has  given  you 
the  correct  interpretation  of  Scripture.'* 
This  is  evidently  inspired  by  Paul's  quibble,  **  If  the 
dead  rise  not  from  the  grave,  then  is  our  religion  vain.'* 
Lincoln  once  referred  to  this  kind  of  reasoning  by 
saying,  **  I  object  to  the  assumption  that  my  ambition 
is  to  have  my  son  marry  a  negress,  simply  because  I 
am  struggling  for  emancipation.**  Mrs.  Eddy  may  heal 
you,  but  that  does  not  prove  that  her  interpretation 
of  Scripture  is  true.  Because  this  happens,  that  does 
not  necessarily  follow.  Neither,  because  a  thing  precedes 
a  thing  or  goes  with  a  thing,  is  the  thing  the  cause  of 
the  thing.  On  page  five  hundred  fifty-three  is  this: 
**  Adam  was  created  before  Eve.  Herein  it  is  seen 
that  the  maternal  egg  never  brought  forth  Adam. 
Eve  was  formed  from  Adam*s  rib,  not  from  a  fetal 


ovum." 


351 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


In  reading  things  like  this  in  **  Science  and  Health," 
let  us  not  be  too  severe  on  Mrs.  Eddy,  but  just  bear 
in  mind  that  such  silly  superstitions  and  barbaric 
folklore  are  yet  officially  believed  by  all  orthodox 
clergymen  and  members  of  orthodox  churches.  You 
can  accept  a  belief  in  Adam's  fall  and  the  vicarious 
atonement  and  still  make  money  and  have  good  health. 
^  Page  one  hundred  two:  **  The  mild  forms  of  animal 
magnetism  are  disappearing,  and  its  aggressive  features 
are  coming  to  the  front.  The  looms  of  crime,  hidden  in 
the  dark  recesses  of  mortal  thought,  are  every  hour 
weaving  webs  more  complicated  and  subtle.  So  secret 
are  its  present  methods  that  they  ensnare  the  age  into 
indolence,  and  produce  the  very  apathy  on  this  subject 
which  the  criminal  desires.** 

This  passage  reveals  the  one  actually  dangerous  thing 
in  Christian  Science — the  fallacy  that  one  mind  can 
weave  a  web  that  will  work  the  undoing  of  another. 
This  is  the  basis  of  a  belief  in  witchcraft,  and  justifies 
the  hangings  at  Salem.  On  page  one  hundred  three  I 
find  this :  **  As  used  in  Christian  Science,  animal  magnet- 
ism or  hypnotism  is  the  specific  term  for  error,  or  mortal 
mind  53  5S 

It  is  the  false  belief  that  mind  is  in  matter,  and  both 
evil  and  good ;  that  evil  is  as  real  as  goodness,  and  more 
powerful.  This  belief  has  not  one  quality  of  truth  or 
good.  It  is  either  ignorant  or  malicious.  The  malicious 
form  of  animal  magnetism  ultimates  in  moral  idiocy. 
352 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


The  truths  of  immortal  mind  sustain  man;  and  they 
annihilate  the  fables  and  mortal  mind,  whose  flimsy 
and  gaudy  pretensions,  like  silly  moths,  singe  their 
own  wings  and  fall  into  dust.  In  reality  there  is  no 
mortal  mind,  and  consequently  no  transference  of 
mortal  thought  and  will-power.*'  Page  five  hundred 
two:  **  Spiritually  followed,  the  book  of  Genesis  is  the 
history  of  the  untrue  image  of  God,  named  a  sinful 
mortal.  This  deflection  of  being,  rightly  viewed,  serves 
the  spiritual  actuality  of  man,  as  given  in  the  first 
chapter  of  Genesis.  When  the  crude  forms  of  human 
thought  take  on  higher  symbols  and  significations, 
the  scientifically  Christian  views  of  the  universe  will 
app)ear,  illuminating  time  with  the  glory  of  eternity." 
^  1  append  these  two  passages  simply  as  samples  of 
**  inspired  literature." 

Any  one  who  tries  to  understand  such  printed  matter 
is  headed  for  Bloomingdale.  You  must  leave  it  alone 
absolutely  or  else  accept  it  and  read  it  with  your  mental 
eyes  closed,  mumbling  it  with  your  lips,  and  let  your 
mind  roam  like  a  priest  reading  his  breviary  in  the 
smoking-apartment  of  a  Pullman  car.  The  question 
then  arises,  **  Was  Mrs.  Eddy  sincere  in  putting  forth 
such  writings?  ** 

And  the  answer  is,  she  was  most  certainly  sincere,  and 
she  was  certainly  sane.  She  was  an  honest  woman.  But 
she  was  not  a  clear  or  logical  thinker,  except  on  matters 
of  finance  and  business,  and  consequently  she  did  not 

353 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


give  forth  a  clear  expression  when  she  essayed  phi- 
losophy. In  order  to  write  lucidly  you  must  think 
lucidly.  Mrs.  Eddy  had  no  sense  of  literary  values. 
She  was  absolutely  devoid  of  humor,  and  humor  is 
only  the  ability  to  detect  a  little  thing  from  a  big  one 
— to  perceive  a  wrong  adjustment  from  a  right  one  33 
Style  in  literature  is  taste.  But  the  lack  of  style,  taste 
and  humor  is  general  in  mankind.  The  world  has  pro- 
duced only  a  few  great  thinkers,  and  one  of  them  was 
Darwin,  a  name  which  Mrs.  Eddy  mentioned  in  **  Sci- 
ence and  Health  "  with  reproach.  Great  writers  are 
even  more  rare  than  great  thinkers,  because  to  write 
one  must  have  the  ability  not  only  to  think  clearly, 
but  the  knack  or  technical  skill  to  use  the  right  word, 
the  luminous  word,  and  so  arrange,  paragraph  and 
punctuate  them  that  your  meaning  will  be  clear  to 
average  minds.  To  say  that  Mrs.  Eddy  was  not  a 
thinker  nor  a  writer,  is  not  an  indictment  of  the  woman, 
although  it  may  be  a  reflection  on  the  mental  processes 
of  the  people  who  think  she  was. 
To  say  that  there  are  two  million  people  reading  Mrs. 
Eddy,  also  proves  nothing,  since  numbers  are  no  vin- 
dication. Over  a  hundred  million  people  have  kissed 
the  big  toe  of  Saint  Peter  in  Rome. 
And  surely  the  Roman  Catholic  Church  contains  a 
vast  number  of  highly  educated  people.  The  things 
you  do  not  know,  you  do  not  know.  And  Mrs.  Eddy, 
knowing  nothing  of  literary  style,   knew  nothing  of 

354 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


literary  art.  Her  prose  and  her  poetry  are  worse  than 
ordinary.  All  inspirational  poetry  I  ever  read  is  rot, 
and  all  inspired  paintings  I  ever  saw  are  daubs.  Mrs. 
Eddy  should  not  be  blamed  for  her  limitations  5S  5S 
Many  people  who  are  great  in  certain  lines  labor  under 
the  hallucination  that  they  are  also  great  in  others. 
Matthew  Arnold  was  a  great  writer,  and  he  also  thought 
he  was  a  great  orator. 

But  when  he  spoke,  his  words  simply  fell  over  the 
footlights  into  the  orchestra  and  died  there.  He  could 
not  reach  the  front  row.  Most  comedians  want  to  play 
Hamlet,  and  all  of  us  have  heard  girls  attempt  to  sing 
who  thought  they  could  sing,  and  who  were  encouraged 
in  the  hallucination  by  their  immediate  kinsfolk  5S 
Mrs.  Eddy  thought  she  could  write,  and  unfortunately 
she  was  corroborated  in  her  error  by  the  applause  of 
people  who,  not  being  able  to  read  her  book,  kindly 
attributed  the  inability  to  their  own  limitations  and 
not  to  hers,  being  prompted  in  this  by  the  suggestion 
oft  repeated  by  Mrs.  Eddy,  herself.  The  resemblance 
of  Mrs.  Eddy*s  thought  to  that  of  Jesus  was  never 
noticed  until  Mrs.  Eddy  first  explained  the  matter. 
Mrs.  Eddy  was  by  no  means  insane.  Swedenborg  was 
a  civil  engineer  and  a  mathematician.  He  wrote  forty 
books  that  are  nearly  as  opaque  as  **  Science  and 
Health.**  If  you  write  stupidly  enough,  some  one  will 
surely  throw  up  his  cap  and  cry  **  Great!  '*  And  others 
will  follow  the  example  and  take  up  the  shout,  because 

333 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


It  is  much  easier,  as  Doctor  Johnson  affirmed,  to  praise 
a  book  than  to  read  and  understand  it.  The  custom 
of  reading  to  a  congregation  in  a  dead  or  foreign  lan- 
guage, which  the  Hsteners  do  not  understand,  has 
never  caused  any  general  protest  from  the  listeners. 
The  scoffers  are  the  only  ones  who  have  ever  noticed 
the  incongruity,  and  they  do  not  count,  since  they 
probably  would  not  attend,  anyway. 
Next  to  reading  from  a  book  written  in  the  dead 
language,  is  to  read  from  a  book  that  is  unintelligible. 
To  listen  to  such  makes  no  tax  upon  the  intellect,  and 
with  the  right  accessories  is  soporific,  restful,  pleasing 
and  to  be  commended.  If  it  does  not  supply  an  idea, 
it  at  least  imparts  a  feeling.  Mrs.  Eddy's  success  in 
literature  arose  from  the  extreme  muddiness  of  her 
thinking  and  her  opacity  in  expression. 
If  she  had  written  fairly  well,  her  mediocrity  would 
have  been  apparent  to  every  one;  but  writing  abso- 
lutely without  rhyme  or  reason,  we  bow  before  her 
supreme  assurance.  The  strongest  element  in  men  is 
inertia — we  agree  rather  than  fight  about  it.  We  want 
health — and  health  is  what  Mrs.  Eddy  gives  to  us — 
therefore,  **  Science  and  Health  with  Key  to  the  Scrip- 
tures *'  is  the  greatest  book  in  the  whole  world.  Sancta 
simplicitas!  Why  not,  indeed! 


356 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


EOPLE  turn  to  Mrs.  Eddy's  book  for  relief 
just  exactly  as  they  formerly  went  to  the 
doctor  for  the  same  reason.  ^  In  addition 
to  bodily  health,  Mrs.  Eddy  gives  joy,  hope, 
worldly  success;  and  even  superior  minds,  seeing  these 
practical  results  of  Christian  Science,  move  in  the  line 
of  least  resistance  and  are  quite  willing  to  accept  the 
book,  not  troubled  at  all  about  its  medieval  reasoning. 
In  Ungania  is  a  very  great  merchant  who,  not  content 
with  having  the  biggest  store  in  the  Kingdom,  aspires 
to  the  biggest  University.  The  fact  that  the  higher 
criticism  is  to  him  only  a  trivial  matter,  and  really 
unworthy  of  the  serious  attention  of  a  busy  man, 
simply  reveals  human  limitation. 

The  specialist  is  created  at  a  terrific  cost,  and  that 
a  person  will  be  practical,  shrewd,  diplomatic  and  wise 
in  managing  the  buying  public  and  an  army  of  employ- 
ees, and  yet  know  and  love  Walt  Whitman,  is  too  much 
to  expect.  This  keen  and  successful  merchant,  an  abso- 
lute tyrant  in  certain  ways,  has  his  soft  side  and  many 
pleasant  qualities.  Why  any  one  should  ever  question 
the  literal  truth  of  the  Bible  is  beyond  his  comprehen- 
sion 53  38 

He  is  convinced  that  **  Leaves  of  Grass  "  is  an  obscene 
book,  never  having  read  it ;  yet  he  knows  nothing  about 
the  third,  eleventh  and  thirteenth  chapters  of  Second 
Samuel,  having  read  the  Book  all  his  life.  He  has  a 
pitying,  patronizing  smile  for  any  one  who  suggests 
that  David  was  a  very  faulty  man,  and  that  possibly 

357 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


Solomon  was  not  the  wisest  person  that  ever  lived. 
*'  What  difference  does  it  make,  anyway?  **  he  testily 
asks.  If  you  work  for  him  you  have  to  agree  with  him, 
or  else  be  very  silent  as  to  what  you  actually  believe. 
We  often  find  an  avowed  and  reiterated  love  for  Jesus, 
the  non-resistant,  going  hand  in  hand  with  a  passion 
for  war,  a  miser's  greed,  a  lust  for  power  and  a  thirst 
for  revenge. 

There  may  be  a  prating  about  righteousness  while  the 
hand  of  the  man  is  feeling  for  his  sword-hilt,  and  his 
eye  is  locating  your  jugular.  The  Ten  Commandments 
are  all  rescinded  in  war  time.  The  New  York  **  Evening 
Post  **  noted  the  peculiar  fact  that  nine  out  of  ten  of 
the  delegates  at  The  Hague  International  Peace  Con- 
ference were  theological  heretics.  As  a  rule.  Orthodox 
Christians  stand  for  war,  and  also  for  capital  punish- 
ment. How  do  we  explain  these  inconsistencies?  53  58 
We  do  not  try  to:  they  are  simply  facts  in  the  partial 
development  of  the  race.  Why  millionaires  should  pat- 
ronize the  memory  of  Jesus  is  something  no  one  can 
understand,  save  that  things  work  by  antithesis.  Mrs. 
Eddy  was  of  the  same  shrewd,  practical  type  as  the 
merchant  prince  just  mentioned.  She  was  the  greatest 
woman-general  of  her  day  and  generation.  She  possessed 
all  the  qualities  that  go  to  make  successful  leadership. 
^  She  was  self-reliant,  proud,  arrogant,  implacable  in 
temper,  rapid  in  decision,  unbending,  shrewd,  diplo- 
matic— and  a  good  hater. 
358 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


At  times  she  dismissed  her  critics  with  simply  a  look. 
No  man  could  dictate  to  her,  and  few  dared  make  sug- 
gestions in  her  presence.  To  move  her,  the  matter 
had  to  be  brought  to  her  attention  in  a  way  that  led  her 
to  believe  that  she  had  discovered  it  herself.  And  of 
course  all  the  credit  went  to  her.  In  all  Christian  Science 
churches  are  various  selections  from  her  writings,  and 
beneath  every  one  is  her  name.  **  Thou  shalt  have  no 
other  gods  before  me!  "  is  the  one  controlling  edict 
breathed  forth  by  her  life  and  words.  One  of  her  orders 
was  that  whenever  one  of  her  hymns  was  announced, 
always  and  forever  it  must  be  stated  that  it  was  written 
by  Mrs.  Mary  Baker  Eddy.  Always  and  forever,  the 
**  student  **  giving  testimony  refers,  in  terms  of  lavish 
praise  and  fulsome  adulation,  to  "  Our  Blessed  Teacher, 
Guide  and  Exemplar,  Mary  Baker  Eddy.**  God  Al- 
mighty and  Jesus  occupy  secondary  positions  in  all 
Christian  Science  meetings. 

Mrs.  Eddy  is  mentioned  five  times  to  where  they  are 
once.  And  I  would  not  criticize  this  if  Mrs.  Eddy  had 
but  regarded  Jesus  as  simply  a  great  man  in  history 
and  **  God  **  as  an  abstract  term  referring  to  the 
Supreme  Intelligence  in  Nature.  But  to  her,  God 
and  Jesus  were  persons  who  dictated  books,  and  very 
frequently  she  was  careful  to  explain  that  her  method 
of  healing  was  exactly  the  same  as  that  practised 
by  Jesus.  Side  by  side  with  His  words  are  hers. 
Passages   from    the   Bible   are   read   alternately   with 

359 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


passages  from  **  Science  and  Health.**  If  both  were 
regarded  as  mere  literature,  this  would  be  pardonable, 
but  when  we  are  told  that  both  are  **  sacred  '*  writ, 
and  **  damned  be  he  who  dares  deny  or  doubt,**  we 
are  simply  lost  in  admiration  for  the  supreme  egotism 
of  the  lady.  To  get  mad  about  it  were  vain — let  us  all 
smile.  Surely  the  imagination  that  can  trace  points  of 
resemblance  between  Mrs.  Mary  Baker  Eddy  and 
Jesus,  the  lowly  peasant  of  Nazareth,  is  admirable. 
Jesus  was  a  communist  in  principle,  having  nothing, 
giving  everything.  He  carried  neither  scrip  nor  purse. 
He  wrote  nothing.  His  indifference  to  place,  pelf  and 
power  is  His  distinguishing  characteristic.  Mrs.  Eddy's 
love  of  power  was  the  leading  motive  of  her  life;  her 
ability  to  bargain  was  beautiful ;  her  resorts  to  law  and 
the  subtleties  of  legal  aid  were  all  strictly  modern; 
and  the  way  she  tied  up  the  title  to  her  writings  by 
lead-pipe-cinched  copyrights  reveals  the  true  instincts 
of  Connecticut   53   33 

This  jealousy  of  her  rights  and  the  safeguarding  of 
her  interests  were  among  the  emphatic  features  of  her 
life,  and  set  her  apart  as  the  antithesis  of  Jesus  53  53 
There  is  one  character  in  history,  however,  to  whom 
Mrs.  Eddy  bore  a  close  resemblance — and  that  is  Julius 
Caesar,  who  was  educated  for  the  priesthood,  became  a 
priest,  and  was  Pope  of  Rome  before  he  ventured  into 
fighting  and  politics  as  a  business.  Mrs.  Eddy*s  faith 
in  herself,  her  ability  to  decide,  her  quick  intuitions* 

360 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


the  method  and  simplicity  of  her  life,  her  passion  for 
power,  her  pleasure  in  authorship — all  these  were  the 
traits  which  exalted  the  name  and  fame  of  Caesar  58 
The  inventor  of  the  calendar  ordered  that  it  should 
be  known  as  the  **  Julian  Calendar,*'  and  it  is  so  called, 
even  unto  this  day.  Once  Carlyle  sat  smoking  with 
Milburn,  the  blind  preacher.  They  had  been  discussing 
the  historicity  of  Jesus.  Then  they  sat  smoking  in 
silence.  Finally,  Tammas  the  Techy  knocked  the  ashes 
out  of  his  long  clay  t.  d.  and  muttered,  half  to  himself 
and  half  to  Milburn,  **  Ah,  a  great  mon,  a  great  mon 
— but  he  had  his  limitations!  **  The  same  remark  can 
truthfully  be  applied  to  Mrs.  Eddy.  And  about  the 
only  point  that  Jesus  and  Mrs.  Eddy  have  in  common 
is  this  matter  mentioned  by  Carlyle. 
The  superior  shrewdness  and  the  keen  business  instinct 
of  Mrs.  Eddy  are  seen  in  the  use  of  the  words  **  Chris- 
tian *'  and  **  Science."  The  sub-title,  **  With  Key  to 
the  Scriptures,"  is  particularly  alluring.  And  the  use 
of  the  Oxford  binding  was  the  crowning  stroke  of  com- 
mercial insight.  Surely  Mrs.  Eddy  must  command  our 
profound  respect.  She  was  undoubtedly  a  very  great 
business  genius,  to  say  the  very  least. 


361 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


HEN  John  Henry  Newman  became  a  Catholic, 
he  gave  as  a  reason  for  his  decision  that  he 
had  found  no  place  in  literature  or  art  to  rest 
his  head.  His  reward  for  not  finding  a  place 
in  literature  or  art  for  his  head  was  the  red  hat. 
Let  the  followers  of  Mrs.  Eddy  take  comfort  in  that 
their  great  teacher  had  plenty  of  high  precedent  for 
believing  that  Adam  was  created  by  fiat,  and  Eve  was 
made  from  his  rib,  all  the  fiat  being  used;  that  Joshua 
commanded  the  sun  to  stand  still  and  it  obeyed,  even 
when  the  order  should  have  been  given  to  the  earth; 
that  Lazarus  was  raised  from  the  dead  after  his  body 
had  become  putrid;  that  witchcraft  is  a  fact  in  Nature; 
and  that  children  can  be  born  with  the  aid  of  one  parent 
a  little  better  than  in  the  old-fashioned  way — ^parthe- 
nogenesis, I  think  they  call  it. 

These  inconsistencies  of  absolute  absurdity,  existing 
side  by  side  with  great  competence  and  sanity,  are  to 
be  found  everyhere  in  history. 

Mrs.  Eddy  excited  the  envy  of  the  medical  world  in  her 
demonstration  that  good  health  and  happiness  are  the 
sure  results  of  getting  rid  of  the  doctor  habit;  but  they 
got  even  with  her  when  she  said  that  virgin  motherhood 
would  yet  become  the  rule,  and  tilling  of  the  soil  would 
cease  to  be  a  necessity. 

Saint  Augustine   thought,   as   did  most  of   the  early 
Churchmen,  that  to  do  evil  that  good  might  follow  was 
not  only  justifiable,  but  highly  meritorious.  So  they 
362 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


preached  hagiology  to  scare  people  into  the  narrow  path 
of  rectitude. 

Chapman,  Alexander,  Torrey,  Billy  Sunday  and  most 
other  professional  evangelists  believe  in  and  practise 
the  same  doctrine. 

The  literary  conscience  was  a  thing  known  in  Greece, 
but  only  recently,  say  within  two  hundred  years,  has  it 
been  again  manifest,  and  as  yet  it  is  rare.  It  consists  in 
the  scorn  and  absolute  refusal  to  write  a  line  except 
that  which  stands  for  truth. 

The  artistic  conscience  that  refuses  to  paint  for  hire  or 
model  on  order  is  the  same.  Wagner,  Millet,  Rembrandt, 
William  Morris  and  Ruskin  are  examples  of  men  who 
were  incapable  of  anything  but  their  highest  and  best 
creative  work,  and  refused  to  truckle  to  the  mercenary 
horde.  Such  men  may  be  without  conscience  in  a  busi- 
ness way.  And  a  person  may  be  absolutely  moral  in  all 
his  acts  of  life,  except  in  writing  and  talking,  and  here 
he  may  be  slipshod  and  uncertain. 

Mrs.  Eddy  was  beautifully  lacking  in  the  literary  con- 
science, just  as  much  so  as  was  Gladstone  when  he 
attempted  to  reply  to  Ingersoll  in  **The  North  American 
Review,*'  and  resorted  to  sophistry  and  evasion  in  lieu 
of  logic.  Absolute  truth  to  Gladstone  was  a  matter  of 
indifference — expediency  was  his  shibboleth.  Truth  to 
Mrs.  Eddy  was  also  a  secondary  matter;  the  only  things 
that  really  mattered  were  Health  and  Success.  Health 
and  Success  are   undoubtedly  great  things  and  well 

363 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


worthy  of  possession,  but  I  wish  to  secure  them  only 
through  the  expression  of  truth.  If  you  gag  my  tongue, 
chain  my  pen  and  cry,  **  Believe  and  you  will  have 
Health,**  I  would  say,  **  Give  me  liberty  or  give  me 
death!  **  Christian  Scientists  ask  you  to  buy  Mrs. 
Eddy's  book,  ''  Science  and  Health.** 
When  the  volume  is  handed  you,  you  are  promised 
health  and  success  if  you  believe  its  every  word;  and 
if  you  don*t,  you  are  threatened  with  **  moral  idiocy.'* 
^  It  is  the  old  promise  of  Paradise  and  the  threat  of 
Hell  in  a  new  guise.  As  for  me,  I  decline  the  book. 


364 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


TEPHEN  GIRARD  was  a  great  merchant 
who  had  a  great  love  of  truth;  but  if  he  had 
been  in  a  retail  business,  his  zeal  for  truth 
might  have  been  slightly  modified. 
As  a  rule,  the  world  of  humanity  can  be  divided  into 
two  parts :  the  practical  men  and  the  searchers  for  truth.^ 
Usually  the  latter  have  nothing  to  lose  but  their  head. 
Spinoza,  Galileo,  Bruno,  Thomas  Paine,  Walt  Whitman, 
Henry  Thoreau,  Bronson  Alcott,  are  the  pure  type. 
Then  come  Theodore  Parker  and  Ralph  Waldo  Emer- 
son, crowded  out  of  their  pulpits,  scorned  by  their  Alma 
Mater,  pitied  by  the  public — yet  holding  true  to  their 
course  53  53 

And  lo !  they  grew  rich ;  whereas,  if  they  had  stuck  close 
to  the  shore  and  safety,  they  would  have  been  drowned 
in  the  shallows  of  oblivion. 

On  the  other  hand,  we  find  in,  say,  the  directorate  of 
the  Standard  Oil  Company,  many  men  who  are  zealous 
members  of  the  orthodox  churches,  giving  large  sums 
in  support  of  the  '*  gospel,'*  and  taking  an  active  interest 
in  its  promulgation.  All  of  them  say,  with  the  late  Mr. 
Morgan,  **  My  mother's  religion  is  good  enough  for 
me."  So  here  we  get  practical  shrewdness  combined 
with  minds  that,  so  far  as  abstract  truth  is  concerned, 
are  simply  prairie-dog  towns. 

These  men  belong  to  a  type  that  will  cling  to  error  as 
long  as  it  is  soft,  easy  and  popular.  Most  certainly  these 
men  are  not  fools — they  are  highly  competent  and  useful 

365 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


in  their  way.  But  as  for  superstition,  they  find  it  sooth- 
ing; it  saves  the  trouble  of  thinking,  and  all  their 
energies  are  needed  in  business. 

Religion,  to  them,  is  a  social  diversion,  with  a  chance 
of  salvation  on  the  side.  Inertia  does  not  grip  them 
when  it  comes  to  commerce — but  in  religion  it  does. 
Lincoln  once  said  that  there  was  just  one  thing,  and 
only  one  thing,  that  God  Almighty  could  not  under- 
stand: and  that  was  the  workings  of  the  mind  of  an 
intelligent  American  juror. 

Herbert  Spencer  says  that  Sir  Isaac  Newton  was  one 
of  the  six  best  educated  men  the  world  has  seen.  He 
was  the  first  man  to  resolve  light  into  its  constituent 
elements.  Voltaire  says  that  when  Newton  discovered 
the  Law  of  Gravitation  he  excited  the  envy  of  the  scien- 
tific world. 

'*  But,**  adds  Voltaire,  **  when  he  wrote  a  book  on  the 
Bible  prophecies,  the  men  of  science  got  even  with  him." 
Sir  Isaac  Newton  defended  the  literal  inspiration  of  the 
Scriptures  and  was  a  consistent  member  of  the  Church 
of  England.  Doctor  Johnson  was  unhappy  all  day  if  he 
did  n't  touch  every  tenth  picket  of  the  fence  with  his 
cane  as  he  walked  downtown. 

Blackstone,  the  great  legal  commentator,  believed  in 
witchcraft,  and  bolstered  his  belief  by  citing  the  Scrip- 
tural text,  '*  Thou  shalt  not  suffer  a  witch  to  live  ** — 
thus  proving  Moses  a  party  to  the  superstition.  Sir 
Matthew  Hale,  Chief  Justice  of  England,  did  the  same. 
366 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


Gladstone  was  a  great  statesman,  and  yet  he  believed 
in  the  Mosaic  account  of  Creation,  just  as  did  Mary 
Baker  Eddy. 

John  Adams  was  a  rebel  from  political  slavery,  but  lived 
and  died  a  worthy  Churchman,  subsisting  on  canned 
theology — and  canned  in  England,  at  that. 
Franklin  and  Jefferson  were  rebels  from  both  political 
and  theological  despotism,  but  looked  leniently  on 
leeches  and  apothecaries.  Herbert  Spencer  had  a  free 
mind  as  regards  religion,  politics,  economics  and  sociol- 
ogy; yet  he  was  a  bachelor,  lived  in  the  city,  belonged 
to  a  club,  played  billiards  and  smoked  cigars.  Physical 
health  was  out  of  his  reach,  and  with  all  his  vast  knowl- 
edge, he  never  knew  why.  All  through  history  we  find 
violence  and  gentleness,  ignorance  and  wisdom,  folly 
and  shrewdness  side  by  side  in  the  same  person. 
The  one  common  thing  in  humanity  is  inconsistency. 
To  account  for  it  were  vain.  We  know  only  that  it  is. 


367 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


HE  very  boldness  of  Mrs.  Eddy's  claims 
created  an  impetus  that  carried  conviction. 
^The  woman  certainly  believed  in  herself, 
^  and  she  also  believed  in  the  Power,  of  which 
she  was  a  necessary  part,  that  works  for  righteousness. 
She  repudiated  the  supernatural,  not  by  denying 
**  miracles,*'  but  by  holding  that  the  so-called  miracles 
of  the  Bible  really  occurred  and  were  perfectly  natural — 
all  according  to  Natural  Law,  which  is  the  Divine  Law. 
^And  the  explanation  of  this  Divine  Law  was  her 
particular  business.  Thus  did  she  win  to  her  side  those 
who  were  too  timid  in  constitution  to  forsake  forms 
and  ceremonies  and  stand  alone  on  the  broad  ground 
of  Rationalism. 

Christian  Science  is  not  a  religion  of  fight,  stress  and 
struggle.  Is  n*t  it  better  to  relax  and  rest  and  allow 
Divinity  to  flow  through  us,  than  to  sit  on  a  sharp  rail 
and  call  the  passer-by  names  in  falsetto?  May  Irwin's 
motto,  **  Don't  Argufy,"  is  n't  so  bad  as  a  working 
maxim,  after  all. 

All  Christian  denominations  are  very  much  alike.  Their 
differences  are  microscopic,  and  recognized  only  by 
those  who  are  immersed  in  them.  Martin  Luther  only 
softened  the  expression  of  the  Roman  Catholic  Church 
— he  did  not  change  its  essence. 

Benjamin  Franklin  declared  that  he  could  not  tell  the 
difference  between  a  Catholic  and  an  Episcopalian.  But 
Christian  Science  is  a  complete  departure  from  all  other 
368 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


denominations,  and  while  professing  to  be  Christian, 
is  really  something  else,  or  if  it  is  Christian,  then 
orthodoxy  is  not. 

Christian  Science  strikes  right  at  the  root  of  orthodoxy, 
since  it  divides  the  power  of  Jesus  with  Mary  Baker 
Eddy  and  affirms  that  Jesus  was  not  **  The  Savior/* 
but  A  Savior. 

This  is  the  position  of  Thomas  Paine,  and  all  other  good 
radicals.  Christian  Science  places  Mrs.  Eddy's  work 
right  alongside  of  the  Bible.  No  denomination  has  ever 
put  out  a  volume  stating  that  the  book  was  required  in 
order  to  make  the  Bible  intelligible.  No  denomination 
has  ever  put  forth  a  person  as  the  equal  of  Jesus.  This 
has  only  been  done  by  unbelievers,  atheists  and  free- 
thinkers si  58 

Christianity  is  at  last  attacked  in  its  own  house  and  by 
its  own  household.  It  is  thoroughly  understood  and 
admitted  everywhere  that  there  are  two  kinds  of  Christi- 
anity. One  is  the  kind  taught  by  the  Nazarene ;  and  the 
other  is  the  institutional  variety,  made  up  of  denom- 
inations which  hold  millions  upon  millions  of  dollars' 
worth  of  prop)erty  without  taxation,  and  parade  their 
ritual  with  rich  and  costly  millinery. 
The  one  was  lived  by  a  Man  who  had  not  where  to  lay 
His  head;  and  the  other  is  an  acquirement  taken  over 
from  pagan  Rome,  and  continued  largely  in  its  pagan 
form  even  unto  this  day.  Christian  Science  is  neither 
one  nor  the  other,  and  the  obvious  pleasantry  that  it  is 

369 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


neither  Christian  nor  scientific  is  a  jest  in  earnest. 
Christian  Science  is  a  modern  adaptation  of  all  that  is 
best  in  the  simplicity  and  asceticism  of  Jesus,  the 
commonsense  philosophy  of  Benjamin  Franklin,  the 
mysticism  of  Swedenborg,  and  the  bold  pronunciamento 
of  Robert  IngersoU.  It  is  a  religion  of  affirmation  with 
a  denial-of-matter  attachment. 

It  is  a  religion  of  this  world.  Jesus  was  a  Man  of  Sor- 
rows but  Mary  Baker  Eddy  was  a  Daughter  of  Joy  3S 
And  as  the  universal  good  sense  of  mankind  holds  that 
the  best  preparation  for  a  life  to  come,  if  there  is  one, 
is  to  make  the  best  of  this,  Christian  Science  is  meeting 
with  a  fast-growing  popular  acceptance. 
The  decline  of  the  old  orthodoxy  is  owing  to  its  clinging 
to  the  fallacy  that  the  world's  work  is  base,  and  Nature 
is  a  trickster  luring  us  to  our  doom.  Mrs.  Eddy  reconciled 
the  old  idea  with  the  new  and  made  it  mentally  palata- 
ble. And  this  is  the  reason  why  Christian  Science  is 
going  to  sweep  the  earth  and  in  twenty  years  will  have 
but  one  competitor,  the  Roman  Catholic  faith. 
Orthodoxy,  blind,  blundering,  stubborn,  senile,  is  tot- 
tering— the  undertaker  is  at  the  door.  Indeed,  the  old 
idea  of  our  orthodox  friends  that  they  were  preparing 
to  die,  was  literally  true. 

The  undertaker's  name  and  business  address  attached 
to  the  front  of  many  a  city  church  is  a  sign  too  subtle 
to  overlook.  Not  only  wets  the  undertaker  a  partner  of 
the  priest,  but  he  is  now  foreclosing  his  claim.  Christian 

370 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


Science  is  not  final.  After  it  has  lived  its  day,  another 
religion  will  follow,  and  that  is  the  Religion  of  Common- 
sense,  the  esoteric  religion  which  Mrs.  Eddy  herself 
lived  and  practised. 

As  for  her  believers,  she  gave  them  the  religion  of  a 
Book — two  Books,  the  Bible  and  **  Science  and  Health.** 
They  want  form  and  ritual  and  temples. 
She  gave  them  these  things,  just  as  doctors  give  sweet- 
ened water  to  people  who  still  demand  medicine;  and 
as  if  to  supply  the  zealous  converts,  just  out  of  ortho- 
doxy, their  fill  of  ecclesiastic  husks,  she  built  fine 
churches — churches  rivaling  the  far-famed  San  Salute 
of  Venice.  Let  them  have  their  wish!  Paganism  is  in 
their  blood — they  are  even  trying  to  worship  her! 
^  Let  them  go  on  and  eventually  they  will  pray  not 
in  temples  nor  on  this  or  that  mountain,  but  in  spirit 
and  in  truth,  just  as  did  Mrs.  Eddy,  one  of  the  world's 
most  successful  women. 


371 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


HRISTIAN  SCIENCE  is  orthodox  Christi- 
anity, minus  medical  fetish  and  the  fear  that 
a  belief  in  sin,  sickness,  death  and  eternal 
punishment  naturally  lends,  plus  the  joy  of 
a  natural,  healthy,  human  life.  The  so-called  rational 
Christian  sects  preserve  their  Devil  in  the  form  of  a 
Doctor,  and  Hell  in  the  shape  of  a  Hospital. 
My  hope  and  expectation  is  that  Christian  Science  will 
become  a  Rational  Religion  instead  of  a  one-man 
institution,  or  a  religion  of  authority,  such  as  it  now  is. 
Its  superstitious  features  have  doubtless  been  strong 
factors  in  its  rapid  growth — serving  as  stays  or  stocks 
to  aid  in  the  launching. 

But  now,  the  sooner  the  ship  floats  free  the  better. 
Christian  Scientists,  being  men  and  women,  can  not 
continue  to  grow  if  fettered  with  an  Index  Expurga- 
torius  and  mandatory  edicts  and  encyclicals.  That  which 
binds  and  manacles  must  go — the  good  will  remain  58 
Christian  Science  brings  good  news,  and  good  news  is 
always  curative.  Mrs.  Eddy  animated  her  patients  with 
a  new  thought — the  thought  of  harmony,  the  denial  of 
disease,  and  the  affirmation  that  God  is  good  and  life 
is  beautiful.  The  animation  thus  produced  is  in  itself 
the  most  powerful  healing  principle  known  to  science. 
Life  is  born  of  love.  Joy  is  a  prophylactic.  Christian 
Science  comes  to  the  **  student  **  as  a  great  flood  of 
light.  His  circulation  becomes  normal,  his  muscles 
relax,  the  nerves  rest,  digestion  acts,  elimination  takes 
372 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


place — and  the  person  is  well.  ^  Fear  has  congested  the 
organs — love,  hope  and  faith  place  them  in  an  attitude 
so  Nature  plays  through  them.  The  patient  is  healed. 
In  it  there  is  neither  mystery  nor  miracle.  It  is  all  very 
simple  33  53 

Let  us  rid  ourselves  of  a  belief  in  the  strange  and  occult! 
The  Christian  Science  organization  is  an  expediency. 
It  is  an  intellectual  crutch.  The  book  is  a  necessity.  It 
is  a  scaffolding.  Yet  he  who  mistakes  the  scaffolding  for 
the  edifice  is  a  specialist  in  scaffolding. 
Truth  can  never  be  caught  and  crystallized  in  a  formula. 
Also  this:  truth  can  never  be  monopolized  by  an  **  ite  *' 
or  an  **  ist.**  Eventually  the  label  will  be  eliminated 
with  the  scaffolding,  and  the  lumber  of  ritual  and  rite 
will  have  to  go. 

We  will  live  truth  instead  of  talking  about  it.  Among 
Christian  Scientists  there  are  no  drunkards,  paupers  or 
gamblers.  Also,  there  are  no  sick  people.  To  them  sick- 
ness is  a  disgrace. 

Orthodox  Christians  get  sick  and  gratify  their  sense  of 
approbation  by  receiving  pastoral  calls  and  visits  from 
the  doctor  and  neighbors.  The  biblical  injunction  to 
visit  the  sick  was  never  followed  by  Mrs.  Eddy — she 
always  decided  for  herself  just  what  injunctions  should 
be  waived  and  what  followed. 

Those  which  she  did  not  like  she  interpreted  spiritually 
or  else  glided  over.  The  biblical  statement  that  man's 
days  are  few  and  full  of  trouble,  and  also  the  assertion 

373 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


that  man  is  prone  to  wickedness  as  the  sparks  fly  up- 
wards, are  both  very  conveniently  glossed. 
Christian  Scientists  know  the  rules  of  health,  just  as 
most  people  do;  but  what  is  more,  they  follow  them, 
thus  avoiding  the  disgrace  of  being  pointed  out.  They 
have  made  sickness  not  only  tabu,  but  invalidism  ridic- 
ulous 53  53 

When  things  become  absurd  and  preposterous,  we 
abandon  them.  Unpopularity  can  do  what  logic  is  help- 
less to  bring  about.  The  reasoning  of  Christian  Scientists 
is  bad,  but  their  intuitions  are  right. 
While  denying  the  existence  of  matter,  no  people  on 
earth  are  as  canny,  save  possibly  the  Quakers.  A  bank- 
balance  to  a  Christian  Scientist  is  no  barren  ideality. 
It  is  like  falsehood  to  a  Jesuit — a  very  present  help  in 
time  of  trouble.  Sin,  to  them,  consists  in  making  too 
much  fuss  about  life  and  talking  about  death.  Do  what 
you  want  and  forget  it.  Quit  talking  about  the  weather, 
night  air,  miasma. 

Knowingly  or  unknowingly  Christian  Scientists  culti- 
vate resiliency.  They  are  proof  against  drafts  and  mi- 
crobes. Eat  what  you  like,  but  not  too  much  of  it.  Be 
moderate.  Christian  Scientists  get  their  joy  out  of 
their  work.  This  is  essentially  hygienic.  They  breathe 
deeply,  eat  moderately,  bathe  plentifully,  work  indus- 
triously— and  smile.  This  is  all  sternly  scientific.  It  can 
never  be  argued  down. 

No  school  of  medicine  has  ever  offered  a  prophylactic 
374 


MARY    BAKER    EDDY 


equal  to  work  and  good-cheer,  and  no  system  of  religion 
has  ever  offered  a  working  formula  for  health,  happiness 
and  success  equal  to  that  launched  by  Mrs.  Eddy.  The 
science  of  medicine  is  a  science  of  palliation,  fl  Christian 
Scientists  avoid  the  cause  of  sickness,  and  thus  keep 
well  53  58 

There  is  no  vitality  in  drugs.  Nature  cures — obey  her. 
In  this  matter  of  bodily  health  just  a  few  plain  rules 
suffice.  And  these  rules,  fairly  followed,  soon  grow  into 
a  pleasurable  habit.  Fortunately,  we  do  not  have  to 
oversee  our  digestion,  our  circulation,  the  work  of  the 
millions  of  pores  that  form  the  skin,  or  the  action  of 
the  nerves.  Folks  who  get  fussy  about  their  digestion 
and  assume  personal  charge  of  their  nerves  have 
**  nerves  "  and  are  apt  to  have  no  digestion. 
**  I  have  a  pain  in  my  side,'*  said  the  woman  who  had 
no  money  to  the  busy  doctor.  **  Forget  it,"  was  the 
curt  advice.  Get  the  Health  Habit,  and  forget  it. 
This  is  the  quintessence  of  Christian  Science.  Your 
mental  attitude  controls  your  body.  Happiness  is  your 
health.  There  is  no  devil  but  fear.  As  a  man  thinketh 
in  his  heart,  so  is  he. 


375 


./ 


so  HERE  ENDETH  "LirTLE  JOURNEYS  TO  THE  HOMES 
OF  GREAT  TEACHERS"  BEING  VOLUME  TEN  OF 
THE  SERIES,  AS  WRITTEN  BY  ELBERT  HUBBARD:  EDITED 
AND  ARRANGED  BY  JOHN  T.  HOYLE;  TYPOGRAPHY 
BY  CHARLES  J.  ROSEN  AND  AXEL  EDWARD  SAHLIN; 
PRESSWORK  BY  JOHN  HALL  AND  PETER  ZIMMER; 
BORDERS  AND  INITIALS  BY  ROYCROFT  ARTISTS  AND 
BINDING  BY  CHARLES  YOUNGERS  ^  PRODUCED  BY 
THE  ROYCROFTERS.  THEIR  SHOPS,  WHICH  ARE  IN 
EAST  AURORA,  ERIE  COUNTY,  NEW  YORK,  MCMXVI. 


Date  Due 

All  library  items  are  subject  to  recall  3  weeks  from 
the  original  date  stamped. 


Brigham  Young  University 


JUL  J  1  'IWW 

JU  .  ?  6  2000 

-f 


i+ 


u 


i 
it 


1 1  (■ 


-^ 


3  1 1 97  00398  9644 


>  /  •  •  k